Abstract
This article explores two research questions through a case study of U.S. biotechnology oversight: why visions of Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) are difficult to implement in governance systems for emerging technologies, and how to get policies and programs to overcome barriers to RRI implementation on the national policy agenda. Recent research on barriers to RRI is first reviewed to categorize the types of barriers. Key barriers center around meso- and macro-level institutional and societal forces that disincentivize RRI in innovation systems, as well as micro-level attitudinal and capacity barriers. These barriers point to policy changes that are likely needed to implement RRI in governance systems, in particular incentives for RRI from national funding organizations. However, getting RRI on the policy agenda for biotechnology may be difficult given macro-level socioeconomic and political forces. Therefore, the article uses insights from policy process theory to identify possible ways to get RRI on the national policy agenda. It identifies several ways to promote RRI in national policy-making, such as shifting the policy image of RRI, changing policy venues to encourage RRI, expanding the scope of RRI as a policy issue, and catalyzing focusing events to raise national awareness about RRI.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baumgartner, F.R., Jones, B.D., & Mortensen, P.B. (2014). Punctuated equilibrium theory: Explaining stability and change in public policymaking. In C.M. Weible, & P.A. Sabatier (Eds), Theories of the Policy Process (3rd ed., pp. 59–103). Westview Press.
Brown, J., Fatehi, L., & Kuzma, J. (2015). Altruism and Skepticism in public attitudes toward food nanotechnology. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 17, 122–140.
Burget, M., Badone, E., & Pedaste, M. (2017). Definitions and conceptual dimensions of responsible research and innovation: a literature review. Science and Engineering Ethics, 23, 1–19.
Carro-Ripalda, S., & Macnaghten, P. (2015). Global lessons for agricultural sustainability from GM crops. In P. Mitton & D. Bennet (Eds.), Analyses—Africa´s Futures: Can Biosciences Contribute? (pp. 21–27). Banson.
CFI (2022). The Center for Food Integrity’s Coalition for Responsible Gene Editing in Agriculture. Retrieved July 6, 2022 from https://geneediting.foodintegrity.org/.
Cummings, C. L., Kuzma, J., Kokotovich, A., Glas, D., & Grieger, K. (2021). Barriers to responsible innovation of nanotechnology applications in food and agriculture: a study of US experts and developers. NanoImpact, 23, 100326–100335.
Douglas, H. (2003). The moral responsibilities of scientists (tensions between autonomy and responsibility). American Philosophical Quarterly, 40, 59–68.
Fisher, E., & Rip, A. (2013). Responsible innovation: Multi-level dynamics and soft intervention practices. In R. Owen, J. Bessant, & M. Heintz (Eds.), Responsible innovation: Managing the responsible emergence of science and innovation in society (pp. 165–183). Wiley.
Fraaije, A., & Flipse, S. M. (2020). Synthesizing an implementation framework for responsible research and innovation. Journal of Responsible Innovation, 7(1), 113–137.
Gordon, D. R., Jaffe, G., Doane, M., Glaser, A., Gremillion, T. M., & Ho, M. D. (2021). Responsible governance of gene editing in agriculture and the environment. Nature Biotechnology, 39(9), 1055–1057.
Guston, D. H., Fisher, E., Grunwald, A., Owen, R., Swierstra, T., & Van der Burg, S. (2014). Responsible innovation: Motivations for a new journal. Journal of Responsible Innovation, 1(1), 1–8.
Gutzmann, N. (2018, November). Responsible innovation in genetic engineering research: What does it mean for graduate researchers?. In Entomology 2018. ESA. Retrieved July 7, 2022 from https://esa.confex.com/esa/2018/meetingapp.cgi/Paper/131509.
Jasanoff, S. (2005). Designs on Nature. Princeton University Press.
Jenkins-Smith, H.C., Nohrstedt, D., Weible, C.M., & Sabatier, P.A. (2014). The Advocacy Coalition Framework: Foundations, evolution, and ongoing research. In C.M. Weible, & P.A. Sabatier (Eds), Theories of the Policy Process (3rd ed., pp. 183–223). Westview Press.
Jordan, N. R., et al. (2017). A cooperative governance network for crop genome editing: The success of governance networks in other areas could help to find common ground for applying genome editing in agriculture. EMBO Reports, 18, 1683–1687.
Kingdon, J.W. (1995). Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. 2nd ed. Harper Collins.
Kuiken, T., Barrangou, R., & Grieger, K. (2021). (Broken) promises of sustainable food and agriculture through new biotechnologies: The CRISPR Case. The CRISPR Journal, 4(1), 25–31.
Kuzma, J. (2018). Regulating gene edited crops. Issues in Science & Technology, 35(1), 80–85.
Kuzma, J. (2022). Governance of gene-edited plants: Insights from the history of biotechnology oversight and policy process theory. Advance Online Publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/01622439221108225
Kuzma, J., & Besley, J. C. (2008). Ethics of risk analysis and regulatory review: From bio- to nanotechnology. NanoEthics, 2(2), 149–162.
Kuzma, J., & Cummings, C. L. (2021). Cultural beliefs and stakeholder affiliation influence attitudes towards responsible research and innovation among united states stakeholders involved in biotechnology and gene editing. Frontiers in Political Science, 3, 677003.
Kuzma, J., & Grieger, K. (2020). Community-led governance for gene-edited crops. Science, 370(6519), 916–918.
Kuzma, J., Larson, J., & Najmaie, P. (2009). Evaluating oversight systems for emerging technologies: A case study of genetically engineered organisms. Journal of Law Medicine and Ethics, 37(4), 546–586.
Kuzma, J., Kokotovich, A., & Kuzhabekova, A. (2016). Attitudes towards governance of gene editing. Asian Biotechnology Development Review, 18(1), 69–92.
Kuzma, J. (2014) Properly paced or problematic?: examining governance of GMOs. In G. Marchant, K. Abbott, & B. Allenby (Eds.), Innovative Governance Models for Emerging Technologies. Edward Elgar.
Kuzma, J. (2020). U.S. oversight of gm crops: a place for values? In A. Goldberg (Ed.), Feeding the World Well. John Hopkins University Press.
Kuzma, J. (2021). Deficits of public deliberation in u.s. oversight for gene-edited organisms. Hastings Center Report, 51(6), S25-S34.
Marris, C. (2015). The construction of imaginaries of the public as a threat to synthetic biology. Science as Culture, 24, 83–98.
Owen, R., & Pansera, M. (2019). Responsible innovation: Process and politics. In R. von Schomberg (Ed.), International Handbook on Responsible Innovation (pp. 35–48). Edward Elgar Publishing.
Pansera, M., Owen, R., Meacham, D., & Kuh, V. (2020). Embedding responsible innovation within synthetic biology research and innovation: Insights from a UK multi-disciplinary research centre. Journal of Responsible Innovation, 7(3), 384–409.
Roberts, P., Herkert J., & Kuzma, J. (2020). Responsible innovation in biotechnology: stakeholder attitudes and implications for research policy. Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene, 8(1), https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.446.
Schattschneider, E. E. (1960). The Semi-sovereign People. Holt.
Siegrist, M., Connor, M., & Keller, C. (2012). Trust, confidence, procedural fairness, outcome fairness, moral conviction, and the acceptance of GM field experiments. Risk Analysis, 32(8), 1394–1403.
Slaughter, S., & Rhoades, G. (2010). Academic capitalism and the new economy: Markets, state, and higher education. Johns Hopkins University Press.
Slovic, P. (1987). Perception of risk. Science, 236(4799), 280–285.
Stilgoe, J., Owen, R., & Macnaghten, P. (2013). Developing a framework for responsible innovation. Research Policy, 42(9), 1568–1580.
Suldovsky, B. (2016). In science communication, why does the idea of the public deficit always return? Exploring key influences. Public Understanding of Science, 25, 415–426.
Thompson, P. (2007). Food Biotechnology in Ethical Perspective. 2nd Edition. Springer.
Wiek, A., Foley, R. W., Guston, D. H., & Bernstein, M. J. (2016). Broken promises and breaking ground for responsible innovation–intervention research to transform business-as-usual in nanotechnology innovation. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 28(6), 639–650.
Wittrock, C., Forsberg, E.-M., Pols, A., Macnaghten, P., & Ludwig, D. (2021). Implementing Responsible Research and Innovation. Springer.
Yue, C. Shuoli, Z, Cummings, C., & Kuzma J. (2015). Investigating factors influencing consumer willingness to buy gm food and nano-food: an application of structural equation modeling. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 17, 283-302
Zahariadis, N. (2014). Ambiguity and multiple streams. In C.M. Weible, & P.A. Sabatier (Eds), Theories of the Policy Process (3rd ed., pp. 25–58). Westview Press.
Acknowledgements
The author acknowledges the support of U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF) grant #1540244.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The author has not declared any conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Kuzma, J. Implementing responsible research and innovation: a case study of U.S. biotechnology oversight. GPPG 2, 306–325 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43508-022-00046-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43508-022-00046-x