Skip to main content

Wild justice and fair play: cooperation, forgiveness, and morality in animals

Abstract

In this paper I argue that we can learn much about ‘wild justice’ and the evolutionary origins of social morality – behaving fairly – by studying social play behavior in group-living animals, and that interdisciplinary cooperation will help immensely. In our efforts to learn more about the evolution of morality we need to broaden our comparative research to include animals other than non-human primates. If one is a good Darwinian, it is premature to claim that only humans can be empathic and moral beings. By asking the question ‘What is it like to be another animal?’ we can discover rules of engagement that guide animals in their social encounters. When I study dogs, for example, I try to be a ‘dogocentrist’ and practice ‘dogomorphism.’ My major arguments center on the following ‘big’ questions: Can animals be moral beings or do they merely act as if they are? What are the evolutionary roots of cooperation, fairness, trust, forgiveness, and morality? What do animals do when they engage in social play? How do animals negotiate agreements to cooperate, to forgive, to behave fairly, to develop trust? Can animals forgive? Why cooperate and play fairly? Why did play evolve as it has? Does ‘being fair’ mean being more fit – do individual variations in play influence an individual's reproductive fitness, are more virtuous individuals more fit than less virtuous individuals? What is the taxonomic distribution of cognitive skills and emotional capacities necessary for individuals to be able to behave fairly, to empathize, to behave morally? Can we use information about moral behavior in animals to help us understand ourselves? I conclude that there is strong selection for cooperative fair play in which individuals establish and maintain a social contract to play because there are mutual benefits when individuals adopt this strategy and group stability may be also be fostered. Numerous mechanisms have evolved to facilitate the initiation and maintenance of social play to keep others engaged, so that agreeing to play fairly and the resulting benefits of doing so can be readily achieved. I also claim that the ability to make accurate predictions about what an individual is likely to do in a given social situation is a useful litmus test for explaining what might be happening in an individual's brain during social encounters, and that intentional or representational explanations are often important for making these predictions.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  • Adams E.R. and Burnett G.W. 1991. Scientic vocabulary divergence among female primatologists working in East Africa. Soc.Stud.Sci. 21:547-560.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aldis O. 1975. Play Fighting. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen C. and Bekoff M. 1997. Species of Mind:The Philosophy and Biology of Cognitive Ethology. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aureli F. and de Waal F.B.M. (ed.) 2000. Natural Conflict Resolution. University of California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aviles L. 1999. Cooperation and non-linear dynamics:an ecological perspective on the evolution of sociality. Evol.Ecol.Res. 1:459-477.

    Google Scholar 

  • Axelrod R. 1984. The Evolution of Cooperation. Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateson G. 2000. Steps to an Ecology of Mind. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer E.B. and Smuts B.B. 2002. Role reversal and self-handicapping during playfighting in domestic dogs, Canis familiaris. Paper presented at the meetings of the Animal Behavior Society. University of Indiana.

  • Bekoff M. 1975. The communication of play intention:are play signals functional? Semiotica 15: 231-239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bekoff M. 1977a.Social communication in canids:evidence for the evolution of a stereotyped mammalian display. Science 197:1097-1099.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bekoff M. 1977b. Mammalian dispersal and the ontogeny of individual behavioral phenotypes. Am.Nat. 111:715-732.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bekoff M. 1995. Play signals as punctuation:the structure of social play in canids. Behaviour 132: 419-429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bekoff M. 1996. Cognitive ethology, vigilance, information gathering, and representation:who might know what and why? Behav.Process. 35:225-237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bekoff M. (ed.) 2000a.The Smile of a Dolphin:Remarkable Accounts of Animal Emotions. Discovery Books/Random House, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bekoff M. 2000b. Animal emotions:exploring passionate natures. BioScience 50:861-870.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bekoff M. 2001a. Social play behaviour, cooperation, fairness, trust and the evolution of morality. J. Conscious. Stud. 8(2):81-90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bekoff M. 2001b. The evolution of animal play, emotions, and social morality:on science, theology, spirituality, personhood, and love. Zygon (J. Reli. Sci.) 36:615-655.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bekoff M. 2002a. Minding Animals:Awareness, Emotions, and Heart. Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bekoff M. 2002b. Virtuous nature. New Scientist 13 July, pp.34-37.

  • Bekoff M. 2002c. Self-awareness. Nature 419:255.

  • Bekoff M. 2003a. Consciousness and self in animals:some reflections. Zygon (J. Reli. Sci.) 38:229-245.

  • Bekoff M. 2003b. Empathy:common sense, science sense, wolves, and well-being. Behav. Brain Sci. 25:26-27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bekoff M. 2004. The question of animal emotions:an ethological perspective. In: McMillan F. (ed.), Mental Health and Well-being in Animals. Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bekoff M. (in press). Wild Justice and Fair Play:Cooperation, Forgiveness and Morality in Animals. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

  • Bekoff M. and Allen C. 1992. Intentional icons:towards an evolutionary cognitive ethology. Ethology 91:1-16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bekoff M. and Allen C. 1997. Cognitive ethology:slayers, skeptics, and proponents. In: Mitchell R.W., Thompson N. and Miles L. (<nt>eds</nt>), Anthropomorphism, Anecdote, and Animals:The Emperor 's New Clothes? SUNY Press, Albany, New York, pp 313-334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bekoff M. and Allen C. 1998. Intentional communication and social play:how and why animals negotiate and agree to play. In: Bekoff M. and Byers J.A. (ed.), Animal Play:Evolutionary, Comparative, and Ecological Perspectives. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge and New York, pp.97-114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bekoff M., Allen C. and Burghardt G.M.(<nt>eds</nt>), 2002. The Cognitive Animal. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bekoff M. and Byers J.A. 1981. A critical reanalysis of the ontogeny of mammalian social and locomotor play:an ethological hornet 's nest. In: Immelmann K., Barlow G.W., Petrinovich L. and Main M. (<nt>eds</nt>), Behavioral Development:The Bielefeld Interdisciplinary Project. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp.296-337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bekoff M. and Byers J.A.(<nt>eds</nt>), 1998. Animal Play:Evolutionary, Comparative, and Ecological Approaches. Cambridge University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bekoff M. and Wells M.C. 1986. Social behavior and ecology of coyotes. Adv. Study Behav. 16: 251-338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein I.S. 2000. The law of parsimony prevails:missing premises allow any conclusion. J. Conscious.Stud. 7:31-34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bewley T. 2003. Fair 's fair. Nature 422:125-126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boehm C. 1999. Hierarchy in the Forest:The Evolution of Egalitarian Behavior. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bond A., Kamil A.C. and Balda R.P. 2003. Social complexity and transitive inference in corvids. Animal Behav. 65:479-487.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowles S. and Gintis H. 2002. Home reciprocans. Nature 415:125-128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradie M. 1999. Evolutionary game theory meets the social contract. Biol.Philos. 14:607-613.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley B.J. 1999. Levels of selection, altruism, and primate behavior. Quart. Rev. Biol. 74:171-194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brosnan S.F. and de Waal F.B.M. 2003. Monkeys reject unequal pay. Nature 425:297-299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burghardt G.M. 1997. Amending Tinbergen:A fifth aim for ethology. In: Thomson Mitchell R.W.N. and Miles L. (<nt>eds</nt>), Anthropomorphism, Anecdote, and Animals:The Emperor 's New clothes? SUNY Press, Albany (NY), pp.254-276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burghardt G.M. 2005. The Genesis of Play. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byers J.A. 1977. Terrain preferences in the play of Siberian ibex kids (Capra ibex sibirica ). Zeit-schrift fur Tierpsychologie 45:199-209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byers J.A. 1998. Biological effects of locomotor play:getting into shape or something else. In: Bekoff M. and Byers J.A. (<nt>eds</nt>), Animal Play:Evolutionary, Comparative, and Ecological Perspectives. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp.205-220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Church F. 1959. Emotional reactions of rats to the pain of others. J. Compar. Physiol. Psychol. 52: 132-134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damasio A. 2003. Looking for Spinoza:Joy, Sorrow, and the Feeling Brain. Harcourt, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin C. 1859. On the Origin of Species By Means of Natural Selection. Murray, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin C.1871/ 1936. The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex. Random House, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin C.1872/ 1998. The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals, 3rd ed. Oxford University Press, New York, (with an Introduction, Afterword, and Commentaries by Paul Ekman).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins R. 1976. The Sel sh Gene. Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins R. 2001. Sustainability doesn 't come naturally:a Darwinian perspective on values. www.environmentfoundation.net/richard-dawkins.htm.

  • de Waal F. 1991. Complementary methods and convergent evidence in the study of primate social cognition. Behaviour 18:297-320.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Waal F. 2001. The Ape and the Sushi Master:Cultural Reflections of a Primatologist. Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Waal F. and Tyack P.L.(<nt>eds</nt>), 2003. Animal Social Complexity:Intelligence, Culture, and Individualized Societies. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolan R.J. Emotion, cognition, and behavior. 2002. Science 298:1191-1194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas K. 2001. Playing fair. New Scientist 10 March (No.2281).pp.38-42.

  • Drea C.M. and Frank L.G. 2003. The social complexity of spotted hyenas. In: de Waal F. and Tyack P.L. (<nt>eds</nt>), Animal Social Complexity:Intelligence, Culture, and Individualized Societies. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, pp.121-148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dugatkin L.A. 1997. Cooperation Among Animals:An Evolutionary Perspective. Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dugatkin L.A. and Bekoff M. 2003. Play and the evolution of fairness:a game theory model. Behav. Proc. 60:209-214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dylan B. 1983. In dels. CBS Inc.

  • Fagen R. 1981. Animal Play Behavior. Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fagen R. 1993. Primate juveniles and primate play. In: Pereira M.E. and Fairbanks L.A. (<nt>eds</nt>), Juvenile Primates:Life History, Development, and Behavior. Oxford University Press, New York pp.183-196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fehr E. and Gachter S. 2002. Altruistic punishment in humans. Nature 415:137-140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fehr E. and Rockenbach B. 2003. Detrimental effect of sanctions on human altruism. Nature 422: 137-140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Field A. 2001. Altruistically Inclined? The Behavioral Sciences, Evolutionary Theory, and the Origins of Reciprocity.The University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flack J.C. and de Waal F. 2000. Any animal whatever:Darwinian building blocks of morality in monkeys and apes. J. Conscious. Stud. 7:1-29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flack J.C., Jeannotte L.A. and de Waal F. 2004. Play signaling and the perception of social rules by juvenile chimpanzees. J. Compar. Psychol, 118:149-159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frith C.D. and Frith U. 1999. Interacting minds-a biological basis. Science 286:1692-1695.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallese V. 1998. Mirror neurons, from grasping to language.Conscious. Bull. Fall 3-4.

  • Gallese V. and Goldman A. 1998. Mirror neurons and the simulation theory of mind-reading. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2:493-501.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould S.J. and Lloyd E.A. 1999. Individuality and adaptation across levels of selection:how shall we name and generalize the unit of Darwinism. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 96:11904-11909.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin D.R. 2001. [tiAnimal Minds]. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

  • Gruen L. 2002. The morals of animal minds. In: Bekoff, Allen and Burghardt (<nt>eds</nt>), The Cognitive Animal, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, pp.437-442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guzeldere G. and Nahmias E. 2002. Darwin 's continuum and the building blocks of deception. In: Bekoff, Allen and Burghardt (<nt>eds</nt>), The Cognitive Animal, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, pp.353-362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauser M. 2000. Wild Minds. Henry Holt, New York.

  • Hill H.L. and Bekoff M. 1977. The variability of some motor components of social play and agonistic behaviour in Eastern coyotes. Canis latrans var Animal Behav. 25:907-909.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinde R.A. 2002. Why Good is Good:The Sources of Morality. Routledge, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalai Lama 2002. Understanding our fundamental nature. In: Davidson R.J. and Harrington A. (<nt>eds</nt>), Visions of Compassion:Western Scientists and Tibetan Buddhists Examine Human Nature. Oxford University Press, New York, pp.66-80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horowitz A.C. 2002. The behaviors of theories of mind, and a case study of dogs at play. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, San Diego.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudson S.D. 1986. Human Character and Morality:Reflections from the History of Ideas. Routledge & Kegan Paul, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurd J.P. 1996. (ed). Investigating the Biological Foundations of Human Morality. The Edwin Mellen Press, Lewiston, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamieson D. 2002. Sober and Wilson on psychological altruism. Philos.Phenomenol. Res. LXV: 702-710.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamieson D. and Bekoff M. 1993. On aims and methods of cognitive ethology.Philosophy of Science Association 2:110-124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitchen D.M. and Packer C. 1999. Complexity in vertebrate societies. In: Keller L. (ed.), Levels of Selection in Evolution. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, pp.176-196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kropotkin P. 1902. Mutual aid:a factor of evolution. Philips & Co, McClure, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuczaj S., Tranel K., Trone M. and Hill H. 2001. Are animals capable of deception or empathy? Implications for animal consciousness and animal welfare. Animal Welfare 10:S161-173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leigh E.G.Jr. 1999. Levels of selection, potential conflicts, and their resolution:Role of the ''Common good '’. In: Keller L. (ed.), Levels of Selection in Evolution. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, pp.15-30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macintyre A. 1999. Dependent Rational Animals:Why Human Beings Need the Virtues.Open Court, Chicago.

  • Markowitz H. 1982. Behavioral Enrichment in the Zoo. Van Reinhold Company, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marler P. 1996. Social cognition:are primates smarter than birds? In: Nolan V. Jr. and Ketterson E.D. (<nt>eds</nt>), Current Ornithology, Vol.13. Plenum Press, New York, pp.1-32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr E. 2000. Darwin 's influence on modern thought. Sci.Am. 283:67-71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mech L.D. 1970. The Wolf.Garden City, Doubleday, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell L.E. 1998. Stacked Deck:A Story of Sel shness in America. Temple University Press, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

    Google Scholar 

  • Motluk A. 2001. Read my mind. New Sci. 169:22-26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuman Y. 2003. The logic of meaning-in-context. Am. J. Semiotics (special issue:Gregory Bateson).

  • Okamoto K. and Matsumara S. 2000. The evolution of punishment and apology:an iterated prisoner 's dilemma model. Evol. Ecol. 14:703-720.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poole J. 1998. An exploration of a commonality between ourselves and elephants. Etica Animali 9/ 98:85-110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panksepp J. 1998. A effective Neuroscience. Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panksepp J. 2000. The rat will play. In: Bekoff M. (ed.), The Smile of a Dolphin:Remarkable Accounts of Animal Emotions. Random House/Discovery Books, New York, pp.146-147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pellis S. 2002. Keeping in touch:play ghting and social knowledge. In: Bekoff, Allen and Burghardt (<nt>eds</nt>), The Cognitive Animal, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, pp.421-427.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson G.R. 1999. The evolution of consciousness and the theology of nature. Zygon 34:283-306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson G.R. 2000. God, genes, and cognizing agents. Zygon 35:469-480.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pigliucci M. 2002. Are ecology and evolutionary biology ''soft ''sciences? Ann. Zool. Fenn. 39:87-98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Power T.G. 2000. Play and Exploration in Children and Animals. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preston S.D. and de Waal F.B.M. 2002. Empathy:its ultimate and proximate bases. Behav. Brain Sci. 25:1-72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridley M. 1996. The Origins of Virtue:Human Instincts and the Evolution of Cooperation. Viking, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridley M. 2001. The Cooperative Gene. The Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rilling J.K., Gutman D.A., Zeh T.R., Pagnoni G., Berns G.S. and Kitts C.D. 2002. A neural basis for cooperation. Neuron 36:395-405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riolo R.L., Cohen M.D. and Zelrod R. 2001. Evolution of cooperation without reciprocity. Nature 414:441-443.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaller G.B. and Lowther G.R. 1969. The relevance of carnivore behavior to the study of early hominids. Southwestern J. Anthropol. 25:307-341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott J.P. and Fuller J.L. 1965. Genetics and the Social Behavior of the Dogs. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sigmund K., Fehr E. and Nowak M.A. 2002. The economics of fair play. Sci. Am. 286(1):83-87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sigmund K. and Nowak M.A. 2001. Evolution:tides of tolerance. Nature 414:403-405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer P. 1999. A Darwinian Left:Politics, Evolution, and Cooperation. Yale University Press, New Haven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siviy S. 1998. Neurobiological substrates of play behavior:Glimpses into the structure and function of mammalian playfulness. In: Bekoff M. and Byers J.A. (<nt>eds</nt>), Animal Play:Evolutionary, Comparative, and Ecological Perspectives. Cambridge University Press, New York, 221-242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skyrms B. 1996. Evolution of the Social Contract. Cambridge University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smuts B.B. 2001. Encounters with animal minds. J. Conscious. Stud. 8:293-309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sober E. and Wilson D.S. 1998. Unto Others:The Evolution and Psychology of Unselfish Behavior. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sober E. and Wilson D.S. 2000. Summary of:unto others:the evolution and psychology of unselfish behavior. J. Conscious. Stud. 7:185-206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon R. 1995. A passion for justice:Emotions and the origins of the social contract. Rowman & Little eld Publishers, Inc, Lanham, Maryland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spinka M., Newberry R.C. and Bekoff M. 2000. Mammalian play:training for the unexpected. Quart. Rev. Biol. 76:141-168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson P.R. 1975. [atA cross-species analysis of carnivore, primate, and hominid behavior]. J. Human Evol. 4:113-124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinbergen N. 1972. Introduction to Hans Kruuk, The Spotted Hyena. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomasello M. and Call J. 1997. Primate Cognition. Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Waal F. 1996. Good-natured:The Origins of Right and Wrong in Humans and other Animals. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson D.M. and Croft D.B. 1996. Age-related differences in playfighting strategies of captive male red-necked wallabies (Macropus rufogriseus banksianus ). Ethology 102:33-346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wechlin S., Masserman J.H. and Terris W. Jr. 1964. Shock to a conspeci c as an aversive stimulus. Psychon. Sci. 1:17-18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson D.S. 2002. Darwin 's Cathedral:Evolution, Religion, and the Nature of Society. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wrangham R. and Conklin-Brittain N. 2003. Cooking as a biological trait.Compar. Biochem. Physiol., Part A, 136:35-46.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bekoff, M. Wild justice and fair play: cooperation, forgiveness, and morality in animals. Biology & Philosophy 19, 489–520 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/sBIPH-004-0539-x

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/sBIPH-004-0539-x

  • Anthropomorphism
  • Cooperation
  • Evolution of social behavior
  • Fairness
  • Forgiveness
  • Prediction
  • Social contract
  • Social morality
  • Social play
  • Trust