Advertisement

Optimization of Friction Welding Process Parameters for Joining Carbon Steel and Stainless Steel

  • R. PaventhanEmail author
  • P. R. Lakshminarayanan
  • V. Balasubramanian
Article

Abstract

Friction welding is a solid state joining process used extensively currently owing to its advantages such as low heat input, high production efficiency, ease of manufacture, and environment friendliness. Materials difficult to be welded by fusion welding processes can be successfully welded by friction welding. An attempt was made to develop an empirical relationship to predict the tensile strength of friction welded AISI 1040 grade medium carbon steel and AISI 304 austenitic stainless steel, incorporating the process parameters such as friction pressure, forging pressure, friction time and forging time, which have great influence on strength of the joints. Response surface methodology was applied to optimize the friction welding process parameters to attain maximum tensile strength of the joint. The maximum tensile strength of 543 MPa could be obtained for the joints fabricated under the welding conditions of friction pressure of 90 MPa, forging pressure of 90 MPa, friction time of 6 s and forging time of 6 s.

Key words

friction welding stainless steel response surface methodology optimization 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Ozdemir N. Investigation of the Mechanical Properties of Friction-Welded Joints Between AISI 304L and AISI 4340 Steel as a Function of Rotational Speed [J]. Materials Letters, 2005, 59(19/20): 2504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    Yoon Han-ki, Kong Yu-sik, Kim Seon-jin, et al. Mechanical Properties of Friction Welds of RAFs (JLF-1) to SUS304 Steels as Measured by the Acoustic Emission Technique [J]. Fusion Engineering and Design, 2006, 81(8/9/10/11/12/13/14), 945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    Dobrovidov A N. Selection of Optimum Conditions for the Friction Welding of High Speed Steel 45 [J]. Weld Prod, 1975, 22(3), 226.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Ishibashi A, Ezoe S, Tanaka S. Studies on Friction Welding of Carbon and Alloy-Steels [M]. Bulletin of the JSME, 1983, 26(216), 1080.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Sahin Mumim. Evaluation of the Joint Interface Properties of Austenitic Stainless Steel (AISI 304) Joined by Friction Welding [J]. Materials and Design, 2007, 28(7), 2244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Sathiya P, Aravindan S, Noorul Haq A. Mechanical and Metallurgical Properties of Friction Welded AISI 304 Austenitic Stainless Steel [J]. Int J Adv Manuf Technol, 2005, 26(5/6): 505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    Ananthapadmanaban D, Seshagiri Rao V, Abraham Nikhil, et al. A Study of Mechanical Properties of Friction Welded Mild Steel to Stainless Steel Joints [J]. Materials and Design, 2009, 30(7): 2642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    Satyanarayana V V, Madhusudhan Reddy G, Mohandas T. Dissimilar Metal Friction Welding of Austenitic-Ferritic Stainless Steels [J]. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2005, 160(2), 128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    Yilmaz M. Investigation of the Welding Zone in Friction Welding of Different Tool Steels [D]. Istanbul, Technical University of Yildiz, 1993.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Ates Hakan, Turker Mehmet, Kurt Adem. Effect of Friction Pressure on the Properties of Friction Welded MA956 Iron-Based Superalloy [J]. Materials and Design, 2007, 28(3): 948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    Meshram S D, Mohandas T, Madhusudhan Reddy G. Friction Welding of Dissimilar Pure Metals [J]. Journal of Material Processing Technology, 2007, 184(1/2/3): 330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    Khuri A I, Cornell J A. Response Surfaces Design and Analysis [M]. New York: Marcel Dekker, 1996.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    Gunaraj V, Murugan N. Application of Response Surface Methodology for Predicting Weld Bead Quality in Submerged Arc Welding of Pipes [J]. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 1999, 88(1/2/3), 266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    Tien Chuen-lin, Lin Shane-wen. Optimization of Process Parameters of Titanium Dioxide Films by Response Surfaces Methodology [T]. Optics Communications, 2006, 266(2), 574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    Phillip J R. Taguchi Techniques for Quality Engineering [M]. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1988.Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    Lakshminarayanan A K, Balasubramanian V. Comparison of RSM With ANN in Predicting Tensile Strength of Friction Stir Welded AA7039 Aluminum Alloy Joints [J]. Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China, 2009, 19(1): 9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© China Iron and Steel Research Institute Group 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. Paventhan
    • 1
    Email author
  • P. R. Lakshminarayanan
    • 1
  • V. Balasubramanian
    • 1
  1. 1.Center for Materials Joining Research (CEMAJOR), Department of Manufacturing EngineeringAnnamalai UniversityAnnamalainagarIndia

Personalised recommendations