Effects of solvent on the maximum charge state and charge state distribution of protein ions produced by electrospray ionization
- 267 Downloads
The effects of solvent composition on both the maximum charge states and charge state distributions of analyte ions formed by electrospray ionization were investigated using a quadrupole mass spectrometer. The charge state distributions of cytochrome c and myoglobin, formed from 47%/50%/3% water/solvent/acetic acid solutions, shift to lower charge (higher m/z) when the 50% solvent fraction is changed from water to methanol, to acetonitrile, to isopropanol. This is also the order of increasing gas-phase basicities of these solvents, although other physical properties of these solvents may also play a role. The effect is relatively small for these solvents, possibly due to their limited concentration inside the electrospray interface. In contrast, the addition of even small amounts of diethylamine (<0.4%) results in dramatic shifts to lower charge, presumably due to preferential proton transfer from the higher charge state ions to diethylamine. These results clearly show that the maximum charge states and charge state distributions of ions formed by electrospray ionization are influenced by solvents that are more volatile than water. Addition of even small amounts of two solvents that are less volatile than water, ethylene glycol and 2-methoxyethanol, also results in preferential deprotonation of higher charge state ions of small peptides, but these solvents actually produce an enhancement in the higher charge state ions for both cytochrome c and myoglobin. For instruments that have capabilities that improve with lower m/z, this effect could be taken advantage of to improve the performance of an analysis.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 20.Popovych, O.; Tomkins, R. P. T. Nonaqueous Solution Chemistry; Wiley: New York, 1981; p 224.Google Scholar
- 21.Hunter, E. P.; Lias, S. G. In NIST Chemistry Webbook, NIST Standard Reference Database Number 69; Mallard, W. G.; Lindstrom, P. J., Eds.; National Institute of Standards and Technology: Gaithersburg, MD, March 1998.Google Scholar
- 25.Alberty, R. A.; Silbey, R. J. Physical Chemistry, 1st ed.; Wiley: New York, 1992; p 605.Google Scholar
- 31.CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics; Lide, D. R., Ed.; CRC: Boca Raton, FL, 1996.Google Scholar