Advertisement

Journal of Hydrodynamics

, Volume 23, Issue 3, pp 353–360 | Cite as

Identification of Abkowitz Model for Ship Manoeuvring Motion Using ε -Support Vector Regression

  • Xin-guang Zhang
  • Zao-jian ZouEmail author
Article

Abstract

By anac10°/10° zigzag test, the hydrodynamic derivatives in the Abkowitz model for ship manoeuvring motion are identified by using ε -Support Vector Regression (ε -SVR). To damp the extent of parameter drift, a series of random numbers are added into the training samples to reconstruct the training samples. The identification results of the hydrodynamic derivatives are compared with the Planar Motion Mechanism (PMM) test results to verify the identification method. By using the identified Abkowitz model, 20°/20° zigzag test is numerically simulated. The simulated results are compared with those obtained by using the Abkowitz model where the hydrodynamic derivatives are obtained from PMM tests. The agreement is satisfactory, which shows that the regressive Abkowitz model has a good generalization performance.

Key words

ship manoeuvring Abkowitz model parameter identification ε -Support Vector Regression (ε -SVR) 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    ABKOWITZ M. A. Measurement of hydrodynamic characteristic from ship maneuvering trials by system identification[J]. Transactions of Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers, 1980, 88: 283–318.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    OGAWA A., KASAI H. On the mathematical model of manoeuvring motion of ship[J]. International Shipbuilding Progress, 1978, 25(292): 306–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    NOMOTO K., TAGUCHI T. and HONDA K. et al. On the steering qualities of ships[J]. International Shipbuilding Progress, 1957, 35(4): 354–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    MAHFOUZ A. B., HADDARA M. R. Effects of the damping and excitation on the identification of the hydrodynamic parameters for an underwater robotic vehicle[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2003, 30(8): 1005–1025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    SELVAM R. P., BHATTACHARYYA S. K. and HADDARA M. R. A frequency domain system identification method for linear ship manoeuvring[J]. International Shipbuilding Progress, 2005, 52(1): 5–27.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    BHATTACHARYYA S. K., HADDARA M. R. Parameter identification for nonlinear ship manoeuvring[J]. Journal of Ship Research, 2006, 50(3): 197–207.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    EBADA A., ABDEL-MAKSOUD M. Applying artificial intelligence (A.I.) to predict the limits of ship turning manoeuvres[J]. Jahrbuch der Schiffbautechnischen Gesellschaft, 2005, 99: 132–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    MOREIRA L., GUEDES SOARES C. Dynamic model of manoeuvrability using recursive neural networks[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2003, 30(13): 1669–1697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    CHIU F. C., CHANG T. L. and GO J. et al. A recursive neural networks model for ship maneuverability prediction[C]. Proceedings of Ocean’04, MTS/IEEE Texhno-Ocean’04. Kobe, Japan, 2004, 3: 1211–1218.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    VAPNIK V. N. Universal learning technology: Support vector machines[J]. NEC Journal of Advanced Technology, 2005, 2(2): 137–144.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    LUO Wei-lin, ZOU Zao-jian and LI Tie-shan. Application of support vector machine to ship steering[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University (Science), 2009, 14(2): 462–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    LUO Wei-lin, ZOU Zao-jian. Identification of response models of ship maneuvering motion using support vector machines[J]. Journal of Ship Mechanics, 2007, 11(6): 832–838.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    LUO W. L., ZOU Z. J. Prediction of ship mano- euvring by using support vector machines[C]. Work- shop on Verification and Validation of Ship Mano- euvring Simulation Methods, SIMMAN 2008. Copenhagen, Denmark, 2008, 1: E28–E32.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    LUO W. L., ZOU Z. J. Parametric identification of ship manoeuvring models by using support vector machines[J]. Journal of Ship Research, 2009, 53(1): 19–30.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    CHISLETT M. S., STRØM-TEJSEN J. Planar motion mechanism tests and full-scale steering and maneuvering predictions for a Mariner Class Vessel, Technical Report Hy-6, Hydro- and Aerodynamics Laboratory, Lyngby, Denmark, 1965.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© China Ship Scientific Research Center 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Naval Architecture, Ocean and Civil EngineeringShanghai Jiao Tong UniversityShanghaiChina
  2. 2.School of Naval Architecture, Ocean and Civil Engineering and State Key Laboratory of Ocean EngineeringShanghai Jiao Tong UniversityShanghaiChina

Personalised recommendations