Abstract
Token economies are an effective behavior-management tool used across multiple populations and settings. However, researchers have shown that several variables may impact its effectiveness (Hackenberg 2009, 2018). One variable within a token economy that has not been thoroughly studied is token manipulation or the extent to which the learner physically manipulates a tangible token. Thus, the current study compared the effectiveness of a token economy when participants physically manipulated tokens (token manipulation) to when the experimenter manipulated the tokens (no manipulation). In addition, we evaluated participant preference between the two conditions (i.e., token manipulation and no manipulation). The results showed higher rates of the target response during the no token manipulation condition for one participant, while no differences were observed for the other two participants. Two participants preferred the token manipulation condition, whereas the other participant showed no preference.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ayllon, T., & Azrin, N. H. (1965). The measurement and reinforcement of behavior of psychotics. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 8, 357–383. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1965.8-357.
Barkley, R. A., Hastings, J. E., Tousel, R. E., & Tousel, S. E. (1976). Evaluation of a token system for juvenile delinquents in a residential setting. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 7, 227–230.
Boniecki, K. A., & Moore, S. (2003). Breaking the silence: Using a token economy to reinforce classroom participation. Teaching of Psychology, 30, 224–227. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328023top3003_05.
Charlop-Christy, M. H., & Haymes, L. K. (1998). Using objects of obsession as token reinforcers for children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 28, 189–198. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026061220171.
DeLeon, I. G., Chase, J. A., Frank-Crawford, M. A., Carreau-Webster, A. B., Triggs, M., Bullock, C. E., & Jennett, H. K. (2014). Distributed and accumulated reinforcement arrangements: Evaluations of efficacy and preference. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 47, 293–313. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.116.
Donaldson, J., DeLeon, I. G., Fisher, A. B., & Kahng, S. (2014). Effects and preference for conditions of token earn versus token loss. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 47, 537–548. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.135.
Filcheck, H. A., McNeil, C. B., Greco, L. A., & Bernard, R. S. (2004). Using whole-class token economy and coaching of teacher skills in a preschool classroom to manage disruptive behavior. Psychology in the Schools, 41, 351–361. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.10168.
Fisher, W., Piazza, C. C., Bowman, L. G., Hagopian, L. P., Owens, J. C., & Slevin, I. (1992). A comparison of two approaches for identifying reinforcers for persons with severe and profound disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25, 491–498. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1992.25-491.
Fox, D. D., Hopkins, B. L., & Anger, W. K. (1987). The long-term effects of a token economy on safety performance in open-pit mining. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 20, 215–224. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1987.20-215.
Giley, C., & Ringdahl, J. E. (2014). The effects of item preference and token reinforcement on sharing behavior exhibited by children with autism spectrum disorder. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 8, 1425–1433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2014.07.010.
Hackenberg, T. D. (2009). Token reinforcement: A review and analysis. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 91, 257–286. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.2009.91-257.
Hackenberg, T. D. (2018). Token reinforcement: Translational research and application. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 51, 393–435. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.439.
Ingham, R. J., & Andrews, G. (1973). An analysis of a token economy in stuttering therapy. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 6, 219–229. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1973.6-219.
Kazdin, A. E. (1977). The token economy. Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-46134121-5.
Kelleher, R. T. (1958). Fixed-ratio schedules of conditioned reinforcement with chimpanzees. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1, 281–289. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1958.1-281.
Kent, H. M., Malott, R. W., & Greening, M. (1977). Improving attendance at work in a volunteer food co-operative with a token economy. Journal or Organizational Behavior Management, 1, 89–98. https://doi.org/10.1300/j1300/j075v01n01_06.
Leaf, R., Taubman, M., & McEachin, J. (2012). A work in progress companion series: Token economy. New York: DRL.
Lloyd, K. E., & Abel, L. (1970). Performance on a token economy psychiatric ward: A two-year summary. Behavior Research and Therapy, 8, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7967(70)90027-6.
Malagodi, E. F. (1967). Acquisition of the token-reward habit in the rat. Psychological Reports, 20, 1335–1342. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1967.20.3c.1335.
Milan, M. A., & McKee, J. M. (1976). The cellblock token economy: Token reinforcement procedures in a maximum-security correctional institution for adult male felons. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 9, 253–275. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1976.9-253.
Raiff, B. R., Bullock, C. E., & Hackenberg, T. D. (2008). Response-cost punishment with pigeons: Further evidence of response suppression via token loss. Learning & Behavior, 36, 29–41. https://doi.org/10.3758/LB.36.1.29.
Tarbox, R. S. F., Ghezzi, P. M., & Wilson, G. (2006). The effects of token reinforcement on attending in a young child with autism. Behavioral Interventions, 21, 155–164. https://doi.org/10.1002/bin.213.
Wolfe, J. B. (1936). Effectiveness of token rewards for chimpanzees. Comparative Psychology Monographs, 12, 1–72.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sleiman, A.A., Betz, A.M., Rey, C.N. et al. Effects of Token Manipulation on Responding within a Token Economy Implemented with Children with Autism. Educ. Treat. Child. 43, 323–333 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43494-020-00014-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43494-020-00014-2