Table 1 Phenomenon structure according to the Süddeutsche Zeitung and Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung
Süddeutsche Zeitung (SZ) | Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (FAZ) | |
|---|---|---|
Moral and value-related actors | AI companies with an economic focus AI companies with a normative will to shape the future AI companies see themselves as saviors of the future AI technology can take on a life of its own against ethical programming | AI companies and technology are economically oriented AI technology cannot act ethically Future shaping of values by non-European actors People potentially acting against other people |
Responsible Actors | Human actions justify AI consequences Human tendency to abdicate responsibility Humans required to take responsibility Responsibilities for AI influence difficult to assign questionable power of civil society and politics | Human actions cause AI consequences Lack of social control options Human tendency to abdicate responsibility Responsibility of AI corporations difficult to assign Humans needed as the final authority in AI decisions EU, State and legal system as important players Accepting and reflecting on responsibility as a society |
Moral and value-related questions and consequences | Rationalistic social conditions due to AI Unpredictable value-related consequences of AI development | Legal system with AI-induced rationalism AI will increasingly elude control Consequences of AI only to be seen in the future Ethical reflection necessary in parallel with AI development |
Socio-historical framework conditions | Digitalization promotes economic principles Capitalism promotes economic principles | Lack of digital competence in society AI emergence as a consequence of social change toward productivity Demands for ethics contradict the realities |