Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Policy brief: the creation of a G20 coordinating committee for the governance of artificial intelligence

  • Original Research
  • Published:
AI and Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This policy brief proposes a group of twenty (G20) coordinating committee for the governance of artificial intelligence (CCGAI) to plan and coordinate on a multilateral level the mitigation of AI risks. The G20 is the appropriate regime complex for such a metagovernance mechanism, given the involvement of the largest economies and their highest political representatives. Other regime complexes and international organizations, which also focus on AI governance, tend to either lack such political power or exclude major rivalry countries. However, such inclusive centrality is necessary to counter the fragmentation of the existing cyber regime complex and effectively coordinate the mitigation of AI risks on a global level. Therefore, the G20 CCGAI is proposed to complement and strengthen polycentric governance as well as AI governance networks. CCGAI’s metagovernance function is presented as a task intended to institutionalize linkages between the CCGAI and relevant actors with the G20 complex and the broader AI and cyber regime complex. While the policy brief outlines the landscape of AI risks and proposes an agenda with AI governance challenges, the focus is on the functional and organizational features of the CCGAI and how such chartered committee can foster international collaboration. Without such global coordination, AI governance risks becoming primarily an instrument of strategic competition and rivalry. An earlier and shorter version of this policy brief was included in the Think 20 (T20) communique as a recommendation to the G20 in 2020 (Jelinek Global Solutions Initiative Foundation, 2020). The T20 is a G20 engagement group that incubates and proposes policy ideas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from $39.99 /Month
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Canada)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, books and news in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

References

  1. Benson, R., Zürn, M.: Untapped potential: how the G20 can strengthen global governance. South Afr. J. Intern. Affairs (2019). https://doi.org/10.1080/10220461.2019.1694576

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Brockelman, T.P.: Zizek and Heidegger: the question concerning techno-capitalism. Bloomsbury Publishing, New York (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brundage, M., Avin, S., Clark, J., et al.: The malicious use of artificial intelligence: forecasting, prevention and mitigation. Technical Report arXiv:1802.07228v1 (2018)

  4. Buchanan, A., Keohane, R.O.: The legitimacy of global governance institutions. Ethics Intern Affairs (2006). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-7093.2006.00043.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cihon, P., Maas, M., Kemp, L.: Should artificial intelligence governance be centralized? Design Lessons from History. arXiv:2001.03573v1 (2020)

  6. Corea, F.: AI knowledge map: how to classify AI technologies. https://link.medium.com/0f4BD3u754. Accessed 29 Aug 2019 (2018)

  7. Dafoe, A.: AI governance: a research agenda, working document, v1.0. Oxford, Governance of AI Program Future of Humanity Institute University of Oxford (2019)

  8. European Commission: On artificial intelligence - a European approach to excellence and trust. Brussels. https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/commission-white-paper-artificial-intelligence-feb2020_en.pdf. Accessed 19 Feb 2020 (2020)

  9. European Commission: A European strategy for data. Brussels. https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/communication-european-strategy-data-19feb2020_en.pdf. Accessed 19 Feb 2020 (2020)

  10. Ferrando, F.: Posthumanism, transhumanism, antihumanism, metahumanism, and new materialisms differences and relations. Existenz 8(2), 26–32 (2013)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. G20: G20 digital economy development and cooperation initiative. https://www.g20chn.org/English/Documents/Current/201609/P020160908736971932404.pdf. Accessed 10 Apr 2020 (2016)

  12. G20: G20 digital economy ministerial conference. https://www.bmwi.de/Redaktion/DE/Downloads/G/g20-digital-economy-ministerial-declaration-english-version.pdf. Accessed 10 Apr 2020 (2017)

  13. G20: G20 repository of digital policies. https://g20digitalrepo.org. Accessed 10 Apr 2020 (2018)

  14. G20: G20 ministerial statement on trade and digital economy. Ministry of foreign affairs. https://www.mofa.go.jp/files/000486596.pdf. Accessed 10 Apr 2020 (2019)

  15. Hilbrich, S., Schwab, J.: Towards a more accountable G20? Accountability mechanisms of the G20 and the new challenges posed to them by the 2030 Agenda. Discussion Paper. https://www.die-gdi.de/uploads/media/DP__13.2018.pdf. Accessed 19 Feb 2020 (2018)

  16. Husain, A.: Hyperwar: conflict and competition in the AI century. SparkCognition Press, Austin (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Jelinek, T. The future rulers? In: Billows, W., Körber, S. (eds.) Reset Europe. Culture Report EUNIC Yearbook 2018. European National Institutes for Culture (EUNIC) and Institut für Auslandsbeziehungen (ifa). Steidl, Göttingen, pp. 244–252 (2020)

  18. Jelinek, T.: The artificial intelligence governance gap: a barrier to intelligent decarbonization. In: Inderwildi, O., Kraft, M. (eds.) Intelligent decarbonization - Can artificial intelligence and cyberphysical systems foster the achievement of climate change mitigation targets? Springer Nature and Cambridge CARES, Heidelberg (forthcoming 2021)

  19. Jelinek, T., Wallach, W., Kerimi, D. Coordinating committee for the governance of artificial intelligence. Berlin, G20 Insights, Global Solutions Initiative Foundation (2020)

  20. Jessop, B.: Metagovernance. In: Bevir, M. (ed.) The SAGE handbook of governance, pp. 106–123. SAGE, London (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. [15] Jobin, A., Ienca, M., Vayena, E.: The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines. arXiv:1906.11668 (2019)

  22. Johnston, S.F.: The technological fix as social cure-all: origins and implications. IEEE Technol. Soc. 37(1), 47–54 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Keohane, R.O., Victor, D.G.: The regime complex for climate change. Discussion paper 10–33. The Harvard Project on Climate Agreements, Belfer Center. https://www.belfercenter.org/sites/default/files/legacy/files/Keohane_Victor_Final_2.pdf. Accessed 10 Mar 2020 (2010)

  24. Lorenz, P., Saslow, K.: Demystifying AI and AI companies: what foreign policy makers need to know about the global AI industry. Stiftung Neue Verantwortung, Berlin.https://www.stiftung-nv.de/sites/default/files/demystifying_ai_and_ai_companies.pdf. Accessed 19 Mar 2020 (2019)

  25. Martens, J.: Corporate influence on the G20: The case of the B20 and transnational business networks. Berlin, New York. Heinrich-Böll-Stiftung and Global Policy Forum. https://www.boell.de/sites/default/files/corporate_influence_on_the_g20.pdf. Accessed 18 Mar 2020 (2017)

  26. Morse, J., Keohane, R.O.: Contested multilateralism. The Rev Intern Organ 9, 385–412 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Nye, J.S.: The regime complex for managing global cyber activities. Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School. https://www.belfercenter.org/sites/default/files/files/publication/global-cyber-final-web.pdf. Accessed 10 Nov 2019 (2014)

  28. OECD: Recommendation of the council on artificial intelligence. Paris. https://one.oecd.org/document/C/MIN(2019)3/FINAL/en/pdf. Accessed 10 Dec 2019 (2019)

  29. Ostrom, E.: Governing the commons: the evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1990)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  30. Piketty, T.: Capital and ideology. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Polyakova, A.: Weapons of the weak: Russia and AI-driven asymmetric warfare. A blueprint for the future of AI: 2018–2019. Artificial Intelligence and Emerging Technology. Washington DC, The Brookings Institution (2018)

  32. Rolnick, D., Donti, P. L. et al.: Tackling climate change with machine learning. arXiv:1906.05433v2 (2019)

  33. Scharff, R.C., Dus, V. (eds.): Philosophy of technology: the technological condition - an anthology, 2nd edn. Wiley, West Sussex (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Schedler, A.: Conceptualizing accountability. In: Schedler, A., Diamon, L., Plattner, M.F. (eds.) The self-restraining state: power and accountability in new democracies, pp. 13–28. Lynn Reinner Publishers, London (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Scholte, J.A.: Global governance, accountability and civil society. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2011). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511921476.002

    Book  Google Scholar 

  36. Shackelford, S.J.: The future of frontiers. Lewis & Clark Law Review. Kelley School of Business Research Paper No. 19–12 (forthcoming 2020)

  37. Slaughter, S.: The power of the G20: the politics of legitimacy in global governance. Routledge, New York (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Snower, D., Chierchia, G., Lesemann, P., et al.: Caring cooperators and powerful punishers: differential effects of induced care and power motivation on different types of economic decision making. Sci. Rep. 7, 11068 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-11580-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. United Nations: United Nations Secretary-General’s Roadmap for Digital Cooperation https://www.un.org/en/content/digital-cooperation-roadmap. Accessed 1 Jul 2020 (2020)

  40. United States Department of State: Joint Statement from founding members of the Global Partnership on Artificial Intelligence. https://www.diplomatie.gouv.fr/en/french-foreign-policy/digital-diplomacy/news/article/launch-of-the-global-partnership-on-artificial-intelligence-by-15-founding. Accessed 15 Jun 2020 (2020)

  41. Vinuesa, R., Azizpour, H., et al.: The role of artificial intelligence in achieving the sustainable development goals. Nat. Commun. 11(233), 1–10 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Wallach, W., Marchant, G.E.: Toward the agile and comprehensive international governance of AI and robotics. Proc. IEEE 107, 505–508 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2019.2899422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Wyatt, S.: Technological determinism is dead; long live technological determinism. In: Hackett, E., Amsterdamska, O., Lynch, M., Wajcman, J. (eds.) Handbook of science and technology studies, pp. 165–180. MIT Press, Cambridge (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Zeng, Y., Lu, E., Huangfu, C.: Linking artificial intelligence principles. arXiv:1812.04814 (2018)

  45. Zizek, S.: The plague of fantasies. Verso Books, London (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Zuboff, S.: The age of surveillance capitalism: the fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. Profile Books, London (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  47. International Congress of the Governance of Artificial Intelligence: https://www.icgai.org. Accessed 15 Jun 2020 (2020)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Senior Fellow and Europe Director, Taihe Institute, Berlin, Germany

    Thorsten Jelinek

  2. Chair Technology and Ethics Research Group, Yale University Interdisciplinary Center for Bioethics, New Haven, USA

    Wendell Wallach

  3. Head of the Center for the Fourth Industrial Revolution China, World Economic Forum, Beijing, China

    Danil Kerimi

Authors
  1. Thorsten Jelinek
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Wendell Wallach
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Danil Kerimi
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thorsten Jelinek.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jelinek, T., Wallach, W. & Kerimi, D. Policy brief: the creation of a G20 coordinating committee for the governance of artificial intelligence. AI Ethics 1, 141–150 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-020-00019-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-020-00019-y

Keywords

Profiles

  1. Thorsten Jelinek View author profile