Advertisement

Rapid analysis of antibiotic-containing mixtures from fermentation broths by using liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry and matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time-of-flight-mass spectrometry

  • Bradley L. Ackermann
  • Brian T. Regg
  • Luigi Colombo
  • Sergio Stella
  • John E. Coutant
Articles

Abstract

A crucial step in the isolation of antibiotic substances is establishing whether or not the isolated material represents a new chemical entity. Because of the importance of molecular weight to this process—known as dereplication—mass spectrometry has traditionally played an active role. In this communication a strategy for utilizing liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC/MS) for novelty assessment is described. Crude extracts (20–50 µg) are chromatographed by conventional bore high-performance liquid chromatography (1 mL/min) after which a postcolumn split to divert roughly one-tenth of the sample to the mass spectrometer for molecular weight determination by electrospray ionization (ESI) mass spectrometry. The majority of the effluent is sent to a UV detector and ultimately collected as 1-min fractions for biological testing. As a secondary confirmation of molecular weight, an aliquot of each fraction (< 5%) is taken for analysis by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization (MALDI). The improved efficiency of this approach over more traditional schemes utilizing off-line fraction collection and conventional ionization methods can be explained by several factors. First, the superior sensitivity of ESI and MALDI means that less material is required for successful analysis. Second, on-line LC/MS optimizes the efficiency of sample transfer and saves both time and labor. Furthermore, the concentration dependence of ESI allows a majority of the material injected for LC/MS to be recovered for biological testing without compromising the signal available for molecular weight determination. As a validation of the above method, crude extracts containing two well-characterized antibiotics—teicoplanin and phenelfamycin—were examined. Results from these analyses are presented along with data from the analysis of a potent unknown antifungal sample.

Keywords

MALDI Fermentation Broth Teicoplanin Molecular Weight Determination Antibiotic Substance 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Georgopapadakou, N. H.; Walsh, T. J. J. Science 1994, 264, 371–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Neu, H. C. Science 1992, 257, 1064–1073.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Davies, J. Science 1994, 264, 375–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bates, J. H. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 1995, 151, 942–943.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Omura, S. Microbiol. Rev. 1986, 50, 259–279.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Vandamme, E. J. J. Biotechnol. 1994, 37, 89–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Omura, S. J. Ind. Microbiol. 1992, 10, 135–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Monaghan, R. L.; Tkacz, J. S. Ann. Rev. Microbiol. 1990, 44, 271–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Yarbrough, G. G.; Taylor, D. P.; Rowlands, R. T.; Crawford, M. S.; Lasure, L. L. J. Antibiot. 1993, 46, 535–544.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sedlock, D. M.; Sun, H. H.; Smith, W. F.; Kawaoka, K.; Gillum, A. M.; Cooper, R. J. Ind. Microbiol. 1992, 9, 45–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Alvi, K. A.; Peterson, J.; Hofmann, B. J. Ind. Microbiol. 1995, 15, 80–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Corley, D. G.; Durley, R. G. J. Nat. Prod. 1994, 57, 1484–1490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kinghorn, A. D.; Famsworth, N. R.; Beecher, C. W. W.; Soejarto, D. D.; Cordell, G. A.; Pezzuto, J. M.; Wall, M. E.; Wani, M. C.; Brown, D. M. Int. J. Pharmacogn. 1995, 33, 48–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sottani, C.; Islam, K.; Soffientini, A.; Zerilli, L. F.; Seraglia, R. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 1993, 7, 680–683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Roberts, G. D.; Carr, S. A.; Rottschaefer, S.; Jeffs, P. W. J. Antibiot. 1985, 38, 713–720.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Edwards, D. M. F.; Selva, E.; Stella, S.; Zerilli, L. F.; Gallo, G. G. Biol. Mass Spectrom. 1992, 21, 51–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    McCracken, R. J.; Blanchflower, W. J.; Rowan, C.; McCoy, M. A.; Kennedy, D. G. Analyst 1995, 120, 2347–2351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sanders, P.; Delepine, B. Biol. Mass Spectrom. 1994, 23, 369–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Coutant, J. E.; Chen, T.-M.; Ackermann, B. L. J. Chromatogr. 1990, 529, 265–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kiehl, D. E.; Kennington, A. S. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 1995, 9, 1297–1301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Fouda, H. G.; Schnieder, R. P. Ther. Drug. Monit. 1995, 17, 179–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    D’Agostino, P. A.; Hancock, J. R.; Provost, L. R. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 1995, 9, 1038–1043.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Straub, R.; Linder, M.; Voyksner, R. D. Anal. Chem. 1994, 66, 3651–3658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Colombo, L.; Stella, S.; Regg, B. T.; Ackermann, B. L. Proceedings of the 42nd ASMS Conference on Mass Spectrometry and Allied Topics; 1994, p. 613.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Constant, H. L.; Beecher, C. W. W. Nat. Prod. Lett. 1995, 6, 193–196.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bardone, M. R.; Paternoster, M.; Coronelli, C. J. Antibiot. 1978, 31, 170–177.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Barna, J. C. J.; Williams, D. H.; Stone, D. J. M.; Leung, T. W. C.; Doddrell, D. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1984, 106, 4895–4902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hunt, A. H.; Molloy, R. M.; Occolowitz, J. L.; Marconi, G. G.; Debeno, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1984, 106, 4891–4895.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hochlowski, J. E.; Buytendorp, M. H.; Whittern, D. N.; Buko, A. M.; Chen, R. H.; McAlpine, J. B. J. Antibiot. 1988, 41, 1300–1315.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Hall, C. C.; Watkins, J. D.; Georgopapdakou, N. H. Antimcrob. Agents Chemother. 1989, 33, 322–325.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Parmeggiani, A.; Swart, G. W. M. Ann. Rev. Microbiol. 1985, 39, 557–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Härri, E.; Loeffler, W.; Sigg, H. P.; Stähelin, H.; Stoll, C.; Tamm, C.; Wiesinger, D. Helv. Chim. Acta 1962, 45, 839–853.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Hopfgartner, G.; Bean, K.; Henion, J.; Henry, R. J. Chromatogr. 1993, 647, 51–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Vestal, M. L.; Juhasz, P.; Martin, S. A. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 1995, 9, 1044–1050.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Julian, R. K., Jr. Presented at the 44th ASMS Conference on Mass Spectrometry and Allied Topics, Portland, OR, June 1996Google Scholar

Copyright information

© American Society for Mass Spectrometry 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bradley L. Ackermann
    • 1
  • Brian T. Regg
    • 1
  • Luigi Colombo
    • 2
  • Sergio Stella
    • 2
  • John E. Coutant
    • 2
  1. 1.Hoechst Marion Roussel, Inc.Cincinnati
  2. 2.Lepetit Research CenterGerenzano (VA)Italy

Personalised recommendations