Skip to main content
Log in

A Practical Approach to Incorporating Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Practices into Biomedical Engineering Undergraduate Courses

  • Teaching Tips
  • Published:
Biomedical Engineering Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Biomedical engineering (BME) undergraduate curricula have begun to address gaps in diversity, especially in response to the newly proposed ABET diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) criteria. However, there is a significant lack of teaching resources, and pedagogical training available for those interested in including DEI into their course material. This is not restricted to BME and permeates many STEM fields. Thus, new engaging techniques to incorporate DEI into STEM teaching must be developed and tested. A mandatory undergraduate BME course at Stony Brook University was redesigned, to include DEI concepts directly into course content. Instructor generated resources were presented and discussed throughout the semester. These resources focused on introducing prominent scholars, engineers, and researchers, who rarely make it into textbook discussions, and their discoveries and contributions. A graded project was incorporated that asked students to generate their own resources, with the understanding that an overarching goal was to develop a library of information to be shared with our student population. After one semester, over seventy biographies have been collated. This approach worked well to highlight individual accomplishments of diverse scholars. Students appeared to be engaged with the discussion (observed through body language and participation), and appreciated researching a prominent engineer outside of those typically discussed. In the future, it will be important to link highlighted engineers more closely to course content, and to include key findings more directly within topics that are under discussion. Importantly, these efforts must be included within the graded course content to help ensure engagement, retention, and understanding.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

None.

Code Availability

None.

References

  1. Sarraju A, Ngo S, Rodriguez F. The leaky pipeline of diverse race and ethnicity representation in academic science and technology training in the United States, 2003–2019. PLoS ONE. 2023;18: e0284945.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Sohail A, Iqbal JJ, Razaq A and Sabir MS. The impact of diversity training on commitment, career satisfaction and innovation. 2011

  3. Shields B. Justice, equity, diversity, and inclusion curriculum within an introductory bioengineering course. Biomed Eng Educ. 2023;3:39–49.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. ABET Inc. Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2023–2024. https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-engineering-programs-2023-2024/. Accessed 30 Jan 2024

  5. ABET Inc. Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2024–2025. https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-engineering-programs-2024-2025/. Accessed 30 Jan 2024

  6. Ceglie R, Olivares V. Representation of diversity in science textbooks. In: Hickman H, Porfilio BJ, editors. The new politics of the textbook. Rotterdam: SensePublishers; 2012. p. 49–68.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Delgato MH. Considerations of multicultural science and curriculum reform: A content analysis of state-adopted biology textbooks in Florida. 2009

  8. Figueiredo D. Walking through the leaky academic pipeline in STEM: equity not equality needed for women and under Represented Minorities (URMs). 2023

  9. Gregor M, Dunn M, Campbell-Halfaker D, Martin-Fernandez J, Ferrer A, Robinson S. Plugging the leaky pipeline: a qualitative investigation of untenured female faculty in STEM. J Career Dev. 2023;50:425–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Svensson HN. Examining the leaky pipeline: do women and men differ in their attributions for success and failure in STEM contexts? 2023

  11. GEM Consortium. About Us - GEM Fellowship. https://www.gemfellowship.org/about-us/. Accessed 30 Jan 2024

  12. Anyichie AC, Butler DL. Examining culturally diverse learners’ motivation and engagement processes as situated in the context of a complex task. Front Educ. 2023;8:1041946.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lubicz-Nawrocka T, Bovill C. Do students experience transformation through co-creating curriculum in higher education? Teach High Educ. 2023;28:1744–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Rivadeneira J, Inga E. Interactive peer instruction method applied to classroom environments considering a learning engineering approach to innovate the Teaching–Learning process. Educ Sci. 2023;13:301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Burnett C and Taylor Z. Developing Self Efficacy: Role Modeling and Mentoring for Undergraduates of Color. UNM Chronicle of Mentoring & Coaching. 2023

  16. Caplar N, Tacchella S, Birrer S. Quantitative evaluation of gender bias in astronomical publications from citation counts. Nat Astron. 2017;1:0141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Dion ML, Sumner JL, Mitchell SM. Gendered citation patterns across political science and social science methodology fields. Polit Anal. 2018;26:312–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Dworkin JD, Linn KA, Teich EG, Zurn P, Shinohara RT, Bassett DS. The extent and drivers of gender imbalance in neuroscience reference lists. Nat Neurosci. 2020;23:918–26.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Maliniak D, Powers R, Walter BF. The gender citation gap in international relations. Int Organ. 2013;67:889–922.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Mitchell SM, Lange S, Brus H. Gendered citation patterns in international relations journals. Int Stud Perspect. 2013;14:485–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Not applicable.

Funding

The author did not receive support from any organization for the submitted work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

The author designed this innovative practice, implemented it into his course, and drafted, and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David A. Rubenstein.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author has no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Ethical Approval

None.

Consent to Participate

None.

Consent to Publication

None.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rubenstein, D.A. A Practical Approach to Incorporating Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Practices into Biomedical Engineering Undergraduate Courses. Biomed Eng Education (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43683-024-00149-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43683-024-00149-3

Keywords

Navigation