Abstract
This study analyses the determinants of academic achievement among Japanese university students. Based on a survey conducted by a Japanese educational think tank, this study confirms that female students record significantly higher academic achievement levels compared to their male counterparts, which is in line with the findings of most previous studies. This result is partly explained by the gender differences in students’ study skills at the university level. Further, the analysis reveals that the study skills attained by students at high school are maintained and affect their academic achievement at the university level. Although enrolment in one’s preferred university increases a student’s academic achievement, selecting a university based on the recommendations of others or according to the type of entrance examination lowers achievement. Further, receiving comparatively large monetary allowances from parents or earning significant amounts of money from part-time employment can potentially lower students’ academic achievement. Subgroup estimations—such as those for national universities, private universities, and different faculties—confirm the robustness of the current study’s results. According to the quantile regression model, although the effects of gender on academic achievement decrease with increasing quantiles, they remain significant at all quantiles.

Data availability
The data might be requested to the Social Science Japan Data Archive, Center for Social Research and Data Archives, Institute of Social Science, University of Tokyo, Japan.
Notes
Arquero et al. (2009) point out that the motives, expectations, and interests of subjects are important factors for academic achievement; however, very few studies investigate the relationship between the reason for choice of university and academic achievement.
To assess these three categories, there are 11, 12, and 22 questions for each category in this survey and each respondent was required to select one of the following responses for each question: (1) absolutely not applicable, (2) not very applicable, (3) quite applicable, and (4) very applicable. We converted these responses into the numerical values by factor analyses.
References
Aciro R, Onen D, Malinga GM, Ezati BA, Openjuru GL (2021) Entry grades and the academic performance of university students: a review of literature. Educ Q Rev 4(1):141–150
Akaike H (1974) A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans Autom Control 19:716–723
Alalouch C (2021) Cognitive styles, gender, and student academic performance in engineering education. Educ Sci 11(502):1–18
Arquero JL, Byrne M, Flood B, Gonzalez JM (2009) Motives, expectations, preparedness and academic performance: a study of students of accounting at a Spanish university. Revista De Contabilidad 12(2):279–299
Bai C, Chi W, Qian X (2014) Do college entrance examination scores predict undergraduate GPAs? A tale of two universities. China Econ Rev 30:632–647
Bakar KM, Tarmizi RA, Mahyuddin R, Elias H, Luan WS, Ayub AFM (2010) Relationships between university students’ achievement motivation, attitude and academic performance in Malaysia. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 2:4906–4910
Benesse Education Research Institute (2008) Study and life condition survey of university students in Japan. Benesse Education Research Institute, Japan
Bertrand M, Goldin C, Katz L (2010) Dynamics of the gender gap for young professionals in the financial and corporate sectors. Am Econ J Appl Econ 2:228–255
Bettinger EP, Evans BJ, Pope DG (2013) Improving college performance and retention the easy way: unpacking the ACT exam. Am Econ J Econ Pol 5:26–52
Betts JR, Morrell R (1999) The determinants of undergraduate grade point average: the relative importance of family background, high school resources, and peer group effects. J Hum Resour 34:268–293
Buchinsky M (1998) Recent advances in quantile regression models: a practical guideline for empirical research. J Hum Resour 33:88–126
Bulent A, Hakan K, Aydin B (2015) An analysis of undergraduates’ study skills. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 197:1355–1362
Cabinet Office (2018) White paper on gender equality 2018. Cabinet Office, Government of Japan, Japan
Callender C (2008) The impact of term-time employment on higher education students’ academic attainment and achievement. J Educ Policy 23:359–377
Cohn E, Cohn S, Balch DC, Bradley J (2004) The determinants of undergraduate grade point average. Econ Educ Rev 23:577–586
Danilowicz-Gösele K, Lerche K, Meya J, Schwager R (2017) Determinants of students’ success at university. Educ Econ 25:513–532
Darolia R, Wydick B (2011) The economics of parenting, self-esteem and academic performance: theory and a test. Economica 78:215–239
Dayıoglu M, Türüt-Aşık S (2007) Gender differences in academic performance in a large public university in Turkey. High Educ 53:255–277
Gareau A, Gaudreau P, Boileau L (2019) Past academic achievement contributes to university students’ autonomous motivation (AM) which is later moderated by implicit motivation and working memory: a Bayesian replication of the explicit-implicit model of AM. Learn Individ Differ 73:30–41
Hassan SM, Al-Razgan SM (2016) Pre-university exams effect on students GPA: a case study in IT department. Procedia Comput Sci 82:127–131
Hedin B, Kann V (2019) Improving study skills by combining a study skill module and repeated reflection seminars. Educ Res Int 2019:1–8
Indreica E, Cazan A, Truta C (2011) Effects of learning styles and time management on academic achievement. Soc Behav Sci 30:1096–1102
Irwin N, Burnett KM, McCarron PA (2018) Association between attendance and overall academic performance on module within a professional pharmacy degree. Curr Pharm Teach Learn 10(3):396–401
Jeynes WH (2011) Parental involvement and minority student achievement—a metaanalysis, parental involvement and academic success, chapter 5. Routledge, London, pp 73–97
Jeynes WH (2015) A meta-analysis: the relationship between father involvement and student academic achievement. Urban Educ 50(4):387–423
Krohn GA, O’Conner CM (2005) Student effort and performance over semester. J Econ Educ 36:3–29
Kuncel NR, Credé M, Thomas LL (2005) The validity of self-reported grade point averages, class ranks, and test scores: a meta-analysis and review of the literature. Rev Educ Res 75:63–82
Landin M, Perez J (2015) Class attendance and academic achievement of pharmacy students in a European university. Curr Pharm Teach Learn 7:78–83
Lee VE, Bryk AS, Smith JB (1993) The organization of effective secondary schools. In: Darling-Hammond L (ed) Review of research in education, vol 19. American Educational Research Association, Washington, pp 171–267
Liem J, Lusting K, Dillon C (2010) Depressive symptoms and life satisfaction among emerging adults: a comparison of high school dropouts and graduates. J Adult Dev 17:33–43
McNabb R, Pal S, Sloane P (2002) Gender differences in educational attainment: the case of university students in England and Wales. Economica 69:481–503
Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (2008) School basic survey 2008. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Tokyo
Noble JP, Sawyer RL (2004) Is high school GPA better than admission test scores for predicting academic success in college? Coll Univ 79(4):17–22
Non A, Tempelaar D (2016) Time preferences, study effort, and academic performance. Econ Educ Rev 54:36–61
Nonis SA, Hudson GI (2006) Academic performance of college students: influence of time spent studying and working. J Educ Bus 81:151–159
Nonis SA, Hudson GI (2010) Performance of college students: impact of study time and study habits. J Educ Bus 85:229–238
Pepe K (2012) A research of the relationship between study skills of students and their GPA. Soc Behav Sci 47:1048–1057
Pike GR, Saupe JL (2002) Does high school matter? An analysis of three methods of predicting first-year grades. Res High Educ 43:187–207
Plant EA, Ericsson KA, Hill L, Asberg K (2005) Why study time does not predict grade point average across college students: implications of deliberate practice for academic performance. Contemp Educ Psychol 30:96–116
Richman JM, Bowen GL, Woolley ME (2004) School failure: an eco-interactional-developmental perspective. In: Fraser MW (ed) Risk and resilience in childhood: an ecological perspective, 2nd edn. NASW Press, Cary, pp 133–160
Stanca L (2006) The effects of attendance on academic performance: panel data evidence for introductory microeconomics. J Econ Educ 37:251–266
Verbree A, Maas L, Hornstra L, Meij LW (2021) Personality predicts academic achievement in higher education: differences by academic field of study. Learn Individ Differ 92:102081
Wolfe RN, Johnson SD (1995) Personality as a predictor of college performance. Educ Psychol Meas 55:177–185
Yasuda H (2013) Gender gap of senior university students in Japan. Rep Tokyo Econ Univ 285:129–153 (in Japanese)
Yasuda H (2014) Gender gap of academic achievement and learning attitude. Rep Tokyo Econ Univ 289:85–101 (in Japanese)
Zwick T (2012) Determinants of individual academic achievement-group selectivity effects have many dimensions. ZEW Discuss Pap 12–081:1–35
Funding
Funding was provided by Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (Grant No. 18K01652).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Takeuchi, M. Determinants of academic achievement in Japanese university students: gender, study skills, and choice of university. SN Soc Sci 2, 83 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-022-00388-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-022-00388-7