Wild justice and fair play: cooperation, forgiveness, and morality in animals

Abstract

In this paper I argue that we can learn much about ‘wild justice’ and the evolutionary origins of social morality – behaving fairly – by studying social play behavior in group-living animals, and that interdisciplinary cooperation will help immensely. In our efforts to learn more about the evolution of morality we need to broaden our comparative research to include animals other than non-human primates. If one is a good Darwinian, it is premature to claim that only humans can be empathic and moral beings. By asking the question ‘What is it like to be another animal?’ we can discover rules of engagement that guide animals in their social encounters. When I study dogs, for example, I try to be a ‘dogocentrist’ and practice ‘dogomorphism.’ My major arguments center on the following ‘big’ questions: Can animals be moral beings or do they merely act as if they are? What are the evolutionary roots of cooperation, fairness, trust, forgiveness, and morality? What do animals do when they engage in social play? How do animals negotiate agreements to cooperate, to forgive, to behave fairly, to develop trust? Can animals forgive? Why cooperate and play fairly? Why did play evolve as it has? Does ‘being fair’ mean being more fit – do individual variations in play influence an individual's reproductive fitness, are more virtuous individuals more fit than less virtuous individuals? What is the taxonomic distribution of cognitive skills and emotional capacities necessary for individuals to be able to behave fairly, to empathize, to behave morally? Can we use information about moral behavior in animals to help us understand ourselves? I conclude that there is strong selection for cooperative fair play in which individuals establish and maintain a social contract to play because there are mutual benefits when individuals adopt this strategy and group stability may be also be fostered. Numerous mechanisms have evolved to facilitate the initiation and maintenance of social play to keep others engaged, so that agreeing to play fairly and the resulting benefits of doing so can be readily achieved. I also claim that the ability to make accurate predictions about what an individual is likely to do in a given social situation is a useful litmus test for explaining what might be happening in an individual's brain during social encounters, and that intentional or representational explanations are often important for making these predictions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Adams E.R. and Burnett G.W. 1991. Scientic vocabulary divergence among female primatologists working in East Africa. Soc.Stud.Sci. 21:547-560.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Aldis O. 1975. Play Fighting. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Allen C. and Bekoff M. 1997. Species of Mind:The Philosophy and Biology of Cognitive Ethology. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Aureli F. and de Waal F.B.M. (ed.) 2000. Natural Conflict Resolution. University of California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Aviles L. 1999. Cooperation and non-linear dynamics:an ecological perspective on the evolution of sociality. Evol.Ecol.Res. 1:459-477.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Axelrod R. 1984. The Evolution of Cooperation. Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bateson G. 2000. Steps to an Ecology of Mind. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bauer E.B. and Smuts B.B. 2002. Role reversal and self-handicapping during playfighting in domestic dogs, Canis familiaris. Paper presented at the meetings of the Animal Behavior Society. University of Indiana.

  9. Bekoff M. 1975. The communication of play intention:are play signals functional? Semiotica 15: 231-239.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bekoff M. 1977a.Social communication in canids:evidence for the evolution of a stereotyped mammalian display. Science 197:1097-1099.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bekoff M. 1977b. Mammalian dispersal and the ontogeny of individual behavioral phenotypes. Am.Nat. 111:715-732.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bekoff M. 1995. Play signals as punctuation:the structure of social play in canids. Behaviour 132: 419-429.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bekoff M. 1996. Cognitive ethology, vigilance, information gathering, and representation:who might know what and why? Behav.Process. 35:225-237.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bekoff M. (ed.) 2000a.The Smile of a Dolphin:Remarkable Accounts of Animal Emotions. Discovery Books/Random House, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bekoff M. 2000b. Animal emotions:exploring passionate natures. BioScience 50:861-870.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bekoff M. 2001a. Social play behaviour, cooperation, fairness, trust and the evolution of morality. J. Conscious. Stud. 8(2):81-90.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bekoff M. 2001b. The evolution of animal play, emotions, and social morality:on science, theology, spirituality, personhood, and love. Zygon (J. Reli. Sci.) 36:615-655.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bekoff M. 2002a. Minding Animals:Awareness, Emotions, and Heart. Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bekoff M. 2002b. Virtuous nature. New Scientist 13 July, pp.34-37.

  20. Bekoff M. 2002c. Self-awareness. Nature 419:255.

  21. Bekoff M. 2003a. Consciousness and self in animals:some reflections. Zygon (J. Reli. Sci.) 38:229-245.

  22. Bekoff M. 2003b. Empathy:common sense, science sense, wolves, and well-being. Behav. Brain Sci. 25:26-27.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Bekoff M. 2004. The question of animal emotions:an ethological perspective. In: McMillan F. (ed.), Mental Health and Well-being in Animals. Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Bekoff M. (in press). Wild Justice and Fair Play:Cooperation, Forgiveness and Morality in Animals. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

  25. Bekoff M. and Allen C. 1992. Intentional icons:towards an evolutionary cognitive ethology. Ethology 91:1-16.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Bekoff M. and Allen C. 1997. Cognitive ethology:slayers, skeptics, and proponents. In: Mitchell R.W., Thompson N. and Miles L. (<nt>eds</nt>), Anthropomorphism, Anecdote, and Animals:The Emperor 's New Clothes? SUNY Press, Albany, New York, pp 313-334.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Bekoff M. and Allen C. 1998. Intentional communication and social play:how and why animals negotiate and agree to play. In: Bekoff M. and Byers J.A. (ed.), Animal Play:Evolutionary, Comparative, and Ecological Perspectives. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge and New York, pp.97-114.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Bekoff M., Allen C. and Burghardt G.M.(<nt>eds</nt>), 2002. The Cognitive Animal. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Bekoff M. and Byers J.A. 1981. A critical reanalysis of the ontogeny of mammalian social and locomotor play:an ethological hornet 's nest. In: Immelmann K., Barlow G.W., Petrinovich L. and Main M. (<nt>eds</nt>), Behavioral Development:The Bielefeld Interdisciplinary Project. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp.296-337.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Bekoff M. and Byers J.A.(<nt>eds</nt>), 1998. Animal Play:Evolutionary, Comparative, and Ecological Approaches. Cambridge University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Bekoff M. and Wells M.C. 1986. Social behavior and ecology of coyotes. Adv. Study Behav. 16: 251-338.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Bernstein I.S. 2000. The law of parsimony prevails:missing premises allow any conclusion. J. Conscious.Stud. 7:31-34.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Bewley T. 2003. Fair 's fair. Nature 422:125-126.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Boehm C. 1999. Hierarchy in the Forest:The Evolution of Egalitarian Behavior. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Bond A., Kamil A.C. and Balda R.P. 2003. Social complexity and transitive inference in corvids. Animal Behav. 65:479-487.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Bowles S. and Gintis H. 2002. Home reciprocans. Nature 415:125-128.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Bradie M. 1999. Evolutionary game theory meets the social contract. Biol.Philos. 14:607-613.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Bradley B.J. 1999. Levels of selection, altruism, and primate behavior. Quart. Rev. Biol. 74:171-194.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Brosnan S.F. and de Waal F.B.M. 2003. Monkeys reject unequal pay. Nature 425:297-299.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Burghardt G.M. 1997. Amending Tinbergen:A fifth aim for ethology. In: Thomson Mitchell R.W.N. and Miles L. (<nt>eds</nt>), Anthropomorphism, Anecdote, and Animals:The Emperor 's New clothes? SUNY Press, Albany (NY), pp.254-276.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Burghardt G.M. 2005. The Genesis of Play. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Byers J.A. 1977. Terrain preferences in the play of Siberian ibex kids (Capra ibex sibirica ). Zeit-schrift fur Tierpsychologie 45:199-209.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Byers J.A. 1998. Biological effects of locomotor play:getting into shape or something else. In: Bekoff M. and Byers J.A. (<nt>eds</nt>), Animal Play:Evolutionary, Comparative, and Ecological Perspectives. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp.205-220.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Church F. 1959. Emotional reactions of rats to the pain of others. J. Compar. Physiol. Psychol. 52: 132-134.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Damasio A. 2003. Looking for Spinoza:Joy, Sorrow, and the Feeling Brain. Harcourt, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Darwin C. 1859. On the Origin of Species By Means of Natural Selection. Murray, London.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Darwin C.1871/ 1936. The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex. Random House, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Darwin C.1872/ 1998. The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals, 3rd ed. Oxford University Press, New York, (with an Introduction, Afterword, and Commentaries by Paul Ekman).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Dawkins R. 1976. The Sel sh Gene. Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Dawkins R. 2001. Sustainability doesn 't come naturally:a Darwinian perspective on values. www.environmentfoundation.net/richard-dawkins.htm.

  51. de Waal F. 1991. Complementary methods and convergent evidence in the study of primate social cognition. Behaviour 18:297-320.

    Google Scholar 

  52. de Waal F. 2001. The Ape and the Sushi Master:Cultural Reflections of a Primatologist. Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  53. de Waal F. and Tyack P.L.(<nt>eds</nt>), 2003. Animal Social Complexity:Intelligence, Culture, and Individualized Societies. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Dolan R.J. Emotion, cognition, and behavior. 2002. Science 298:1191-1194.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Douglas K. 2001. Playing fair. New Scientist 10 March (No.2281).pp.38-42.

  56. Drea C.M. and Frank L.G. 2003. The social complexity of spotted hyenas. In: de Waal F. and Tyack P.L. (<nt>eds</nt>), Animal Social Complexity:Intelligence, Culture, and Individualized Societies. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, pp.121-148.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Dugatkin L.A. 1997. Cooperation Among Animals:An Evolutionary Perspective. Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Dugatkin L.A. and Bekoff M. 2003. Play and the evolution of fairness:a game theory model. Behav. Proc. 60:209-214.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Dylan B. 1983. In dels. CBS Inc.

  60. Fagen R. 1981. Animal Play Behavior. Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Fagen R. 1993. Primate juveniles and primate play. In: Pereira M.E. and Fairbanks L.A. (<nt>eds</nt>), Juvenile Primates:Life History, Development, and Behavior. Oxford University Press, New York pp.183-196.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Fehr E. and Gachter S. 2002. Altruistic punishment in humans. Nature 415:137-140.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Fehr E. and Rockenbach B. 2003. Detrimental effect of sanctions on human altruism. Nature 422: 137-140.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Field A. 2001. Altruistically Inclined? The Behavioral Sciences, Evolutionary Theory, and the Origins of Reciprocity.The University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Flack J.C. and de Waal F. 2000. Any animal whatever:Darwinian building blocks of morality in monkeys and apes. J. Conscious. Stud. 7:1-29.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Flack J.C., Jeannotte L.A. and de Waal F. 2004. Play signaling and the perception of social rules by juvenile chimpanzees. J. Compar. Psychol, 118:149-159.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Frith C.D. and Frith U. 1999. Interacting minds-a biological basis. Science 286:1692-1695.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Gallese V. 1998. Mirror neurons, from grasping to language.Conscious. Bull. Fall 3-4.

  69. Gallese V. and Goldman A. 1998. Mirror neurons and the simulation theory of mind-reading. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2:493-501.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Gould S.J. and Lloyd E.A. 1999. Individuality and adaptation across levels of selection:how shall we name and generalize the unit of Darwinism. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 96:11904-11909.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Griffin D.R. 2001. [tiAnimal Minds]. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

  72. Gruen L. 2002. The morals of animal minds. In: Bekoff, Allen and Burghardt (<nt>eds</nt>), The Cognitive Animal, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, pp.437-442.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Guzeldere G. and Nahmias E. 2002. Darwin 's continuum and the building blocks of deception. In: Bekoff, Allen and Burghardt (<nt>eds</nt>), The Cognitive Animal, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, pp.353-362.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Hauser M. 2000. Wild Minds. Henry Holt, New York.

  75. Hill H.L. and Bekoff M. 1977. The variability of some motor components of social play and agonistic behaviour in Eastern coyotes. Canis latrans var Animal Behav. 25:907-909.

    Google Scholar 

  76. Hinde R.A. 2002. Why Good is Good:The Sources of Morality. Routledge, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  77. Dalai Lama 2002. Understanding our fundamental nature. In: Davidson R.J. and Harrington A. (<nt>eds</nt>), Visions of Compassion:Western Scientists and Tibetan Buddhists Examine Human Nature. Oxford University Press, New York, pp.66-80.

    Google Scholar 

  78. Horowitz A.C. 2002. The behaviors of theories of mind, and a case study of dogs at play. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, San Diego.

    Google Scholar 

  79. Hudson S.D. 1986. Human Character and Morality:Reflections from the History of Ideas. Routledge & Kegan Paul, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  80. Hurd J.P. 1996. (ed). Investigating the Biological Foundations of Human Morality. The Edwin Mellen Press, Lewiston, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  81. Jamieson D. 2002. Sober and Wilson on psychological altruism. Philos.Phenomenol. Res. LXV: 702-710.

    Google Scholar 

  82. Jamieson D. and Bekoff M. 1993. On aims and methods of cognitive ethology.Philosophy of Science Association 2:110-124.

    Google Scholar 

  83. Kitchen D.M. and Packer C. 1999. Complexity in vertebrate societies. In: Keller L. (ed.), Levels of Selection in Evolution. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, pp.176-196.

    Google Scholar 

  84. Kropotkin P. 1902. Mutual aid:a factor of evolution. Philips & Co, McClure, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  85. Kuczaj S., Tranel K., Trone M. and Hill H. 2001. Are animals capable of deception or empathy? Implications for animal consciousness and animal welfare. Animal Welfare 10:S161-173.

    Google Scholar 

  86. Leigh E.G.Jr. 1999. Levels of selection, potential conflicts, and their resolution:Role of the ''Common good '’. In: Keller L. (ed.), Levels of Selection in Evolution. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, pp.15-30.

    Google Scholar 

  87. Macintyre A. 1999. Dependent Rational Animals:Why Human Beings Need the Virtues.Open Court, Chicago.

  88. Markowitz H. 1982. Behavioral Enrichment in the Zoo. Van Reinhold Company, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  89. Marler P. 1996. Social cognition:are primates smarter than birds? In: Nolan V. Jr. and Ketterson E.D. (<nt>eds</nt>), Current Ornithology, Vol.13. Plenum Press, New York, pp.1-32.

    Google Scholar 

  90. Mayr E. 2000. Darwin 's influence on modern thought. Sci.Am. 283:67-71.

    Google Scholar 

  91. Mech L.D. 1970. The Wolf.Garden City, Doubleday, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  92. Mitchell L.E. 1998. Stacked Deck:A Story of Sel shness in America. Temple University Press, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

    Google Scholar 

  93. Motluk A. 2001. Read my mind. New Sci. 169:22-26.

    Google Scholar 

  94. Neuman Y. 2003. The logic of meaning-in-context. Am. J. Semiotics (special issue:Gregory Bateson).

  95. Okamoto K. and Matsumara S. 2000. The evolution of punishment and apology:an iterated prisoner 's dilemma model. Evol. Ecol. 14:703-720.

    Google Scholar 

  96. Poole J. 1998. An exploration of a commonality between ourselves and elephants. Etica Animali 9/ 98:85-110.

    Google Scholar 

  97. Panksepp J. 1998. A effective Neuroscience. Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  98. Panksepp J. 2000. The rat will play. In: Bekoff M. (ed.), The Smile of a Dolphin:Remarkable Accounts of Animal Emotions. Random House/Discovery Books, New York, pp.146-147.

    Google Scholar 

  99. Pellis S. 2002. Keeping in touch:play ghting and social knowledge. In: Bekoff, Allen and Burghardt (<nt>eds</nt>), The Cognitive Animal, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, pp.421-427.

    Google Scholar 

  100. Peterson G.R. 1999. The evolution of consciousness and the theology of nature. Zygon 34:283-306.

    Google Scholar 

  101. Peterson G.R. 2000. God, genes, and cognizing agents. Zygon 35:469-480.

    Google Scholar 

  102. Pigliucci M. 2002. Are ecology and evolutionary biology ''soft ''sciences? Ann. Zool. Fenn. 39:87-98.

    Google Scholar 

  103. Power T.G. 2000. Play and Exploration in Children and Animals. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  104. Preston S.D. and de Waal F.B.M. 2002. Empathy:its ultimate and proximate bases. Behav. Brain Sci. 25:1-72.

    Google Scholar 

  105. Ridley M. 1996. The Origins of Virtue:Human Instincts and the Evolution of Cooperation. Viking, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  106. Ridley M. 2001. The Cooperative Gene. The Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  107. Rilling J.K., Gutman D.A., Zeh T.R., Pagnoni G., Berns G.S. and Kitts C.D. 2002. A neural basis for cooperation. Neuron 36:395-405.

    Google Scholar 

  108. Riolo R.L., Cohen M.D. and Zelrod R. 2001. Evolution of cooperation without reciprocity. Nature 414:441-443.

    Google Scholar 

  109. Schaller G.B. and Lowther G.R. 1969. The relevance of carnivore behavior to the study of early hominids. Southwestern J. Anthropol. 25:307-341.

    Google Scholar 

  110. Scott J.P. and Fuller J.L. 1965. Genetics and the Social Behavior of the Dogs. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  111. Sigmund K., Fehr E. and Nowak M.A. 2002. The economics of fair play. Sci. Am. 286(1):83-87.

    Google Scholar 

  112. Sigmund K. and Nowak M.A. 2001. Evolution:tides of tolerance. Nature 414:403-405.

    Google Scholar 

  113. Singer P. 1999. A Darwinian Left:Politics, Evolution, and Cooperation. Yale University Press, New Haven.

    Google Scholar 

  114. Siviy S. 1998. Neurobiological substrates of play behavior:Glimpses into the structure and function of mammalian playfulness. In: Bekoff M. and Byers J.A. (<nt>eds</nt>), Animal Play:Evolutionary, Comparative, and Ecological Perspectives. Cambridge University Press, New York, 221-242.

    Google Scholar 

  115. Skyrms B. 1996. Evolution of the Social Contract. Cambridge University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  116. Smuts B.B. 2001. Encounters with animal minds. J. Conscious. Stud. 8:293-309.

    Google Scholar 

  117. Sober E. and Wilson D.S. 1998. Unto Others:The Evolution and Psychology of Unselfish Behavior. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  118. Sober E. and Wilson D.S. 2000. Summary of:unto others:the evolution and psychology of unselfish behavior. J. Conscious. Stud. 7:185-206.

    Google Scholar 

  119. Solomon R. 1995. A passion for justice:Emotions and the origins of the social contract. Rowman & Little eld Publishers, Inc, Lanham, Maryland.

    Google Scholar 

  120. Spinka M., Newberry R.C. and Bekoff M. 2000. Mammalian play:training for the unexpected. Quart. Rev. Biol. 76:141-168.

    Google Scholar 

  121. Thompson P.R. 1975. [atA cross-species analysis of carnivore, primate, and hominid behavior]. J. Human Evol. 4:113-124.

    Google Scholar 

  122. Tinbergen N. 1972. Introduction to Hans Kruuk, The Spotted Hyena. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  123. Tomasello M. and Call J. 1997. Primate Cognition. Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  124. de Waal F. 1996. Good-natured:The Origins of Right and Wrong in Humans and other Animals. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  125. Watson D.M. and Croft D.B. 1996. Age-related differences in playfighting strategies of captive male red-necked wallabies (Macropus rufogriseus banksianus ). Ethology 102:33-346.

    Google Scholar 

  126. Wechlin S., Masserman J.H. and Terris W. Jr. 1964. Shock to a conspeci c as an aversive stimulus. Psychon. Sci. 1:17-18.

    Google Scholar 

  127. Wilson D.S. 2002. Darwin 's Cathedral:Evolution, Religion, and the Nature of Society. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  128. Wrangham R. and Conklin-Brittain N. 2003. Cooking as a biological trait.Compar. Biochem. Physiol., Part A, 136:35-46.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bekoff, M. Wild justice and fair play: cooperation, forgiveness, and morality in animals. Biology & Philosophy 19, 489–520 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/sBIPH-004-0539-x

Download citation

  • Anthropomorphism
  • Cooperation
  • Evolution of social behavior
  • Fairness
  • Forgiveness
  • Prediction
  • Social contract
  • Social morality
  • Social play
  • Trust