Skip to main content
Log in

A POCUS-first pathway to streamline care for children with suspected ileocolic intussusception

  • Quality Improvement and Patient Safety (QIPS)
  • Published:
Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

As point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) has emerged as a valuable tool for intussusception screening, this quality improvement study aimed to implement a “POCUS-first” pathway in a Pediatric Emergency Department (ED) to streamline workflow and expedite care for children with suspected intussusception.

Methods

This was a prospective analysis of children diagnosed with ileocolic intussusception in a Pediatric ED between June 2022 and June 2023. The study compared the “POCUS-first” cohort with the group receiving only radiology-performed ultrasound. Key outcomes included physician initial assessment to radiology-performed US time and physician initial assessment to reduction time. Continuous improvement efforts incorporated pediatric emergency medicine physician training, education, and pathway dissemination through plan-do-study-act cycles.

Results

The study included 29 patients in the “POCUS-first” pathway group and 70 patients in the non-POCUS group. The “POCUS-first” pathway demonstrated a significantly shorter physician initial assessment to reduction time compared to the non-POCUS group (170.7 min vs. 240.6 min, p = 0.02). Among non-transferred patients, the “POCUS-first” group also had a significantly shorter emergency department length of stay (386 min vs. 544 min, p = 0.047).

Conclusions

Implementation of a “POCUS-first” pathway for managing ileocolic intussusception led to notable improvements in process efficiency. The shorter physician initial assessment to reduction time highlights the potential for expedited decision-making and intervention. These study findings support the potential of this pathway to optimize the management and outcomes of children with ileocolic intussusception.

Résumé

Objectifs

Comme l’échographie au point de soin (POCUS) est devenue un outil précieux pour le dépistage de l’intussusception, cette étude d’amélioration de la qualité visait à mettre en œuvre une voie "POCUS-first" dans un service d’urgence pédiatrique (ED) rationaliser le flux de travail et accélérer les soins aux enfants présentant une intussusception suspectée.

Méthodes

Il s’agissait d’une analyse prospective des enfants diagnostiqués avec une intussusception iléo-colique dans un DE pédiatrique entre juin 2022 et juin 2023. L’étude a comparé la cohorte "POCUS-first" avec le groupe recevant uniquement des ultrasons radiologiques. Les principaux résultats comprenaient l’évaluation initiale par le médecin du temps de radiologie effectué aux États-Unis et l’évaluation initiale par le médecin du temps de réduction. Les efforts d’amélioration continue ont incorporé la formation, l’éducation et la diffusion des parcours des médecins en médecine d’urgence pédiatrique par le biais de cycles de plan-do-study-act.

Résultats

L’étude a inclus 29 patients dans le groupe "POCUS-first" et 70 patients dans le groupe non-POCUS. La voie "POCUS-first" a démontré une évaluation initiale significativement plus courte du temps de réduction par rapport au groupe non POCUS (170,7 minutes vs. 240,6 minutes, p = 0,02). Parmi les patients non transférés, le groupe "POCUS-first" a également eu une durée de séjour à l’urgence significativement plus courte (386 minutes vs. 544 minutes, p = 0,047).

Conclusions

La mise en œuvre d’une voie "POCUS-first" pour gérer l’intussusception iléo-colique a conduit à des améliorations notables de l’efficacité des processus. L’évaluation initiale plus courte du médecin pour réduire le temps met en évidence la possibilité d’une prise de décision et d’une intervention accélérée. Les résultats de cette étude confirment le potentiel de cette voie pour optimiser la prise en charge et les résultats des enfants atteints d’intussusception iléo-colique.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Meier DE, Coln CD, Rescorla FJ, Olaolorun A, Tarpley JL. Intussusception in children: international perspective. World J Surg. 1996;20:1035–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002689900158.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Daneman A, Navarro O. Intussusception. Part 1: a review of diagnostic approaches. Pediatr Radiol. 2003;33(2):79–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-002-0832-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Daneman A, Navarro O. Intussusception. Part 2: an update on the evolution of management. Pediatr Radiol. 2004;34(2):97–187. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-003-1082-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ko HS, Schenk JP, Tröger J, Rohrschneider WK. Current radiological management of intussusception in children. Eur Radiol. 2007;17(9):2411–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-007-0589-y.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Fischer TK, Bihrmann K, Perch M, Koch A, Wohlfahrt J, Kåre M, et al. Intussusception in early childhood: a cohort study of 1.7 million children. Pediatrics. 2004;114(3):782–5. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2004-0390.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ramachandran P, Gupta A, Vincent P, Sridharan S. Air enema for intussusception: is predicting the outcome important? Pediatr Surg Int. 2008;24(3):311–3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-007-2101-9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. American College of Emergency Physicians. Emergency ultrasound guidelines. Ann Emerg Med. 2009;53(4):550–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2008.12.013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Paek SH, Kim DK, Kwak YH, Jung JY, Lee S, Park JW. Effectiveness of the implementation of pediatric intussusception clinical pathway: a pre- and postintervention trial. Medicine (Baltimore). 2021;100(48): e27971. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000027971.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Tsou PY, Wang YH, Ma YK, et al. Accuracy of point-of-care ultrasound and radiology-performed ultrasound for intussusception: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Emerg Med. 2019;37(9):1760–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2019.06.006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bergmann KR, Arroyo AC, Tessaro MO, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of point-of-care ultrasound for intussusception: a multicenter, noninferiority study of paired diagnostic tests. Ann Emerg Med. 2021;78(5):606–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2021.04.033.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kim JH, Lee JY, Kwon JH, Cho HR, Lee JS, Ryu JM. Point-of-care ultrasound could streamline the emergency department workflow of clinically nonspecific intussusception. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2020;36(2):e90–5. https://doi.org/10.1097/PEC.0000000000001283.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Marin JR, Lewiss RE. American academy of pediatrics, committee on pediatric emergency medicine, 2013–2014; point-of-care ultrasonography by pediatric emergency physicians. Policy statement. Ann Emerg Med. 2015;65(4):472–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2015.01.028.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lewis D, Rang L, Kim D, et al. Recommendations for the use of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) by emergency physicians in Canada. CJEM. 2019;21(6):721–6. https://doi.org/10.1017/cem.2019.392.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Abo AM, Alade KH, Rempell RG, et al. Credentialing pediatric emergency medicine faculty in point-of-care ultrasound: expert guidelines. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2021;37(12):e1687–94. https://doi.org/10.1097/PEC.0000000000001677.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Harel-Sterling M, Diallo M, Santhirakumaran S, Maxim T, Tessaro M. Emergency department resource use in pediatric pneumonia: point-of-care lung ultrasonography versus chest radiography. J Ultrasound Med. 2019;38(2):407–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/jum.14703.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Zoabi M, Kvatinsky N, Shavit I. Evaluation of a point-of-care ultrasonography decision-support algorithm for the diagnosis of transient synovitis in the pediatric emergency department. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4(7):e2116915. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.16915.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Sweller J. Discussion of the special issue on cognitive load theory. Br J Educ Psychol. 2023;93(Suppl 2):402–10. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12606.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Beyer A, Lam V, Fagel B, et al. Undifferentiated dyspnea with point-of-care ultrasound, primary emergency physician compared with a dedicated emergency department ultrasound team. J Emerg Med. 2021;61(3):278–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2021.03.003.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. van Merrienboer JJG, Kirschner PA, Kester L. Taking the load off a learner’s mind: Instructional design for complex learning. Educ Psychol. 2003;38(1):5–13. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3801_2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Poonai N, Cohen DM, MacDowell D, et al. Sedation and analgesia for reduction of pediatric ileocolic intussusception. JAMA Netw Open. 2023;6(6):e2317200. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.17200.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hadas Katz-Dana.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file 1 (DOCX 1129 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Katz-Dana, H., Harel-Sterling, M., Vincent, D. et al. A POCUS-first pathway to streamline care for children with suspected ileocolic intussusception. Can J Emerg Med 26, 235–243 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43678-024-00673-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43678-024-00673-9

Keywords

Motsclés

Navigation