Skip to main content
Log in

Impact of public debt on economic growth: a case study of Jammu and Kashmir

  • Original Article
  • Published:
SN Business & Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Jammu and Kashmir is an ex-special category state that has traditionally stressed fiscal health, relying on central transfers and debt. The rising debt burden on India's subnational economy has become a burning issue and target of fiscal policy after the Covid-19. Thus, the current research attempts to evaluate the influence of debt on economic development and to assess the sustainability of the state's expanding public debt from 1991 to 2021.Two major research questions have been posed in the article, the first being estimating the sustainability of the total outstanding liabilities of Jammu and Kashmir, which will be followed by modeling the relationship between total liabilities, interest receipts, gross capital formation and economic growth. To estimate the long-run relationship between total liabilities and economic growth of Jammu and Kashmir ARDL (Autoregressive Distributive Lag) model has been used based on the stationarity of the data, where some variables were integrated of order 1 and some variables were integrated at the level. The Domar’s debt sustainability model has been estimated to understand the economic sustainability of debts. Empirical analysis indicates that Jammu and Kashmir has much higher Debt to GSDP ratio than national average. Debt serving or interest payment to Revenue Receipts ratio has declined constantly over the period of time from 24% in 1992 to merely 5% in 2020, which marks a drastic improved performance. The study finds that both public debt and debt-servicing burden have a negative and significant impact on per-capita income in both short-run and long-run. The Domar’s debt sustainability analysis indicates that the state has unsustainable debts in early 2000s however after the implementation of FRBM act the sustainability was restored. The bifurcation of the state in two union territories and Covid-19 pandemic has resulted in unattainability of debt in Jammu and Kashmir from 2018 to 2021.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Source: MOSPI State Debt statistics 2022

Fig. 2

Source: RBI Handbook of Statistics of State Finances

Fig. 3

Source: Authors’ computation

Fig. 4

Source: Authors Own Computation

Fig. 5

Source: Authors Own Computation

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability statement

I Mohd Yousuf Malik assure that the on the request of the revivers the data of the corresponding paper will be made available. I also testify that the data has been collected from the secondary sources like RBI state statistics documents and budget document of Jammu and Kashmir. I also testify that the all the sources of data have been accredited in the paper.

Notes

  1. The Centre government in India grants special category status to states that have hilly terrain, a low population density, or a sizable tribal population, a strategic location along borders with neighboring countries, and economic and infrastructure backwardness. This categorization was based on the Gadgil formula's suggestions. The SCS criteria are as follows: the Centre pays 90% of the funds necessary under a centrally-sponsored plan to special category status states, compared to 60% or 75% in other states, with the remaining amounts contributed by state governments.

  2. The erstwhile special category state Jammu and Kashmir was bifurcated into two Union Territories, Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh, on 31 October 2019.

References

  • Abbas SA, Christensen JE (2010) The role of domestic debt markets in economic growth: an empirical investigation for low-income countries and emerging markets. IMF Staff Pap 57(1):209–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agarwal MK, Ansari S (2021) Impact of public debt on the economic growth of sub-national economies in India: a case of Uttar Pradesh. Econ Polit Week 57(21):49–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Anyway T, Masoga MM (2018) Can public debt stimulate public investment and economic growth in South Africa? Cogent Econ Fin 6:1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Baaziz Y, Guesmi K, Heller D, Lahiani A (2015) Does public debt matter for economic growth? Evidence from South Africa. J Appl Bus Res 31(6):2187–2196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barro RJ (1989) The Ricardian approach to budget deficits. J Econ Perspect 3(2):37–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baum A, Checherita-Westphal C, Rother P (2013) Debt and growth: New evidence for the euro area. J Int Money Fin 32(1):809–821

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard OJ, Chouraki JC, Hagemann RP, Sartor N (1990) The sustainability of fiscal policy: new answers to an old question. OECD Econ Stud 15:7–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Broner F, Aitor E, Alberto M, Jaume V (2014) Sovereign debt markets in turbulent times: creditor discrimination and crowding-out effects. J Monet Econ 61:114–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buiter WH (1985) Guide to public sector deficit and debt. Econ Policy:13–79.

  • Cecchetti SG, Mohanty MS, Zampolli F (2011) The real effects of debt

  • Checherita C, Rother P (2012) The impact of high gov-ernment debt on economic growth and its channels. Eur Econ Rev 56(7):1392–1405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Checherita-Westphal C, Rother P (2012) The impact of high government debt on economic growth and its channels: an empirical investigation for the euro area. Eur Econ Rev 56(7):1392–1405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham RT (1993) The effects of debt burden on economic growth in heavily indebted developing nations. J Econ Dev 18(1).

  • Diamond PA (1965) National debt in a neoclassical growth model. Am Econ Rev 55(5):1126–1150

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickey DA, Fuller WA (1981) Likelihood ratio statistics for autoregressive time series with unit root. Econometrica 49:1057–1072

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Domar ED (1944) The" burden of the debt" and the national income. Am Econ Rev 34(4):798–827

    Google Scholar 

  • Elmendorf DW, Mankiw GN (1999) Government debt. In: Taylor JB, Woodford M (eds) Handbook of macroeconomics. Harvard University.

  • FRBM Review Committee Report (2017) Government of India

  • Herndon T, Ash M, Pollin R (2014) Does high public debt consistently stifle economic growth? A critique of Reinhart and Rogoff. Camb J Econ 38(2):257–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janowicz-Lomott M, Łyskawa K, Polychronidou P, Karasavvoglou A (eds) Economic and financial challenges for balkan and eastern european countries. Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics

  • Krugman P (1988) Financing vs. forgiving a debt overhang. J Dev Econ 29(3):253–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar M, Woo J (2010) Public debt and growth. In: IMF Working Paper 10/174.

  • Lee SP, Ng YL (2015) Public debt and economic growth in Malaysia. Asian Econ Fin Rev 5(1):119–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mankiw NG, Romer D, Weil DN (1992) A contribution to the empirics of economic growth. Quart J Econ 107(2):407–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Modigliani F (1961) Long-run implications of alternative fiscal policies and the burden of the national debt. Econ J 71(284):730–755

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mosler W (2012) Soft currency economics II. Valance Company. (MMT – Modern Monetary Theory)

  • Nwannebuike US, Ike UJ, Onuka OI (2016) External debt and economic growth: the Nigeria experience. Eur J Acc Audit Fin Res 4(2):33–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Onogbosele DO, Ben MD (2016) The impact of domestic debt on economic growth of Nigeria. Asian Res J Arts Soc Sci 1(3):1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Owusu-Nantwi V, Erickson C (2016) Public debt and economic growth in Ghana. Afr Dev Rev 28(1):116–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pesaran MH (2007) A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross-section dependence. J Appl Economet 22(2):265–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pesaran MH, Shin Y, Smith RJ (2001) Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. J Appl Economet 16(3):289–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reinhart CM, Rogoff KS (2010) Growth in a time of debt. Am Econ Rev 100(2):573–578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reserve Bank of India (2021) Handbook of statistics of Indian states. Reserve Bank of India, Government of India.

  • Teles VK, Mussolini CC (2014) Public debt and the limits of fiscal policy to increase economic growth. Eur Econ Rev 66(1):1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woo J, Kumar MS (2015) Public debt and growth. Economica 82(328):70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wray RL (1998) Understanding modern money: the key to full employment and price stability. Edward Elgar, Northampton

    Google Scholar 

  • Wray RL (2015) Modern monetary theory: a primer on macroeconomics for sovereign monetary systems, 2nd edn. Palgrave Macmillan, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I Mohd Yousuf Malik acknowledge that there are no funding sources of the article titled Impact of Public Debt on Economic Growth: A Case Study of Jammu and Kashmir. The research has been carried without any funding source. The authors whose names are listed immediately below certify that they have NO affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest (such as honoraria; educational grants; participation in speakers’ bureaus; membership, employment, consultancies, stock ownership, or other equity interest; and expert testimony or patent-licensing arrangements), or non-financial interest (such as personal or professional relationships, affiliations, knowledge or beliefs) in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.

Funding

Not Applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

There are currently two authors listed in the paper, the first author is the principal author ho has given the original idea to work on this problem and prepared manuscript. The 2nd author is my PhD Supervisor who has helped in revision and Proof Reading.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohd Yousuf Malik.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

I, Mohd Yousuf Malik assure that assure that the authors don’t have any conflict of interest regarding the funding source, no affiliation regarding the employment or interest stock ownership, and patent licensing in the subject matter of the materials discussed in the paper attached above. Thus we give consent on proceeding with the publication process of the article attached above.

Ethical statement

Hereby, I Dr. M Yousuf Malik consciously assures that for the manuscript impact of Public Debt on Economic Growth: A Case Study of Jammu and Kashmir the following is fulfilled: (1) This material is the authors' own original work, which has not been previously published elsewhere. (2) The paper is not currently being considered for publication elsewhere. (3) The paper reflects the author's own research and analysis in a truthful and complete manner. (4) The paper properly credits the meaningful contributions of co-authors and co-researchers. (5) The results are appropriately placed in the context of prior and existing research. (6) All sources used are properly disclosed (correct citation). Literally copying of text must be indicated as such by using quotation marks and giving proper reference. (7) All authors have been personally and actively involved in substantial work leading to the paper, and will take public responsibility for its content. The violation of the Ethical Statement rules may result in severe consequences. I agree with the above statements and declare that this submission follows the policies of Solid State Ionics as outlined in the Guide for Authors and in the Ethical Statement.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Malik, M.Y., Agarwal, M.K. Impact of public debt on economic growth: a case study of Jammu and Kashmir. SN Bus Econ 3, 124 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43546-023-00505-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43546-023-00505-5

Keywords

Navigation