Abstract
Impact of human–induced environmental changes, particularly climate change, on biodiversity and human welfare has become a major concern of this century. Their negative effects on pollinators and pollination, a crucial ecoservice for sustenance of biodiversity and crop productivity, leading to the ‘global pollinator crisis’ are well recognized. Serious international efforts are being undertaken to mitigate the crisis. In recent years, effects of artificial light at night (ALAN), which has been increasing exponentially since the nineteenth century, on biodiversity and ecoservices has become another concern. Effects of ALAN have been studied extensively on a number of nocturnal pollinators, particularly moths and bats. ALAN has been shown to affect their behavior, movements, foraging and reproduction leading to a significant decline in their abundance and diversity. The impacts of ALAN on nocturnal pollination, largely confined so far to moth-pollinated systems, are not uniform; many studies have reported its negative effects and a few some positive effects. There are hardly any studies on the effects of ALAN on pollination services of other nocturnal pollinators such as bats, crepuscular (dusk and dawn) and diurnal pollinators. Studies from India on these lines are completely lacking. It is important to extend these studies to species not investigated so far and make them more comprehensive to get a clear knowledge on the impact of ALAN on pollinators and pollination, and to develop effective mitigation measures.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Source: Wikimedia commons
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bennie, J., Davies, T.W., Cruse, D., Gaston, K.J.: Ecological effects of artificial light at night on wild plants. J. Ecol. 104, 611–620 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.1255
Biesmeijer, J.C., Roberts, S.P.M., Reemer, M., et al.: Parallel declines in pollinators and insect- pollinated plants in Britain and the Netherlands. Science 313, 351–354 (2006)
Borges, R.M.: Dark matters: challenges of nocturnal communication between plants and animals in delivery of pollination services. Yale J. Biol. Med. 91, 33–42 (2018)
Borges, R.M.: Impacts of artificial light at night on nocturnal and diurnal insect biology and diversity. Indian J. Entomol. (2022). https://doi.org/10.5958/IJE.2022.182
Borges, R.M., Somanathan, H., Kelber, A.: Patterns and processes in nocturnal and crepuscular pollination services. Q. Rev. Biol. 91, 389–418 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1086/689481
Boyes, D.H., Evans, D.M., Fox, R.: Is light pollution driving moth population declines? A review of causal mechanisms across the life cycle. Insect Conserv. Divers. Special Issue 14(2), 167–187 (2021)
Brant, R.A., Arduser, M., Dunlap, A.S.: There must bee a better way: a review of published urban bee literature and suggested topics for future study. Landsc. Urban Plan. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2022.104513
Brehm, G., Niermann, J., Nino, L.M.J.: Moths are strongly attracted to ultraviolet and blue radiation. Insect Conserv. Divers. Special Issue 14, 188–198 (2021)
Buchmann, S.L., Nabhan, G.P.: The forgotten pollinators. The Island Press, Washington (1996)
Ceballos, G., Ehrlich, P.P., Barnosky, A.D., et al.: Accelerated modern human-induced species losses: entering the sixth mass extinction. Sci. Adv. 1, e1400253 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1400253
Cordeiro, G.D., Liporoni, R., Caetano, C.A., et al.: Nocturnal bees as crop pollinators. Agronomy 11, 1014 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11051014
Deichmann, J.L., Gatty, C.A., Navarro, J.M.A., et al.: Reducing the blue spectrum of artificial light at night minimises insect attraction in a tropical lowland forest. Insect Conserv. Divers. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1111/icad.12479
Devoto, M., Bailey, S., Memmott, J.: The ‘night shift’: nocturnal pollen-transport networks in a boreal pine forest. Ecol. Entomol. 36, 25–35 (2011)
Dyer, F.C.: Nocturnal orientation by the Asian honey bee, Apis dorsata. Anim. Behav. 33, 769–774 (1985)
EU The Habitat Directive. Environment (1992). https://ec.europa.eu › habitatsdirective › index_en
Falcon, J., Torriglia, A., Attia, D., et al.: Exposure to artificial light at night and the consequences for flora, fauna, and ecosystems. Front. Neurosci. 14, 602796 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2020.602796
Fleming, T.H., Geiselman, C., Kress, W.J.: The evolution of bat pollination: a phylogenetic perspecitive. Ann. Bot. 104, 1017–1043 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcp197
Fox, R., Parsons, M.S., Chapman, J.W. et al.: The State of Britain's Larger Moths 2013. Technical Report, Butterfly Conservation and Rothamsted Research, U.K. (2013)
Frank, K.D.: Effects of artificial night lighting on moths. In: Richand, C., Longcore, T. (eds.) Ecological consequences of artificial night lighting, pp. 305–344. Island Press, Washington (2006)
Gaston, K.J., Bennie, J.: Demographic effects of artificial night-time lighting on animal populations. Environ. Rev. 22, 323–330 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1139/er-2014-40005
Gauthreaux, S.A., Belser, C.G.: Effects of artificial night lighting on migrating birds. In: Rich, C., Longcore, T. (eds.) Ecological consequences of artificial night lighting, pp. 67–93. Island Press, Washington (2006)
Giavi, S., Fontaine, C., Knop, E.: Impact of artificial light at night on diurnal plant-pollinator interactions. Nat. Commun. 12, 1690 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-22011-8
Heywood, V.H.: Plant conservation in the anthropocene: challenges and future prospects. Plant Divers. 39, 314–330 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pld.2017.10.004
Holker, F., Wolter, C., Perkin, E.K., Tockner, K.: Light pollution as a biodiversity threat. Trends Ecol. Evol. 25, 681–682 (2010a). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2010.09.007
Holker, F., Moss, T., Griefahn, B., et al.: The dark side of light: a transdisciplinary research agenda for light pollution policy. Ecol. Soc. 15, 13 (2010b)
Holker, F., Bolliger, J., Davies, T.W., et al.: Pressing research questions on how light pollution affects biodiversity. Front. Ecol. Evol. (2021). https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2021.767177
Honnen, A.-C., Kypke, J.L., Holker, F., Monaghan, M.T.: Artificial light at night influences clock-gene expression, activity, and fecundity in the mosquito Culex pipiens f. molestus. Sustainability 11, 6220 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11226220
IPCC: Summary for Policymakers of the Working Group I. In: Contribution to the IPCC Sixth Assessment Report. Climate change (2021)
Jagerbrand, A.K., Bouroussis, C.A.: Ecological impact of artificial light at night: Effective strategies and measures to deal with protected species and habitats. Sustainability 13, 5991 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13115991
Kaunath, V., Eccard, J.A.: Light attraction in Carabid beetle: comparison among animals from the inner city and a dark sky reserve. Front. Ecol. Evol. (2022). https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2022.751288
Kearns, C.A., Inouye, D.W., Waser, N.M.: Endangered mutualisms: the conservation of plant–pollinator interactions. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 29, 83–112 (1998)
Knop, E., Zoller, L., Ryser, R., Erpe, C.G., et al.: Artificial light at night as a new threat to pollination. Nature 548, 206–209 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature23288
Levin, D.A.: Plant speciation in the age of climate change. Ann. Bot. 124, 769–775 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcz108
Longcore, T., Rich, C.: Ecological light pollution. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2, 191–198 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1890/1540-9295(2004)002[0191:ELP]2.0.CO;2
Longcore, T., Aldern, H.L., Eggers, J.F.: Tuning the white light spectrum of light emitting diode lamps to reduce attraction of nocturnal arthropods. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 370, 20140125 (2015)
Loss, S.R., Will, T., Loss, S.S., Marra, P.P.: Bird-building collisions in the United States: estimates of annual mortality and species vulnerability. Condor 116, 8–23 (2014)
Macgregor, C.J., Pocock, M.J.O., Fox, R., et al.: Pollination by nocturnal Lepidoptera, and the effects of light pollution: a review. Ecol. Entomol. 40, 187–198 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1111/een.12174
Macgregor, C.J., Evans, D.M., Fox, R., et al.: The dark side of street lighting: impacts on moth and evidence for the disruption of nocturnal pollen transport. Glob. Change Biol. 23, 697–707 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.13371
Macgregor, C.J., Pocock, M.J.O., Fox, R., et al.: Effects of street lighting technologies on the success and quality of pollination in a nocturnally pollinated plant. Ecosphere 10, e02550 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.2550
Meravi, N., Prajapati, S.K.: Effect streetlight pollution on the photosynthetic efficiency of different plants. Biol. Rhythm Res. 51, 67–75 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/09291016.2018.1518206
Morrison D.W.: Lunar phobia in a neotropical fruit bat, Artibeus jamicensis (Chiroptera: Phyllostomidae). Anim. Behav. 26, 852–855 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-3472(78)90151-3
Musila, S., Bogdanowicz, W., Syingi, R., et al.: No lunar phobia in insectivorous bats in Kenya. Mamm. Biol. 95, 77–84 (2019)
Nemec, S.J.: Use of artificial lighting to reduce Heliothis spp. populations in cotton fields. J. Econ. Entomol. 62, 1138–1140 (1969)
Owens, A.C.S., Lewis, S.M.: The impact of artificial light at night on nocturnal insects: a review and synthesis. Ecol. Evol. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4557
Owens, A.C.S., Cochard, P., Durrant, J., et al.: Light pollution is a driver of insect declines. Biol. Conserv. 241, 108259 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108259
Raven, P.H.: Biological extinction and climate change. In: Al-Delaimy, W.K., Ramanathan, V., Sanchez Sorondo, M. (eds.) Health of People, Health of Planet and our Responsibility, pp. 11–20. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31125-4_2
Rodriguez, A., Dann, P., Chiaradia, A.: Reducing light-induced mortality of seabirds: high pressure sodium lights decrease the fatal attraction of shearwaters. J. Nat. Conserv. 39, 68–72 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2017.07.001
Saldaña-Vázquez, R., Munguía-Rosas, M.A.: Lunar phobia in bats and its ecological correlates: a meta-analysis. Mamm. Biol. 78, 216–219 (2013)
Shivanna, K.R.: Climate change and its impact on biodiversity and human welfare. Proc. Indian Natl. Sci. Acad. 88, 160–171 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43538-022-00073-6
Shivanna, K.R., Sanjappa, M.: Conservation of endemic and threatened flowering plants: challenges and priorities for India. J. Indian Bot. Soc. 101, 269–290 (2021)
Shivanna, K.R., Tandon, R., Monika, K.: ‘Global Pollinator Crisis’ and its impact on crop productivity and sustenance of plant diversity. In: Tandon, R., Shivanna, K.R., Monika, K. (eds.) Reproductive ecology of flowering plants: patterns and processes, pp. 395–413. Springer, Singapore (2020)
Simon, R., Bakunowski, K., Reyes-Vasques, A.E., et al.: Acoustic traits of bat-pollinated flowers compared to flowers of other pollination syndromes and their echo-based classification using convolutional neural networks. PLoS Comput. Biol. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009706
Singhal, R.K., Kumar, M., Bose, B.: Ecophysiological response of artificial night light pollution in plants. Russ. J. Plant Physiol. 66, 190–202 (2019)
Somanathan, H., Borges, R.M.: Nocturnal pollination by the carpenter bee Xylocopa tenuiscapa (Apidae) and the effect of floral display on fruit set in Heterophragma quadriloculare (Bignoniaceae) in India. Biotropica 33, 78–89 (2001)
Somanathan, H., Borges, R.M., Warrant, E.J., Kelber, A.: Visual ecology of Indian carpenter bees I: light intensities and flight activity. J. Comp. Physiol. a: Neuroethol. Sens. Neural Behav. Physiol. 194, 97–107 (2008)
Sower, L.L., Shorey, H.H., Gaston, L.K.: Sex pheromones of noctuid moths. XXI. Light : dark cycle regulation and light inhibition of sex pheromone release by females of Trichoplusiani. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 63, 1090–1092 (1970)
Stewart, A.J.A.: Impacts of artificial lighting at night on insect conservation. Insect Conserv. Divers. Special Issue 14(2), 163–166 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1111/icad.12490
Stone, E.L., Harris, S., Jones, G.: Impact of artificial lighting on bats: a review of challenges and solutions. Mamm. Biol. 80, 213–219 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mambio.2015.02.004
Straka, T.M., Von der Lippe, M., Voigt, C.C., et al.: Light pollution impairs urban nocturnal pollinators but less so in areas with high tree cover. Sci. Total Environ. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146244
Thomas, C.D.: Rapid acceleration of plant speciation during the Anthropocene. Trends Ecol. Evol. 30, 448–455 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2015.05.009
Tylianakis, J.M.: The global plight of pollinators. Science 339, 1532–1533 (2013)
Van Doren, B.M., Willard, D.E., Hennen, M., et al.: Drivers of fatal bird collusions in an urban centre. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA (2021). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2101666118
Van Geffen, K.G., van Eck, E., de Boer, R.A., et al.: Artificial light at night inhibits mating in a geometrid moth. Insect Conserv. Divers. 8, 282–287 (2015a)
Van Geffen, K.G., Groot, A.T., van Grunsven, R.H.A., et al.: Artificial night lighting disrupts sex pheromones in a noctid moth: moth sex pheromones in illuminated nights. Ecol. Entomol. 40, 401–408 (2015b)
Van Langevelde, F., van Grunsven, R.H.A., Veenendaal, E.M., Fijen, T.P.M.: Artificial night lighting inhibits feeding in moths. Biol. Lett. 13, 20160874 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2016.0874
Voigt, C.C., Roeleke, M., Marggraf, L. et al.: Migratory bats respond to artificial green light with positive phototaxis. PLoS ONE 12, e0177748 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0177748
Voigt, C.C., Rehnig, K., Lindecke, O., Petersons, G.: Migratory bats are attracted to red light but not by warm white light: implications for the protection of nocturnal migrants. Ecol. Evol. 8, 9353–9361 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4400
Voigt, C.C., Dekker, J., Fritze, M., et al.: The impact of light pollution on bats varies according to foraging guild and habitat context. Bioscience 71, 1103–1109 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biab087
Wakefield, A., Stone, E.L., Jones, G., Harris, S.: Light-emitting diode street lights reduce last-ditch evasive manoeuvres by moths to bat echolocation calls. R. Soc. Open Sci. 2, 150291 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.150291
Wenzel, A., Grassa, I., Belavadib, V.V., Tscharntke, T.: How urbanization is driving pollinator diversity and pollination: a systematic review. Biol. Conserv. 241, 108321 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108321
Wilson, A.A., Ditmer, M.A., Barber, J.R., et al.: Artificial night light and anthropogenic noise interact to influence bird abundance over a continental scale. Glob. Change Biol. 27, 3987–4004 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15663
Zheng, Q., Teo, H.C., Koh, L.P.: Artificial light at night advances spring phenology in the United States. Remote Sens. 13, 399 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13030399
Zielinska-Dabkowska, K.M., Szlachetko, K., Bobkowska, K.: An impact analysis of artificial light at night (ALAN) on bats. A case study of the historic monument and natura 2000 Wisłouj´scie Fortress in Gdansk. Poland Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 18, 11327 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182111327
Funding
No organization has funded this work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
There is no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Shivanna, K.R. Impact of light pollution on nocturnal pollinators and their pollination services. Proc.Indian Natl. Sci. Acad. 88, 626–633 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43538-022-00134-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43538-022-00134-w