Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Outcomes of Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasties Performed for Proximal Humeral Fractures Versus Elective Etiologies

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty is commonly performed for elective indications, such as cuff tear arthropathies, salvage arthropathies and tumours with excellent outcomes. However, its use in treating acute conditions such as 3- and 4-part proximal humeral fractures in the elderly has been more controversial. The aim of our study is to directly compare the short-term intra-operative and post-operative outcomes of RTSA for traumatic proximal humeral fractures as compared to elective shoulder arthroplasty.

Methods

We retrospectively identified 78 consecutive patients who had undergone RTSA from 2009 to 2018 at a tertiary hospital. These patients were classified by etiology as either elective or trauma cases. Comparative analysis of the baseline demographics, as well as post-operative surgical, functional and range-of-movement outcomes between the two groups was performed.

Results

57 Patients made up the elective cohort and 14 patients made up the trauma cohort. The elective cohort was significantly older compared to the traumatic fracture cohort (73.2 vs 78.6, p = 0.026). No significant differences were observed when comparing post-operative surgical outcomes. At 6 months, the elective cohort demonstrated greater forward flexion (105.8° vs 127.2°, p = 0.041), as well as higher SF-36 PCS (27.85 vs 43.99, p = 0.018) and ASES scores (35.5 vs 76.31, p = 0.009). However, these differences resolved by 1-year post-op and no significant differences were noted comparing functional and range-of-movement outcomes at 1-year post-op.

Conclusions

Our study suggests that the application of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in the management of traumatic humeral fractures may produce similarly favourable 1-year outcomes to that performed for elective etiologies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Grammont, P.T.P., Laffay, J., & Deries, X. (1987). Concept study and realization of a new total shoulder prosthesis. Rhumatologie. 39.

  2. Baulot, E., Sirveaux, F., & Boileau, P. (2011). Grammont’s idea: The story of Paul Grammont’s functional surgery concept and the development of the reverse principle. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 469(9), 2425–2431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Jain, N. B., Higgins, L. D., Guller, U., Pietrobon, R., & Katz, J. N. (2006). Trends in the epidemiology of total shoulder arthroplasty in the United States from 1990–2000. Arthritis Care & Research, 55(4), 591–597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Jain, N. B., & Yamaguchi, K. (2014). The contribution of reverse shoulder arthroplasty to utilization of primary shoulder arthroplasty. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, 23(12), 1905–1912.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. National Joint Registry for England WaNI (2016). National Joint Registry: 13th Annual Report.

  6. Registry AOANJR (2016). National Joint Replacement Registry: Hip, Knee & Shoulder Arthroplasty.

  7. Surgeons AAoO. The American Joint Replacement Registry Annual Report.

  8. Singhal, K., & Rammohan, R. (2018). Going forward with reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Journal of Clin Orthopedics Trauma, 9(1), 87–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. McFarland, E. G., Huri, G., Hyun, Y. S., Petersen, S. A., & Srikumaran, U. (2016). Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty without bone-grafting for severe glenoid bone loss in patients with osteoarthritis and intact rotator cuff. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume, 98(21), 1801–1807.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Smith, C. D., Guyver, P., & Bunker, T. D. (2012). Indications for reverse shoulder replacement: A systematic review. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British Volume, 94(5), 577–583.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Shukla, D. R., McAnany, S., Kim, J., Overley, S., & Parsons, B. O. (2016). Hemiarthroplasty versus reverse shoulder arthroplasty for treatment of proximal humeral fractures: A meta-analysis. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, 25(2), 330–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sevivas, N., Ferreira, N., Andrade, R., et al. (2017). Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for irreparable massive rotator cuff tears: A systematic review with meta-analysis and meta-regression. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, 26(9), e265–e277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ernstbrunner, L., Andronic, O., Grubhofer, F., Camenzind, R. S., Wieser, K., & Gerber, C. (2019). Long-term results of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for rotator cuff dysfunction: A systematic review of longitudinal outcomes. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, 28(4), 774–781.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Anakwenze, O. A., Zoller, S., Ahmad, C. S., & Levine, W. N. (2014). Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for acute proximal humerus fractures: A systematic review. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, 23(4), e73-80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Longo, U. G., Petrillo, S., Berton, A., & Denaro, V. (2016). Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for the management of fractures of the proximal humerus: A systematic review. Musculoskeletal Surgery, 100(2), 83–91.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Gallinet, D., Ohl, X., Decroocq, L., Dib, C., Valenti, P., & Boileau, P. (2018). Is reverse total shoulder arthroplasty more effective than hemiarthroplasty for treating displaced proximal humerus fractures in older adults? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Orthopaedics & Traumatology, Surgery & Research, 104(6), 759–766.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Boileau, P., Watkinson, D., Hatzidakis, A. M., & Hovorka, I. (2006). Neer Award 2005: The Grammont reverse shoulder prosthesis: Results in cuff tear arthritis, fracture sequelae, and revision arthroplasty. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, 15(5), 527–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lindbloom, B. J., Christmas, K. N., Downes, K., et al. (2019). Is there a relationship between preoperative diagnosis and clinical outcomes in reverse shoulder arthroplasty? An experience in 699 shoulders. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, 28(6s), S110-s117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Boileau, P., Alta, T. D., Decroocq, L., et al. (2019). Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for acute fractures in the elderly: Is it worth reattaching the tuberosities? Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, 28(3), 437–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Liu, J. N., Agarwalla, A., Gowd, A. K., et al. (2019). Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humerus fracture: A more complex episode of care than for cuff tear arthropathy. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, 28(11), 2139–2146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kuo, L. T., Hsu, W. H., Chi, C. C., & Yoo, J. C. (2018). Tranexamic acid in total shoulder arthroplasty and reverse shoulder arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 19(1), 60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Mittal, C., Lee, H. C. D., Goh, K. S., et al. (2018). ValuedCare program: A population health model for the delivery of evidence-based care across care continuum for hip fracture patients in Eastern Singapore. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 13(1), 129–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Association AH (2019). Fact Sheet: Post-acute Care.

  24. Friedman, R. J., Cheung, E. V., Flurin, P. H., et al. (2018). Are age and patient gender associated with different rates and magnitudes of clinical improvement after reverse shoulder arthroplasty? Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 476(6), 1264–1273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Liau Zi Qiang Glen.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None.

Ethical approval

Study approved by local ethics board (DSRB 2019/00057).

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants in this study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 21 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Glen, L.Z.Q., Cheong, C.K., Nistala, K.R.Y. et al. Outcomes of Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasties Performed for Proximal Humeral Fractures Versus Elective Etiologies. JOIO 56, 1066–1072 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43465-022-00625-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43465-022-00625-4

Keywords

Navigation