Elimination of the concentration dependence in mass isotopomer abundance mass spectrometry of methyl palmitate using metastable atom bombardment

  • Clifton K. Fagerquist
  • Marc K. Hellerstein
  • Denis Faubert
  • Michel J. Bertrand
Article
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:

Abstract

An important problem in mass isotopomer abundance mass spectrometry (MIAMS) is the dependence of measured mass isotopomer abundances on sample concentration. We have evaluated the role of ionization energy on mass isotopomer abundance ratios of methyl palmitate as a function of sample concentration. Ionization energy was varied using electron impact ionization (EI) and metastable atom bombardment (MAB). The latter generates a beam of metastable species capable of ionizing analyte molecules by Penning ionization. We observed that ionization of methyl palmitate by EI (70 eV) showed the greatest molecular ion fragmentation and also showed the greatest dependence of relative isotopomer abundance ratios on sample concentration. Ionization using the 3 P 2 and 3 P 0 states of metastable krypton (9.92 and 10.56 eV, respectively) resulted in almost no molecular ion fragmentation, and the isotopomer abundances quantified were essentially independent of sample concentration. Ionization using the 3 P 2 and 3 P 0 states of metastable argon (11.55 and 11.72 eV, respectively) showed molecular ion fragmentation intermediate between that of EI and MAB(Kr) and showed an isotopomer concentration dependence which was less severe than that observed with EI but more severe than that observed with MAB(Kr). The observed decrease in the dependence of isotopomer abundance on sample concentration with a decrease in molecular ion fragmentation is consistent with the hypothesis that proton transfer from a fragment cation to a neutral molecule is the gas phase reaction mechanism responsible for the concentration dependence. Alternative explanations, e.g., hydrogen abstraction from a neutral molecule to a molecular cation, is not supported by these results. Moreover, the MAB ionization technique shows potential for eliminating one source of error in MIAMS measurements of methyl palmitate, in particular, and of fatty acids methyl esters, in general.

Keywords

Proton Transfer Proton Affinity Electron Impact Hydrogen Abstraction Isotope Ratio Mass Spectrometry 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Hellerstein, M. K.; Neese, R. A. Am. J. Phys. 1992, 263, E988-E1001.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hellerstein, M. K. J. Bio. Chem. 1991, 266, 10920–10924.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hellerstein, M. K.; Neese, R. A. Am. J. Phys. 1999, 276, E1146-E1162.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Papageorgeopolis, C.; Caldwell, K.; Shackleton, C. H. L.; Schweingruber, H.; Hellerstein, M. K. Anal. Biochem. 1999, 267, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Macallan, D. C.; Fullerton, C. A.; Neese, R. A.; Haddock, K.; Park, S.; Hellerstein, M. K. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 1998, 95, 708–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lee, W. N. P.; Bergner, E. A.; Guo, Z. K. Biol. Mass Spectrom. 1992, 21, 114–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Patterson, B. W.; Wolfe, R. R. J. Mass Spectrom. 1993, 22, 481–486.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fagerquist, C. K.; Neese, R. A.; Hellerstein, M. K. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 1999, 10, 430–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fagerquist, C. K.; Schwarz, J.-M. J. Mass Spectrom. 1998, 33, 144–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tulloch, A. P.; Hogge, L. R. Chem. Phys. Lipids 1985, 37, 271–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Faubert, D.; Paul, G. J. C.; Giroux, J.; Bertrand, M. J. Int. J. Mass Spec. Ion Processes 1993, 124, 69–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Vuica, A.; Faubert, D.; Evans, M.; Bertrand, M. J. Proceedings of the 46th American Society on Mass Spectrometry; Orlando, Florida, 1998.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Penning, F. M. Naturwissenschaften 1927, 15, 818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fagerquist, C. K.; Faubert, D.; Bertrand, M. J. Proceedings of the 47th American Society on Mass Spectrometry; Dallas, Texas, 1999.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    McLafferty, F. W. Anal. Chem. 1959, 82, 31.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dinh-Nguyen, Ng.; Ryhage, R.; Stallberg-Stenhagen, S.; Stenhagen, E. Arkiv. Kemi. 1961, 18, 393–399.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Siska, P. E. Rev. Mod. Phys. 1993, 65, 337–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Nicol, C. H.; Calvert, J. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1967, 89, 1790–1798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Boer, F. P.; Shannon, T. W.; McLafferty, F. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1968, 90, 7239–7248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Evans, J.; Nicol, G.; Munson, B. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2000, 11, 789–796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lias, S. G.; Bartmess, J. E.; Liebman, J. F.; Holmes, J. L.; Levin, R. D.; Mallard, W. G. J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 1988, 17, Suppl. 1, 24.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Yoshino, K.; Tanaka, Y. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 1979, 69, 159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© American Society for Mass Spectrometry 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Clifton K. Fagerquist
    • 1
    • 3
  • Marc K. Hellerstein
    • 1
  • Denis Faubert
    • 2
  • Michel J. Bertrand
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Nutritional Sciences and ToxicologyUniversity of CaliforniaBerkeleyUSA
  2. 2.Regional Center for Mass Spectrometry, Department of ChemistryUniversity of MontrealMontrealCanada
  3. 3.Department of ChemistryUniversity of MinnesotaMinneapolis

Personalised recommendations