Skip to main content
Log in

Perceptions of gender equity in emergency medicine in Canada

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Women-identifying emergency physicians face gender-based discrimination throughout their careers. The purpose of this study was to explore emergency physician’s perceptions and experiences of gender equity in emergency medicine.

Methods

We conducted a secondary analysis of data from a previously conducted survey of Canadian emergency physicians on barriers to gender equity in emergency medicine. Survey responses were analyzed using logistic regression to determine the impact that gender, practice setting, years since graduation, race, equity-seeking status, and parental status had on agreement about gender equity in emergency medicine and five of the problem statements.

Results

A total of 710 participants completed the survey. Most identified as women (58.8%), white (77.4%), graduated between 2010 and 2019 (40%), had CCFP (Emergency Medicine) designation (47.9%), an urban practice (84.4%), were parents (62.4%) and did not identify as equity-seeking (79.9%). Women-identifying physicians were less likely to perceive gender equity in emergency medicine, OR 0.52, CI [0.38, 0.73]. Women-identifying physicians were more likely to agree with statements about microaggressions, OR 4.39, CI [2.66, 7.23]; barriers to leadership, OR 3.51, CI [2.25, 5.50]; gender wage gap, OR 13.46, CI [8.27, 21.91]; lack of support for parental leave, OR 2.85, CI [1.82, 4.44]; and education on allyship, OR 2.23 CI [1.44, 3.45] than men-identifying physicians.

Conclusion

In this study, women-identifying physicians were less likely to perceive that there was gender equity in emergency medicine than men-identifying physicians. Women-identifying physicians agreed that there are greater barriers for career advancement including fewer opportunities for leadership, a gender wage gap, a lack of parental leave policies to support a return to work and a lack of education for men to become allies. Men-identifying physicians were less aware of these inequities. Health systems must work to improve gender equity in emergency medicine and this will require education and allyship from men-identifying physicians.

Résumé

Introduction

Les femmes médecins urgentistes sont confrontées à une discrimination fondée sur le sexe tout au long de leur carrière. L'objectif de cette étude était d'explorer les perceptions et les expériences des médecins urgentistes en matière d'équité entre les sexes en médecine d'urgence.

Méthodes

Nous avons procédé à une analyse secondaire des données d'une enquête menée précédemment auprès des médecins urgentistes canadiens sur les obstacles à l'équité entre les sexes en médecine d'urgence. Les réponses au sondage ont été analysées à l’aide d’une régression logistique pour déterminer l’incidence que le sexe, le milieu de pratique, les années écoulées depuis l’obtention du diplôme, la race, le statut de demandeur d’équité et le statut parental avaient sur l’accord sur l’équité entre les sexes en médecine d’urgence et cinq des énoncés de problème.

Résultats

Au total, 710 participants ont répondu à l'enquête. La plupart d'entre eux sont des femmes (58.8 %), de race blanche (77.4 %), ont obtenu leur diplôme entre 2010 et 2019 (40 %), ont le titre de CCMF (médecine d'urgence) (47.9 %), exercent en milieu urbain (84.4 %), sont parents (62.4 %) et ne se déclarent pas en quête d'équité (79.9 %). Les médecins s'identifiant à des femmes étaient moins susceptibles de percevoir l'équité entre les sexes en médecine d'urgence, OR 0.52, IC [0.38,0.73]. Les médecins s'identifiant comme femmes étaient plus susceptibles d'être d'accord avec les déclarations sur les microagressions, OR 4.39, IC [2.66, 7.23] ; obstacles au leadership, OR 3.51, IC [2.25, 5.50] ; écart salarial entre les hommes et les femmes, OR 13.46, IC [8.27, 21.91] ; le manque de soutien pour le congé parental, OR 2.85, IC [1.82, 4.44]; et l’éducation sur l’alliance, OR 2.23 IC [1.44, 3.45] que les médecins s'identifiant comme hommes.

Conclusion

Dans cette étude, les médecins s'identifiant à des femmes étaient moins susceptibles de percevoir qu'il y avait une équité entre les sexes en médecine d'urgence que les médecins s'identifiant à des hommes. Les femmes médecins s'accordent à dire qu'il existe davantage d'obstacles à l'avancement professionnel, notamment moins d'opportunités de leadership, un écart salarial entre les hommes et les femmes, un manque de politiques de congé parental pour favoriser le retour au travail et un manque d'éducation des hommes pour qu'ils deviennent des alliés. Les médecins s'identifiant à des hommes étaient moins conscients de ces inégalités. Les systèmes de santé doivent s'efforcer d'améliorer l'équité entre les sexes dans la médecine d'urgence, ce qui nécessitera une formation et un allié de la part des médecins qui s'identifient aux hommes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

CAEP:

Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians

CCFP(EM):

Certificate of the College of Family Physicians with a Certificate of Added Competence in Emergency Medicine.

CI:

Confidence Interval

ED:

Emergency Department

OR:

Odds ratio

References

  1. Gender and Health [Internet]. World Health Organization: WHO; [2023; 2023, September 27]. Available from: https://www.who.int/health-topics/gender#tab=tab_1

  2. McIlveen-Brown E, Morris J, Lim R, Johnson K, Byrne A, Bischoff T, et al. Priority strategies to improve gender equity in Canadian emergency medicine: proceedings from the CAEP 2021 Academic Symposium on leadership. Can J Emergency Med. 2022;1:1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43678-021-00245-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Addressing gender equity and diversity in Canada’s medical profession: a review. [Internet] Ottawa: Canadian Medical Association; [2020; 2023, September 27]. https://www.cma.ca/sites/default/files/pdf/Ethics/report-2018-equity-diversity-medicine-e.pdf

  4. Derose KP, Hays RD, McCaffrey DF, Baker DW. Does physician gender affect satisfaction of men and women visiting the emergency department? J Gen Intern Med. 2001;16:218–26. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016004218.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Greenwood BN, Carnahan S, Huang L. Patient–physician gender concordance and increased mortality among female heart attack patients. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2018;115(34):8569–74. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016004218.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Canadian Medical Association. Rise of women in medicine not matched by leadership roles. CMAJ. 2018 Aug 7;190(31):E942-. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.180959

  7. Cohen M, Kiran T. Closing the gender pay gap in Canadian medicine. CMAJ. 2020;192(35):E1011–7. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.200375.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Brown A, Bonneville G, Glaze S. Nevertheless, they persisted: how women experience gender-based discrimination during postgraduate surgical training. J Surg Educ. 2021;78(1):17–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2020.06.027.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Pachulicz S, Schmitt N, Kuljanin G. A model of career success: a longitudinal study of emergency physicians. J Vocat Behav. 2008;73(2):242–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2008.05.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Sheppard G, Pham C, Nowacki A, Bischoff T, Snider C. Towards gender equity in emergency medicine: a position statement from the CAEP Women in Emergency Medicine committee. Can J Emergency Med. 2021;23:455–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43678-021-00114-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ruzycki SM, Freeman G, Bharwani A, Brown A. Association of physician characteristics with perceptions and experiences of gender equity in an academic internal medicine department. JAMA network open. 2019 Nov 1;2(11):e1915165-. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.15165

  12. Thompson K, Hammond N, Lynch D, Van Der Merwe M, Modra L, Yong SA, et al. Perceptions of gender equity among critical care and other health professionals: a cross-sectional survey. Aust Crit Care. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aucc.2023.07.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Torres MB, Salles A, Cochran A. Recognizing and reacting to microaggressions in medicine and surgery. JAMA Surg. 2019;154(9):868–72. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2019.1648.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lu DW, Lall MD, Mitzman J, Heron S, Pierce A, Hartman ND, et al. # MeToo in EM: a multicenter survey of academic emergency medicine faculty on their experiences with gender discrimination and sexual harassment. Western J Emergency Med. 2020;21(2):252. https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2019.11.44592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gibney R, Cantwell C, Toohey S, Boysen-Osborn M, Wiechmann W, et al. Gender evaluation and numeric distribution in emergency medicine residencies (GENDER): a retrospective analysis of gender ratios among residents and residency directors from 2014–2017. Western J Emergency Med. 2022;23(6):886. https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2022.7.54678.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Mangurian C, Linos E, Sarkar U. et al. What’s holding women in medicine back from leadership? [Internet] Harvard Business Review: Harvard Business Publishing; [2018 June, 19, 2023, September 27]. https://hbr.org/2018/06/whats-holding-women-in-medicine-back-from-leadership

  17. Silver JK, Ghalib R, Poorman JA, Al-Assi D, Parangi S, Bhargava H, et al. Analysis of gender equity in leadership of physician-focused medical specialty societies, 2008–2017. JAMA Intern Med. 2019;179(3):433–5. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.5303.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Gottlieb M, Krzyzaniak SM, Mannix A, Parsons M, Mody S, Kalantari A, et al. Sex distribution of editorial board members among emergency medicine journals. Ann Emerg Med. 2021;77(1):117–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2020.03.027.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Mannix A, Gore K, Parsons M, Rehman M, Monteiro S, Gottlieb M. Gender distribution of emergency medicine podcast speakers. Ann Emerg Med. 2022;80(1):60–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2022.02.008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ju M, van Schaik SM. Effect of professional background and gender on residents’ perceptions of leadership. Acad Med. 2019;94(11S):S42–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000002925.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Carr PL, Raj A, Kaplan SE, Terrin N, Breeze JL, Freund KM. Gender differences in academic medicine: retention, rank, and leadership comparisons from the national faculty survey. Acad Med. 2018;93(11):1694–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000002146.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Guptill M, Reibling ET, Clem K. Deciding to lead: a qualitative study of women leaders in emergency medicine. Int J Emerg Med. 2018;11:1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12245-018-0206-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Risberg G, Johansson EE, Hamberg K. ‘Important… but of low status’: male education leaders’ views on gender in medicine. Med Educ. 2011;45(6):613–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03920.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Rouse LP, Nagy-Agren S, Gebhard RE, Bernstein WK. Women physicians: Gender and the medical workplace. J Womens Health. 2020;29(3):297–309. https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2018.7290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Chen Y, Orlas C, Kim T, Chang DC, Kelleher CM. Workforce attrition among male and female physicians working in US academic hospitals, 2014–2019. JAMA Netw Open. 2023;6(7): e2323872. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.23872.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Duong D. Why are emergency departments closing? Can Med Assoc J. 2022;194(33):E1138–9. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.1096014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Experiences of discrimination of Black and Indigenous populations in Canada, 2019. Statistics Canada: Canadian Centre for Justice and Community Safety Statistics; [2022, February 16; 2023, September 27]. https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/85-002-x/2022001/article/00002-eng.htm

  28. Ruzycki SM, Brown A, Bharwani A, Freeman G. Gender-based disparities in medicine: a theoretical framework for understanding opposition to equity and equality. BMJ Leader. 2021:leader-2020. https://doi.org/10.1136/leader-2020-000231

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank CAEP for their support and the many individuals who took the time to complete the survey.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study concept and design. Authors TMC, EB, JM, and GS were responsible for ethics approval for the study, developing the research question, analyzing the results and writing the manuscript. Authors YY, QJ, and NB were responsible for developing the study protocol, preparing the statistical analysis for the study and manuscript preparation. Authors TB, CP, IM, RL, AP, MM, AZ, KH, and AB were each involved in developing the research question, study protocol, analyzing the results and reviewing the manuscript. The first draft of the manuscript was written by GS and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors have reviewed the final manuscript and have given their permission for publication.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gillian Sheppard.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Author NB, MM, QJ, AP, IM, EB, RL, CP, TB, YY, AB, and KH have nothing to declare. Author TMC has received funding from a PSI Foundation Grant, AAMC Honoraria, and has received Honoraria from Harvard University, Toronto Metropolitan University and McMaster University, and has received funds for travel from CAEP, AAMC, Toronto Metropolitan University, and McMaster University. Author GS is the former Chair of the CAEP Women in Emergency Medicine Committee and has received travel support and speaking honoraria from CAEP and Memorial University. Author JM is a board member at CAEP and L’Association des médecins d’urgence de Quebec and is the Vice-Chair of the CAEP Leadership committee.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sheppard, G., McIlveen-Brown, E., Jacques, Q. et al. Perceptions of gender equity in emergency medicine in Canada. Can J Emerg Med 26, 271–279 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43678-024-00665-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43678-024-00665-9

Keywords

Motsclés

Navigation