Journal of Nuclear Cardiology

, Volume 10, Issue 5, pp 456–463

Stress-related variations in left ventricular function as assessed with gated myocardial perfusion SPECT

  • Hein J. Verberne
  • Marcel G. W. Dijkgraaf
  • G. Aernout Somsen
  • Berthe L. F. van Eck-Smit



There is inconsistency in reported patient characteristics associated with differences in basal and poststress left ventricular function (delta ejection fraction [△EF]) assessed by gated single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). This inconsistency may therefore hamper adequate interpretation. In this study we first determined the reproducibility of serial gated SPECT-assessed left ventricular function. Second, we determined whether left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) assessed directly after stress reflects basal LVEF and, if not, what patient characteristics were associated with this discrepancy in LVEF.>/<

Methods and Results

Serial reproducibility of technetium 99m tetrofosmin gated SPECT-assessed LVEF in 22 patients showed a mean difference between two sequential measurements at rest of 0.09% EF units, with a 95% limit of agreement (2 SDs) at 5.8% EF units. In 229 patients Tc-99m tetrofosmin gated SPECT was performed after stress and at rest. Independent predictors of △EF were the presence of scintigraphically proven ischemia (standardized coefficient, -1.256; P = .003) and difference in heart rate at the time of acquisition (standardized coefficient, 0.121; P = .001).>/<


Gated SPECT-assessed LVEF at rest is reproducible under standard clinical conditions. However, LVEF assessed after stress does not represent LVEF at rest in patients with scintigraphically proven ischemia and in patients with increased heart rate after stress compared with heart rate at rest.>/<

Key Words

Myocardial perfusion scintigraphy gated single photon emission computed tomography left ventricular function ischemia heart rate 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Jones RH, Johnson SH, Bigelow C, et al. Exercise radionuclide angiocardiography predicts cardiac death in patients with coronary artery disease. Circulation 1991;84:I52–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pryor DB, Harrell FE Jr, Lee KL, et al. Prognostic indicators from radionuclide angiography in medically treated patients with coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 1984;53:18–22.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sharir T, Germano G, Kavanagh PB, et al. Incremental prognostic value of post-stress left ventricular ejection fraction and volume by gated myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography. Circulation 1999;100:1035–42.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    White HD, Norris RM, Brown MA, et al. Left ventricular endsystolic volume as the major determinant of survival after recovery from myocardial infarction. Circulation 1987;76:44–51.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hachamovitch R, Berman DS, Shaw LJ, et al. Incremental prognostic value of myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography for the prediction of cardiac death: differential stratification for risk of cardiac death and myocardial infarction. Circulation 1998;97:535–43.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ambrosio G, Betocchi S, Pace L, et al. Prolonged impairment of regional contractile function after resolution of exercise-induced angina. Evidence of myocardial stunning in patients with coronary artery disease. Circulation 1996;94:2455–64.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nixon JV, Brown CN, Smitherman TC. Identification of transient and persistent segmental wall motion abnormalities in patients with unstable angina by two-dimensional echocardiography. Circulation 1982;65:1497–503.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rozanski A, Berman D, Gray R, et al. Preoperative prediction of reversible myocardial asynergy by postexercise radionuclide ventriculography. N Engl J Med 1982;307:212–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rozanski A, Elkayam U, Berman DS, et al. Improvement of resting myocardial asynergy with cessation of upright bicycle exercise. Circulation 1983;67:529–35.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bolli R. Mechanism of myocardial “stunning.” Circulation 1990; 82:723–38.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bolli R, Marban E. Molecular and cellular mechanisms of myocardial stunning. Physiol Rev 1999;79:609–34.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Braunwald E, Kloner RA. The stunned myocardium: prolonged, postischemic ventricular dysfunction. Circulation 1982;66:1146–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Heyndrickx GR, Millard RW, McRitchie RJ, Maroko PR, Vatner SF. Regional myocardial functional and electrophysiological alterations after brief coronary artery occlusion in conscious dogs. J Clin Invest 1975;56:978–85.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Germano G, Kiat H, Kavanagh PB, et al. Automatic quantification of ejection fraction from gated myocardial perfusion SPECT. J Nucl Med 1995;36:2138–47.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Germano G, Erel J, Lewin H, Kavanagh PB, Berman DS. Automatic quantitation of regional myocardial wall motion and thickening from gated technetium-99m sestamibi myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997;30:1360–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Borges-Neto S, Javaid A, Shaw LK, et al. Poststress measurements of left ventricular function with gated perfusion SPECT: comparison with resting measurements by using a same-day perfusionfunction protocol. Radiology 2000;215:529–33.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hashimoto J, Kubo A, Iwasaki R, et al. Gated single-photon emission tomography imaging protocol to evaluate myocardial stunning after exercise. Eur J Nucl Med 1999;26:1541–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Johnson LL, Verdesca SA, Aude WY, et al. Postischemic stunning can affect left ventricular ejection fraction and regional wall motion on post-stress gated sestamibi tomograms. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997;30:1641–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bavelaar-Croon CD, America YG, Atsma DE, et al. Comparison of left ventricular function at rest and post-stress in patients with myocardial infarction: evaluation with gated SPECT. J Nucl Cardiol 2001;8:10–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Paul AK, Hasegawa S, Yoshioka J, et al. Exercise-induced stunning continues for at least one hour: evaluation with quantitative gated single-photon emission tomography. Eur J Nucl Med 1999;26:410–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Germano G, Kavanagh PB, Waechter P, et al. A new algorithm for the quantitation of myocardial perfusion SPECT. I: Technical principles and reproducibility. J Nucl Med 2000;41:712–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kumita S, Cho K, Nakajo H, et al. Assessment of left ventricular diastolic function with electrocardiography-gated myocardial perfusion SPECT: comparison with multigated equilibrium radionuclide angiography. J Nucl Cardiol 2001;8:568–74.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hyun IY, Kwan J, Park KS, Lee WH. Reproducibility of Tl-201 and Tc-99m sestamibi gated myocardial perfusion SPECT measurement of myocardial function. J Nucl Cardiol 2001;8: 182–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lee DS, Cheon GJ, Ahn JY, Chung JK, Lee MC. Reproducibility of assessment of myocardial function using gated 99Tc(m)-MIBI SPECT and quantitative software. Nucl Med Commun 2000;21: 1127–34.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lee DS, Ahn JY, Kim SK, et al. Limited performance of quantitative assessment of myocardial function by thallium-201 gated myocardial single-photon emission tomography. Eur J Nucl Med 2000;27:185–91.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Vallejo E, Dione DP, Bruni WL, et al. Reproducibility and accuracy of gated SPECT for determination of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction: experimental validation using MRI. J Nucl Med 2000;41:874–82.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Vallejo E, Chaya H, Plancarte G, Victoria D, Bialostozky D. Variability of serial same-day left ventricular ejection fraction using quantitative gated SPECT. J Nucl Cardiol 2002;9:377–84.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kim SJ, Kudej RK, Yatani A, et al. A novel mechanism for myocardial stunning involving impaired Ca(2_) handling. Circ Res 2001;89:831–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kloner RA, Allen J, Cox TA, Zheng Y, Ruiz CE. Stunned left ventricular myocardium after exercise treadmill testing in coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 1991;68:329–34.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Scognamiglio R, Ponchia A, Fasoli G, Miraglia G, Dalla-Volta S. Exercise-induced left ventricular dysfunction in coronary heart disease. A model for studying the stunned myocardium in man. Eur Heart J 1991;12(Suppl G):16–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Zuber E, Rosfors S. Effect of reversible hypoperfusion on left ventricular volumes measured with gated SPECT at rest and after adenosine infusion. J Nucl Cardiol 2000;7:655–60.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Smanio PE, Watson DD, Segalla DL, et al. Value of gating of technetium-99m sestamibi single-photon emission computed tomographic imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997;30:1687–92.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Achtert AD, King MA, Dahlberg ST, et al. An investigation of the estimation of ejection fractions and cardiac volumes by a quantitative gated SPECT software package in simulated gated SPECT images. J Nucl Cardiol 1998;5:144–52.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Everaert H, Vanhove C, Franken PR. Effects of low-dose dobutamine on left ventricular function in normal subjects as assessed by gated single-photon emission tomography myocardial perfusion studies. Eur J Nucl Med 1999;26:1298–303.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Germano G, Kavanagh PB, Kavanagh JT, et al. Repeatability of automatic left ventricular cavity volume measurements from myocardial perfusion SPECT. J Nucl Cardiol 1998;5: 477–83.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Iskandrian AE, Germano G, VanDecker W, et al. Validation of left ventricular volume measurements by gated SPECT 99mTc-labeled sestamibi imaging. J Nucl Cardiol 1998;5:574–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© American Society of Nuclear Cardiology 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hein J. Verberne
    • 1
  • Marcel G. W. Dijkgraaf
    • 2
  • G. Aernout Somsen
    • 3
  • Berthe L. F. van Eck-Smit
    • 1
  1. 1.Departments of Nuclear MedicineAcademic Medical CenterAmsterdamThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Departments of Clinical Epidemiology & BiostatisticsAcademic Medical CenterAmsterdamThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Departments of CardiologyAcademic Medical CenterAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations