Advertisement

Journal of Bionic Engineering

, Volume 3, Issue 1, pp 39–41 | Cite as

Patented Biologically-inspired technological innovations: A twenty year view

  • Richard H. C. BonserEmail author
Article

Abstract

Publication rate of patents can be a useful measure of innovation and productivity in fields of science and technology. To assess the growth in industrially-important research, I conducted an appraisal of patents published between 1985 and 2005 on online databases using keywords chosen to select technologies arising as a result of biological inspiration.

Whilst the total number of patents increased over the period examined, those with biomimetic content had increased faster as a proportion of total patent publications. Logistic regression analysis reveals that we may be a little over half way through an initial innovation cycle inspired by biological systems.

Keywords

patent biomimetic bionic technology commercialization 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Lu Y X. Significance and progress of bionics. Journal of Bionics Engineering, 2004, 1, 1–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Vincent J F V, Mann D L. Systematic technology transfer from biology to engineering. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society London A, 2002, 360, 159–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Vincent J F V. Technology that imitates nature - Biomimetics. The Economist Technology Quarterly, 2005, June, 10–12.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Grushcow J M. Measuring secrecy: A cost of the patent system revealed. Journal of Legal Studies, 2004, 33, 59–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Royal Society working group on intellectual property. Keeping Science Open: The Effects of Intellectual Property Policy on the Conduct of Science. The Royal Society, 2004.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dunwell J M. Review: Intellectual property aspects of plant transformations. Plant Biotechnology Journal, 2005, 3, 371–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Andersen B. The hunt for S-shaped growth paths in technological innovation: A patent study. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 1999, 9, 487–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hayashi A M. Technology trajectories and the birth of new industries. MIT Sloan Management Review, 2004, 45, 7–8.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pouris A. Technological performance judged by American patents awarded to South African inventors. South African Journal of Science, 2005, 101, 221–224.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Huang Z, Chen H, Yan L, Roco M C. Longitudinal nanotechnology development (1991–2002): National Science Foundation funding and its impact on patents. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 2005, 7, 343–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Utterback J M, Suarez F F. Innovation, competition and industry structure. Research Policy, 1993, 22, 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    De Mestral G. Velvet type fabric and method of producing same, 1955, US Patent 2717437.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dahlin K B, Behrens D M. When is an invention really radical? Defining and measuring technological radicalness. Research Policy, 2005, 34, 717–737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Jilin University 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for BiomimeticsUniversity of ReadingReadingUK

Personalised recommendations