Advertisement

Journal of Nuclear Cardiology

, Volume 6, Issue 4, pp 449–457 | Cite as

An introduction to attenuation correction

  • Jennifer Miles
  • S. James CullomEmail author
  • James A. Case
Technologists’ Section

Summary

Attenuation correction techniques have demonstrated improved diagnostic accuracy and quality of myocardial perfusion SPECT images in limited studies. The future success of these methods relies largely on understanding the characteristics of the images and their interpretative meaning, as well as their limitations. It will be important to define the impact on patient management decisions, quantitation, laboratory efficiency, physician confidence, and communication of important findings. Advances in these areas will help position nuclear cardiology to compete with other imaging modalities. As this technology matures, the technologist has an essential role in ensuring efficient use of these techniques and maximizing the quality of this promising new way to image patients.

Keywords

Single Photon Emission Compute Tomography Attenuation Correction Nuclear Cardiology Filter Back Projection Attenuation Artifact 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    DePuey EG, Garcia EV. Optimal specificity of thallium-201 SPECT through recognition of imaging artifacts. J Nucl Med 1989;30:441–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wackers FJTh. Artifacts in planar and SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging. Am J Card Imag 1992;6:42–58.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    DePuey EG. How to detect and avoid myocardial perfusion SPECT artifacts. J Nucl Med 1994;35:699–702.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Garcia EV, Cullom SJ, Galt JR. Symbiotic developments in PET and SPECT to quantify and display myocardial tomography. J Nucl Med 1991;32:166–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Early PJ, Sodee DB. Principles and practice of nuclear medicine. St. Louis: CV Mosby; 1985.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Garcia EV, Van Train K, Maddahi J, Prigent F, Friedman J, Areeda J, et al. Quantification of rotational thallium-201 myocardial tomography. J Nucl Med 1985;26:17–26.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bushberg JT, Seibert JA, Leidholdt EM Jr, Boone JM. The essential physics of medical imaging. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins; 1994;239–89.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Greer KL, Harris CC, Jaszczak RJ, Coleman RE, Hedlund LW, Floyd CE, et al. Transmission computed tomography data acquisition with a SPECT system. J Nucl Med Tech 1987;15:53–6.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ficaro EP, Rogers WL, Schwaiger M. Comparison of Am-241 and Tc-99m as transmission sources for the attenuation correction of Tl-201 SPECT imaging of the heart. J Nucl Med 1994;35:652–63.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    King MA, Tsui BMW, Pan TS. Attenuation compensation for cardiac single-photon emission computed tomographic imaging: part 1—impact of attenuation and methods of estimating attenuation maps. J Nucl Cardiol 1995;2:513–24.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    King MA, Tsui BMW, Pan TS, Glick SJ, Soares EJ. Attenuation compensation for cardiac single-photon emission computed tomographic imaging: part 2—attenuation compensation algorithms. J Nucl Cardiol 1995;3:55–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kuhl DE, Hale J, Eaton WL. Transmission scanning: a useful adjunct to conventional emission scanning for accurately keying isotope deposition to radiographic anatomy. Radiology 1966;7:278 [abstract].Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bailey DL, Transmission scanning in emission tomography. Eur J Nucl Med 1998;25:774–87.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bailey DL, Hutton BF, Walker PJ. Improved SPECT using simultaneous emission and transmission tomography. J Nucl Med 1987;28:844–51.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Tung CH, Gullberg GT, Zeng GL, Christian PE, Datz FL, Morgan HT. Non-uniform attenuation correction using simultaneous transmission and emission converging tomography. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 1992;39:1134–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ficaro EP, Fessler JA, Ackermann RJ, Rogers WL, Corbett JR, Schwaiger M. Simultaneous transmission-emission thallium-201 cardiac SPECT: effect of attenuation correction on myocardial tracer distribution. J Nucl Med 1995;36:921–31.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ficaro EP, Fessler JA, Shreve PD, Kritzman JN, Rose PA, Corbett JR. Simultaneous transmission/emission myocardial perfusion tomography: diagnostic accuracy of attenuation-corrected 99mTc-sestamibi single-photon emission computed tomography. Circulation 1996;93:463–73.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hollinger EF, Loncaric S, Yu DC, Ali A, Chang W. Using fast sequential asymmetric fan beam transmission CT for attenuation correction of cardiac SPECT imaging. J Nucl Med 1998;39:1335–44.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    BeaconTM, Picker International, Cleveland, OH 44143.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tan P, Bailey DL, Meikle SR, Eberl S, Fulton RR, Hutton BF. A scanning line source for simultaneous emission and transmission measurements in SPECT. J Nucl Med 1993;34:1752–60.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Celler A, Sitek A, Stoub E, Hawman P, Harrop R and Lyster D. Multiple line source array for SPECT transmission scans: simulation, phantom and patient studies. J Nuel Med 1998;39:2183–9.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Budinger TF, Gullberg GT. Transverse section reconstruction of gamma-ray emitting radionuclides inpatients. In: Ter-Pogossian MM, Phelps ME, Brownell GL, eds., Reconstruction tomography in diagnostic radiology and nuclear medicine. Baltimore: University Park Press; 1977;315–42.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Tsui BMW, Gullberg GT, Edgerton ER, Ballard JG, Perry JR, McCartney WH, Berg J. Correction of nonuniform attenuation in cardiac SPECT imaging. J Nucl Med 1989;30:497–507.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Chang LT. A method for attenuation correction in radionuclide computed tomography. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 1978;1:638–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hendel RC, Berman DS, Cullom SJ, Follansbee W, Heller GV, Mahmarian JJ. A multicenter trial to evaluate the efficary of correction for photon attenuation and scatter in SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging. Circulation (In press).Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hashimoto J, Ogawa K, Kubo A, Ichihara T, Motomura N, Takayama T, et al. Application of transmission scan-based attenuation compensation to scatter-corrected thallium-201 myocardial single-photon emission tomographic images. Eur J Nucl Med 1998;25:120–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Prvulovich EM, Lonn AHR, Bomanji JB, Jarritt PH, Ell P. Effect of attenuation correction on myocardial thallium-201 distribution inpatients with a low-likelihood of coronary artery disease. Eur J Nucl Med 1997;24:266–75.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Chouraqui P, Livschitz S, Sharir T, Wainer N, Wilk M, Moalem I, et al. Evaluation of an attenuation correction method for thallium-201 myocardial perfusion tomographic imaging of patients with low-likelihood of coronary artery disease. J Nucl Cardiol 1998;5:369–77.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kluge R, Sattler B, Seese A, Knapp WH. Attenuation correction by simultaneous emission-transmission myocardial single-photon emission tomography using a technetium-99m-labeled radiotracer: impact on diagnostic accuracy. Eur J Nucl Med 1997;24:1107–14.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Matsunari I, Boning G, Ziegler SI, Kosa I, Nekolla SG, Ficaro EP, et al. Attenuation corrected thallium-201/stress technetium 99m sestamibi myocardial SPECT in normals. J Nucl Cardiol 1998;5:48–55.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Gallowitsch HJ, Syokora J, Mikosch P, Kresnik E, Unterweger O, Molnar M, et al. Attenuation corrected thallium-201 single-photon emission tomography using a gadolinium-153 moving line source: clinical value and the impact of attenuation correction on the extent and severity of perfusion abnormalities. Eur J Nucl Med 1998;25:220–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Chua T, Kiat H, Germano G, Maurer G, Van Train K, Friedman J, et al. Gated technetium-99m sestamibi for simultaneous assessment of stress myocardial perfusion, post-exercise regional ventricular function and myocardial viability: correlation with echocardiography and rest thallium-201 scintigraphy. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995;23:1107–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Berman D, Hosen K, Friedman JD, Wang FP, Van Train K, Matzer L, et al. Separate acquisition rest thallium-201/stress technetium-99m sestamibi dual-isotope myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography: a clinical validation study. JACC 1993;22:1455–64.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Cullom SJ, Groch MW, Braymer WK, Ye J, Spies SM, Hendel RC. Improved normal distributions in attenuation corrected Tc-99m-sestamibi cardiac SPECT with Gd-153 transmission scanning and down-scatter correction. J Nucl Cardiol 1997;4(suppl):s116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Heller EN, DeMan P, Yi-Hwa L, Dione DP, Zubal IG, Wackers FJT, et al. Extracardiac activity complicates quantitative cardiac SPECT imaging using a simultaneous transmission-emission approach. J Nucl Med 1997;38:1882–90.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Garcia EV, ed. Imaging guidelines for nuclear cardiology procedures, part 1. J Nucl Cardiol 1996;3:G1-46.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Almeida P, Bendriem B, de Druille O, Peltier A, Perrot C, and Brulon V. Dosimetry of transmission measurements in nuclear medicine: a study using anthropomorphic phantoms and thermoluminescent dosimeters. Eur J Nucl Med 1998;25:1435–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Rothenberg LN. Patient dose in mammography. Radiographics 1990;10:739–46.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Lanzisera PA, Jones AR, Gattone RG, Reid RD. Consolidated guidance about materials licenses. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC. 1998. NUREG-1556, 9.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© American Society of Nuclear Cardiology 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jennifer Miles
    • 1
    • 2
  • S. James Cullom
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • James A. Case
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Cardiovascular ConsultantsPCKansas City
  2. 2.Mid America Heart InstituteKansas City

Personalised recommendations