Skip to main content
Log in

Describing a novel, national, vertical mentorship program for women in emergency medicine across Canada

  • Educational Innovation
  • Published:
Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Mentorship models deviating from traditional staff-student dyads are beginning to emerge, and the CAEP Women in Emergency Medicine (WEM) Committee has implemented a novel, vertical mentorship program in the hopes of increasing mentorship accessibility across Canada for students, residents, and attending physicians. The vertical mentorship consisted of an attending physician, resident, and medical student all practicing or interested in EM. Groups were created based on location or niche preference. Early and post-mentorship surveys were sent to all 60 participants to gauge overall impact on career development, academic promotion, emotional wellbeing, and niche development. Overall, the implementation of an innovative, national, vertical mentorship program was largely beneficial for the personal wellbeing and professional development of participants. Academic institutions are strongly encouraged to implement formal vertical mentorship to increase access to mentorship for trainees at all stages in their career.

Résumé

Des modèles de mentorat qui s’écartent des dyades traditionnelles du personnel et des étudiants commencent à émerger, et le Comité des femmes en médecine d’urgence (ME) de l’ACMU a mis en œuvre un nouveau programme de mentorat vertical dans l’espoir d’accroître l’accessibilité du mentorat partout au Canada pour les étudiants. les résidents et les médecins traitants. Le mentorat vertical consistait en un médecin traitant, un résident et un étudiant en médecine, tous pratiquant ou intéressés par la SE. Les groupes ont été créés en fonction de l’emplacement ou de la préférence de niche. Des sondages ont été envoyés aux 60 participants pour évaluer l’impact global sur le développement de carrière, la promotion académique, le bien-être émotionnel et le développement de niche. Dans l’ensemble, la mise en œuvre d’un programme de mentorat novateur, national et vertical a été largement bénéfique pour le bien-être personnel et le perfectionnement professionnel des participants. Les établissements d’enseignement sont fortement encouragés à mettre en œuvre un mentorat vertical formel afin d’accroître l’accès au mentorat pour les stagiaires à toutes les étapes de leur carrière.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Data availability

Data available within the article or its supplementary materials.

References

  1. Farkas AH, Allenbaugh J, Bonifacino E, Turner R, Corbelli JA. Mentorship of US medical students: a systematic review. J Gen Intern Med. 2019;34(11):2602. /pmc/articles/PMC6848625/

  2. Resident Doctors of Canada. POSITION PAPER Mentorship in Residency. 2013.

  3. Kosoko-Lasaki O, Sonnino RE, Voytko M Lou. Mentoring for women and underrepresented minority faculty and students: experience at two institutions of higher education. J Natl Med Assoc. 2006;98(9):1449. /pmc/articles/PMC2569723/?report=abstract

  4. Osborn EHS, Ernster VL, Martin JB. Women’s attitudes toward careers in academic medicine at the University of California, San Francisco. Acad Med. 1992;67(1):59–62. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1729997/.

  5. Lautenberger DM, Dandar VM, Raezer CL, Sloane RA, Steinecke A, Alexander H, et al. The state of women in academic medicine. 2014; Available from: www.aamc.org/91514/reproductions.html.

  6. Degree. FUNCTIONS AND STRUCTURE OF A MEDICAL SCHOOL Standards for Accreditation of Medical Education Programs Leading to the M.D. Degree LCME® Page ii Functions and Structure of a Medical School Standards for Accreditation of Medical Education Programs Leading to the. 2015.

  7. Sambunjak D, Straus SE, Marušić A. Mentoring in academic medicine: a systematic review. JAMA. 2006;296(9):1103–15. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/203257

  8. Ramanan RA, Taylor WC, Davis RB, Phillips RS. Mentoring matters: mentoring and career preparation in internal medicine residency training. J Gen Intern Med. 2006;21(4):340. Available from: /pmc/articles/PMC1484727/

  9. Ayyala MS, Skarupski K, Bodurtha JN, González-Fernández M, Ishii LE, Fivush B, et al. Mentorship is not enough: exploring sponsorship and its role in career advancement in academic medicine. Acad Med. 2019;94(1):94–100. https://journals.lww.com/academicmedicine/Fulltext/2019/01000/Mentorship_Is_Not_Enough__Exploring_Sponsorship.29.aspx

  10. Peterson U, Bergström G, Samuelsson M, Åsberg M, Nygren Å. Reflecting peer-support groups in the prevention of stress and burnout: randomized controlled trial. J Adv Nurs. 2008;63(5):506–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2008.04743.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Himle DP, Jayaratne S, Thyness P. The effects of emotional support on burnout, work stress and mental health among Norwegian and American social workers. J Soc Serv Res. 2008;13(1):27–45. https://doi.org/10.1300/J079v13n01_02.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Pethrick H, Nowell L, Oddone-Paolucci E, Lorenzetti L, Jacobsen M, Clancy T, et al. Psychosocial and career outcomes of peer mentorship in medical resident education: a systematic review protocol. Syst Rev. 2017;6(1):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0571-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No financial support was received.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

IM and CP conceived and designed the mentorship program and both surveys. IM obtained ethics approval and led the distribution of the surveys to mentorship program participants, supervised by CP. IM was responsible for collecting all data. IM drafted the manuscript. CP was the primary content expert and contributed substantive changes to the manuscript. All authors have seen and approved the final manuscript version. IM takes responsibility for the manuscript as a whole.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Isabella Menchetti.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors do not have any conflicts of interest to declare.

Ethical approval

This study was approved by the University of Manitoba Health Research Ethics Board (HREB). Ethics # HS25448 (H2022:124).

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PDF 377 KB)

Supplementary file2 (DOCX 324 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Menchetti, I., Pham, C. Describing a novel, national, vertical mentorship program for women in emergency medicine across Canada. Can J Emerg Med 26, 409–412 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43678-024-00715-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43678-024-00715-2

Keywords

Mots-clés

Navigation