Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry

, Volume 12, Issue 12, pp 1262–1271

Effects of the position of internal histidine residues on the collision-induced fragmentation of triply protonated tryptic peptides

Article

Abstract

The collision-induced dissociation spectra of a series of synthetic, tryptic peptides that differed by the position of an internal histidine residue were studied. Electrospray ionization of these peptides produced both doubly and triply protonated molecular ions. Collision-induced fragmentation of the triply protonated peptide ions had better efficiency than that of the doubly protonated ions, producing a higher abundance of product ions at lower collision energies. The product ion spectra of these triply protonated ions were dominated by a series of doubly charged y-ions and the amount of sequence information was dependent on the position of the histidine residue. In the peptides where the histidine was located towards the C-terminus of the peptide, a more extensive series of sequence specific product ions was observed. As the position of the histidine residue was moved towards the N-terminus of the peptide, systematically less sequence information was observed. The peptides were subsequently modified with diethylpyrocarbonate to manipulate the product ion spectra. Addition of the ethoxyformyl group to the N-terminus and histidine residue shifted the predominant charge state of the modified peptide to the doubly protonated form. These peptide ions fragmented efficiently, producing product ion spectra that contained more sequence information than could be obtained from the corresponding unmodified peptide.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Yates, J. R., 3rd. Mass spectrometry and the age of the proteome. J. Mass Spectrom. 1998, 33, 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chambers, G.; Lawrie, L.; Cash, P.; Murray, G. I. Proteomics: A new approach to the study of disease. J. Pathol. 2000, 192, 280–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bichsel, V. E.; Liotta, L. A.; Petricoin, E. F., 3rd. Cancer proteomics: From biomarker discovery to signal pathway profiling. Cancer J. 2001, 7, 69–78.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fields, S. Proteomics in genomeland. Science 2001, 291, 1221–1224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Godovac-Zimmermann, J.; Brown, L. R. Perspectives for mass spectrometry and functional proteomics. Mass Spectrom. Rev. 2001, 20, 1–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dongré, A. R.; Jones, J. L.; Somogyi, Á.; Wysocki, V. H. Influence of peptide composition, gas-phase basicity, and chemical modification on fragmentation efficiency: Evidence for the mobile proton model. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 8365–8374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Summerfield, S.; Gaskell, S. J. Fragmentation efficiencies of peptide ions following low energy collisional activation. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. Ion Processes 1997, 165/166, 509–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gu, C.; Somogyi, Á.; Wysocki, V. H.; Medzihradszky, D. F. Fragmentation of protonated oligopeptides XLDVLQ (X = L,H,K or R) by surface induced dissociation: Additional evidence for the mobile proton model. Anal. Chem. Acta 1999, 397, 247–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cox, K. A.; Gaskell, S. J.; Morris, M.; Whiting, A. Role of the site of protonation in the low-energy decompositions of gas-phase peptide ions. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 1996, 7, 522–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nari, H.; Somogyi, Á.; Wysocki, V. H. Effect of alkyl substitution at the amide nitrogen on amid bond cleavage: Electrospray ionization/surface-induced dissociation fragmentation of substance P and two alkylated analogs. J. Mass Spectrom. 1996, 31, 1141–1148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jones, J. L.; Dongré, A. R.; Somogyi, Á.; Wysocki, V. H. Sequence dependence of peptide fragmentation efficiency curves determined by electrospray ionization/surface-induced dissociation mass spectrometry. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 8368–8369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Burlet, O.; Orkiszewski, R. S.; Ballard, K.; Gaskell, S. J. Charge promotion of low-energy fragmentations of peptide ions. Rapid Comm. Mass Spectrom. 1992, 6, 658–662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    McCormack, A. L.; Somogyi, Á.; Dongré, A. R.; Wysocki, V. H. Fragmentation of protonated peptides: Surface-induced dissociation in conjunction with a quantum mechanical approach. Analyt. Chem. 1993, 65, 2859–2872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wysocki, V. H.; Tsaprailis, G.; Smith, L. L.; Breci, L. A. Mobile and localized protons: A framework for understanding peptide dissociation. J. Mass Spectrom. 2000, 35, 1399–1406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kinter, M.; Sherman, N. E. Protein Sequencing and Identification Using Tandem Mass Spectrometry; John Wiley & Sons, Inc: New York, 2000; pp 64–79.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Eng, J. K.; McCormack, A. L.; Yates, J. R., III. An approach to correlate tandem mass spectral data of peptides with amino acid sequences in a protein database. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 1994, 5, 976–989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Perkins, D. N.; Pappin, D. J.; Creasy, D. M.; Cottrell, J. S. Probability-based protein identification by searching sequence databases using mass spectrometry data. Electrophoresis 1999, 20, 3551–3567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Harrison, A. G. The gas-phase basicities and proton affinities of amino acids and peptides. Mass Spectrom. Rev. 1997, 16, 201–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Roth, K. D. W.; Huang, Z. H.; Sadagopan, N.; Watson, J. T. Charge derivatization of peptides for analysis by mass spectrometry. Mass Spectrom. Rev. 1998, 17, 255–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Dikler, S.; Kelly, J. W.; Russell, D. H. Improving mass spectrometric sequencing of arginine-containing peptides by derivatization with acetylacetone. J. Mass Spectrom. 1997, 32, 1337–1349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Brancia, F. L.; Oliver, S. G.; Gaskell, S. J. Improved matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometric analysis of tryptic hydrolysates of proteins following quanidation of lysine-containing peptides. Rapid Comm. Mass Spectrom. 2000, 14, 2070–2073.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Summerfield, S.; Bolgar, M. S.; Gaskell, S. J. Promotion and stabilization of b1 ions in peptide phenylthiocarbamoyl derivatives: Analogies with condensed-phase chemistry. J. Mass Spectrom. 1997, 32, 225–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Miles, E. W. Modification of histidyl residues in proteins by diethylpyrocarbonate. Methods Enzymol. 1977, 47, 431–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© American Society for Mass Spectrometry 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Lerner Research Institute Mass Spectrometry Laboratory for Protein Sequencing, Department of Cell BiologyCleveland Clinic FoundationClevelandUSA
  2. 2.Department of Cell Biology/NC10, Lerner Research InstituteCleveland Clinic FoundationClevelandUSA

Personalised recommendations