Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Correction: AI and Ethics https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-023-00299-0
When the article was published, the author did ask to remove the following paragraph under heading 2.2: “In another case, the Paris Court of Appeal dealt with a dispute over the copyright in a photograph taken by a monkey using the photographer’s camera [5]. The court ultimately held that the photograph was not eligible for copyright protection, as it did not meet the originality requirement under French copyright law. The court reasoned that the photographer did not exercise any creative control over the photograph, as he did not select the framing, focus, or other artistic elements of the image. Therefore, the monkey was not considered the author of the work and no copyright protection was granted to the photograph. While not directly related to AI, this case raised questions about the criteria for copyright protection and the ownership of works created by non-human agents.”
Also, the original reference [5] was removed:
“Cupp, R.: Considering the private animal and damages. Washington Univ Law Rev 98(4), 1313–1342 (2021)”
The original article has been updated.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Zhuk, A. Correction: Navigating the legal landscape of AI copyright: a comparative analysis of EU, US, and Chinese approaches. AI Ethics (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-023-00365-7
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-023-00365-7