Journal of Nuclear Cardiology

, Volume 10, Issue 5, pp 498–505 | Cite as

Abnormal heart rate recovery immediately after treadmill testing: Correlation with clinical, exercise testing, and myocardial perfusion parameters

  • Panagiotis Georgoulias
  • Alexandros Orfanakis
  • Nikolaos Demakopoulos
  • Petros Xaplanteris
  • Georgios Mortzos
  • Panos Vardas
  • Nikolaos Karkavitsas
Article
Received:
Accepted:

Abstract

Background

The increase in heart rate during exercise is considered to be attributed to sympathetic system activation combined with parasympathetic withdrawal. The prognostic importance of the chronotropic response to exercise and heart rate recovery 1 minute after exercise has already been established. The purpose of this study was to evaluate heart rate recovery as an index of myocardial ischemia, by correlating heart rate recovery with known parameters of myocardial ischemia.>/<

Methods and Results

Included in the study were 304 consecutive patients (73% men), aged 34 to 82 years. Patients whose heart rate recovery value or myocardial perfusion imaging could have been influenced by factors other than ischemic disease were excluded from the study. The patients underwent single photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging combined with symptom-limited exercise testing with thallium 201 or technetium 99m tetrofosmin. The value for heart rate recovery was defined as the decrease in heart rate from peak exercise to 1 minute after termination of exercise. For semiquantitation of the scintigram, the uptake of the radiotracer was graded on a scale from 0 to 4. Twenty-one beats per minute was defined as the lowest normal value for heart rate recovery. We found 74 patients (24%) with an abnormal value. We also found a significant correlation between heart rate recovery 1 minute after exercise and stress myocardial perfusion score. In addition, there was a statistically significant relationship between heart rate recovery and chronotropic variables. Patients with an abnormal value of heart rate recovery were generally of an older age, were more likely men, had a higher frequency of risk factors for coronary artery disease, were mostly taking cardioactive medications, had lower efficiency during treadmill testing, and had more pathologic findings on the scintigram.>/<

Conclusions

Myocardial ischemia, as assessed by myocardial perfusion imaging, is an important correlate of heart rate recovery. There is a significant correlation between chronotropic variables during exercise testing and heart rate recovery 1 minute after exercise. It seems that the heart rate recovery value 1 minute after peak exercise may be considered a reliable index of the severity of myocardial ischemia.>/<

Key Words

Heart rate recovery treadmill testing myocardial perfusion imaging myocardial ischemia 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Barron HV, Lesh MD. Autonomic nervous system and sudden cardiac death. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996;27:1053–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sandvik L, Erikssen J, Ellestad M, et al. Heart rate increase and maximal heart rate during exercise as predictors of cardiovascular mortality: a 16-year follow-up study of 1960 healthy men. Coron Artery Dis 1995;6:667–7, 1996.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Schwartz PJ, La Rovere MT, Vanoli E. Autonomic nervous system and sudden cardiac death. Experimental basis and clinical observations for post-myocardial infarction risk stratification. Circulation 1992;85:I77–91.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ellestad MH. Chronotropic incompetence. The implications of heart rate response to exercise (compensatory parasympathetic hyperactivity?). Circulation 1996;93:1485–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Arai Y, Saul JP, Albrecht P, et al. Modulation of cardiac autonomic activity during and immediately after exercise. Am J Physiol 1989;256:H132–41.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Imai K, Sato H, Hori M, et al. Vagally mediated heart rate recovery after exercise is accelerated in athletes but blunted in patients with chronic heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol 1994;24:1529–35.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fletcher GF, Balady G, Froelicher VF, et al. Exercise standards. A statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association Writing Group. Circulation 1995;91:580–615.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lauer MS, Francis GS, Okin PM, et al. Impaired chronotropic response to exercise stress testing as a predictor of mortality. JAMA 1999;281:524–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cole CR, Blackstone EH, Pashkow FJ, Snader CE, Lauer MS. Heart-rate recovery immediately after exercise as a predictor of mortality. N Engl J Med 1999;341:1351–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Desai MY, De La Pena-Almaguer E, Mannting F. Abnormal heart rate recovery after exercise: a comparison with known indicators of increased mortality. Cardiology 2001;96:38–44.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cole CR, Foody JM, Blackstone EH, Lauer MS. Heart rate recovery after submaximal exercise testing as a predictor of mortality in a cardiovascularly healthy cohort. Ann Intern Med 2000;132:552–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kurata C, Tawarahara K, Taguchi T, et al. Lung thallium-201 uptake during exercise emission computed tomography. J Nucl Med 1991;32:417–23.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Georgoulias P, Demakopoulos N, Kontos A, et al. Tc-99m tetrofosmin myocardial perfusion imaging before and six months after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Clin Nucl Med 1998;23:678–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Georgoulias P, Demakopoulos N, Kontos A, et al. 99mTc-tetrofosmin myocardial perfusion imaging: a comparison with coronary angiography [in German]. Nuklearmedizin 1996;35:153–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Aepfelbacher FC, Johnson RB, Schwartz JG, et al. Validation of a model of left ventricular segmentation for interpretation of SPET myocardial perfusion images. Eur J Nucl Med 2001;28: 1624–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Watanabe J, Thamilarasan M, Blackstone EH, Thomas JD, Lauer MS. Heart rate recovery immediately after treadmill exercise and left ventricular systolic dysfunction as predictors of mortality; the case of stress echocardiography. Circulation 2001;104:1911–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Nishime EO, Cole CR, Blackstone EH, Pashkow FJ, Lauer MS. Heart rate recovery and treadmill exercise score as predictors of mortality in patients referred for exercise ECG. JAMA 2000;284:1392–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rigo P, Leclercq B, Itti R, Lahiri A, Braat S. Technetium-99mtetrofosmin myocardial imaging: a comparison with thallium-201 and angiography. J Nucl Med 1994;35:587–93.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Iskandrian AS, Chae SC, Heo J, et al. Independent and incremental prognostic value of exercise single-photon emission computed tomographic (SPECT) thallium imaging in coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993;22:665–70.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Brown KA, Altland E, Rowen M. Prognostic value of normal technetium-99m-sestamibi cardiac imaging. J Nucl Med 1994;35: 554–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Brown KA. Prognostic value of thallium-201 myocardial perfusion imaging. A diagnostic tool comes of age. Circulation 1991;83:363- 81.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Osterhues HH, Kochs M, Hombach V. Time-dependent changes of heart rate variability after percutaneous transluminal angioplasty. Am Heart J 1998;135:755–61.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Grunwald AM, Watson DD, Holzgrefe HH Jr, Irving JF, Beller GA. Myocardial thallium-201 kinetics in normal and ischemic myocardium. Circulation 1981;64:610–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sridhara BS, Braat S, Rigo P, et al. Comparison of myocardial perfusion imaging with technetium-99m tetrofosmin versus thallium- 201 in coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 1993;72:1015–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© American Society of Nuclear Cardiology 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Panagiotis Georgoulias
    • 1
  • Alexandros Orfanakis
    • 3
  • Nikolaos Demakopoulos
    • 1
  • Petros Xaplanteris
    • 2
  • Georgios Mortzos
    • 1
  • Panos Vardas
    • 3
  • Nikolaos Karkavitsas
    • 4
  1. 1.Departments of Nuclear MedicineNIMTS HospitalAthensGreece
  2. 2.Departments of CardiologyNIMTS HospitalAthensGreece
  3. 3.Departments of CardiologyUniversity HospitalHeraklionGreece
  4. 4.Departments of Nuclear MedicineUniversity HospitalHeraklionGreece

Personalised recommendations