Skip to main content
Log in

Optimizing collaborative relationships in emergency medicine research

  • CAEP Academic Symposium Paper
  • Published:
Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

The objective of the Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians (CAEP) 2020 Academic Symposium Panel was to present recommendations for collaboration on (1) writing a grant application; (2) conducting a study; (3) writing an abstract; and (4) writing a manuscript.

Methods

We assembled an expert panel of eight experienced emergency medicine clinician scientists from across Canada. Panel members performed literature searches for each of the four topics. Draft recommendations were developed and refined in an iterative fashion by panel members. We solicited external feedback on the draft recommendations online from identified researchers known to CAEP and in person at the Network of Canadian Emergency Researchers meeting in February 2020. We obtained additional feedback during an online symposium presentation on October 15th, 2020, open to all members of the Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians.

Results

Four sets of recommendations were established for each component including: 14 for writing a grant application including relevant timelines; 23 for conducting a study; 13 for writing an abstract; and 18 for writing a manuscript. Forming a strong team, including patients, appropriate methodologists, content experts and a mix of senior and junior investigators, establishing and following clear timelines, and proactive communications were common themes.

Conclusions

We offer recommendations for research collaboration for (1) writing a grant, (2) conducting a study, (3) writing an abstract, and (4) writing a manuscript. We believe these recommendations will help to improve the science, improve grant success, and improve the impact of the abstracts and manuscripts.

Résumé

Objectif

L'objectif du comité d’experts du symposium académique 2020 de l’Association canadienne des médecins d’urgence (ACMU) était de présenter des recommandations de collaboration sur (1) la rédaction d’une demande de subvention; (2) l’accomplissement d’une étude; (3) la rédaction d’un résumé; et (4) la rédaction d’un manuscrit.

Méthodes

Nous avons réuni un comité d'experts de huit cliniciens-chercheurs en médecine d’urgence dotés d’expérience de partout au Canada. Les membres du comité ont effectué des recherches documentaires sur chacun des quatre sujets. Des projets de recommandations ont été élaborés et affinés de manière itérative par les membres du comité. Nous avons sollicité en ligne des remarques externes sur les projets de recommandations des chercheurs connus de l’ACMU (CAEP) ainsi que des chercheurs connus en personne lors de la réunion du Réseau des chercheurs d’urgence canadienne en février 2020. Nous avons obtenu des remarques supplémentaires lors d'une présentation du symposium en ligne le 15 octobre 2020, ouvert à tous les membres de l'Association canadienne des médecins d'urgence.

Résultats

Quatre séries de recommandations ont été établies pour chaque composante, dont: 14 pour la rédaction d'une demande de subvention, y compris les délais pertinents; 23 pour mener une étude; 13 pour rédiger un résumé; et 18 pour la rédaction d'un manuscrit. La formation d'une équipe solide, comprenant des patients, des méthodologistes appropriés, des experts en contenu et un mélange de chercheurs principaux et chercheurs assistants, l'établissement et le respect de calendriers clairs et des communications proactives étaient des thèmes communs.

Conclusion

Nous proposons des recommandations de collaboration de recherche pour (1) rédiger une subvention, (2) mener une étude, (3) rédiger un résumé et (4) rédiger un manuscrit. Nous croyons que ces recommandations contribueront à améliorer la science, à renforcer le succès des subventions et à bonifier l'impact des résumés et des manuscrits.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Stiell IG, Artz JD, Lang ES, et al. An environmental scan of academic emergency medicine at the 17 Canadian medical schools: why does this matter to emergency physicians? CJEM. 2017;19:39–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Harvey BJ, Lang ES, Frank JR. The research guide: a primer for residents, other health care trainees, and practitioners. 1st ed. Ottawa: The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chan AW, Tetzlaff JM, Altman DG, et al. SPIRIT 2013 statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials. Ann Intern Med. 2013;158:200–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhang XC, Tran AH, Papanagnou D. A curious researcher’s guide on successfully publishing scientific manuscripts. Cureus. 2018;10:e2683.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Buderer NM, Plewa MC. Collaboration among emergency medicine physician researchers and statisticians: resources and attitudes. Am J Emerg Med. 1999;17:692–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Archer SW, Carlo WA, Truog WE, et al. Improving publication rates in a collaborative clinical trials research network. Semin Perinatol. 2016;40:410–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Pololi L, Knight S, Dunn K. Facilitating scholarly writing in academic medicine. J Gen Intern Med. 2004;19:64–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals. 2020. 2020.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We appreciate all the clinicians, research coordinators and research assistants who provided feedback on the draft recommendations. Dr. Jeffrey Perry is supported by the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Ontario through a Mid-Career Award. Dr. Jacques Lee is supported by the Schwartz/Reisman Emergency Medicine Institute Inaugural Research Chair in Geriatric Emergency Medicine.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeffrey J. Perry.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Perry, J.J., Vaillancourt, C., Hohl, C.M. et al. Optimizing collaborative relationships in emergency medicine research. Can J Emerg Med 23, 291–296 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43678-020-00080-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43678-020-00080-w

Keywords

Navigation