Abstract
Authorship in scientific manuscripts indicates intellectual contribution of individuals to a research project and authors play a key role in the research and dissemination of results of a research project. It is important for authors to follow guidelines on authorship and submission of manuscripts and to agree on the order of authorship before beginning the project. Criteria for authorship, roles and responsibilities of authors, author metrics and misconduct of authors and their consequences are discussed in this editorial. Properly assigning authorship ensures transparency, accountability, and fairness in the scientific community.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
ICMJE|Home. Accessed 17 Mar 2023. https://www.icmje.org/
NIH Office of Intramural Research. Accessed 17 Mar 2023. https://oir.nih.gov/
ORCID. Accessed 17 Mar 2023. https://orcid.org/
Kim, J., & Diesner, J. (2015). Coauthorship networks: a directed network approach considering the order and number of coauthors. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66, 2685–2696. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23361
Brand, A., Allen, L., Altman, M., Hlava, M., & Scott, J. (2015). Beyond authorship: attribution, contribution, collaboration, and credit. Learned Publishing., 28(2), 151–155. https://doi.org/10.1087/20150211
Slone, R. M. (1996). Coauthors’ contributions to major papers published in the AJR: Frequency of undeserved coauthorship. AJR American Journal of Roentgenology, 167(3), 571–579. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.167.3.8751654
Singhal, S., & Kalra, B. S. (2021). Publication ethics: role and responsibility of authors. Indian Journal of Gastroenterology, 40(1), 65–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12664-020-01129-5
Bavdekar, S. (2012). Authorship issues. Lung India, 29(1), 76. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-2113.92371
Wager, E. (2006). How to spot authorship problems. Committee on Publication Ethics. https://doi.org/10.24318/cope.2019.2.16
Gøtzsche, P. C., Hróbjartsson, A., Johansen, H. K., Haahr, M. T., Altman, D. G., & Chan, A. W. (2007). Ghost authorship in industry-initiated randomised trials. PLOS Medicine, 4(1), 19–29. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0040019
COPE Council. COPE Flowcharts and infographics — How to recognise potential authorship problems — English. https://doi.org/10.24318/cope. 2019.2.22 This is the complete reference given in the link https://publicationethics.org/sites/default/files/recognising-authorship-problems-cope-infographic.pdf
Standalone Journals—Beall’s List. Accessed 19 Mar 2023. https://beallslist.net/standalone-journals/
Kurt, S. (2018). Why do authors publish in predatory journals? Why do authors publish in predatory journals? Learned Publishing, 31(2), 141–147. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1150
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval and informed consent
Ethical approval and informed consent for this editorial are not required.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Kambhampati, S.B.S., Maini, L. Authorship in Scientific Manuscripts. JOIO 57, 783–788 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43465-023-00896-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43465-023-00896-5