Abstract
Objectives
To perform a province-wide evaluation of adult major traumas and determine the proportion of patients who met clinical and/or anatomical criteria for resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA).
Methods
This is a retrospective analysis of all major trauma patients (age > 16) presenting to the sole adult level 1 trauma centre in Nova Scotia over a 5-year period (2012–2017). Data were collected from the Nova Scotia Trauma Registry and medical charts. We identified potential REBOA candidates using either: (1) clinical criteria (primary survey, Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma, pelvic/chest X-ray); or (2) anatomical criteria (ICD-10-CA codes). Potential candidates with persistent hypotension were considered true REBOA candidates.
Results
Overall 2885 patients were included in the analysis, of whom 248 (8.6%) patients were in shock (including 106 transfer patients) and had their charts reviewed. A total of 137 patients met clinical criteria for REBOA; 44 (1.5%) had persistent hypotension 10–20 min into resuscitation and were considered true REBOA candidates. There were 59 patients who met anatomical criteria for REBOA, of whom 15 (0.5%) patients had persistent hypotension and were true REBOA candidates. The 15 REBOA candidates based on anatomical criteria also met clinical criteria for REBOA.
Conclusions
In this registry-based retrospective analysis, 1.5% of adult major trauma patients Nova Scotia were REBOA candidates based on resuscitative clinical presentation, while 0.5% were candidates based on post hoc anatomical injury patterns. Our findings suggest that using clinical findings and bedside imaging modalities as criteria may overestimate the number of candidates for REBOA.
Résumé
Objectifs
Effectuer une évaluation à l'échelle de la province des traumatismes majeurs chez l'adulte et déterminer la proportion de patients qui répondaient aux critères cliniques et/ou anatomiques de l’occlusion endovasculaire par ballonnet de réanimation de l'aorte (REBOA).
Les méthodes
Analyse rétrospective de tous les patients ayant subi un traumatisme majeur (âge > 16 ans) qui se sont présentés au seul centre de traumatologie de niveau 1 pour adultes en Nouvelle-Écosse sur une période de 5 ans (2012-2017). Les données ont été recueillies à partir du registre des traumatismes de la Nouvelle-Écosse et des dossiers médicaux. Nous avons identifié des candidats potentiels à la REBOA en utilisant l'un ou l'autre : 1) des critères cliniques (enquête primaire, évaluation ciblée avec échographie pour les traumatismes, radiographie pelvienne/du thorax) ; ou 2) des critères anatomiques (codes CIM-10-CA). Les candidats potentiels présentant une hypotension persistante étaient considérés comme de véritables candidats au REBOA.
Résultats
Au total, 2 885 patients ont été inclus dans l'analyse, dont 248 (8,6 %) étaient en état de choc (dont 106 patients transférés) et ont vu leur dossier révisé. Au total, 137 patients répondaient aux critères cliniques pour la REBOA ; 44 (1,5 %) présentaient une hypotension persistante de 10 à 20 minutes en réanimation et étaient considérés comme de véritables candidats à la REBOA. Il y avait 59 patients qui répondaient aux critères anatomiques pour le REBOA, dont 15 (0,5 %) avaient une hypotension persistante et étaient de véritables candidats au REBOA. Les 15 candidats REBOA basés sur des critères anatomiques répondaient également aux critères cliniques de REBOA.
Conclusions
Dans cette analyse rétrospective basée sur un registre, 1,5 % des patients adultes ayant subi un traumatisme majeur en Nouvelle-Écosse étaient des candidats au REBOA sur la base d'une présentation clinique de réanimation, tandis que 0,5 % étaient des candidats sur la base de modèles de blessures anatomiques post-hoc. Nos conclusions suggèrent que l'utilisation des résultats cliniques et des modalités d'imagerie au chevet du patient comme critères peut surestimer le nombre de candidats à la REBOA.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Statistics Canada. Leading causes of death, total population, by age group (Table: 13-10-0394-01). https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/t1/tbl1/en/tv.action?pid=1310039401. Accessed 22 Sept 2020.
World Health Organization. Disease burden and mortality estimates. https://www.who.int/healthinfo/global_burden_disease/estimates/en/index1.html. Accessed 18 Sept 2020.
Pfeifer R, Teuben M, Andruszkow H, Barkatali BM, Pape H. Mortality patterns in patients with multiple trauma: a systematic review of autopsy studies. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(2):e0148844. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0148844.
Kauvar DS, Lefering R, Wade CE. Impact of hemorrhage on trauma outcome: an overview of epidemiology, clinical presentations, and therapeutic considerations. J Trauma. 2006;60(6 Suppl):S3-11. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ta.0000199961.02677.19.
Morrison JJ, Rasmussen TE. Noncompressible torso hemorrhage: a review with contemporary definitions and management strategies. Surg Clin N Am. 2012;92(4):843–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suc.2012.05.002.
Brenner M, Inaba K, Aiolfi A, DuBose J, Fabian T, Bee T, et al. Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta and resuscitative thoracotomy in select patients with hemorrhagic shock: early results from the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma’s aortic occlusion in resuscitation for trauma and acute care surgery registry. J Am Coll Surg. 2018;226(5):730–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2018.01.044.
Inoue J, Shiraishi A, Yoshiyuki A, Haruta K, Matsui H, Otomo Y. Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta might be dangerous in patients with severe torso trauma: a propensity score analysis. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2016;80(4):557–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000000968.
Joseph B, Zeeshan M, Sakran JV, Hamidi M, Kulvatunyou N, Khan M, et al. Nationwide analysis of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta in civilian trauma. JAMA Surg. 2019;154(6):500–8. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2019.0096.
Manzano Nunez R, Naranjo MP, Foianini E, Ferrada P, Rincon E, García-Perdomo HA, et al. A meta-analysis of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) or open aortic cross-clamping by resuscitative thoracotomy in non-compressible torso hemorrhage patients. World J Emerg Surg. 2017;12:30. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-017-0142-5.
Bekdache O, Paradis T, Shen YBH, Elbahrawy A, Grushka J, Deckelbaum D, et al. Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA): indications: advantages and challenges of implementation in traumatic non-compressible torso hemorrhage. Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2019;4(1):e000262. https://doi.org/10.1136/tsaco-2018-000262.
Barnard EB, Morrison JJ, Madureira RM, Lendrum R, Fragoso-Iniguez M, Edwards A, et al. Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA): a population based gap analysis of trauma patients in England and Wales. Emerg Med J. 2015;32(12):926–32. https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2015-205217.
Dumas RP, Holena DN, Smith BP, Jafari D, Seamon MJ, Reilly PM, et al. Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta: assessing need in an urban trauma center. J Surg Res. 2019;233:413–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2018.08.031.
Moore L, Stelfox HT, Evans D, Hameed SM, Yanchar NL, Simons R, et al. Trends in injury outcomes across Canadian trauma systems. JAMA Surg. 2017;152(2):168–74. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2016.4212.
Tansley G, Schuurman N, Erdogan M, Bowes M, Green R, Asbridge M, et al. Development of a model to quantify the accessibility of a Canadian trauma system. CJEM. 2017;19(4):285–92. https://doi.org/10.1017/cem.2017.9.
QEII HSC Trauma Team Activation Criteria. Nova Scotia Trauma Program. 2013. http://www.cdha.nshealth.ca/system/files/sites/139/documents/trauma-team-activation-criteria.pdf. Accessed 15 Sept 2020.
Rouse C, Hayre J, French J, Fraser J, Watson I, Benjamin S, et al. A traumatic tale of two cities: does EMS level of care and transportation model affect survival in patients with trauma at level 1 trauma centres in two neighbouring Canadian provinces? Emerg Med J. 2018;35:83–8. https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2016-206329.
Von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gotzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP, STROBE Initiative. Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. BMJ. 2007;335(7624):806–8.
Brenner M, Hoehn M, Pasley J, Dubose J, Stein D, Scalea T. Basic endovascular skills for trauma course: bridging the gap between endovascular techniques and the acute care surgeon. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014;77(2):286–91. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000000310.
Qasim Z, Bradley K, Panichelli H, Robinson J, Zern SC. Successful interprofessional approach to development of a resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta program at a community trauma center. J Emerg Med. 2018;54(4):419–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2018.01.005.
Brenner M, Hicks C. Major abdominal trauma: critical decisions and new frontiers in management. Emerg Med Clin N Am. 2018;36(1):149–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emc.2017.08.012.
Brenner M, Teeter W, Hoehn M, Pasley J, Hu P, Yang S, et al. Use of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta for proximal aortic control in patients with severe hemorrhage and arrest. JAMA Surg. 2018;153(2):130–5. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2017.354934T.
Osborn LA, Brenner ML, Prater SJ, Moore LJ. Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta: current evidence. Open Access Emerg Med. 2019;2019(11):29–38. https://doi.org/10.2147/OAEM.S166087.
Ribeiro Junior MAF, Feng CYD, Nguyen ATM, Rodrigues VC, Bechara GEK, de-Moura RR, et al. The complications associated with Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta (REBOA). World J Emerg Surg. 2018;13:20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-018-0181-6.
Borger van derBurg BLS, van Dongen TTCF, Morrison JJ, Hedeman Joosten PPA, DuBose JJ, Hörer TM, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the use of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta in the management of major exsanguination. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2018;44(4):535–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-018-0959-y.
Yamamoto R, Cestero RF, Suzuki M, Funabiki T, Sasaki J. Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) is associated with improved survival in severely injured patients: a propensity score matching analysis. Am J Surg. 2019;218(6):1162–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2019.09.007.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Karen Ssebazza (Registry Coordinator, TNS) and David Urquhart (IT Manager, Department of Emergency Medicine, Dalhousie University) for assisting with data collection. Data used in this research were made available by the Nova Scotia Department of Health and Wellness. Any opinions expressed by the authors do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the Nova Scotia Department of Health and Wellness or TNS.
Funding
This research received no specific grant from any funding agency, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The author(s) declare no competing interests.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hurley, S., Erdogan, M., Kureshi, N. et al. Comparison of clinical and anatomical criteria for resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) among major trauma patients in Nova Scotia. Can J Emerg Med 23, 528–536 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43678-021-00100-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43678-021-00100-3