Indiscriminate polyandry and male parental effort

  • Michael A. Fishman
  • Lewi Stone
Article
Received:
Accepted:

Abstract

Extrapair paternity involves cooperation between mated females and extrapair males. On the other hand, mated males exhibit a spectrum of anti-cuckolding strategies. Hence, extrapair attributes of diverse species and populations reported in the literature are particular solutions of evolutionary games involving gender-specific cuckolding/anti-cuckolding strategies. Here we use game theoretical methods to study the effect of male paternal effort conserving strategies in situations where females seek extrapair fertilizations (EPF) for reasons of genetic compatibility and/or in pursuit of genetic diversity for their offspring. In such cases, females cannot make a pre-copulatory selection of the optimal genetic partners, and therefore combine promiscuous copulation with the use of in copula and/or post-copulatory selection mechanisms to optimize the genetic endowment of their offspring—indiscriminate polyandry. Our results indicate that, when indiscriminate polygamy is constrained by the availability of extrapair male partners, there are three possible (parameter regime wise) evolutionary stable strategy solutions. (1) All females seek EPF, while all males restrict parental care. (2) All females seek EPF, while all males are unconditionally parental. (3) Females use a combination strategy where pursuit of EPF is mixed—on either a population, or an individual level—with genetic monogamy, while all males use a conditional paternal care strategy, which involves adjusting their parental efforts according to their certainty of paternity.

Keywords

Payoff Parental Care Pure Strategy Evolutionary Game Payoff Matrix 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Baer, B. and P. Schmid-Hempel (1999). Experimental variation in polyandry affects parasite loads and fitness in a bumble-bee. Nature 397, 151–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Begon, M., J. L. Harper and C. R. Townsend (1995). Ecology: Individuals, Populations, and Communities, 2nd edn, Blackwell Science, p. 198.Google Scholar
  3. Birkhead, T. R. and A. P. Møller (1993). Female control of paternity. Trend. Ecol. Evol. 8, 100–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Burke, T. (1989). DNA fingerprinting and other methods for the study of mating success. Trends Ecol. Evol. 4, 139–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cézilly, F. and R. G. Nager (1995). Comparative evidence for a positive association between divorce and extra-pair paternity in birds. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 262, 7–12.Google Scholar
  6. Cressman, R. (1992). The Stability Concept of Evolutionary Game Theory, Berlin: Springer.MATHGoogle Scholar
  7. Cressman, R. and A. T. Dash (1991). Strong stability and evolutionary stable strategies with two types of players. J. Math. Biol. 30, 89–99.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. Currie, D. R., T. Burke, R. L. Whitney and D. B. A. Thompson (1998). Male and female behaviour and extra-pair paternity in the wheatear. Anim. Behav. 55, 689–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Davies, N. B. (1991). Mating systems, in Behavioural Ecology, 3rd edn, J. R. Krebs and N. B. Davies (Eds), Blackwell Science, pp. 263–294.Google Scholar
  10. Dixon, A., D. Ross, S. L. C. O’Malley and T. Burke (1994). Paternal investment inversely related to degree of extrapair paternity in the reed bunting. Nature 371, 698–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dunn, P. O., A. D. Afton, M. L. Gloutney and R. T. Alisauskas (1999). Forced copulation results in few extrapair fertilizations in Ross’s and lesser snow geese. Anim. Behav. 57, 1071–1081.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fishman, M. A. and L. Stone (2002). Fertility assurance through extrapair fertilization, and male parental effort. Bull. Math. Biol. 64, 809–823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Freeman-Gallant, C. R., E. M. Johnson, F. Saponara and M. Stanger (2002). Variation at the major histocompatibility complex in Savannah sparrows. Mol. Ecol. 11, 1125–1130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jeffreys, A. J., V. Wilson and S. L. Thein (1985). Hypervariable ‘minisatellite’ regions in human DNA. Nature 314, 67–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jennions, M. D. and M. Petrie (2000). Why do females mate multiply? A review of the genetic benefits. Biol. Rev. 75, 21–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kempenaers, B., B. Congdon, P. Boag and R. J. Robertson (1999). Extrapair paternity and egg hatchability in tree swallows: evidence for the genetic compatibility hypothesis? Behav. Ecol. 10, 304–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kempenaers, B., R. B. Lanctot and R. J. Robertson (1998). Certainty of paternity and paternal investment in eastern bluebirds and tree swallows. Anim. Behav. 55, 845–860.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kempenaers, B. and B. C. Sheldon (1997). Studying paternity and paternal care: pitfalls and problems. Anim. Behav. 53, 423–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kempenaers, B., G. R. Verheyren and A. A. Dhondt (1997). Extra-pair paternity in the blue tit (Parus caeruleus): female choice, male characteristics, and offspring quality. Behav. Ecol. 8, 481–492.Google Scholar
  20. Krokene, C., K. Rigstad, M. Dale and J. T. Lifjeld (1998). The function of extrapair paternity in blue tits and great tits: good genes or fertility insurance? Behav. Ecol. 9, 649–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Møller, A. P. (1992). Frequency of female copulation with multiple males and sexual selection. Am. Nat. 139, 1089–1101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Møller, A. P. (2000). Male parental care, female reproductive success, and extrapair paternity. Behav. Ecol. 11, 161–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Møller, A. P. and J. V. Briskie (1995). Extra-pair paternity, sperm competition and the evolution of testis size in birds. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 46, 357–365.Google Scholar
  24. Møller, A. P. and J. J. Cuervo (2000). The evolution of paternity and paternal care in birds. Behav. Ecol. 11, 472–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Peterson, K. A., K. J. Thusius, L. A. Whittingham and P. O. Dunn (2001). Allocation of male parental care in relation to paternity within and among broods of the common yellowthroat (Geothlypis trichas). Ethology 107, 573–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Petrie, M. and B. Kempenaers (1998). Extrapair paternity in birds: explaining variation between species and populations. Trends Ecol. Evol. 13, 52–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Seger, J. and H. J. Brockmann (1987). What is bet hedging? in Oxford Surveys in Evolutionary Biology, P. J. Harvey and L. Partridge (Eds), Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 182–211.Google Scholar
  28. Selten, R. (1980). A note on evolutionary stable strategies in asymmetrical animal conflicts. J. Theor. Biol. 84, 93–101.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sheldon, B. C., K. Rasanen and P. C. Dias (1997). Certainty of paternity and paternal effort in the collared flycatcher. Behav. Ecol. 8, 421–428.Google Scholar
  30. Strohbach, S., E. Curio, A. Bathen, J. T. Epplen and T. Lubjuhn (1998). Extrapair paternity in the great tit (Parus major): a test of the ‘good genes’ hypothesis. Behav. Ecol. 9, 388–396.Google Scholar
  31. Stutchbury, B. J. M. (1998). Extra-pair mating effort of male hooded warblers Wilsonia citrina. Anim. Behav. 55, 553–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Trivers, R. L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection, in Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man, B. Campbell (Ed.), Aldine.Google Scholar
  33. Wagner, R. H., M. D. Schug and E. S. Morton (1996). Confidence of paternity, actual paternity and parental effort by purple martins. Anim. Behav. 52, 123–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Weibull, J. W. (1996). Evolutionary Game Theory, Cambridge, MA: MIT press.Google Scholar
  35. Whittingham, L. A. and J. T. Lifjeld (1995). High parental investment in unrelated young—extra-pair paternity and male-parental care in house martins. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 37, 103–108.Google Scholar
  36. Yezerinac, S. M., P. J. Weatherhead and P. T. Boag (1996). Cuckoldry and lack of parentage-dependent paternal care in yellow warblers: a cost-benefit approach. Anim. Behav. 52, 821–832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Zeh, J. A. and D. W. Zeh (1996). The evolution of polyandry. 1. Intragenomic conflict and genetic incompatibility. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 263, 1711–1717.Google Scholar
  38. Zeh, J. A. and D. W. Zeh (1997). The evolution of polyandry. 2. Post copulatory defenses against genetic incompatibility. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 264, 69–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Mathematical Biology 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael A. Fishman
    • 1
  • Lewi Stone
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Zoology, Faculty of Life SciencesTel Aviv UniversityTel AvivIsrael

Personalised recommendations