Skip to main content
Log in

Engaging Undergraduates in an REU Site in Conversations About Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion

  • Teaching Tips
  • Published:
Biomedical Engineering Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper describes our implementation of a conversation series focused on diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) within an existing National Science Foundation Research Experiences for Undergraduates (REU) program. While many REU programs actively recruit diverse participants, few include instructional time dedicated to DEI topics. Here, we share a curriculum of DEI conversations aimed at a diverse audience and reflect on the success of the program based on participant feedback. Additionally, we provide a detailed facilitation guide to ease implementation of the course.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Instructional guide is provided as a supplement to the manuscript. Participant survey data are not available as the small number of participants prevents anonymity.

Code Availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. Kuh G. High‐impact educational practices: what they are, who has access to them, and why they matter. Association of American Colleges and Universities. 2008. ISBN 978-0-9796181-4-7.

  2. Hunter AB, Laursen SL, Seymour E. Becoming a scientist: the role of undergraduate research in students’ cognitive, personal, and professional development. Sci Educ. 2007;91:36–74. https://doi.org/10.1002/SCE.20173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Jiang Z, Caicedo JM, Petrulis R. Development and implementation of an NSF REU site with integrated academia-industry research experience. 126th ASEE Annu Conf Expo. 2020. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--34140

  4. Hernandez PR, Woodcock A, Estrada M, Schultz PW. Undergraduate research experiences broaden diversity in the scientific workforce. Bioscience. 2018;68:204–11. https://doi.org/10.1093/BIOSCI/BIX163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Nyame-Mensah A, Tamer B, Stout JG. Understanding how summer research experiences can foster diversity in computing research. Computing Research Association: Washington, DC. 2015. http://cra.org/cerp/research-findings/

  6. Ordonez P, Ortiz-Zuazaga H, Ramirez-Lugo JS. Broadening Participation in Computing through a Biology Summer Research Experience for Undergraduates. 2020 Res Equity Sustain Particip Eng Comput Technol RESPECT 2020 - Proc. https://doi.org/10.1109/RESPECT49803.2020.9272417

  7. Guo F, Young J, Deese N, et al. Promoting the diversity, equity, and inclusion in organic chemistry education through undergraduate research experiences at WSSU. Educ Sci. 2021;11:394. https://doi.org/10.3390/EDUCSCI11080394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Greenman SJ, Chepp V, Burton S. High-impact educational practices: leveling the playing field or perpetuating inequity? Teach High Educ. 2021;27:267–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2021.2000384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lincoln YS, Stanley CA. The faces of institutionalized discrimination and systemic oppression in higher education: uncovering the lived experience of bias and procedural inequity. Qual Inq. 2021;27:1233–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/10778004211026892.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. McDevitt AL, Patel MV, Ellison AM. Lessons and recommendations from three decades as an NSF REU site: a call for systems-based assessment. Ecol Evol. 2020;10:2710–38. https://doi.org/10.1002/ECE3.6136.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Patel L. Desiring diversity and backlash: white property rights in higher education. Urban Rev. 2015;47:657–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-015-0328-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Banks JA. Shaping the future of multicultural education. J Negro Educ. 1979;48:237. https://doi.org/10.2307/2295045.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Diverse Top 100 Degree Producers. Diverse Issues High. Educ. https://top100.diverseeducation.com/.

  14. Moll LC, Amanti C, Neff D, Gonzalez N. Funds of knowledge for teaching: using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory Pract. 1992;31:132–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Rowson B, et al. Citation diversity statement in BMES journals. Ann Biomed Eng. 2021;49:947–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-021-02739-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhou D, et al. dalejn/cleanBib: v1.1.1. 2022. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4104748

  17. Laohaprapanon S, Sood G, Naji B. ethnicolr: predict race and ethnicity from name. 2022. https://github.com/appeler/ethnicolr

Download references

Funding

The “BME Community of Undergraduate Research Scholars for Cancer (BME CUReS Cancer)” REU Site is made possible by NSF Grant 1757885. We multiply our impact by embedding students supported by other sources whenever appropriate. In summer 2021, we embedded an NIH-funded BUILDing SCHOLARS student from The University of Texas at El Paso in our Site (RL5 GM 118969). The Cockrell School of Engineering generously provided support for site outcomes evaluation. We also acknowledge the support of the BME CUReS Scholars by the Biomedical Engineering Department and the Texas4000 organization to enable student presentations at the annual Biomedical Engineering Society meeting.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the design and conception of the manuscript. The course discussed was implemented by GS, NK, and BB. The program evaluation was conducted by AC and MB. All authors contributed to the manuscript and approved its contents.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gabriella P. Sugerman.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

Ethical Approval

The program evaluation discussed in this manuscript was conducted with Institutional Review Board approval in accordance with the Joint Committee Standards for Educational Evaluation.

Consent to Participate

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the program evaluation.

Consent for Publication

Participants consented to the inclusion of survey data in this manuscript.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PDF 439 kb)

Supplementary file2 (DOCX 16 kb)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sugerman, G.P., Chasen, A., Kalkunte, N. et al. Engaging Undergraduates in an REU Site in Conversations About Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion. Biomed Eng Education 4, 137–144 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43683-023-00113-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43683-023-00113-7

Keywords

Navigation