Abstract
Phytochrome A (phyA) comprises two native types, phyA′ and phyA″, with distinct spectroscopic, photochemical, and functional properties, differing at the N-terminal extension, probably, by the state of phosphorylation. To find out if and how protein phosphatases (PP) affect the state of the phyA species in planta, we studied the effect of the non-specific phosphatase inhibitor NaF on etiolated maize seedlings with the use of low-temperature fluorescence spectroscopy and photochemistry. In roots, phosphatase inhibition facilitated photoreceptor destruction in its labile phyA′ form and shifted the phyA′/phyA″ ratio towards the more stable phyA″. The effect of NaF was not observed in stems. It was similar, though less pronounced, in comparison to the effects of the serine/threonine PP inhibitors, okadaic and cantharidic acids (OA and CA), which likewise facilitate the destruction of phyA′ in etiolated maize stems, not, however, in roots (Sineshchekov et al., Photochem. Photobiol 89:83–96, 2013). The phyA′/phyA″ balance thus depends on the kinase/phosphatase equilibrium in the root cells. The relatively low effect of NaF on phyA in roots, together with the lack of the effect of OA and CA in them, may imply that the mechanism controlling the phyA′/phyA″ balance in roots can be different from that in shoots.
Graphic abstract
![](http://media.springernature.com/lw685/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs43630-021-00110-1/MediaObjects/43630_2021_110_Figa_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs43630-021-00110-1/MediaObjects/43630_2021_110_Fig1_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs43630-021-00110-1/MediaObjects/43630_2021_110_Fig2_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs43630-021-00110-1/MediaObjects/43630_2021_110_Fig3_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs43630-021-00110-1/MediaObjects/43630_2021_110_Fig4_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs43630-021-00110-1/MediaObjects/43630_2021_110_Fig5_HTML.png)
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- CA:
-
Cantharidic acid
- FR:
-
Far-red light
- γ1 :
-
The extent of the Pr → lumi-R phototransformation
- HIR:
-
High-irradiance response
- JA:
-
Jasmonic acid
- λa, λe, λmax :
-
Wavelengths of the actinic and excitation light and of the maximum of phytochrome fluorescence, respectively
- LFR:
-
Low-fluence response
- lumi-R:
-
The first photoproduct of the Pr phototransformation at 77–85 K
- NaF:
-
Sodium fluoride
- NTE:
-
N-Terminal extension
- phy:
-
Phytochrome
- Ptot :
-
Total phy content
- Pr:
-
The red-light-absorbing phy form
- Pfr:
-
The far-red-light-absorbing phy form
- R:
-
Red light
- PP1 and PP2A:
-
Protein phosphatases 1 and 2A
- phyA and phyB:
-
Phytochromes A and B
- phyA′ and phyA″:
-
Subpopulations of phyA
- T:
-
Temperature
- VLFR:
-
Very low-fluence response
References
Legris, M., Ince, Y. Ç., & Fankhause, C. (2019). Molecular mechanisms underlying phytochrome-controlled morphogenesis in plants. Nature Communications, 10, 1–15.
Casal, J. J., Candia, A. N., & Sellaro, R. (2014). Light perception and signaling by phytochrome A. Journal of Experimental Botany, 65, 2835–2845.
Kneissl, J., Shinomura, T., Furuy, M., & Bolle, C. (2008). A rice phytochrome A in Arabidopsis: The role of the N-terminus under red and far-red light. Molecular Plant, 1, 84–102.
Long, C., & Iino, M. (2001). Light-dependent osmoregulation in pea stem protoplasts. Photoreceptors, tissue specificity, ion regulation, and physiological implications. Plant Physiology, 125, 1854–1869.
Takano, M., Inagaki, N., Xie, X., Yuzurihara, N., Hihara, F., Ishizuka, T., Yano, M., Nishimura, M., Miyao, A., Hirochika, H., & Shinomura, T. (2005). Distinct and cooperative functions of phytochromes A, B, and C in the control of deetiolation and flowering in rice. The Plant Cell, 17, 3311–3325.
Sineshchekov, V. (2019). Two molecular species of phytochrome A with distinct modes of action. Functional Plant Biology, 46, 118–135.
Sineshchekov, V., Sudnitsin, A., Adam, E., Schäfer, E., & Viczian, A. (2014). phyA-GFP is spectroscopically and photochemically similar to phyA and comprises both its native types, phyA′ and phyA′′. Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences, 13, 1671–1679.
Casal, J. J., Davis, S. J., Kirchenbauer, D., Viczian, A., Yanovsky, M. J., Clough, R. C., & Vierstra, R. D. (2002). The serine-rich N-terminal domain of oat phytochrome A helps regulate light responses and subnuclear localization of the photoreceptor. Plant Physiology, 129, 1127–1137.
Sineshchekov, V. A., Koppel, L. A., & Bolle, C. (2018). Two native types of phytochrome A, phyAʹ and phyAʹʹ, differ by the state of phosphorylation at the N-terminus as revealed by fluorescence investigations of the Ser/Ala mutant of rice phyA expressed in transgenic Arabidopsis. Functional Plant Biology, 45, 150–159.
Sineshchekov, V. A., Loskovich, A. V., Riemann, M., & Nick, P. (2004). The jasmonate-free rice mutant hebiba is affected in the response of phyA′/phyA′′ pools and protochlorophyllide biosynthesis to far-red light. Photochemical and Photobiological Sciences, 3, 1058–1062.
Riemann, M., Bouyer, D., Hisada, A., Müller, A., Yatou, O., Weiler, E. W., Takano, M., Furuya, M., & Nick, P. (2009). Phytochrome A requires jasmonate for photodestruction. Planta, 229, 1035–1045.
Sineshchekov, V., Koppel, L., Riemann, M., & Nick, P. (2021). Phytochrome A and its functional manifestations in etiolated and far-red light-grown seedlings of the wild-type rice and its hebiba and cpm2 mutants deficient in the defense-related phytohormone jasmonic acid. Photochemistry and Photobiology, 97, 335–342.
McMichael, R. W., Jr., & Lagarias, J. C. (1990). Phosphopeptide mapping of Avena phytochrome phosphorylated by protein kinases in vitro. Biochemistry, 29, 3872–3878.
Yeh, K.-C., & Lagarias, J. C. (1998). Eukaryotic phytochromes: Light-regulated serine/threonine protein kinases with histidine kinase ancestry. Proceedings of the National academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 95, 13976–13981.
Lapko, V. N., Jiang, X. Y., Smith, D. L., & Song, P. S. (1997). Posttranslational modification of oat phytochrome A: Phosphorylation of a specific serine in a multiple serine cluster. Biochemistry, 36, 10595–10599.
Han, Y. J., Kim, H. S., Kim, Y. M., Shin, A. Y., Lee, S. S., Bhoo, S. H., & Kim, J. I. (2010). Functional characterization of phytochrome autophosphorylation in plant light signaling. Plant and Cell Physiology, 51, 596–609.
Hoang, Q. T., Han, Y. J., & Kim, J. I. (2019). Plant phytochromes and their phosphorylation. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 20, 3450.
Zhou, Y., Yang, L., Duan, J., Cheng, J., Shen, Y., Wang, X., & Li, J. (2018). Hinge region of Arabidopsis phyA plays an important role in regulating phyA function. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115, E11864–E11873.
Saijo, Y., Zhu, D., Li, J., Rubio, V., Zhou, Z., Shen, Y., & Deng, X. W. (2008). Arabidopsis COP1/SPA1 complex and FHY1/FHY3 associate with distinct phosphorylated forms of phytochrome A in balancing light signaling. Molecular Cell, 31, 607–613.
Kim, J. I., Shen, Y., Han, Y. J., Park, J. E., Kirchenbauer, D., Soh, M. S., & Song, P. S. (2004). Phytochrome phosphorylation modulates light signaling by influencing the protein–protein interaction. The Plant Cell, 16, 2629–2640.
Zhang, S., Li, C., Zhou, Y., Wang, X., Li, H., Feng, Z., & Li, J. (2018). TANDEM ZINC-FINGER/PLUS3 is a key component of phytochrome A signaling. The Plant Cell, 30, 835–852.
Shin, A. Y., Han, Y. J., Baek, A., Ahn, T., Kim, S. Y., Nguyen, T. S., & Kim, J. I. (2016). Evidence that phytochrome functions as a protein kinase in plant light signalling. Nature Communications, 7, 1–13.
Hoang, Q. T., Cho, J. Y., Choi, D. M., Shin, A. Y., Kim, J. A., Han, Y. J., & Kim, J. I. (2021). Protein kinase activity of phytochrome A positively correlates with photoresponses in Arabidopsis. Frontiers in Plant Science. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.706316
Sineshchekov, V., Koppel, L., & Kim, J. I. (2019). The dephosphorylated S8A and S18A mutants of (oat) phytochrome A comprise its two species, phyA′ and phyA′′, suggesting that autophosphorylation at these sites is not involved in the phyA differentiation. Photochemical and Photobiological Sciences, 18, 1242–1248.
Sineshchekov, V., Koppel, L., Shor, E., Kochetova, G., Galland, P., & Zeidler, M. (2013). Protein phosphatase activity and acidic/alkaline balance as factors regulating the state of phytochrome A and its two native pools in the plant cell. Photochemistry and Photobiology, 89, 83–96.
Shelden, E., & Wadswort, P. (1996). Stimulation of microtubule dynamic turnover in living cells treated with okadaic acid. Cell Motility and the Cytoskeleton, 35, 24–34.
Senna, R., Simonin, V., Silva-Neto, M. A. C., & Fialho, E. (2006). Induction of acid phosphatase activity during germination of maize (Zea mays) seeds. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 44, 467–473.
Grover, M., Dhingra, A., Sharma, A. K., Maheshwari, S. C., & Tyagi, A. K. (1999). Involvement of phytochrome (s), Ca2+, and phosphorylation in light-dependent control of transcript levels for plastid genes (psbA, psaA and rbcL) in rice (Oryza sativa). Physiologia Plantarum, 105, 701–707.
Jaumot, M. J., & Hancock, F. (2001). Protein phosphatases 1 and 2A promote Raf-1 activation by regulating 14-3-3 interactions. Oncogene, 20, 3949–3958.
MacKintosh, C., Lyon, G. D., & MacKintosh, R. W. (1994). Protein phosphatase inhibitors activate anti-fungal defence responses of soybean cotyledons and cell cultures. The Plant Journal, 5, 137–147.
Chang, S. C., & Kaufman, P. B. (2000). Effects of staurosporine, okadaic acid, and sodium fluoride on protein phosphorylation in graviresponding oat shoot pulvini. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 38, 315–323.
Goschorska, M., Gutowska, I., Olszewska, M., Baranowska-Bosiacka, I., Rać, M., Olszowski, T., & Chlubek, D. (2015). Effect of sodium fluoride on the catalase activity in THP-1 macrophages. Fluoride, 48, 274–282.
Pant, S., Pant, P., & Bhiravamurthy, P. V. (2008). Effects of fluoride on early root and shoot growth of typical crop plants of India. Fluoride, 41, 57.
Chandra, P., Vishnoi, N., & Singh, D. P. (2012). Assessment of fluoride contamination of water and soil and its phytotoxic effect on the growth parameters in selected vegetable crops. Global Journal of Applied Environmental Sciences, 2, 55–65.
Miller, G. W. (1993). The effect of fluoride on higher plants with special emphasis on early physiological and biochemical disorders. Fluoride, 26, 3–22.
Sineshchekov, V. A. (1994). Two spectroscopically and photochemically distinguishable phytochromes in etiolated seedlings of monocots and dicots. Photochemistry and Photobiology, 59, 77–86.
Baunthiyal, M., & Ranghar, S. (2014). Physiological and biochemical responses of plants under fluoride stress: An overview. Fluoride, 47, 287–293.
Sineshchekov, V. A., Ogorodnikova, O. B., & Weller, J. L. (1999). Fluorescence and photochemical properties of phytochromes A and B in etiolated pea seedlings. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology, B: Biology, 49, 204–211.
Clough, R. C., & Vierstra, R. D. (1997). Phytochrome degradation. Plant, Cell & Environmen, 20, 713–721.
Stone, H. J., & Pratt, L. H. (1979). Characterization of the destruction of phytochrome in the red-absorbing form. Plant Physiology, 63, 680–682.
Schwarz, H., & Schneider, H. A. W. (1987). Immunological assay of phytochrome in small sections of roots and other organs of maize (Zea mays L.) seedlings. Planta, 170, 152–160.
Cantón, F. R., & Quail, P. H. (1999). Both phyA and phyB mediate light-imposed repression of phyA gene expression in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology, 121, 1207–1215.
Frances, S., White, M. J., Edgerton, M. D., Jones, A. M., Elliott, R. C., & Thompson, W. F. (1992). Initial characterization of a pea mutant with light-independent photomorphogenesis. The Plant Cell, 4, 1519–1530.
Sineshchekov, V. A., Frances, S., & White, M. J. (1995). Fluorescence and photochemical characterization of phytochrome in de-etiolated pea mutant lip. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B: Biology, 28, 47–51.
Kim, D.-H., Kang, J.-G., Yang, S.-S., Chung, K.-S., Song, P.-S., & Park, C.-M. (2002). A phytochrome-associated protein phosphatase 2A modulates light signals in flowering time control in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell, 14, 3043–3056.
Ryu, J. S., Kim, J. I., Kunkel, T., Kim, B. C., Cho, D. S., Hong, S. H., Kim, S. H., Fernandez, A. P., Kim, Y., Alonso, J. M., Ecker, J. R., Nagy, F., Lim, P. O., Song, P.-S., Schäfer, E., & Nam, H. G. (2005). Phytochrome-specific type 5 phosphatase controls light signal flux by enhancing phytochrome stability and affinity for a signal transducer. Cell, 120, 290–292.
Phee, B. K., Kim, J. I., Shin, D. H., Yoo, J., Park, K., Han, Y. J., Kwon, Y. K., Cho, M. H., Jeon, J. S., Bhoo, S. H., & Hahn, T. R. (2008). A novel protein phosphatase indirectly regulates phytochrome-interacting factor 3 via phytochrome. The Biochemical Journal, 415, 247–255.
Correll, M. J., & Kiss, J. Z. (2005). The roles of phytochromes in elongation and gravitropism of roots. Plant and Cell Physiology, 46, 317–323.
Lee, H. J., Ha, J. H., Kim, S. G., Choi, H. K., Kim, Z. H., Han, Y. J., & Park, C. M. (2016). Stem-piped light activates phytochrome B to trigger light responses in Arabidopsis thaliana roots. Science Signaling, 9, ra106.
Acknowledgements
The authors are very grateful to Prof. P. Galland for his meticulous reading of the manuscript and helpful suggestions. There is no financial support to declare.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
There are not conflicts to declare.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sineshchekov, V., Shor, E. & Koppel, L. The phosphatase/kinase balance affects phytochrome A and its native pools, phyA′ and phyA″, in etiolated maize roots: evidence from the induction of phyA′ destruction by a protein phosphatase inhibitor sodium fluoride. Photochem Photobiol Sci 20, 1429–1437 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43630-021-00110-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43630-021-00110-1