Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Capture of CO2 and Water While Driving for Use in the Food and Agricultural Systems

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Circular Economy and Sustainability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This white paper proposes research on the design and evaluation of an integrated system assembled to the vehicle with no energy penalty where a sequence of processes, cooling, heating, mass transfer, and compression, will take place while driving. The increasing demand for fresh produce has led to an expansion of the US urban agriculture industry (greenhouses) which uses carbon dioxide (CO2) enrichment from burning fossil fuels to increase plant productivity and to shorten the plant growth time. The demand for CO2 and water in greenhouses is massive (2.81 kg CO2eq/kg produce, 22 L water/kg produce), and alternate CO2 and water delivery sources are essential to make post-harvest food processing technologies such as dense-phase CO2 pasteurization of beverages more sustainable. Internal combustion engines (ICE) have an average efficiency of about 30%, with 30% of the thermal energy wasted in the exhaust gases. A typical passenger vehicle emits about 4.6 metric tons of CO2 and 21,000 l of water per year into the environment. Although multiple carbon capture technologies exist, the size of these plants is large, their unit operations are fixed, and the use of novel materials is limited. In this white paper, we propose to retrofit the wasted energy in a car’s exhaust to capture, concentrate, store, and deliver liquid CO2 and water for agricultural and food systems. Preliminary thermodynamic and exergy analysis indicates that this is feasible. Specially designed heat and mass transfer units with novel materials and 3D printing technology could be easily deployed and used while driving to mitigate the global warming problem while addressing the needs of agricultural systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

Data availability

Not applicable.

Code Availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. Wirth M, Vobruba T, Hartl M, Kisser J (2021) Potential nutrient conversion using nature-based solutions in cities and utilization concepts to create circular urban food systems. Circ Econ Sustain 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43615-021-00081-6

  2. van Zanten HHE, van Ittersum MK, de Boer IJM (2019) The role of farm animals in a circular food system. Global Food Security 21:188–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2019.06.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Garcia S, N., Osburn. B.L., Jay-Russell, M.T. (2020) One health for food safety, food security, and sustainable food production. Front Sustain Food Syst 4:1, 9 pages. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2020.00001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Reay DS, Warnatzch EA, Craig E, Dawson L, George S, Norman R, Ritchie P (2020) From farm to fork: growing a scottish food system that doesn’t cost the planet. Front Sustain Food Syst 4:72. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2020.00072

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Paris Agreement. (2015). In Paris; 2015, 1–25. Available at: https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/english_paris_agreement.pdf Accessed January 9, 2020.

  6. EPA (2020) Environmental Protection Agency. Available at: https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions. Accessed January 9, 2020.

  7. European Commission (2020) 2050 long term climate strategy and targets. Available at: https://eceuropaeu/clima/policies/strategies/2050_en Accessed January 9, 2020

  8. Jurgilevich A, Birge T, Kentala-Lehtonen J, Korhonen-Kurki K, Pietikäinen J, Saikku L, Schösler H (2016) Transition towards circular economy in the food system. Sustainability 8(1):69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. De Boer IJM, van Ittersum MK (2018) Circularity in agricultural production. Mansholt lecture. Wageningen University and Research Booklet, www.wur.edu Last accessed January 6 2020.

  10. Venkatramanan V, Shah S, Prasad S, Singh A, Prasad R (2021) Assessment of bioenergy generation potential of agricultural crop residues in India. Circ Econ Sustain. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43615-021-00072-7

  11. Davis SC, Kauneckis D, Kruse NA, Miller KE, Zimmer M, Dabelko GD (2016) Closing the loop: integrative systems management of waste in food, energy, and water systems. J Environ Stud Sci 6:11–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Yang NHN, Bertassini AC, Mendes JAJ et al (2021) The ‘3CE2CE’ framework—change management towards a circular economy: opportunities for agribusiness. Circ Econ Sustain. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43615-021-00057-6

  13. Bakker JC, Adams SR, Boualrd T, Montero JI (2008) Innovative technologies for an efficient use of energy. Acta Hortic 801:49–62. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2008.801.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Liaros S (2021) Circular food futures: what will they look like? (2021) Circular Economy and Sustainability https://doi.org/10.1007/s43615-021-00082-5

  15. Aresta M, Dibenedetto A, Angellini A (2013) The changing paradigm in CO2 utilization. J CO2 Util J CO2 UTIL 3-4:65–73

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. van Kooten O, Heuvelink E, Stanghellini SO, Heuvelink E, Stanghellini S (2008) New development in greenhouse technology can mitigate the water shortage problem of the 21st century. Acta Hortic 767:2. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2008.767.2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. De Pascale S, Maggio A (2004) Sustainable protected cultivation at Mediterranean climate. Perspectives and challenges. Acta Hortic 691:29–42

    Google Scholar 

  18. Liu, P., Shu, G., Tian, H. (2019). Carbon dioxide as working fluids in transcritical Rankine cycle for diesel engine multiple waste heat recovery in comparison to hydrocarbons. J Therm Sci 28, No.3 (2019) 494-504. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11630-019-1090-z

  19. PVTSim Nova 4.1 – Calsep.com (2020).

  20. Gibson J.A., Mangano E., Shiko E., Greenaway A.G, Gromov A. V., Lozinska, M.M., Friedrich, D., Campbell, E.E.B., Wright, P.A., Brandani, S. (2016). Adsorption materials and processes for carbon capture from gas-fired power plants: AMPGas Ind. Eng Chem Res 2016, 55, 3840−3851. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.5b05015

  21. Sharma S, Maréchal F (2019) Carbon dioxide capture from internal combustion engine exhaust using temperature swing adsorption. Front Energy Res 7(December 2019):16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2019.00143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Abid, H.S., Rada, Z.H., Hongqi, X. D., Wang, D. (2017). Enhanced CO2 adsorption and selectivity of CO2/N2 on amino-MIL-53(Al) synthesized by polar co-solvents. Energy Fuel 2018, 32(4):4502–4510, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.7b03240

  23. Dey C, Berger C, Foran B, Foran M, Joske R, Lenzen M, Wood R (2007) Household environmental pressure from consumption: an Australian environmental atlas. G . Birch (Ed.), Water, wind, art and debate: how environmental concerns impact on disciplinary research, Sydney University Press, Sydney.

  24. Vermeulen SJ, Campbell BM, Ingram JSI (2012) Climate change and food systems. Annu Rev Environ Resour 37:195–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Grunert G, Hieke S, Wills J (2014) Sustainability labels on food products: consumer motivation, understanding and use. Food Policy 44:177–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Clune S, Crossin E, Verghesse K (2017) Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories. J Clean Prod 140(2):766–783. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.082

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Okpala COR (2020) Toward sustaining global food systems for the future. Front Sustain Food Syst 31. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2020.00003

  28. Jones CR, Olfe-Ktrautlein B, Naims H, Armstrong K (2017) The social acceptance of carbon dioxide utilization: a review and research agenda. Front Energy Res 5:11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2017.00011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Hofstetter JS, De Marchi V, Sarkis J et al (2021) From sustainable global value chains to circular economy—different silos, different perspectives, but many opportunities to build bridges. Circ Econ Sustain 1(2021):21–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43615-021-00015-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Nikolau, I.E., Jones, N., Stefanakis, A. (2021). Circular economy and sustainability: the past, the present and the future directions. Circ Econ Sustain 1:1-20 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43615-021-00030-3

  31. Hepburn C, Adlen E, Beddington J, Carter EA, Fuss S, Mac Dowell N, Minx JC, Smith P, Williams CK (2019) The technological and economic prospects for CO2 utilization and removal. Nature 575(7781):87–97. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1681-6

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Wasri Y, kabanov, V., Zhou, P., Sinha, A. (2020) Novel carbon dioxide utilization technologies: a means to an end. Front Energy Res 8(October 28). https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2020.574147

  33. Hall BH (2016) University of CB, Khan B (University of CB. New economy handbook. Adopt New Technol. 24 (5), 381. https://doi.org/10.1097/MOO.0000000000000298

  34. Fuss S, Lamb WF, Callaghan MW, Hilaire J, Creutzig F, Amann T, Beringer T, de Oliveira Garcia W, Hartmann J, Khanna T, Luderer G, Nemet GF, Rogelj J, Smith P, Vicente JLV, Wilcox J, del Mar Zamora Dominguez M, Minx JC (2018) Negative emissions—part 2: costs, potentials and side effects. Environ Res Lett 13(6):1–47. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aabf9f

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Sandalow D, Aines R, Friedmann J, McCormick C, and McCoy, S. (2017) Carbon dioxide utilization (CO2U) ICEF roadmap 2.0. Available at: https://www.icef-forum.org/pdf/2018/roadmap/CO2U_Roadmap_ICEF2017.pdf Accessed January 9, 2020.

  36. Zhu Q (2019) Developments on CO2-utilization technologies. Clean Energy 3(2):85–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Alcaraz-Calderon AM, Gonzalez-Diaz MO, Mendez A, Gonzalez-Santaklo JM, Gonzalez-Dias A (2019) Natural gas combined cycle with exhaust gas recirculation and CO2 capture at part-load operation. J Energy Inst 92(2):370–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joei.2017.12.007

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Lee W-S, Kang J-H, Lee J-C (2020) Enhancement of energy efficiency by exhaust gas recirculation with oxygen-rich combustion in a natural gas combined cycle with a carbon capture process. Energy 200:117586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.117586

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Bolton S, Kasturi A, Palko S, Lai C, Love L, Parks J, Sun X, Tsouris C (2019) 3D printed structures for optimized carbon capture technology in packed bed columns. Sep Sci Technol 54(2019):2047–2058

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Schramski JR, Rutz ZJ, Gattie DK, Li K (2011) Trophically balanced sustainable agriculture. J Ecoll Econ 72:88–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Petroleum Engineering Department, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843, USA

    Maria A. Barrufet

  2. Biological and Agricultural Engineering Department, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843-2117, USA

    Elena M. Castell-Perez & Rosana G. Moreira

Authors
  1. Maria A. Barrufet
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Elena M. Castell-Perez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Rosana G. Moreira
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

The three authors brainstormed to finalize the proposed idea.

Barrufet, development of concept, calculations, and technology highlights.

Castell-Perez, development of sections on impact and significance of the proposed research to agriculture and food production systems and preparation and submission of the manuscript.

Moreira, search of literature on the state of greenhouse gas emissions from agriculture and potential uses in food processing and production and preparation of figure and tables.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elena M. Castell-Perez.

Ethics declarations

Consent for Publication

Not applicable.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Barrufet, M.A., Castell-Perez, E.M. & Moreira, R.G. Capture of CO2 and Water While Driving for Use in the Food and Agricultural Systems. Circ.Econ.Sust. 2, 1241–1252 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43615-021-00102-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43615-021-00102-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation