Skip to main content
Log in

Is paddy cultivation in Kashmir Valley still a profitable activity? Geo-economic analysis across physiographic divisions

  • Original Article
  • Published:
SN Business & Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Paddy cultivation in the Kashmir Valley has witnessed a massive shift towards commercial crops on account of profitability concerns in recent times. The present study investigates the economic viability of paddy besides explores constraints faced by paddy farmers at farm-household level. The study examines the role of land qualities in paddy cultivation by incorporating comparative analysis of physiographic divisions. Results show that paddy cultivation is labour intensive and associated with little net incomes. The results reveal that net earnings in rupees from paddy cultivation in valley floor, karewas, foothills and side valley are estimated to be 1591, 373, 213 and 1149, respectively. This is further translated in their corresponding cost–benefit ratio of 1:1.28, 1:1.06, 1:1.04 and 1:1.21. The results suggest moderate to low economic feasibility for paddy in valley floor and other physiographic divisions, respectively. Coming to the constraint analysis, the mean Garrett score revealed that paddy cultivation is mainly constrained by low profitability (63.13), followed by lack of high seed varieties (37.73), small land holding size (21.85), etc. The study calls for immediate government and policy intervention to provide smallholder paddy farmers sufficient subsidies, technology, credit, control over pricing and extension services for sustainable production of this staple food crop.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Al-Sharafat A, Al-Fawwaz TM (2013) Economic analysis of different broiler farm capacities: a case study of Jordan. Int J Bus Manag. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v8n5p41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhat MM, Shah AR (2011) Agricultural land use and cropping pattern in Jammu and Kashmir. Res J Agric Sci 2(3):710–712

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhatt DK (1975) On the quaternary geology of Kashmir Valley with special reference to stratigraphy and sedimentation. Geol Surv India Misc Publ 24:188–203

    Google Scholar 

  • Bresciani F, Valdés A (2007) Beyond food production: the role of agriculture in poverty reduction. Food and Agriculture Org

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chavas J-P, Aliber M (1993) An analysis of economic efficiency in agriculture: a nonparametric approach. J Agric Resour Econ 18:1–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Ettah OI, Ettah GI, Ukwuaba IC (2018) Analysis of profitability in maize production in Obubra Local Government Area of Cross River State, Nigeria. Int J Interdiscip Res Innov 6(1):159–163

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO (1976) A framework for land evaluation. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Soils Bulletin 32. FAO, Rome

  • FAO (1995) Planning for sustainable use of land resources; Towards a new approach. Land and Water Bulletin 2, Rome

  • FAO (2015) Soil functions.2015 FAO International Year of Soils. fao.org/soils-2015

  • SA Ganaie et al. (2012). Role of Dal Lake in the Promotion of Tourism Industry in Kashmir Valley, Jammu and Kashmir, India. Indian J Tour Hosp Manag. 3(1& 2). KIITS, India

  • Ganaie SA et al (2014) Spatial analysis of cropping land use dynamics in Jammu and Kashmir—a district level study. Int J Recent Sci Res 5(3):625–631

    Google Scholar 

  • Ganaie SA et al (2017) Cropping land use shift and food deficit—a disaster in making in Jammu and Kashmir, India. AGUIJPSR 5:134–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrett HE, Woodworth RS (1969) Statistics in psychology and education. Feffer and Simons Pvt. Ltd., p 329

    Google Scholar 

  • Inuwa IMS, Kyiogwom UB, Ala AL, Maikasuwa MA, Ibrahim ND (2011) Profitability analysis of rice processing and marketing in Kano State, Nigeria. Niger J Basic Appl Sci 19:293–298

    Google Scholar 

  • Kulyakwave DP, Xu S, Yu W, Sary S, Muyobozi S (2020) Profitability analysis of rice production, constraints and consumption shares by small-scale producers in Tanzania. Asian J Agric Ext Econ Sociol 37(4):1–12. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajaees/2019/v37i430280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malik MM, Tali JA, Nusrath A (2017) Assessment of land use and land cover change in district Baramulla, Jammu and Kashmir. Res Rev J Space Sci Technol 6(3):1–14p

    Google Scholar 

  • Olukosi JO, Erhabor PO (1988) Introduction to farm management economics. Principles and applications. AGITAB Publishers Ltd

    Google Scholar 

  • Parikh A, Ali F, Kalan Shah M (1995) Measurement of economic efficiency in Pakistani agriculture. Am J Agric Econ 77(3):675–685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parris K (2011) Impact of agriculture on water pollution in OECD countries: recent trends and future prospects. Int J Water Resour Dev 27(1):33–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Posani B (2009) Crisis in the countryside: Farmer suicides and the political economy of agrarian distress in India (No. 09-95). London. Retrieved on 25 Feb 2018, from http://www.lse.ac.uk/internationalDevelopment/pdf/WP/WP95.pdf

  • Pushpa, Srivastava SK, Agarwal PK (2017) Comparative study on cost of cultivation and economic returns from major crops in eastern region of Uttar Pradesh. Int J Agric, Environ Biotechnol 10(3):387–399 (Retrieved on September 1, 2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raghavan M (2008) Changing pattern of input use and cost of cultivation. Econ Pol Wkly 43(26–27):123–129

    Google Scholar 

  • Raza M, Mohammad A, Ahmad A (1978) The valley of Kashmir—a geographical interpretation—the land. Vikas Publication, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Salkinde NJ (1997) Exploring research, 3rd edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanusi SM (2014) Profitability of small-scale maize. Indian J Econ Dev 10(3):205–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh RL (1971) India: a regional geography. National geographical society of India, Varanasi, pp 347–389

    Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava SK, Chand R, Singh J (2017) Changing crop production cost in India: Input prices, substitution and technological effects. Agric Econ Res Rev 30:171–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tripathi A (2017) Socioeconomic backwardness increases vulnerability to climate change: evidence from Uttar Pradesh. J Environ Planning Manag 60(2):328–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Troell M, Naylor RL, Metian M, Beveridge M, Tyedmers PH, Folke C, Arrow KJ, Barrett S, Crépin AS, Ehrlich PR, Gren A, Kautsky N, Levin SA, Nyborg K, Österblom H, Polasky S, Scheffer M, Walker BH, Xepapadeas T, de Zeeuw A (2014) Does aquaculture add resilience to the global food system? Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111(37):13257–13263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsakok I, Gardner B (2007) Agriculture in economic development: primary engine of growth or chicken and egg? Am J Agr Econ 89(5):1145–1151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wani M, Baba SH, Yousuf S (2009) Land-use dynamics in Jammu and Kashmir. Agric Econ Res Rev 22(1):145–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Zalkuwi J, Singh R, Bhattarai M, Singh OP, Rao D (2015) Analysis of constraints influencing sorghum farmers using Garrett’s ranking technique; a comparative study of India and Nigeria. Int J Sci Res 3(3):2435–2440

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Showkat A. Ganaie.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors wish to publish the research paper in the SN Business & Economics (SNBE) Journal. Moreover, the authors do not have any conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lone, F.A., Ganaie, S.A., Ganaie, M.I. et al. Is paddy cultivation in Kashmir Valley still a profitable activity? Geo-economic analysis across physiographic divisions. SN Bus Econ 2, 95 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43546-022-00272-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43546-022-00272-9

Keywords

Navigation