Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Creating Social Value via Undergraduate Design Thinking Course with K-12 STEM Education Outreach in Various Community Settings

  • Innovation Article
  • Published:
Biomedical Engineering Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

BME HealthReach is an educational outreach program where undergraduate BME students participate in an out-of-class design thinking course to create and teach interactive STEM activities to K-12 students, where children with chronic illnesses are the primary clients. We detail research that seeks to answer the following: (1) what impact does this out-of-class design course have? (2) how does this course contribute to the entrepreneurial mindset, including promoting connection-making and creating social value/relationships? and (3) do the STEM activities achieve the educational learning objectives? BME students completed anonymous surveys pre/post-semester and descriptive statistics were used to report their viewpoints. Pediatric patients answered post-activity questions to assess the educational objectives. 98% of the BME students completed the surveys. In the pre-surveys, 49% of participants listed “teaching” as their primary goal for taking the course. In the post-surveys, 68% selected “teaching skills” as the value the course provided. Post-course reflections revealed that out-of-class opportunities positively impacted the BME students by fulfilling their desires to teach, fostering social values, and providing a creative outlet. 132 pediatric patients completed 3 STEM activities, 68% of 6th graders and above demonstrated thorough understanding of the STEM topics. 189 BME students have participated in BME HealthReach (80% participating for multiple semesters), teaching ~1500 pediatric patients and ~2500 K-12 students. The BME students enjoyed exploring connections between their course work and designing STEM activities, while building community social value/relationships. We summarize how our unique educational outreach program fosters social value within BME education and provides innovative K-12 educational programming.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Data is available.

Code Availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology, Inc (ABET). Criteria for accrediting engineering programs, 2021–2022. 2021. https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-engineering-programs-2021-2022/ Accessed 27 April 2021

  2. Bandura, A. Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1977. https://doi.org/10.1177/105960117700200317

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Benware, C. A., and E. L. Deci. Quality of learning with an active versus passive motivational set. Am Educ Res J 21(4):755–765. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312021004755

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Berk, L. E. Child development, 9th ed. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education, Inc., 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bloom, B., M. Englehart, E. Furst, W. Hill, and D. Krathwohl. Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook I: Cognitive domain. New York: Longmans, Green, 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Boonen, H., and K. Petry. How do children with a chronic or long-term illness perceive their school re-entry after a period of homebound instruction? Child 38(4):490–496. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2214.2011.01279.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Common Core Math Standards. 2018. http://www.corestandards.org/. Accessed 1 Aug 2018.

  8. Hardy, E. L., B. Williams, C. Harden, O. Oshinowo, R. Copeland, B. Gee, and W. A. Lam. STEM education for children with sickle cell disease: unique educational outreach program taught by near-peer undergraduate students. Blood 136(Supplement 1):12–13. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2020-142018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kaffenberger, C. School reentry for students with a chronic illness: a role for professional school counselors. Prof Sch Couns 9(3):223–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kern Engineering Education Network (KEEN). In: About Us. 2020. https://engineeringunleashed.com/about.aspx Accessed 2 June 2020.

  11. Kilewer, W. Children’s coping with chronic illness. In: Handbook of children’s coping: linking theory and intervention, edited by S. A. Wolchik, and I. N. Sandler. Boston: Springer, 1997. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2677-0_10

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Kotsis, S., and K. Chung. Application of the ‘see one, do one, teach one’ concept in surgial training. Plast Reconstruct Surg 131(5):1194–1201. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e318287a0b3

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Monroe, A., E. Quinn, W. Samuelson, D. M. Dunleavy, and K. W. Dowd. An overview of the medical school admission process and use of applicant data in decision making: what has changed since the 1980s? Aca Med 88(5):672–681. https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0b013e31828bf252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Next Generation Science Standards. 2018. https://www.nextgenscience.org/standards/standards. Accessed 1 Aug 2018.

  15. Othman, N., and M. H. Amiruddin. Different perspectives of learning styles from VARK model. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 7:652–660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.10.088

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Pascarella, E. T., and P. T. Terenzini. How college affects students: findings and insights from twenty years of research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Pascarella, E. T., and P. T. Terenzini. How college affects students: a third decade of research, Vol. 2, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Saldaña, J. The coding manual for qualitative researcher. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Simmons, D. R., J. Van Mullekonm, and M. W. Ohland. The popularity and intensity of engineering undergraduate out-of-class activities. J Eng Educ 107(4):611–635. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Strauss, L. C., and P. T. Terenzini. The effects of students in- and out-of-class experiences on their analytical and group skills: a study of engineering education. Res High Educ 48(8):967–992. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-007-9057-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Thies, K. M. Identifying the educational implications of chronic illness in school children. J Sch Health. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-1561.1999.tb06354.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Transforming Undergraduate Education in Engineering (TUEE). Phase 1: Synthesizing and Integrating Industry Perspectives. May 9–10, 2013 Workshop Report. 2013. https://tuee.asee.org/phase-i/tuee-phase-i-report/ Accessed 5 May 2020.

  23. Vygotsky, L. S. Mind in society: the development of higher mental processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1978. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjf9vz4

    Book  Google Scholar 

  24. Wolfe, B. L. The influence of health on school outcomes. Med Care. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005650-198510000-00001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Mr. Christopher Harden and Ms. Brenda Williams for their dedication to patient education, Ms. Meredith Fay, the team of BME undergraduate students for their never-ending time and dedication, Mr. Schuyler van Montfrans, Dr. Jordan Ciciliano, and Dr. Wendy Newstetter, and to the Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta Foundation and School Program for their support.

Funding

Supported by funding from Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta Foundation and internally the 1998 Society. Financial support for this work was provided by National Institutes of Health Grant R35HL145000 (W.A.L.) and National Science Foundation grant 1711259 (W.A.L.).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Dr. ETH, Ms. SIF, and Dr. WAL conceptualized and designed the work, as well as co wrote, reviewed, and revised the manuscript. All authors approved the final manuscript as submitted and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wilbur A. Lam.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors have indicated they have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.

Ethical Approval

Human Participants—Emory University IRB—IRB00114382, Georgia Institute of Technology IRB—H20186.

Consent to Participate

Human Participants—Emory University IRB—IRB00114382, Georgia Institute of Technology IRB—H20186.

Consent for Publication

Human Participants—Emory University IRB—IRB00114382, Georgia Institute of Technology IRB—H20186.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PDF 82 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hardy, E.T., Fulmer, S.I., Le Doux, J.M. et al. Creating Social Value via Undergraduate Design Thinking Course with K-12 STEM Education Outreach in Various Community Settings. Biomed Eng Education 2, 253–263 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43683-022-00064-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43683-022-00064-5

Keywords

Navigation