Skip to main content
Log in

A performance-based fire risk analysis for buildings

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Architecture, Structures and Construction Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Fire safety can be defined as the requirements that cumulatively guarantee the absence of conditions for fire ignition and also eliminate or minimize the effects of the fire on people and property. Based on this premise, we can assume that a fire risk assessment methodology is more effective as more components contributing to fire safety are integrated in the analysis process. In this paper a new fire risk assessment methodology is proposed, based in a holistic approach analyzes of the potential of failure of each of the critical components, that compete differently for the overall performance of the fire safety of the building. This methodology attempts to respond to the problems of the current risk analysis methodologies regarding their applicability—with identical reliability—in different types of buildings and fire scenarios. In order to reduce the level of uncertainty, as much as possible, the method uses a redundant fire risk estimation process. In one analysis dimension, the model uses the parameters of probability, severity and exposure of fire for valuing the risk in function of the failure potential of performance analysis indicators considered critical in relation to the variables of fire prevention and protection. It is compared an actual or potential performance with a standard performance considered as safe. In another dimension of analysis, the method determines the potential of fire growth and spread in function of the existing conditions in the building, to assess whether it is safe for its occupants, until the complete evacuation of the building.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24
Fig. 25
Fig. 26

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Watts JM, Hall JR (2016) Introduction to fire risk analysis, SFPE Handbook of Fire Protection Engineering, 5th edn. Springer, USA, pp 2817–2826

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Frantzich H (1998) Risk analysis and fire safety engineering. Fire Safety Jornal 31(4):313–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Meacham BJ (2004) Understanding risk: quantification, perception and characterization. J Fire Prot Eng 14:199–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Martin M, Furness A (2007) Introduction to fire safety management. Elsevier, Oxford, p 440

    Google Scholar 

  5. Meacham BJ, Charters D, and Salisbury PJ (2015) Building fire risk analysis. SFPE handbook of fire protection engineering, 5th ed., Springer, USA, pp. 2941–2991.

  6. Semit, E. D. (2007). FRAME, fire risk assessment method for engineering, France.

  7. Fitzgerald RW, Meacham BJ (2017) Fire performance analysis for buildings, 2nd edn. Wiley, USA, p 640

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. NFPA 550 (2017) Guide to the fire safety concepts tree. National Fire Protection Association NFPA, USA, p 24

  9. NFPA 101 (2018). Life safety code. National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, Massachusetts, USA, pp. 42–43.

  10. Alexander D (2002) Principles of emergency planning and management. Terra Publishing, UK, p 379

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hadjisophocleous, G. and Zalok, E. (2004). Development of design fires for commercial buildings, Proc. Fire Safety Engineering International Conference 2004, Sydney AU, pp 1–14.

  12. EN 1991–1–2 (2002): Eurocode 1: Actions on structures - Part 1–2: General actions - Actions on structures exposed to fire, European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, Belgium.

  13. England JP, Young SA, Hui MC, Kurban N (2000) Guide for the design of fire resistant barriers and structures, Warrington Fire Research (Aust) Pty. Ltd. and Building Control Commission, Melbourne, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  14. Yung D (2008) Principles of fire risk assessment in buildings. Wiley, Toronto, Canada, p 227

    Book  Google Scholar 

  15. Brannigan VM (2000). Fire scenarios or scenario fires? Can fire safety science provide the critical inputs for performance based fire safety analyses? Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium on Fire Safety. International Association for Fire Safety Science, France, pp. 207–218.

  16. Society of Fire Protection Engineers (2007) Guide to performance-based fire protection. Society of Fire Protection Engineers and National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, MA, USA, p 207

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hurley, M. J. & Bukowski, R. W. (2008). Fire hazard analysis techniques. fire protection handbook 20th, National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, MA, USA, pp. 121–134.

  18. ICC (2005) International fire engineering guidelines. International Code Council, Washington, DC, p 415

    Google Scholar 

  19. Jutras I, Meacham BJ (2016) Development of objective-criteria-scenario triplets and design fires for performance-based Fire Safety Design. Journal of Building Engineering 8:269–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Mehaffey JR, Hadjisophocleous G (2016) Fire scenarios. SFPE Handbook of Fire Protection Engineering, 5th ed., Springer, USA, pp. 1262 - 1288.

  21. ISO 16733–1. (2015) Fire safety engineering — Selection of design fire scenarios and design fires — Part 1: Selection of design fire scenarios, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland, 31p.

  22. Hadjisophocleous GV, Yung eD (1999) A description of the probabilistic and deterministic. International Journal on Engineering Performance-Based Fire Codes, pp.18–26.

  23. Walton W, Thomas P (2002) Estimating temperatures in compartment fires. SFPE Handbook of Fire Protection Engineering, 3rd ed., P. J. DiNenno et al. (Eds.), National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, MA.

  24. Coelho P, Costa EM (2007) Combustion. Ed. Orion, Amadora, Portugal, 374 p. (in Portuguese)

  25. Frankel GJ (1993) Atmosferes rich in oxygen. Manual of Fire Protection. ed. MAPFRE. 2219 p..

  26. NFPA 921 (2017) Guide for fire and explosion investigations. National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, MA, USA.

  27. Tuve RL (1993) Principles of fire protection chemistry and physics. National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, MA, USA, 296 p.

  28. Della-Giustina DE (2014) Fire safety management handbook. CRC Press, 3rd ed., Morgantown, USA, 279 p.

  29. Meignant A (2003) The management of the formation. Dom Quixote ed., Lisbon, Portugal, 300 p. (in Portuguese).

  30. Buckley R, Caple eJ (2009) One-to-one training and coaching skills. Kogan Page, London, UK

  31. Grau VP (2003) Fire dynamics – origin of the fires. ed. del Bullent, Valencia, Spain, 381 p. (in Spanish)

  32. Real PV (2003) Fire in steel structures: structural, Design. Orion, Amadora, Portugal ((in Portuguese))

    Google Scholar 

  33. Kawagoe K (2004) Fire behavior in rooms. J Fire Prot Eng 14:5–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Henriques PDF (2010) Fire behaviour of structural glass. Masters Thesis in Civil Engineering, University of Aveiro, Portugal (in Portuguese).

  35. Harmathy TZ (1985) Fire safety science and engineering. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM), STP882, Philadelphia, USA, 427 p..

  36. Tien CL, Lee KY, Stretton AJ (2016) Radiation heat transfer. SFPE Handbook of Fire Protection Engineering, 5th ed., Springer, USA, pp. 102–137.

  37. Beyler CL, Shokri M (1989) Radiation from larger pool fires. J Fire Prot Eng 1(4):141–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Center for Chemical Process Safety (2012) Guidelines for fire protection in chemical, petrochemical, and hydrocarbon processing facilities. Wiley, USA, p 483

    Google Scholar 

  39. Wieczorek CJ, Dembsey NA (2016) Effects of thermal radiation on people: predicting 1st and 2nd Degree Skin Burns. SFPE Handbook of Fire Protection Engineering, 5th ed., Springer, USA, pp 2705–2737

  40. US Fire Administration (2017) Fire in the United States 2006–2015. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), 19th ed., 95 p..

  41. Tubbs J, Meacham BJ (2007) Egress design solutions: a guide to evacuation and crowd management planning. Wiley, USA, p 544p

    Google Scholar 

  42. International Fire Service Training Association (2013) Essentials of fire fighting and fire department operations. Oklahoma, USA, 6th ed..

  43. Fagel MJ (2014) Crisis management and emergency planning: preparing for today's challenges. CRC press, 550p.

  44. Alexander D (2002) Principles of emergency planning and management. Terra Publishing, UK, p 379p

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to João Paulo C. Rodrigues.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest statement

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Leiras, A.B., Rodrigues, J.P.C. & Meacham, B.J. A performance-based fire risk analysis for buildings. Archit. Struct. Constr. 1, 143–175 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44150-021-00016-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s44150-021-00016-7

Keywords

Navigation