Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Is socio-economic status a priviledge anymore? A new explanation of this question

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
SN Social Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

  • 1 Altmetric

Abstract

The purpose of the present research is to explore the association between socioeconomic status (SES), daily internet use (DIU), birth order (BO), family size (FS), maternal working hours (MWH), and paternal working hours (PWH) with theory of mind (ToM) skills among pre-schoolers and primary schoolers. A total of 177 pre-school children and primary school children were included in the research sample. The research was designed as correlational research. The data were analysed with multiple linear regression analysis. Results of the research showed that DIU and SES are most negatively associated with ToM of the participant children. Moreover, it was observed that BO and FS are negatively related to ToM and PWH has higher correlation than MWH in the context of ToM. It was concluded that higher SES seems to offer more availability of internet and digital technologies in home settings and this availability causes negative associations between SES and ToM. Findings were discussed along the relevant literature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Based on informed consent from the participant children and their parents, they were ensured that the data would not be shared with any other third parties. Therefore, there is no data availability to protect their privacy.

References

  • Andreassen CS, Billieux J, Griffiths MD, Kuss DJ, Demetrovics Z, Mazzoni E, Pallesen S (2016) The relationship between addictive use of social media and video games and symptoms of psychiatric disorders: a large-scale cross-sectional study. Psychol Addict Behav 30(2):252–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Astington JW, Jenkins JM (1995) Theory of mind development and social understanding. Cogn Emot 9(2–3):151–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkin AJ, Sharp SJ, Corder K, van Sluijs EM (2014) Prevalence and correlates of screen time in youth: an international perspective. Am J Prev Med 47(6):803–807

  • Barr AB (2015) Family socioeconomic status, family health, and changes in students’ math achievement across high school: a mediational model. Soc Sci Med 140:27–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barr N, Pennycook G, Stolz JA, Fugelsang JA (2015) The brain in your pocket: evidence that smartphones are used to supplant thinking. Comput Hum Behav 48:473–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beeres D, Andersson F, Vossen HG, Galanti MR (2021) Social media and mental health among early adolescents. J Adolesc Health 68(5):953–960

  • Bowerman BL, O’Connell RT (1990) Linear statistical models: an applied approach. Duxbury, Belmont, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley RH, Corwyn RF (2002) Socioeconomic status and child development. Ann Rev Psychol 53(1):371–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brito NH, Noble KG (2014) Socioeconomic status and structural brain development. Front Neurosci 8:276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bond TG, Fox CM (2015) Applying the rasch model: fundamental measurement in the human sciences. Routledge, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Carpendale JIM, Lewis C (2006) How children develop social understanding. Blackwell, Oxford, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Charness G, List JA, Rustichini A, Samek A, Van De Ven J (2019) Theory of mind among disadvantaged children: evidence from a field experiment. J Econ Behav Organ 166:174–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen JF (2017) Pleasure junkies all around! Why it matters and why ‘the arts’ might be the answer: a biopsychological perspective. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 284(1854):20162837

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole K, Mitchell P (1998) Family background in relation to deceptive ability and understanding of the mind. Soc Dev 7(2):181–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crowley K (2014) Child development. Sage Publications, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutting AL, Dunn J (1999) Theory of mind, emotion understanding, language, and family background: individual differences and interrelations. Child Dev 70(4):853–865

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devine RT, Hughes C (2018) Family correlates of false belief understanding in early childhood: a meta-analysis. Child Dev 89(3):971–987

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan OD, Featherman DL, Duncan B (1972) Socio-economic background and achievement. Seminar Press, New Yok

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebert S, Peterson C, Slaughter V, Weinert S (2017) Links among parents’ mental state language, family socioeconomic status, and preschoolers’ theory of mind development. Cogn Dev 44:32–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farah MJ (2018) Socioeconomic status and the brain: prospects for neuroscience-informed policy. Nat Rev Neurosci 19(7):428–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Field A (2012) Discovering statistics using R. Sage Publications, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Gentile DA, Swing EL, Lim CG, Khoo A (2012) Video game playing, attention problems, and impulsiveness: evidence of bidirectional causality. Psychol Pop Media Cult 1(1):62–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein TR, Winner E (2012) Enhancing empathy and theory of mind. J Cogn Dev 13(1):19–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goswami U (2014) Child psychology: short introduction. Oxford University Press, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hackman DA, Farah MJ (2009) Socioeconomic status and the developing brain. Trends Cogn Sci 13(2):65–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hackman DA, Gallop R, Evans GW, Farah MJ (2015) Socioeconomic status and executive function: developmental trajectories and mediation. Dev Sci 18(5):686–702

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair JF, Black B, Babin BJ, Anderson RE (2010) Multivariate data analysis. Pearson, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart B, Risley TR (2003) The early catastrophe: the 30 million word gap by age 3. Am Educ 27(1):4–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath SB (1972) Children’s language. State Department of Education, Columbia, SC

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollingshead AB (1965) Two-factor index of social position. Yale University Press, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • Hou XH, Gong ZQ, Wang LJ, Zhou Y, Su Y (2020) A reciprocal and dynamic development model for the effects of siblings on children’s theory of mind. Front Psychol 11:2667

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huber B, Yeates M, Meyer D, Fleckhammer L, Kaufman J (2018) The effects of screen media content on young children’s executive functioning. J Exp Child Psychol 170:72–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes C, Devine RT, Wang Z (2018) Does parental mind-mindedness account for cross-cultural differences in preschoolers’ theory of mind? Child Dev 89(4):1296–1310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Imuta K, Henry JD, Slaughter V, Selcuk B, Ruffman T (2016) Theory of mind and prosocial behavior in childhood: a meta- analytic review. Dev Psychol 52(8):1192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins JM, Astington JW (1996) Cognitive factors and family structure associated with theory of mind development in young children. Dev Psychol 32(1):70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones DE, Greenberg M, Crowley M (2015) Early social-emotional functioning and public health: the relationship between kindergarten social competence and future wellness. Am J Public Health 105(11):2283–2290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korkmaz B (2011) Theory of mind and neurodevelopmental disorders of childhood. Pediatr Res 69(8):101–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LaBounty J, Wellman HM, Olson S, Lagattuta K, Liu D (2008) Mothers’ and fathers’ use of internal state talk with their young children. Soc Dev 17(4):757–775

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leblanc É, Bernier A, Howe N (2017) The more the merrier? Sibling composition and early manifestations of theory of mind in toddlers. J Cogn Dev 18(3):375–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin F, Zhou Y, Du Y, Qin L, Zhao Z, Xu J, Lei H (2012) Abnormal white matter integrity in adolescents with internet addiction disorder: a tract-based spatial statistics study. PloS One 7(1):e30253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu M, Wu L, Yao S (2016) Dose–response association of screen time-based sedentary behaviour in children and adolescents and depression: a meta-analysis of observational studies. Br J Sports Med 50(20):1252–1258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMahon CA, Bernier A (2017) Twenty years of research on parental mind-mindedness: empirical findings, theoretical and methodological challenges, and new directions. Dev Rev 46:54–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meins E (1997) Security of attachment and the social development of cognition. Psychology Press, Sussex

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers R (1990) Classical and modern regression with applications. PWS- Kent, Boston, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Early Child Care Research Network (2003) Early child care and motherñchild interaction from 36 months through first grade. Infant Behav Dev 26:345–370

  • National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Early Child Care Research Network (2006) Infant-mother attachment classification: risk and protection in relation to changing maternal care- giving quality. Dev Psychol 42(1):38–58

  • Nelson K (2004) Toward a collaborative community of minds. Behav Brain Sci 27(1):119–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nikkelen SW, Valkenburg PM, Huizinga M, Bushman BJ (2014) Media use and ADHD-related behaviors in children and adolescents: a meta-analysis. Dev Psychol 50(9):22–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orben A, Przybylski AK (2019) Screens, teens, and psychological well-being: evidence from three time-use-diary studies. Psychol Sci 30(5):682–696

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pea R, Nass C, Meheula L, Rance M, Kumar A, Bamford H, Nass M, Simha A, Stillerman B, Yang S, Zhou M (2012) Media use, face-to-face communication, media multitasking, and social well-being among 8- to 12-year-old girls. Dev Psychol 48(2):327–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pears KC, Moses LJ (2003) Demographics, parenting, and theory of mind in preschool children. Soc Dev 12(1):1–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perner J (1991) Learning, development, and conceptual change In: Understanding the representational mind. The MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Perner J, Ruffman T, Leekam SR (1994) Theory of mind is contagious: you catch it from your sibs. Child Dev 65(4):1228–1238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson C, Slaughter V (2003) Opening windows into the mind: mothers’ preferences for mental state explanations and children’s theory of mind. Cogn Dev 18(3):399–429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pornari CD, Wood J (2010) Peer and cyber aggression in secondary school students: the role of moral disengagement, hostile attribution bias, and outcome expectancies. Aggress Behav 36(2):81–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruffman T (2014) To belief or not belief: Children’s theory of mind. Developmental Review 3(4):265–293

  • Ruffman T, Perner J, Naito M, Parkin L, Clements WA (1998) Older (but not younger) siblings facilitate false belief understanding. Dev Psychol 34(1):161–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruffman T, Slade L, Crowe E (2002) The relation between children’s and mothers’ mental state language and theory-of-mind understanding. Child Dev 73(3):734–751

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruffman T, Slade L, Devitt K, Crowe E (2006) What mothers say and what they do: the relation between parenting, theory of mind, language and conflict/cooperation. Br J Dev Psychol 24(1):105–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaafsma SM, Pfaff DW, Spunt RP, Adolphs R (2015) Deconstructing and reconstructing theory of mind. Trends Cogn Sci 19(2):65–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selcuk B, Brink KA, Ekerim M, Wellman HM (2018) Sequence of theory-of-mind acquisition in Turkish children from diverse social backgrounds. Infant Child Dev 27(4):e2098

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shatz M, Diesendruck G, Martinez-Beck I, Akar D (2003) The influence of language and socioeconomic status on children’s understanding of false belief. Dev Psychol 39(4):717

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sirin SR (2005) Socioeconomic status and academic achievement: a meta-analytic review of research. Rev Educ Res 75(3):417–453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sodian B (2005) Theory of mind: the case for conceptual development. In: Schneider W, Schumann-Hengsteler R, Sodian B (Eds.) Young children’s cognitive development: interrelationships among executive functioning, working memory, verbal ability and theory of mind. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, pp 95–130

    Google Scholar 

  • Thayer JD (2002) Stepwise regression as an exploratory data analysis procedure. In: Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association (April 1–5), New Orleans

    Google Scholar 

  • Twenge JM, Martin GN, Campbell WK (2018) Decreases in psychological well-being among American adolescents after 2012 and links to screen time during the rise of smartphone technology. Emotion 18(6):765–780

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wellman HM, Cross D, Watson J (2001) Meta-analysis of theory-of-mind development: the truth about false belief. Child Dev 72(3):655–684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woods HC, Scott H (2016) # Sleepyteens: social media use in adolescence is associated with poor sleep quality, anxiety, depression and low self-esteem. J Adolesc 51:41–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu XS, Zhang ZH, Zhao F, Wang WJ, Li YF, Bi L, Quian Z, Lu SS, Feng F, Hu CY, Gong FF, Sun HY (2016) Prevalence of internet addiction and its association with social support and other related factors among adolescents in China. J Adolesc 52:103–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

There is no funding to conduct the research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Primary Education, Artvin Coruh University, Sehir Kampusu, Artvin, 08000, Turkey

    Kerem Coşkun & Cihan Kara

  2. Department of Design, Vocational High School, Artvin Coruh University, Seyitler Kampusu, Artvin, 08000, Turkey

    Meral Coskun

Authors
  1. Kerem Coşkun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Cihan Kara
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Meral Coskun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

KC prepared analyzed the data prepared the research report. Dr. CK and MC collected the data.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kerem Coşkun.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

We certify that the study was performed in accordance with the ethical standards as laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The scale and methodology for this study was approved by the Human Research Ethics committee of the Artvin Coruh University (18457941-050.99-68783).

Informed consent

All participant children and their parents were informed and consent to participate in the study. Its process was well detailed in the method section.

Competing interests

There is no competing interests among the authors.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Coşkun, K., Kara, C. & Coskun, M. Is socio-economic status a priviledge anymore? A new explanation of this question. SN Soc Sci 4, 101 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-024-00902-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-024-00902-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation