Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Nature-Based Solutions as a Tool in the New Circular Economic Model for Climate Change Adaptation

  • Opinion Paper
  • Published:
Circular Economy and Sustainability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

While our modern global society enjoys the benefits of an economic growth that was never seen before, at the same time, it is facing the existential threat of climate change. We now realize that the linear economic model cannot sustain our life standards indefinitely. A new circular approach is already suggested that will adjust our priorities and re-orient future infrastructure investments. In this context, we look back to nature to find the solutions we need to increase the resiliency of our societies, to protect and restore the ecosystems, and to maintain the necessary economic growth without further undermining the planet’s boundaries. Nature-based solutions serve exactly this ambitious and multi-factorial purpose due to their inherent ability not only to tackle climate change but also to provide a series of ecosystems services and social benefits. This opinion paper discusses the potential of nature-based solutions to stimulate a circular model of economic growth, their contribution to new circular strategies for climate change adaptation, the various benefits of such concepts, and the key actions needed to increase the awareness and attract more investments on nature-based approaches in the near future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Available upon request to the corresponding author.

Code Availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. IPCC (2015) Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Available from: https://www.ipcc.ch/. Accessed 15 Dec 2020

  2. Donato DC, Kauffman JB, Murdiyarso D, Kurnianto S, Stidham M, Kanninen M (2011) Mangroves among the most carbon-rich forests in the tropics. Nat Geosci 4:293–297. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1123

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Chandy L, Ledlie N, Penciakova V (2013) The final countdown: prospects for ending extreme poverty by 2030. Global Economy and Development at Brookings, Policy Paper 2013-04. The Brookings Institution, Washington, DC; USA

  4. Magalhães P (2016) Chapter fourteen: safe operating space of humankind treaty [SOS treaty]: a proposal. In: The safe operating space treaty: a new approach to managing our use of the earth system Edited by Paulo Magalhães, WillSteffen, Klaus Bosselmann, Alexandra Aragão and Viriato Soromenho-Marques. pp. 289–309. Cambridge Scholars Publishing (10):1-4438-8903-2

  5. Stefanakis AI, Nikolaou I (2021) Circular economy and sustainability, Volume 1. Elsevier Publishing

  6. Tukker A, de Koning A, Wood R, Hawkins T, Lutter S, Acosta J, Cantuche JMR, Bouwmeester M, Oosterhaven J, Drosdowski T, Kuenen J (2013) EXIOPOL – development and illustrative analyses of a detailed global MR EE SUT/IOT. Econ Syst Res 25(1):50–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/09535314.2012.761952

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wood R, Stadler K, Bulavskaya T, Lutter S, Giljum S, de Koning A, Kuenen J, Schuetz H, Acosta-Fernandez J, Usubiaga A, Simas M, Ivanova O, Weinzettel J, Schmidt JH, Merciai S, Tukker A (2015) Global sustainability accounting—developing EXIOBASE for multi-regional footprint analysis. Sustainability 7:138–163. https://doi.org/10.3390/su7010138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. UNDP (2015) Circular economy strategies for Lao PDR - a metabolic approach to redefine resource efficient and low-carbon development. United Nations Development Programme, a project with Shifting Paradigms, FABRICations and Circle Economy

  9. Circle Economy (2021) Circularity Gap Report 2021. Ruparo, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  10. Circle Economy (2015) Implementing circular economy globally makes Paris Agreement targets achievable. Circle Econ Ecofys

  11. EC (European Commission) (2013) Green infrastructure (GI) — enhancing Europe’s natural capital. COM(2013) 249 final, Brussels, 6.5.2013

  12. Kolokotsa D, Lilli AA, Lilli MA, Nikolaidis NP (2020) On the impact of nature-based solutions on citizens’ health & well being. Energy Build 229:110527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.110527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Spano G, Dadvand P, Sanesi G (2021) Editorial: the benefits of nature-based solutions to psychological health. Front Psychol 12:646627. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.646627

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Cohen-Shacham E, Walters G, Janzen C, Maginnis S (2016) Nature-based solutions to address global societal challenges. IUCN Commission on Ecosystem Management (CEM) and IUCN World Commission on Protected Areas (WCPA), Switzerland

  15. Cohen-Shacham E, Andrade A, Dalton J, Dudley N, Jones M, Kumar C, Maginnis S, Maynard S, Nelson CR, Renaud FG, Welling R, Walters G (2019) Core principles for successfully implementing and upscaling nature-based solutions. Environ Sci Policy 98:20–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bulkeley H, (2020). Nature based solutions towards sustainable communities. Analysis of EU-funded projects. Directorate-General for Research and Innovation, European Commission, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg

  17. United Nations, (2019). World urbanization prospects. Department of Economic and Social Affairs. ST/ESA/SER.A/423

  18. Mcgranahan G, Schensul D, Singh G (2016) Inclusive urbanization: can the 2030 Agenda be delivered without it? Int Inst Enviro Dev (IIED) 28(1):13–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247815627522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lucci P, Mansour-Ille D, Easton-Calabria E, Cumminds C (2016) Sustainable cities - internal migration, jobs and the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Overseas Development Institute, Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation SDC, October

  20. Anwar B, Xiao Z, Akter S, Rehman R (2017) Sustainable urbanization and development goals strategy through public–private partnerships in a South-Asian Metropolis. Sustainability 9(11):1940. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9111940

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Perera D, Smakhtin V, Williams S, North T, Curry A (2021) Ageing water storage infrastructure: an emerging global risk.UNU-INWEH Report Series, Issue 11. United Nations University Institute for Water, Environment and Health, Hamilton, Canada

  22. Kristvik E, Muthanna TM, Alfredsen K (2019) Assessment of future water availability under climate change, considering scenarios for population growth and ageing infrastructure. Water & Climate Change 10(1):1–12. https://doi.org/10.2166/wcc.2018.096

  23. IMF (2019) World economic outlook. In: Global manufacturing downturn, rising trade barriers. International Monetary Fund, Publication Services, Washington

  24. Brown M, Kim Y, Romani M (2015) Infrastructure finance in the developing world. Green infrastructure: definition and needs. The Global Green Growth Institute, Seoul, Korea & The Intergovernmental Group of Twenty Four on Monetary Affairs and Development, Washington

  25. Stefanakis AI (2019) The role of constructed wetlands as green infrastructure for sustainable urban water management. Sustainability 11(24):6981. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11246981

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. GCA (2019) Adapt now: a global call for leadership on climate resilience. Global Commission on Adaptation, Rotterdam, The Netherlands & World Resources Institute, Washington

  27. EC (European Commission) (2015) Towards an EU research and innovation policy agenda for nature-based solutions & re-naturing cities. Final report. Directorate-General for Research and Innovation Climate Action, Environment, Resource Efficiency and Raw Materials, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg

  28. Pearlmutter D, Theochari D, Nehls T, Pinho P, Piro P, Korolova A, Papaefthimioy S, Garcia Mateo MC, Calheiros C, Zluwai I, Pitha U, Schosseler P, Florentin Y, Ouannou S, Gal E, Aichen A, Arnold K, Igondova E, Pucher B (2020) Enhancing the circular economy with nature-based solutions in the built urban environment: green building materials, systems and sites. Blue-Green Syst 2(1):46–72. https://doi.org/10.2166/bgs.2019.928

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Griscom BW, Adams J, Ellis PW, Houghton RA, Lomax G, Miteva DA, Schlesinger WH, Shoch D, Siikamaeki JV, Smith P, Woodbury P, Zganjar C, Blackman A, Campari J, Conant RT, Delgado C, Elias P, Gopalakrishna T, Hamsik MR, Herrero M, Kiesecker J, Landis E, Leastadius L, Leavitt SM, Minnemeyer S, Polasky S, Potapov P, Putz FE, Sanderman J, Silvius M, Wolenberg E, Fargione J (2017) Natural climate solutions. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 114(44):11645–11650. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1710465114

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. EC (European Commission), (2020). Nature-based solutions for microclimate regulation and air quality. Analysis of EU-funded projects. Directorate-General for Research and Innovation, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg

  31. Rosenfeld AH, Akbari H, Romm JJ, Pomerantz M (1998) Cool communities: strategies for heat island mitigation and smog reduction. Energy Build 28:51–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Stefanakis AI, Charalampopoulos I, Psomiadis E, Prigent S (2018) The thermal regime of a large constructed wetland in the desert environment. 16th IWA International Conference on Wetland Systems for Water Pollution Control, Valencia, Spain, September 30 - October 1

  33. EEA (European Environment Agency) (2015) Exploring nature-based solutions - the role of green infrastructure in mitigating the impacts of weather- and climate change-related natural hazards. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg

    Google Scholar 

  34. Griscom BW, Busch J, Cook-Patton SC, Ellis PW, Funk J, Leavitt SM, Lomax G, Turner WR, Chapman M, Engelmann J, Gurwick NP, Landis E, Lawrence D, Malhi Y, Murray LS, Navarrete D, Roe S, Scull S, Smith P, Streck C, Walker WS, Worthington T (2020) National mitigation potential from natural climate solutions in the tropics. Philos Trans R Soc B 375(1794):20190126. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2019.0126

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. De Lamo X, Jung M, Visconti P, Schmidt-Traub G, Miles L, Kapos V (2020) Strengthening synergies: how action to achieve post-2020 global biodiversity conservation targets can contribute to mitigating climate change. UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  36. Lehner B, Döll P (2004) Development and validation of a global database of lakes, reservoirs and wetlands. J Hydrol 296(1–4):1–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Chen L, Chen J (2014) Global wetland mapping (GlobalLand30). Report to Ramsar Convention Secretariat. Gland, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  38. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, (2005). Ecosystems and human well-being: wetlands and water, Synthesis. World Resources Institute, Washington, DC

  39. Hussain SA, Badola R (2010) Valuing mangrove benefits: contribution of mangrove forests to local livelihoods in Bhitarkanika Conservation Area, East Coast of India. Wetl Ecol Manag 18:321–331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11273-009-9173-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Masi F, Rizzo A, Regelsberger M (2018) The role of constructed wetlands in a new circular economy, resource oriented, and ecosystem services paradigm. J Environ Manag 16:275–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Barbosa AE, Fernandes JN, David LM (2012) Key issues for sustainable urban stormwater management. Water Res 46:6787–6798

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Meyer D, Molle P, Esser D, Troesch S, Masi F, Dittmer U (2013) Constructed wetlands for combined sewer overflow treatment-comparison of German. French and Italian approaches Water 5:1–12

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Stefanakis AI (2020) Constructed wetlands for sustainable wastewater treatment in hot and arid climates: opportunities, challenges and case studies in the Middle East. Water 12(6):1665. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12061665

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Nielsen S, Stefanakis AI (2021) Sustainable dewatering of industrial sludges in sludge treatment reed beds: experiences from pilot and full-scale studies under different climates. Appl Sci 10:7446. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10217446

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Stefanakis AI (2018) Constructed wetlands for industrial wastewater treatment, 1st edn. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chicheste

    Google Scholar 

  46. Monteiro CM, Calheiros CS, Martins JP, Costa FM, Palha P, de Freitas S, Ramos NMM, Castro PML (2017) Substrate influence on aromatic plant growth in extensive green roofs in a Mediterranean climate. Urban Ecosyst 20:1347–1357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Jia H, Wang Z, Zhen X, Clar M, Wu SL (2017) China’s sponge city construction: a discussion on technical approaches. Front Environ Sci Eng 11

  48. EC 2015. The EU and nature-based solutions. Available at https://ec.europa.eu/info/research-and-innovation/research-area/environment/nature-based-solutions_en. Accessed 13 Jan 2021

  49. Kapos V, Wicander S, Salvaterra T, Dawkins K, Hicks C (2019) The role of the natural environment in adaptation, background paper for the Global Commission on Adaptation. Global Commission on Adaptation, Rotterdam and Washington

    Google Scholar 

  50. Lawrence D, Vandecar K (2015) Effects of tropical deforestation on climate and agriculture. Nat Clim Chang 5:27–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. McDonald RI, Shemie D (2014) Urban water blueprint: mapping conservation solutions to the global water challenge. The Nature Conservancy, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  52. Chausson A, Turner B, Seddon D, Chabaneix N, Girardin CAJ, Kapos V, Key I, Roe D, Smith A, Woroniecki S, Seddon N (2020) Mapping the effectiveness of nature-based solutions for climate change adaptation. Glob Chang Biol 00:1–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15310

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexandros I. Stefanakis.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Stefanakis, A.I., Calheiros, C.S. & Nikolaou, I. Nature-Based Solutions as a Tool in the New Circular Economic Model for Climate Change Adaptation. Circ.Econ.Sust. 1, 303–318 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43615-021-00022-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43615-021-00022-3

Keywords

Navigation