Abstract
According to research done in South Africa, there is an increasing worry about the wellness of academic staff members, with many of them reporting high levels of stress and burnout. Heavy workloads, a lack of resources, and an unsatisfactory work-life balance are just a few factors that studies have identified as leading to poor well-being. Low salaries, weak recognition, and insufficient support systems are further contributing causes. Academic staff members' personal and professional skills may be badly impacted by stress, which can reduce productivity. Burnout is frequently linked to painful emotional events, and it is particularly common among those working in human service industries. Emotional tiredness, depersonalization marked by a pessimistic and cynical attitude toward others, and dissatisfaction with professional achievements are common burnout reactions. Five databases, including Scopus, PubMed, ScienceDirect, Medline, and Google Scholar, were searched for the review using the keywords (academic staff challenges, academic staff burnout, and academic staff well-being). The search was restricted to peer-reviewed empirical studies that looked at academic staff well-being in full-time university academic staff and were written in English. Papers that did not discuss the well-being of academic staff were disqualified. A thorough data extraction technique was used to retrieve pertinent information from each study. Job security is the least stressful factor, while concerns about diminished research and publishing opportunities and workplace bullying are prevalent. Burnout levels vary across age groups, with academics aged 50 or older showing lower levels. High emotional intelligence in academic staff reduces susceptibility to work challenges. Institutions can implement conflict management strategies to enhance work-related well-being. The review's overall conclusion emphasizes the urgent need for action to address the growing issue of academic staff members' low welfare at South African universities. Failure to address this problem could have detrimental effects on both the standard of instruction given to pupils and the health and well-being of academic staff.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
Teaching within the higher education sector is widely acknowledged as one of the most demanding professions, as evidenced by research conducted by Shen and Slater [1]. Their findings indicate that in the most recent academic year, over a third of academics worldwide reported experiencing significant levels of stress in their jobs. In South Africa, the current slowdown in economic growth has put a strain on both its fiscal capacity and the capability of educational institutions to fund crucial components of the support for academic staff training [2]. Moreover, a combination of factors has contributed to the increased workload and transformed the overall culture of universities. These factors include a surge in student enrollment, heightened scrutiny of teaching and research, greater pressure to secure research funding, an increased emphasis on commercial activities and research impact, as well as the need to achieve more with limited resources [3,4,5]. Furthermore, higher education institutions in South Africa are facing mounting pressure to enhance the quality of their graduates and contribute to scientific and technological advancements aligned with industry requirements [6, 7]. This puts a significant burden on faculty members [8] which can lead to a stressful and unpleasant work environment [9] compounded by personal issues [10]. This situation can lead to decreased faculty performance [11], which can negatively affect the academic atmosphere of the university environment.
University leaders must be responsive to human resource conditions to ensure the well-being and productivity of their academic staff [12]. Identifying work, personal, and family issues could affect academic staff performance. Workplace competition, pressure, stress, and personal greed can lead to a lack of motivation and job satisfaction. Additionally, factors such as task switching, changes in workplace positions, and economic strain can negatively impact academic staff’s psychological health, leading to issues such as substance abuse and discrimination [13]. Chuang [14] suggests that leaders should support and motivate their academic staff to develop a skilled and competitive workforce. One effective method is implementing Academic Staff Assistance Programs (EAPs) within the university environment [15]. Psychological problems, which leaders often ignore, have a more significant impact on academic staff than physical issues [16]. This includes problems such as burnout syndrome. According to Ulrichová [17], the symptoms of burnout syndrome include persistent overload and placing too many demands, which results in emotional tiredness, the materialization of relationships, and a lack of confidence.
Burnout syndrome significantly affects academic staff’s mental health and job performance [18]. Burnout is closely related to working conditions, such as excessive workload, monotonous and repetitive tasks, negative attitudes, and workplace ambiguity [18]. Poalses and Bezuidenhout [19] state that stress is almost always present at work and that it is neither possible nor desirable to eradicate stress completely. It is said that deconstructive or bad stress (distress), which could have demoralizing effects, differs from constructive or good stress (eustress), to which a person can easily adjust. However, it is believed that certain stress is healthy because it can be seen as motivating. Contrarily, stress only becomes an issue when the individual who is experiencing it learns to believe that the demands of the circumstance surpass their capacity to handle them. Distress is also a result of the perception that one lacks the resources (both personal and external) to meet the demands of the circumstance. In this article, the challenges facing South Africa's higher education system are discussed with an emphasis on the well-being of the academic staff. The main causes of these difficulties have been identified, along with suggestions on how to overcome them, through a review of the literature and analysis of the data that is currently accessible.
2 Background and theoritical framework
2.1 Conceptualizing academic staff burnout
Academic employees in South African colleges frequently experience burnout, which can result in emotional sleepiness, depersonalization, and impaired personal success. These burnout symptoms can have a significant negative impact on job satisfaction and productivity, so it's critical to take proactive steps to address them and promote health. The three elements of burnout—emotional sleepiness, depersonalization, and decreased personal accomplishment—must be understood by academics [20].
2.2 Theoretical viewpoints
For the purpose of analyzing burnout among academic staff in South Africa, the Model of Job Demands and Resources (JD-R) model is a theoretical framework to be adopted. Academic staff in South Africa require employment resources including social assistance and professional development to balance their workload demands. According to the Theorem of Conservation of Resources (COR), resource loss or depletion can have negative impacts, thus people attempt to obtain and maintain the resources they value. Academic staff effectiveness and well-being depend on resources including time, energy, social support, autonomy, and professional development. Academic staff burnout may be impacted by resource depletion, in which their resources are depleted by the demands of their roles. Additionally, inadequate resource replacement can exacerbate burnout, including a lack of social support, frank criticism, or possibilities for career growth [21].
2.3 Factors contributing to academic staff burnout in South Africa
Academic staff burnout is a problem at South African universities. It is brought on by a lack of institutional support, heavy administrative and research workloads, and excessive teaching loads [22, 23]. Additionally, it is impacted by academic standing and money, as well as sociocultural elements including racial dynamics and modifications to educational policies.
2.4 Proposed interventions and strategies
Considering the prevalence of burnout, it is advisable for higher education institutions to introduce measures to address the issue [24]. Universities in South Africa can lessen academic staff burnout by employing organizational, policy, and individual level interventions. Task redistribution, providing academic staff with career advancement opportunities, creating support networks, fostering an organizational culture that values collaboration, open communication, and accomplishment acknowledgment, encouraging work-life balance initiatives, encouraging diversity and inclusion initiatives, ensuring that everyone is paid fairly, and improving working conditions are some of these tactics. Institutions can also encourage self-care and self-awareness while promoting stress-reduction methods including mindfulness exercises, stress management classes, and access to counseling services.
3 Methods
Aim: This literature review aimed to assess the current status of academic staff well-being in university settings. An integrated analysis of the available data could potentially be used to develop occupational policies and staff training programs and guide future research initiatives. To achieve these objectives, the review aimed to answer the following questions:
-
1.
What is known about the well-being of university teaching staff?
-
2.
What programs do universities have to help staff cope with work challenges?
3.1 Research strategy
A narrative literature review method can be used to summarize the material already available and give a general overview of what is known at this time on a given subject. It can direct future research and policy development and is especially helpful when the study area is complicated, multifaceted, or new. An exhaustive overview of the literature on a particular study issue or topic is offered by a narrative literature review process, which enables researchers to draw conclusions and spot gaps in the body of knowledge. It allows for flexibility in study selection and synthesis, but it also necessitates careful assessment of the review's study quality.
3.2 Search terms
The terms "academic staff challenges," "academic staff burnout," "academic staff wellness program," and "academic staff well-being" were used to narrow the retrieved papers to studies of academic staff in universities. Only the phrase "academic staff wellbeing" was used to characterize distress in order to preserve the review's exclusive focus and prevent the retrieval of general studies of occupational stress.
3.3 Databases
A comprehensive search was conducted using academic databases such as PubMed, Scopus, Medline, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar to identify relevant studies that investigated the utilization of academic staff wellness programs in South African universities using Academic staff challenges, Academic staff burnout, and Academic staff well-being. In recognition of the interdisciplinary nature of this topic, search engines that cover research in health, education, and social science were utilized. Table 1 details the scope of the searches and the coverage provided by each tool. Furthermore, a manual search was conducted, thoroughly examining the abstracts of relevant journals and the pursuit of articles referenced in papers retrieved by the electronic search.
Table 1 represents different databases for searching for the information used in writing the articles. Five databases were used during the period of January 1999 to May 2023.
3.4 Inclusion/exclusion criteria
A peer-reviewed empirical study was required for inclusion to ensure verifiability and representativeness, while commentary, case studies, and anecdotes were excluded. Studies below the specified standards/criteria were excluded from the study, limiting the strength of conclusions, and resulting in misinterpretation of the phenomenon being examined. Studies that examined part-time staff were excluded, while studies examining full-time staff were included. Inclusion criteria required peer-reviewed empirical investigation to ensure that research in the field was verifiable and representative, and excluded commentary, case studies, and anecdotes. The inclusion of poor-quality studies was deemed to limit the strength of the conclusions and could lead to a misinterpretation of the phenomena under investigation. A total of 62 studies examined full-time academic staff, whereas studies examining part-time academic staff were excluded [25].
3.5 Data extraction tools
A comprehensive data extraction form was employed to analyze the literature to assess the frequency of burnout among academic staff. The primary objective of the literature review was to examine the existing knowledge regarding the well-being of academic staff. As a result, it was necessary to document and articulate the concept of well-being as reported in each research paper.
4 Results
The study combined the results of electronic searches to identify 1070 papers. After removing duplicates, non-academic staff, and non-English language articles, 317 papers were left, and their abstracts were evaluated based on strict inclusion criteria (refer to Fig. 1). Eventually, 60 relevant papers were selected for the review after excluding articles that focused on part-time staff, lacked sufficient methodological rigor, or were specific to elementary, secondary, or college teachers.
4.1 Summer of articles reviewed
Table 2 represents the summary of articles on academic staff well-being. Workload, bullying, pressure to publish, and additional administrative duties were found to be some of the contributing factors to academic staff wellness challenges.
5 Discussion
The workplace and work environment are critical factors that impact an academic staff's well-being and overall life [45]. A study by Warr [46] found that academic staff well-being is linked with job satisfaction. Better well-being is associated with improved job performance, reduced absenteeism, and increased social work behaviors toward co-workers and employers. De Jonge, Bosma [47] further highlight the risks of poor well-being, especially for overcommitted academic staff who suffer from high-cost, low-gain work conditions. Judge, Thoresen [48] suggest that investing in academic staff well-being is in the university’s best interests as it generates higher productivity. Coldwell, Papageorgiou [49] also note that academic staff with higher well-being tend to be more helpful to their co-workers, more punctual and time-efficient, and have longer employment tenures. In the following paragraphs certain factors that have an adverse effect on the well-being of academic staff will be discussed. These factors include excessive workloads, challenges with maintaining a healthy work-life balance, and the detrimental consequences of bullying, which can ultimately lead to burnout.
5.1 Work overload and work-life balance
Overload and work-life balance are two significant stressors that significantly negatively impact the health of academics Frantz, Simons [26]. Academics frequently experience emotions of overload as a result of the excessive demands placed on them, including heavy workloads, strict deadlines, and high expectations. Their emotional and physical health may suffer as a result of this ongoing pressure, which can result in burnout and other health problems. Academics also find it difficult to strike a healthy work-life balance since they frequently devote long hours to their professional tasks, leaving little time for socializing and other personal pursuits. Chronic stress, discontent, and further health deterioration can arise from failing to strike a balance between work and personal life. Academics may become exhausted and overworked due to excessive workload demands, which may ultimately affect how committed they are to their institutions. Another important aspect is job control, or the degree of independence academics have over their work [26]. People are more inclined to demonstrate higher levels of commitment when they feel empowered and included in the decision-making process. On the other hand, having little job control might cause resentment and lower loyalty. Academics are more likely to feel appreciated and devoted to their institutions when they can access the tools, resources, and support needed to perform their responsibilities effectively. A sense of community, trust, and collaboration are also fostered via open and transparent communication channels, which strengthen academics' commitment [26].
Rothmann and Barkhuizen [34] ranked the sources of stress, with workloads being the most significant contributor to stress. The heavy workload could result from changes in academic roles brought on by transformations in higher education. This finding is consistent with previous research, which found that academics experience unmanageable workloads related to teaching, research, and administration as the primary cause of stress [34, 50]. Longer working hours could contribute to academic success in publishing, which is now a central expectation for faculty. As a result, many academic staff are working longer hours [51]. Longer working hours can blur the lines between work and personal life, resulting in conflict. Previous research has shown that long working hours and heavy workloads can interfere with the personal lives of academic staff, leading to work-life imbalance and conflict [52]. Therefore, academics are primarily stressed by their workload and interference, especially when they lack control over their demands [53, 54].
5.2 Bullying
Bullying academic staff members can seriously harm their mental health when it occurs in a university context. Academic bullying refers to repeated and deliberate wrongdoing, such as verbal, psychological, or social harassment, and can come from coworkers, supervisors, or students [28]. The environment this poisonous behavior generates for the people it targets is one of fear, anxiety, and stress. Numerous mental health conditions, including depression, anxiety, poor self-esteem, and even post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), can be brought on by people subjected to ongoing ridicule, humiliation, and criticism of their job. An academic's confidence and enthusiasm for their profession may be undermined by repeated bullying, leading them to feel alone, helpless, and imprisoned in a hostile setting [28].
5.3 Transformation
The transformation in South African universities has caused increased stress among academic staff due to the pressure to meet transformation targets and goals, uncertainty, ambiguity in job roles and expectations, conflicts and tensions, resistance and pushback from stakeholders, and limited resources and funding constraints. It is important for institutions to recognize and address these stressors by providing support, resources, and clear guidelines to ensure a smooth and sustainable transformation process that considers the well-being of academic staff [55].
5.4 Burnout
According to Schaufeli, Taris and Van Rhenen [56], workaholism, burnout, and engagement have unique patterns of relationships with variables such as long working hours, job characteristics, work outcomes, quality of social relationships, and perceived health. De Jonge, Bosma [47] also found that academic staff with an effort-reward imbalance, high job demands, and low job control had an increased risk of emotional exhaustion, mental health and physical health complaints, and job dissatisfaction. Wright and Cropanzano [57] discovered that academic staff with positive emotional symptoms had higher performance ratings from their superiors than those with negative emotional symptoms. Harter, Schmidt and Hayes [45] concluded that workplaces with engaged academic staff were more productive than those with disengaged academic staff.
Barkhuizen and Rothmann [53] suggest that all sources of occupational stress in academia are experienced at similar levels. This indicates that all sources contribute equally to the intensity of the stress experienced by academic staff. Prior studies have highlighted stressors such as work overload, work-life balance [58], job security, career advancement, lack of control, and lack of resources and communication as sources of increasing concern among academics [50, 53]. The sources of occupational stress related to career advancement, and job security were not as prominent among the academics [50, 58]. Another study by Jansen and Taylor [59] reported less stress related to the lack of resources available to them, possibly because historically disadvantaged institutions (HDIs) in South Africa have had fewer resources compared to historically white universities (HWUs). In addition, the study discovered that academics were more worried about the volume of work and obligations they had to do than the stability of their employment. This might be because South African academics have permanent posts following a two-year probationary term, unlike their peers in other nations who do not have the same level of job security [60].
6 Conclusion
It is clear from this review that academic staff members are particularly prone to burnout, especially when workplaces are changing, and numerous demands are placed on them by a pandemic. The findings demonstrate the urgent need for proper action to address this problem and protect the academic staff's well-being. The review shows that academic staff members experience extremely high levels of burnout, which can have negative effects on their productivity and general well-being. Adopting more integrated approaches to workload distribution is essential to preventing burnout in the future and accelerating the recovery process for individuals presently experiencing it. Transparency should be given top priority in these strategies, and the gendered dimensions of workload distribution should also be considered. Institutions can promote a better work environment and lower the risk of burnout by adopting comprehensive policies that address the problems faced by academic staff. Given the long-term detrimental effects of burnout on both performance and academic staff well-being, it is crucial to prioritize implementing strategies for preventing and effectively managing burnout. In conclusion, the academic community must cooperate to establish a positive and healthy working environment that protects the staff's mental and physical health. By doing this, academic institutions may both lessen the negative consequences of burnout and foster a work atmosphere that encourages efficiency, creativity, and the success of their academic staff. In conclusion, specific workplace factors like high teaching loads, administrative duties, research pressures, a lack of institutional support, and the consequences of academic rankings and funding have an impact on academic staff burnout in South African universities. Academic staff experiences and stress levels are influenced by socio-cultural factors, such as historical injustices, socio-economic challenges, racial dynamics, and change demands. Burnout can be lessened by personal characteristics such as coping methods, resilience, work-life balance, and attitudes on the worth of one's job. Promoting the wellbeing and performance of academic staff in South African universities requires understanding and addressing these aspects.
Data availability
The data sets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the request of the corresponding author.
References
Shen P, Slater P. The effect of occupational stress and coping strategies on mental health and emotional well-being among university academic staff during the COVID-19 outbreak. Int Educ Stud. 2021;14(3):82–95.
Van Staden DB. Investing in health professions education: a national development imperative for South Africa. S Afr J Higher Educ. 2021;35(1):231–45.
Kinman G, Johnson S. Special section on well-being in academic employees. Int J Stress Manag. 2019;26(2):159.
Franco-Santos M, Doherty N. Performance management and well-being: a close look at the changing nature of the UK higher education workplace. Int J Hum Resour Manag. 2017;28(16):2319–50.
Kinman G, Wray S. Taking its toll: rising stress levels in further education. London: University and College Union; 2014.
Johnson CO, Nguyen M, Roth GA, Nichols E, Alam T, Abate D, et al. Global, regional, and national burden of stroke, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet. 2019;18(5):439–58.
Pheko MM, Molefhe K. Addressing employability challenges: a framework for improving the employability of graduates in Botswana. Int J Adolesc Youth. 2017;22(4):455–69.
Dougherty KJ, Jones SM, Lahr H, Natow RS, Pheatt L, Reddy V. Looking inside the black box of performance funding for higher education: policy instruments, organizational obstacles, and intended and unintended impacts. RSF The Russell Sage Foundation J Soc Sci. 2016;2(1):147–73.
Addison AK, Yankyera G. An investigation into how female teachers manage stress and teacher burnout: a case study of West Akim Municipality of Ghana. J Educ Pract. 2015;6(10):1–24.
Herr K, Anderson GL. The action research dissertation: a guide for students and faculty. Thousand Oaks: Sage publications; 2014.
Ahamed SR, Sunderasan V. A study on employee motivation and its influence on the performance of the organisation. ITIHAS J Indian Manag. 2016;6(3):37–43. https://web.p.ebscohost.com/ehost/detail/detail?vid=0&sid=2142f579-d8c6-4da8-88a3-35c64cee7814%40redis&bdata=JkF1dGhUeXBlPXNzbyZzaXRlPWVob3N0LWxpdmU%3d#AN=118357121&db=bsu. Accessed 7 July 2023.
Marsden P, Caffrey M, McCaffery J. Human resources management assessment approach. Capacity Plus. 2013. https://iaphl.org/resources/publications/hr-management-assessment-approach_capacityplus/. Accessed 8 July 2023.
Yildirim F, Abukan B, Oztas D. Determining the needs for employee assistance programs (EAPs): a comparative study on public and private sector employees. Handbook of research on human resources strategies for the new millennial workforce. IGI Global; 2017. p. 65–89.
Chuang S-F. Essential skills for leadership effectiveness in diverse workplace development. Online J Workforce Educ Dev. 2013;6(1):5.
Sandys JE. A companion to Latin studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2015.
Grifno KM. Studying Employee Absenteeism Due to Health-Related Factors: A Data-Science Approach. Oklahoma: Oklahoma State University; 2022.
Ulrichová M. Logo therapy and existential analysis in counselling psychology as prevention and treatment of burnout syndrome. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 2012;69:502–8.
Metlaine A, Sauvet F, Gomez-Merino D, Elbaz M, Delafosse JY, Leger D, Chennaoui M. Association between insomnia symptoms, job strain and burnout syndrome: a cross-sectional survey of 1300 financial workers. BMJ Open. 2017;7(1): e012816.
Poalses J, Bezuidenhout A. Mental health in higher education: a comparative stress risk assessment at an open distance learning university in South Africa. Int Rev Res Open Distrib Learn. 2018. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v19i2.3391.
van der Ross MR, Olckers C, Schaap P. Engagement of academic staff amidst COVID-19: the role of perceived organisational support, burnout risk, and lack of reciprocity as psychological conditions. Front Psychol. 2022. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.874599.
Bakker AB, Demerouti E. The job demands-resources model: state of the art. J Manag Psychol. 2007;22(3):309–28.
Barkhuizen EN. Burnout of academic staff in a higher education institution. Potchefstroom: North-West University; 2004.
Bezuidenhout A, Cilliers FV. Burnout, work engagement and sense of coherence in female academics in higher-education institutions in South Africa. SA J Ind Psychol. 2010;36(1):1–10.
Rothmann S, Barkhuizen N, Tytherleigh M. Model of work-related ill health of academic staff in a South African higher education institution. S Afr J High Educ. 2008;22(2):404–22.
Lackritz JR. Exploring burnout among university faculty: Incidence, performance, and demographic issues. Teach Teach Educ. 2004;20(7):713–29.
Frantz J, Simons A, Smith M, Munnik E. The profile of occupational stress in a sample of health profession academics at a historically disadvantaged university in South Africa. S Afr J High Educ. 2019;33(3):132–54.
Hardman J, Shankar K, Crick T, McGaughey F, Watermeyer R, Suri VR, et al. “Does anyone even notice us?” Covid-19’s impact on academics’ well-being in a developing country. S Afr J High Educ. 2022;36(1):1–19.
Conco D, Baldwin-Ragaven L, Christofides N, Libhaber E, Rispel L, White J, Kramer B. Experiences of workplace bullying among academics in a health sciences faculty at a South African university. S Afr Med J. 2021;111(4):315–20.
Fourie M. Institutional transformation at South African universities: implications for academic staff. High Educ. 1999;38:275–90.
Van Niekerk WM, De Klerk M, Pires-Putter JK. Conflict management styles and work-related well-being among higher education employees. J Psychol Afr. 2017;27(3):221–6.
Naidoo-Chetty M, du Plessis M. Systematic review of the job demands and resources of academic staff within higher education institutions. Int J High Educ. 2021;10(3):268–84.
Turner K, Garvis S. Teacher educator wellbeing, stress and burnout: a scoping review. Educ Sci. 2023;13(4):351.
Williams RL Jr, Omar M. How branding process activities impact brand equity within higher education institutions. Milton Park: Taylor & Francis; 2014. p. 1–10.
Rothmann S, Barkhuizen N. Burnout of academic staff in South African higher education institutions. S Afr J High Educ. 2008;22(2):439–56.
Barkhuizen N, Rothmann S. Work engagement of academic staff in South African higher education institutions. Manag Dyn J S Afr Inst Manag Sci. 2006;15(1):38–46.
Odirile BE, Mpofu E, Montsi MR. Career coping and subjective well-being among university employees. Perspect Educ. 2009;27(3):247–57.
Coetzee S, Rothmann S. Occupational stress, organisational commitment and ill-health of employees at a higher education institution in South Africa. SA J Ind Psychol. 2005;31(1):47–54.
Rothmann S, Jordaan G. Job demands, job resources and work engagement of academic staff in South African higher education institutions. SA J Ind Psychol. 2006;32(4):87–96.
Bezuidenhout A. Implications for academic workload of the changing role of distance educators. Distance Educ. 2015;36(2):246–62.
Jorgensen LI, Nel JA, Roux DJ. Qualities of work-related well-being in selected South African occupations. J Psychol Afr. 2013;23(3):447–52.
Fynn A, van der Walt HD. Examining staff burnout during the transition to teaching online due to COVID-19 implications. SA J Hum Resour Manag. 2023;21:2062.
Van Niekerk RL, van Gent MM. Mental health and well-being of university staff during the coronavirus disease 2019 levels 4 and 5 lockdown in an Eastern Cape university, South Africa. S Afr J Psychiatry. 2021;27:1589.
Barkhuizen N, Rothmann S, Van De Vijver FJ. Burnout and work engagement of academics in higher education institutions: effects of dispositional optimism. Stress Health. 2014;30(4):322–32.
Williams T, Sayed Y, Singh M. The experiences of teacher educators managing teaching and learning during times of crises at one initial teacher education provider in South Africa. Perspect Educ. 2022;40(2):69–83.
Harter JK, Schmidt FL, Hayes TL. Business-unit-level relationship between employee satisfaction, employee engagement, and business outcomes: a meta-analysis. J Appl Psychol. 2002;87(2):268.
Warr P. The study of well-being, behaviour and attitudes. In: Warr P, editor. Psychology at work. Penguin Press; 2002. pp. 1–25.
De Jonge J, Bosma H, Peter R, Siegrist J. Job strain, effort-reward imbalance and employee well-being: a large-scale cross-sectional study. Soc Sci Med. 2000;50(9):1317–27.
Judge TA, Thoresen CJ, Bono JE, Patton GK. The job satisfaction–job performance relationship: a qualitative and quantitative review. Psychol Bull. 2001;127(3):376.
Coldwell D, Papageorgiou E, Callaghan C, Fried A. Academic citizenship and wellbeing: an exploratory cross-cultural study of South African and Swedish academic perceptions. S Afr J High Educ. 2016;30(1):80–105.
Tytherleigh MY, Webb C, Cooper CL, Ricketts C. Occupational stress in UK higher education institutions: a comparative study of all staff categories. High Educ Res Dev. 2005;24(1):41–61.
Jacobs JA, Winslow SE. The academic life course, time pressures and gender inequality. Community Work Fam. 2004;7(2):143–61.
Dorenkamp I, Süß S. Work-life conflict among young academics: antecedents and gender effects. Eur J High Educ. 2017;7(4):402–23.
Barkhuizen N, Rothmann S. Occupational stress of academic staff in South African higher education institutions. S Afr J Psychol. 2008;38(2):321–36.
Winefield AH, Gillespie N, Stough C, Dua J, Hapuarachchi J, Boyd C. Occupational stress in Australian university staff: results from a national survey. Int J Stress Manag. 2003;10(1):51.
Engle M. Occupational stress amongst lecturers with specific reference to a further education and training college in the Western Cape. 2012. http://hdl.handle.net/11394/5046. Accessed 8 Aug 2023.
Schaufeli WB, Taris TW, Van Rhenen W. Workaholism, burnout, and work engagement: three of a kind or three different kinds of employee well-being? Appl Psychol. 2008;57(2):173–203.
Wright TA, Cropanzano R. Psychological well-being and job satisfaction as predictors of job performance. J Occup Health Psychol. 2000;5(1):84.
Blatný M, Květon P, Jelínek M, Šolcová I, Zábrodská K, Mudrák J, Machovcová K. The influence of personality traits on life satisfaction through work engagement and job satisfaction among academic faculty members. Stud Psychol. 2018;60(4):274–86.
Jansen J, Taylor N. Educational change in South Africa 1994–2003: case studies in large-scale education reform. 2003. https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/129941468778149162/pdf/282500PAPER0Ed1outh0Africa01Public1.pdf. Accessed 10 Aug 2023.
Du Toit D, Pienaar AE, Truter L. Relationship between physical fitness and academic performance in South African children. S Afr J Res Sport Phys Educ Recreat. 2011;33(3):23–35.
Funding
Open access funding provided by University of Zululand. The authors received no funding for conducting the present research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the study conception and design. The first draft of the manuscript was written by NGD, and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
There are no conflicts of interest or ethical concerns to disclose related to this article.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Dlamini, N.G., Dlamini, N.D. Understanding the well-being challenges confronting academic staff in South African universities: a narrative review. Discov Educ 3, 9 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-024-00089-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-024-00089-8