Abstract
Introduction
Women-identifying emergency physicians face gender-based discrimination throughout their careers. The purpose of this study was to explore emergency physician’s perceptions and experiences of gender equity in emergency medicine.
Methods
We conducted a secondary analysis of data from a previously conducted survey of Canadian emergency physicians on barriers to gender equity in emergency medicine. Survey responses were analyzed using logistic regression to determine the impact that gender, practice setting, years since graduation, race, equity-seeking status, and parental status had on agreement about gender equity in emergency medicine and five of the problem statements.
Results
A total of 710 participants completed the survey. Most identified as women (58.8%), white (77.4%), graduated between 2010 and 2019 (40%), had CCFP (Emergency Medicine) designation (47.9%), an urban practice (84.4%), were parents (62.4%) and did not identify as equity-seeking (79.9%). Women-identifying physicians were less likely to perceive gender equity in emergency medicine, OR 0.52, CI [0.38, 0.73]. Women-identifying physicians were more likely to agree with statements about microaggressions, OR 4.39, CI [2.66, 7.23]; barriers to leadership, OR 3.51, CI [2.25, 5.50]; gender wage gap, OR 13.46, CI [8.27, 21.91]; lack of support for parental leave, OR 2.85, CI [1.82, 4.44]; and education on allyship, OR 2.23 CI [1.44, 3.45] than men-identifying physicians.
Conclusion
In this study, women-identifying physicians were less likely to perceive that there was gender equity in emergency medicine than men-identifying physicians. Women-identifying physicians agreed that there are greater barriers for career advancement including fewer opportunities for leadership, a gender wage gap, a lack of parental leave policies to support a return to work and a lack of education for men to become allies. Men-identifying physicians were less aware of these inequities. Health systems must work to improve gender equity in emergency medicine and this will require education and allyship from men-identifying physicians.
Résumé
Introduction
Les femmes médecins urgentistes sont confrontées à une discrimination fondée sur le sexe tout au long de leur carrière. L'objectif de cette étude était d'explorer les perceptions et les expériences des médecins urgentistes en matière d'équité entre les sexes en médecine d'urgence.
Méthodes
Nous avons procédé à une analyse secondaire des données d'une enquête menée précédemment auprès des médecins urgentistes canadiens sur les obstacles à l'équité entre les sexes en médecine d'urgence. Les réponses au sondage ont été analysées à l’aide d’une régression logistique pour déterminer l’incidence que le sexe, le milieu de pratique, les années écoulées depuis l’obtention du diplôme, la race, le statut de demandeur d’équité et le statut parental avaient sur l’accord sur l’équité entre les sexes en médecine d’urgence et cinq des énoncés de problème.
Résultats
Au total, 710 participants ont répondu à l'enquête. La plupart d'entre eux sont des femmes (58.8 %), de race blanche (77.4 %), ont obtenu leur diplôme entre 2010 et 2019 (40 %), ont le titre de CCMF (médecine d'urgence) (47.9 %), exercent en milieu urbain (84.4 %), sont parents (62.4 %) et ne se déclarent pas en quête d'équité (79.9 %). Les médecins s'identifiant à des femmes étaient moins susceptibles de percevoir l'équité entre les sexes en médecine d'urgence, OR 0.52, IC [0.38,0.73]. Les médecins s'identifiant comme femmes étaient plus susceptibles d'être d'accord avec les déclarations sur les microagressions, OR 4.39, IC [2.66, 7.23] ; obstacles au leadership, OR 3.51, IC [2.25, 5.50] ; écart salarial entre les hommes et les femmes, OR 13.46, IC [8.27, 21.91] ; le manque de soutien pour le congé parental, OR 2.85, IC [1.82, 4.44]; et l’éducation sur l’alliance, OR 2.23 IC [1.44, 3.45] que les médecins s'identifiant comme hommes.
Conclusion
Dans cette étude, les médecins s'identifiant à des femmes étaient moins susceptibles de percevoir qu'il y avait une équité entre les sexes en médecine d'urgence que les médecins s'identifiant à des hommes. Les femmes médecins s'accordent à dire qu'il existe davantage d'obstacles à l'avancement professionnel, notamment moins d'opportunités de leadership, un écart salarial entre les hommes et les femmes, un manque de politiques de congé parental pour favoriser le retour au travail et un manque d'éducation des hommes pour qu'ils deviennent des alliés. Les médecins s'identifiant à des hommes étaient moins conscients de ces inégalités. Les systèmes de santé doivent s'efforcer d'améliorer l'équité entre les sexes dans la médecine d'urgence, ce qui nécessitera une formation et un allié de la part des médecins qui s'identifient aux hommes.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- CAEP:
-
Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians
- CCFP(EM):
-
Certificate of the College of Family Physicians with a Certificate of Added Competence in Emergency Medicine.
- CI:
-
Confidence Interval
- ED:
-
Emergency Department
- OR:
-
Odds ratio
References
Gender and Health [Internet]. World Health Organization: WHO; [2023; 2023, September 27]. Available from: https://www.who.int/health-topics/gender#tab=tab_1
McIlveen-Brown E, Morris J, Lim R, Johnson K, Byrne A, Bischoff T, et al. Priority strategies to improve gender equity in Canadian emergency medicine: proceedings from the CAEP 2021 Academic Symposium on leadership. Can J Emergency Med. 2022;1:1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43678-021-00245-1.
Addressing gender equity and diversity in Canada’s medical profession: a review. [Internet] Ottawa: Canadian Medical Association; [2020; 2023, September 27]. https://www.cma.ca/sites/default/files/pdf/Ethics/report-2018-equity-diversity-medicine-e.pdf
Derose KP, Hays RD, McCaffrey DF, Baker DW. Does physician gender affect satisfaction of men and women visiting the emergency department? J Gen Intern Med. 2001;16:218–26. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016004218.x.
Greenwood BN, Carnahan S, Huang L. Patient–physician gender concordance and increased mortality among female heart attack patients. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2018;115(34):8569–74. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016004218.x.
Canadian Medical Association. Rise of women in medicine not matched by leadership roles. CMAJ. 2018 Aug 7;190(31):E942-. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.180959
Cohen M, Kiran T. Closing the gender pay gap in Canadian medicine. CMAJ. 2020;192(35):E1011–7. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.200375.
Brown A, Bonneville G, Glaze S. Nevertheless, they persisted: how women experience gender-based discrimination during postgraduate surgical training. J Surg Educ. 2021;78(1):17–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2020.06.027.
Pachulicz S, Schmitt N, Kuljanin G. A model of career success: a longitudinal study of emergency physicians. J Vocat Behav. 2008;73(2):242–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2008.05.003.
Sheppard G, Pham C, Nowacki A, Bischoff T, Snider C. Towards gender equity in emergency medicine: a position statement from the CAEP Women in Emergency Medicine committee. Can J Emergency Med. 2021;23:455–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43678-021-00114-x.
Ruzycki SM, Freeman G, Bharwani A, Brown A. Association of physician characteristics with perceptions and experiences of gender equity in an academic internal medicine department. JAMA network open. 2019 Nov 1;2(11):e1915165-. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.15165
Thompson K, Hammond N, Lynch D, Van Der Merwe M, Modra L, Yong SA, et al. Perceptions of gender equity among critical care and other health professionals: a cross-sectional survey. Aust Crit Care. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aucc.2023.07.003.
Torres MB, Salles A, Cochran A. Recognizing and reacting to microaggressions in medicine and surgery. JAMA Surg. 2019;154(9):868–72. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2019.1648.
Lu DW, Lall MD, Mitzman J, Heron S, Pierce A, Hartman ND, et al. # MeToo in EM: a multicenter survey of academic emergency medicine faculty on their experiences with gender discrimination and sexual harassment. Western J Emergency Med. 2020;21(2):252. https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2019.11.44592.
Gibney R, Cantwell C, Toohey S, Boysen-Osborn M, Wiechmann W, et al. Gender evaluation and numeric distribution in emergency medicine residencies (GENDER): a retrospective analysis of gender ratios among residents and residency directors from 2014–2017. Western J Emergency Med. 2022;23(6):886. https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2022.7.54678.
Mangurian C, Linos E, Sarkar U. et al. What’s holding women in medicine back from leadership? [Internet] Harvard Business Review: Harvard Business Publishing; [2018 June, 19, 2023, September 27]. https://hbr.org/2018/06/whats-holding-women-in-medicine-back-from-leadership
Silver JK, Ghalib R, Poorman JA, Al-Assi D, Parangi S, Bhargava H, et al. Analysis of gender equity in leadership of physician-focused medical specialty societies, 2008–2017. JAMA Intern Med. 2019;179(3):433–5. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.5303.
Gottlieb M, Krzyzaniak SM, Mannix A, Parsons M, Mody S, Kalantari A, et al. Sex distribution of editorial board members among emergency medicine journals. Ann Emerg Med. 2021;77(1):117–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2020.03.027.
Mannix A, Gore K, Parsons M, Rehman M, Monteiro S, Gottlieb M. Gender distribution of emergency medicine podcast speakers. Ann Emerg Med. 2022;80(1):60–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2022.02.008.
Ju M, van Schaik SM. Effect of professional background and gender on residents’ perceptions of leadership. Acad Med. 2019;94(11S):S42–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000002925.
Carr PL, Raj A, Kaplan SE, Terrin N, Breeze JL, Freund KM. Gender differences in academic medicine: retention, rank, and leadership comparisons from the national faculty survey. Acad Med. 2018;93(11):1694–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000002146.
Guptill M, Reibling ET, Clem K. Deciding to lead: a qualitative study of women leaders in emergency medicine. Int J Emerg Med. 2018;11:1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12245-018-0206-7.
Risberg G, Johansson EE, Hamberg K. ‘Important… but of low status’: male education leaders’ views on gender in medicine. Med Educ. 2011;45(6):613–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03920.x.
Rouse LP, Nagy-Agren S, Gebhard RE, Bernstein WK. Women physicians: Gender and the medical workplace. J Womens Health. 2020;29(3):297–309. https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2018.7290.
Chen Y, Orlas C, Kim T, Chang DC, Kelleher CM. Workforce attrition among male and female physicians working in US academic hospitals, 2014–2019. JAMA Netw Open. 2023;6(7): e2323872. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.23872.
Duong D. Why are emergency departments closing? Can Med Assoc J. 2022;194(33):E1138–9. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.1096014.
Experiences of discrimination of Black and Indigenous populations in Canada, 2019. Statistics Canada: Canadian Centre for Justice and Community Safety Statistics; [2022, February 16; 2023, September 27]. https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/85-002-x/2022001/article/00002-eng.htm
Ruzycki SM, Brown A, Bharwani A, Freeman G. Gender-based disparities in medicine: a theoretical framework for understanding opposition to equity and equality. BMJ Leader. 2021:leader-2020. https://doi.org/10.1136/leader-2020-000231
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank CAEP for their support and the many individuals who took the time to complete the survey.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the study concept and design. Authors TMC, EB, JM, and GS were responsible for ethics approval for the study, developing the research question, analyzing the results and writing the manuscript. Authors YY, QJ, and NB were responsible for developing the study protocol, preparing the statistical analysis for the study and manuscript preparation. Authors TB, CP, IM, RL, AP, MM, AZ, KH, and AB were each involved in developing the research question, study protocol, analyzing the results and reviewing the manuscript. The first draft of the manuscript was written by GS and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors have reviewed the final manuscript and have given their permission for publication.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Author NB, MM, QJ, AP, IM, EB, RL, CP, TB, YY, AB, and KH have nothing to declare. Author TMC has received funding from a PSI Foundation Grant, AAMC Honoraria, and has received Honoraria from Harvard University, Toronto Metropolitan University and McMaster University, and has received funds for travel from CAEP, AAMC, Toronto Metropolitan University, and McMaster University. Author GS is the former Chair of the CAEP Women in Emergency Medicine Committee and has received travel support and speaking honoraria from CAEP and Memorial University. Author JM is a board member at CAEP and L’Association des médecins d’urgence de Quebec and is the Vice-Chair of the CAEP Leadership committee.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Sheppard, G., McIlveen-Brown, E., Jacques, Q. et al. Perceptions of gender equity in emergency medicine in Canada. Can J Emerg Med 26, 271–279 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43678-024-00665-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43678-024-00665-9