Abstract
This article makes the simple argument that populism is not poorly defined. Rather, this proverbial claim arises from a misunderstanding of concepts and their use. I argue that confusion is linked to a semantic approach to defining a concept. The semantic approach assumes a precise definition of a concept corresponding to some objective phenomena. The main argument is that populism is inherently a collider conceptual variable. The article looks at how it interacts with nationalism and nativism and how this colliding dimension shapes immigration policy in Italy. This article makes two original contributions. First, the paper argues that populism does not have a definitional problem. The second contribution is the use of a case study of immigration in Italy to examine how the colliding effect of populism with nativism and nationalism empirically affects policy framing and implementation.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Palano’s reconstruction of the development and use of populism helps clarify why the concept is not able to be tightly defined. He states: adopting the Foucaultian conception of “genealogy”, the purpose of this article is in fact to recognize the “political” logics that have marked the history of the concept of populism and its arrival in the lexicon of the social sciences. The aim of this reconstruction is not simply to point out the derogatory meaning that often marks the term and, because of this, calling one’s opponent as a “populist” is equivalent in the language of journalism and daily controversy to accusing them of using demagogic rhetoric or of inciting the most sinister resentments for electoral purposes. More precisely, this article attempts instead to highlight how the polemical distortion is genetically present in the concept, or rather in the meaning of the term “populism”, which was “invented” by the social sciences of the 1950s and 1960s (Palano 2022: 2).
References
Albertazzi, D., Arianna, G., & Seddone, A. (2018). No regionalism please, we are Leghisti!’ The transformation of the Italian Lega Nord under the leadership of Matteo Salvini. Regional and Federal Studies, 28(5), 645–671.
Barrenchea, R., & Castillo, I. (2019). The many roads to Rome: family resemblance concepts in the social sciences. Quality & Quantity, 53(1), 107–130.
Beirich, H., & Woods, D. (2000). Globalization, workers and the northern league. West European Politics, 23(1), 130–143.
Berman, S. (2021). The causes of populism in the west. Annual Review of Political Science, 24(3), 1–16.
Biorcio, R. (1991). La Lega Come attore politico: Dal federalismo al populismo regionalista. In R. Mannheimer (Ed.), La Lega Lombarda (pp. 34–82). Feltrinelli.
Bonikowski, B., et al. (2018). Populism and nationalism in a comparative perspective: a scholarly exchange. Nations and Nationalism, 25(1), 58–81. https://doi.org/10.1111/nana.12480.
Brubaker, R. (2020). Populism and nationalism. Nations and Nationalism, 26(1), 44–66. https://doi.org/10.1111/nana.12522.
Bruno, V. A. (2019). Italian populists use social welfare to ignite a war between the poor. October 07, Fair Observer. https://www.fairobserver.com/politics/la-lega-matteo-salvini-immigration-populism-Italy-news-7661/.
Campomori, F., & Ambrosini, M. (2020). Multilevel governance in trouble: the implementation of asylum seekers’ reception in Italy as a battleground. Comparative Migration Studies, 8(22), 1–19.
Caneva, E. (2014). The integration of migrants in Italy: An overview of policy instruments and actors. INTERACT Research Report 05.
Carvalho, J. (2013). Impact of extreme right parties on immigration policy comparing Britain, France, and Italy (1st ed.). Routledge.
Cervi, L., & TejedorDornelles, S. M. A. (2020). When populists govern the country: Strategies of legitimization of anti-immigration policies in Salvini’s Italy. Sustainability, 12(23), 2–12. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122310225.
Cervi, L., & Vidi, V. (2020). Facebooked-live: Análisis del éxito de Matteo Salvini en Facebook. Rev CIDOB D’afers Int, 124, 99–122.
Ceschi, S. (2019). Common home: Migration and development in Italy. Report prepared for Caritas Italian. Rome, Italy.
Collier, D., & Levitsky, S. (1997). Democracy with adjectives: Conceptual innovation in comparative research. World Politics, 49(3), 430–451.
De Cleen, B., et al. (2017). Populism and nationalism in C. In R. Kaltwasser (Ed.), Oxford handbook of populism (pp. 342–362). Oxford University Press.
De Cleen, B., & Stavrakakis, Y. (2017). Distinctions and articulations: a discourse theoretical framework for the study of populism and nationalism. Javnost - the Public, 24(4), 301–319.
Elwert, F., & Winship, C. (2014). Endogenous selection bias: the problem of conditioning on a collider variable. Annual Review of Sociology, 40, 31–53.
Garau, E. (2015). The politics of national identity in Italy: Immigration and Italianità. Routledge.
Goertz, G. (2006). Social science concepts: A user guide. Princeton University Press.
Gottinara, P. C. (2016). The politics of migration in Italy: Perspectives on local debates and party competition. Routledge Press.
Griffith, G. J., Morris, T. T., Tudball, M. J., et al. (2020). Collider bias undermines our understanding of COVID-19 disease risk and severity. Nature Communications, 11(5749), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-19478-2.
Ivaldi, G., Lanzone, L., & Woods, D. (2017). Varieties of populism across a left-right spectrum: the case of the Front National, the Northern League, Podemos, and five-star movement. Swiss Journal of Political Science., 23(4), 354–376.
Jungkunz, S., Fahey, R. A., & Hino, A. (2021). How populist attitudes scales fail to capture support for populists in power. Research article. PLoS ONE, 16(12), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0261658 e0261658.
Mény, Y., & Surel, Y. (2002). The constitutive ambiguity of populism. In Y. Mény & Y. Surel (Eds.), democracies and the populist challenge. New York: Palgrave.
Mudde, C., & Kaltwasser, C. R. (2017). Populism: A very short introduction. Oxford University Press.
Newt, G. (2019). Populism and nativism in contemporary regionalist and nationalist politics: A minimalist framework for ideologically opposed parties. Politics, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263395721995016.
Palano, D. (2022) Inventing ‘populism’: Notes for the genealogy of a paranoid concept. Genealogy, 6(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.3390/genealogy6010002.
Pappas, T. S. (2018). How to tell nativists from populists: an exchange. Journal of Democracy, 29(1), 147–152.
Perlmutter, T. (2015). A narrowing gyre? The Lega Nord and the shifting balance of Italian immigration policy. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 38(8), 1339–1346.
Riedel, R. (2018). Nativism versus nationalism and populism—bridging the Gap. Central European Papers, 6(2), 18–28.
Rodrik, D. (2020). Why does globalization fuel populism? Economics, culture, and the rise of right-wing populism. Annual Review of Economics., 13(6), 1–6. 38.
Ruzza, C. E., & Fella, S. (2011). Populism and the Italian right. Acta Politica, 46, 158–179. https://doi.org/10.1057/ap.2011.5.
Sartori, G. (1970). Concept misformation in comparative politics. The American Political Science Review, 64(4), 1033–1053.
Saylor, R. (2013). Concepts, measures, and measuring well: an alternative outlook. Sociological Research & Methods., 42(3), 354–391.
Schedler, A. (2010). Concept formation in political science. CIDE, Number, 2109.
Schneider, E. C. (2020). Collider bias in economic history research. Explorations in Economic History, 78, 1–10.
Shafer, A. (2021). Cultural backlash? How (not) to explain the rise of authoritarian populism. Review article. British Journal of Political Science. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123421000363.
Woods, D. (1993). The immigration question in Italy. In S. Hellman & G. Pasquino (Eds.), Italian politics: A review. St. Martin’s Press.
Woods, D. (2010). A critical analysis of the Northern League’s ideographical profiling. Journal of Political Ideologies, 15, 189–219.
Woods, D. (2014a). The many faces of populism: Diverse but not disparate. In B. Wejnert & D. Woods (Eds.), The many faces of populism: Current Perspectives. Emerald Press.
Woods, D. (2014b). The many faces of populism in Italy: The Northern League and Berlusconism. In B. Wejnert & D. Woods (Eds.), The many faces of populism: Current perspectives. London: Emerald Press.
Woods, D. (2017). Populism in search of its model. Chinese Political Science Review, 2(3), 253–265.
Zaslove, A. (2011). The re-invention of the European radical right: Populism, regionalism, and the Italian Lega Nord. McGill-Queen’s University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The author declare that there is no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Woods, D. Populism has relationship issues: collider effects and immigration policy in Italy. GPPG 2, 5–21 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43508-022-00035-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43508-022-00035-0