Effects of dipyridamole on left ventricular function
- 25 Downloads
- 5 Citations
Abstract
Background
Changes induced by dipyridamole infusion on left ventricular function in healthy individuals have not been investigated by gated myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomographic (SPECT) imaging.
Methods and Results
This study examined the amplitude and duration of changes induced by dipyridamole infusion on left ventricular function as assessed by technetium 99m sestamibi gated SPECT in 18 subjects with a low likelihood of coronary artery disease. Twenty mCi (740 MBq) of Tc-99m sestamibi were injected at rest. Three different consecutive gated SPECT images were performed 60 minutes later: baseline at rest, during the infusion of 0.76 mg/kg of dipyridamole, and 1 hour later. No patient received aminophylline. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), end-diastolic volume, and end-systolic volume were automically computed. Heart rate (HR) and blood pressure were regularly monitored.
Mean LVEF was 63.2%±8.0% baseline at rest, increased to 73.8%±8.2% (P=.0001) during dipyridamole infusion, and returned to baseline values (63.0%±7.5%) 1 hour later. End-diastolic volume did not vary significantly, and end-systolic volume decreased (from 32.2±19.5 to 26.6±17.9 u, P=.002) and returned to baseline values (32.7±15.6 u) 1 hour later. Dipyridamole induced moderate HR acceleration (from 80.2±15.0 to 96.5±9.6 beats/min, P<.001) and a slight decrease in diastolic blood pressure (from 80.6±8.1 to 70.1±9.0 mm Hg, P<.001). However, 1 hour later, HR and blood pressure had returned to baseline values.
Conclusions
Dipyridamole increases LVEF and HR and decreases diastolic blood pressure slightly in healthy individuals. Because dipyridamole gated SPECT imaging acquisition is usually started 60 minutes after dipyridamole infusion, LVEF is in fact estimated at rest.
Key Words
Dipyridamole gated myocardial perfusion SPECT left ventricular performance ejection fractionPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.Feldman RL, Nichols WW, Pepine CJ, Conti CR. Acute effect of intravenous dipyridamole on regional coronarography hemodynamics and metabolism. Circulation 1981;64:333–44.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 2.Picano E. Dipyridamole-echocardiography test: the historical background and the physiologic basis. Eur Heart J 1989;10:365–76.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 3.Severi S, Picano E, Michelassi C, Lattanzi F, Landi P, Distante A, et al. Diagnostic and prognostic value of dipyridamole echocardiography in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. Circulation 1994;89:1160–73.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 4.Rozanski A, Elkayam U, Berman DS, Diamond GA, Prause J, Swan HJ. Improvement of resting myocardial asynergy with cessation of upright bicycle exercise. Circulation 1983;67:529–35.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 5.Ambrosio G, Betocchi S, Pace L, Losi MA, Perrone-Filardi P, Soricelli A, et al. Prolonged impairment of regional contractile function after resolution of exercise-induced angina. Evidence of myocardial stunning in patients with coronary artery disease. Circulation 1996;94:2455–64.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 6.Chikamori T, Doi YL, Seo H, Kawamoto A, Akagi N, Maeda T, et al. Effects of dipyridamole on left ventricular systolic and diastolic function in healthy young and elderly subjects as assessed by radionuclide angiography. Am J Cardiol 1994;73:1024–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Cates CU, Kronenberg MW, Collins HW, Sandler MP. Dipyridamole radionuclide ventriculography: a test with high specificity for severe coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 1989;13:841–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Klein HO, Ninio R, Eliyahu S, Bakst A, Levi A, Dean H, et al. Effects of the dipyridamole test on left ventricular function in coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 1992;69:482–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Johnson LL, Verdesca SA, Aude WY, Xavier RC, Nott LT, Campanella MW, et al. Postischemic stunning can affect left ventricular ejection fraction and regional wall motion on post-stress gated sestamibi tomograms. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997;30:1641–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Paul AK, Hasegawa S, Yoshioka J, Tsujimura E, Yamaguchi H, Tokita N, et al. Exercise-induced stunning continues for at least one hour: evaluation with quantitative gated single-photon emission tomography. Eur J Nucl Med 1999;26:410–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Bonow RO. Gated myocardial perfusion imaging for measuring left ventricular function. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997;30:1649–50.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Sias T, Watson D, Beller G. Comparison of rest and post stress left ventricular function by gated SPECT [abstract]. J Nucl Cardiol 1999; 6:S16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar