Skip to main content
Log in

Subscapularis Repair in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: Differences in Outcomes Based on Preoperative Quality of Subscapularis Tendon

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

This study examines the influence of preoperative fatty infiltration (FI) of the subscapularis tendon (SBS) on outcomes following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) with SBS repair.

Methods

A cohort of 161 rTSA patients with SBS repair, followed for a mean of 45.3 months, was divided into three groups based on FI: Group A (intact upper and lower portions, n = 85), Group B (intact lower portions, n = 44), and Group C (fatty infiltrated in both portions, n = 32). The mean age was 74.5 years (range: 65–95).

Results

Preoperative FI displayed significant disparity among the groups: Group A (1.18 ± 0.60), Group B (2.95 ± 0.56), and Group C (4.0 ± 0.00) (p < .001). Group A exhibited a more positive trend in activities of daily living, particularly in toileting ability (81% in Group A, 68% in Group B, and 72% in Group C), although without statistical significance (p = 0.220). Complication rates varied: Group A had seven acromial fractures (8%), three cases of instability (3%), and six instances of scapular notching (7%). Group B experienced four acromial fractures (9%) and four cases of scapular notching (9%), while Group C had only one case of scapular notching (3%) (p = 0.733).

Conclusion

In cases characterized by favorable preoperative SBS quality, there was an elevation in functional internal rotation (IR) post-surgery, accompanied by an increased incidence of postoperative complications. Hence, careful consideration is advised when determining the necessity for SBS repair.

Level of Evidence

Level III, retrospective comparative study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Data and materials are not included for personal identifier as subjected by the centre’s International Review Board ethical standards and approval.

Code Availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. Collin, P., Matsumura, N., Ladermann, A., Denard, P. J., & Walch, G. (2014). Relationship between massive chronic rotator cuff tear pattern and loss of active shoulder range of motion. Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery, 23(8), 1195–1202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2013.11.019

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hansen, M. L., Nayak, A., Narayanan, M. S., Worhacz, K., Stowell, R., Jacofsky, M. C., et al. (2013). Role of subscapularis repair on muscle force requirements with reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Bulletin/Hospital for Joint Diseases, 2015(73 Suppl 1), S21–S27.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Oh, J. H., Shin, S. J., McGarry, M. H., Scott, J. H., Heckmann, N., & Lee, T. Q. (2014). Biomechanical effects of humeral neck-shaft angle and subscapularis integrity in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery, 23(8), 1091–1098. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2013.11.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Chalmers, P. N., Rahman, Z., Romeo, A. A., & Nicholson, G. P. (2014). Early dislocation after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery, 23(5), 737–744. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2013.08.015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cheung, E. V., Sarkissian, E. J., Sox-Harris, A., Comer, G. C., Saleh, J. R., Diaz, R., et al. (2018). Instability after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery, 27(11), 1946–1952. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2018.04.015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Edwards, T. B., Williams, M. D., Labriola, J. E., Elkousy, H. A., Gartsman, G. M., & O’Connor, D. P. (2009). Subscapularis insufficiency and the risk of shoulder dislocation after reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery, 18(6), 892–896. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2008.12.013

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Wall, B., Nové-Josserand, L., O’Connor, D. P., Edwards, T. B., & Walch, G. (2007). Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: A review of results according to etiology. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery American, 89(7), 1476–1485. https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.F.00666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. de Boer, F. A., van Kampen, P. M., & Huijsmans, P. E. (2016). The influence of subscapularis tendon reattachment on range of motion in reversed shoulder arthroplasty: A clinical study. Musculoskeletal Surgery, 100(2), 121–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12306-016-0401-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Vourazeris, J. D., Wright, T. W., Struk, A. M., King, J. J., & Farmer, K. W. (2017). Primary reverse total shoulder arthroplasty outcomes in patients with subscapularis repair versus tenotomy. Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery, 26(3), 450–457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2016.09.017

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kim, J. Y., Rhee, Y. G., & Rhee, S. M. (2020). Clinical outcomes after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty according to primary diagnosis. Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery, 12(4), 521–528. https://doi.org/10.4055/cios19164

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Clark, J. C., Ritchie, J., Song, F. S., Kissenberth, M. J., Tolan, S. J., Hart, N. D., et al. (2012). Complication rates, dislocation, pain, and postoperative range of motion after reverse shoulder arthroplasty in patients with and without repair of the subscapularis. Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery, 21(1), 36–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2011.04.009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Somerson, J. S., Hsu, J. E., Gorbaty, J. D., & Gee, A. O. (2016). Classifications in brief: Goutallier classification of fatty infiltration of the rotator cuff musculature. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 474(5), 1328–1332. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-015-4630-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Oh, J. H., Kim, S. H., Choi, J. A., Kim, Y., & Oh, C. H. (2010). Reliability of the grading system for fatty degeneration of rotator cuff muscles. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 468(6), 1558–1564. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-009-0818-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Sirveaux, F., Favard, L., Oudet, D., Huquet, D., Walch, G., & Molé, D. (2004). Grammont inverted total shoulder arthroplasty in the treatment of glenohumeral osteoarthritis with massive rupture of the cuff. Results of a multicentre study of 80 shoulders. The Journal of bone and joint surgery British, 86(3), 388–395. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.86b3.14024

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Puzzitiello, R. N., Moverman, M. A., Menendez, M. E., Hart, P. A., Kirsch, J., & Jawa, A. (2021). Rotator cuff fatty infiltration and muscle atrophy do not impact clinical outcomes after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for glenohumeral osteoarthritis with intact rotator cuff. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2021.03.135

  16. Erickson, B. J., Shishani, Y., Bishop, M. E., Patel, M., Jones, S., Romeo, A. A., et al. (2020). Subscapularis repair during reverse total shoulder arthroplasty using a stem-based double-row repair: Sonographic and clinical outcomes. Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine, 8(3), 2325967120906806. https://doi.org/10.1177/2325967120906806

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Dedy, N. J., Gouk, C. J., Taylor, F. J., Thomas, M., & Tan, S. L. E. (2018). Sonographic assessment of the subscapularis after reverse shoulder arthroplasty: Impact of tendon integrity on shoulder function. Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery, 27(6), 1051–1056. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2017.12.008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Friedman, R. J., Flurin, P. H., Wright, T. W., Zuckerman, J. D., & Roche, C. P. (2017). Comparison of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty outcomes with and without subscapularis repair. Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery, 26(4), 662–668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2016.09.027

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors declare that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript.

Funding

The authors declare that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection, and analysis were performed by S-MR, JUL, CHK, SYK, HJH, RK, YGR. The first draft of the manuscript was written by S-MR and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yong-Girl Rhee.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Consent to Publish

All authors have reviewed the final manuscript and consent for publication.

Ethics Approval

This study was approved by our institutional review board (Kyung Hee University Hospital, KHUH 2021-12-061).

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rhee, SM., Lee, J.W., Lee, J.U. et al. Subscapularis Repair in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: Differences in Outcomes Based on Preoperative Quality of Subscapularis Tendon. JOIO (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43465-024-01139-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43465-024-01139-x

Keywords

Navigation