Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Can99mTc-MDP–SPECT/CT Differentiate Loosening and Infection After Hip and Knee Replacements?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Prosthetic loosening and infection are still common complications after joint replacement. Over the past few years, single-photon emission computed tomography–computed tomography (SPECT/CT) was widely used and showed unique value based on the combination of anatomic and metabolic information of foci. However, its performance in differentiating between prosthetic loosening and periprosthetic infection after joint replacement is still the focus of clinicians and deserves further investigation.

Purpose

This retrospective study was aimed to determine whether bone scintigraphy combined with SPECT/CT still can differentiate prosthetic infection from loosening in patients after joint replacement. The differential efficacy in hip and knee prosthesis was also analyzed. Blood biomarkers for the diagnosis of periprosthetic infection were also evaluated.

Patients and methods

Data sets of 74 prosthetic joints (including knees and hips), with suspected prosthetic loosening or infection between 2015 and 2021, were evaluated. Besides the results of nuclear imaging, X-ray images and serum biomarker were also recorded. Telephone follow-up and revision surgery after SPECT/CT were used as a gold standard. The sensitivity and accuracy of different imaging modalities were calculated by Chi-square test. The diagnostic efficacy of imaging methods and serum biomarkers were then analyzed by the area under curve (receiver operating characteristic curves, ROC) in SPSS 26.

Results

In all, 47 joints (14 knees and 33 hips) were confirmed as aseptic loosening, while 25 joints (18 knees and 7 hips) were confirmed as infection. The sensitivity and accuracy of SPECT combined with SPECT/CT imaging were the highest (92.86% and 87.84%, respectively). The differential efficacy of bone scintigraphy combined with SPECT/CT imaging was also better than any other single imaging modality. In the analysis of involved prosthesis, prosthetic loosening occurred more in hip prosthesis and knee prosthesis was easily infected (P < 0.05). Finally, the sensitivity of ESR and CRP were 80% and 84%, respectively.

Conclusions

Bone scintigraphy with hybrid SPECT/CT remains encouraging in differentiating prosthetic infection from loosening after joint replacement. The diagnostic efficacy of differentiation in hip prosthesis was better than knee. Serum biomarkers cannot be used alone to differentiate prosthetic infection from loosening.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article.

References

  1. Hirschmann, M. T., Amsler, F., & Rasch, H. (2015). Clinical value of SPECT/CT in the painful total knee arthroplasty (TKA): a prospective study in a consecutive series of 100 TKA. European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 42(12), 1869–1882.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hirschmann, M. T., Konala, P., Iranpour, F., et al. (2011). Clinical value of SPECT/CT for evaluation of patients with painful knees after total knee arthroplasty–a new dimension of diagnostics? BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-12-36

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Figa, R., Veloso, M., Bernaus, M., et al. (2020). Should scintigraphy be completely excluded from the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection? Clinical Radiology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2020.06.014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ottink, K. D., Gelderman, S. J., Wouthuyzen-Bakker, M., et al. (2022). Nuclear imaging does not have clear added value in patients with low a priori chance of periprosthetic joint infection a retrospective single-center experience. J Bone Jt Infect, 7(1), 1–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Sheikh, A., & Schweitzer, M. (2009). Imaging in pre- and post-operative assessment in joint preserving and replacing surgery. Radiologic Clinics of North America, 47(4), 761–775.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Beam, E., & Osmon, D. (2018). prosthetic joint infection update. Infectious Disease Clinics of North America, 32(4), 843–859.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bao, B., Liu, C. S., Masson, E. C. O., et al. (2021). Diagnostic accuracy of SPECT/CT arthrography in patients with suspected aseptic joint prostheses loosening. Eur J Hybrid Imaging, 5(1), 4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Arıcan, P., Okudan Tekin, B., Şefizade, R., et al. (2015). The role of bone SPECT/CT in the evaluation of painful joint prostheses. Nuclear Med Commun, 36(9), 931–940.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Li, L., Wang, B., Zhang, B., et al. The diagnostic value of SPECT/CT in aseptic prosthesis looseness after total hip replacement. Journal of Medical Imaging, 2020. 30(02),308-11

  10. Zimmerli, W., Trampuz, A., & Ochsner, P. E. (2004). Prosthetic-joint infections. New Engl J Med, 351(16), 1645–1654.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Farthmann, J., Watermann, D., Erbes, T., et al. (2015). Functional outcome after pelvic floor reconstructive surgery with or without concomitant hysterectomy. Archiv Gynecol Obstetr, 291(3), 573–577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Akcaalan, S., Ozaslan, H. I., Caglar, C., et al. (2022). Role of biomarkers in periprosthetic joint infections. Diagnostics. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12122958

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Yang, F., Zhao, C., Huang, R., et al. (2021). Plasma fibrinogen in the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection. Science and Reports, 11(1), 677.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Sigmund, I. K., Dudareva, M., Watts, D., et al. (2020). Limited diagnostic value of serum inflammatory biomarkers in the diagnosis of fracture-related infections. Bone Joint J, 102, 904–911.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study would not have been possible without the help of all the clinicians participating in the multidisciplinary consultations in our department.

Funding

The authors declare that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qian Zhao.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interests

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tian, Y., Jiang, Y., Feng, B. et al. Can99mTc-MDP–SPECT/CT Differentiate Loosening and Infection After Hip and Knee Replacements?. JOIO 58, 316–322 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43465-024-01095-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43465-024-01095-6

Keywords

Navigation