Abstract
Background/purpose of the study
Aim of the study was to investigate whether ellipsoid sign (ES) in the region corresponding to the cartilaginous facet of the medial femoral condyle (MFC) indicates early cartilage lesion. The finding has not been defined in the literature yet.
Methods
The study was performed retrospectively with 50 patients who underwent articular cartilage examination and arthroscopy between 2015 and 2018. Patients were divided into two according to the presence or absence of ES. There were 24 patients in case group (Group A) and 26 patients in controls (Group B). Weight-bearing cartilage areas of MFC in the region where ES was found in both groups were classified according to arthroscopic Outerbridge classification (OC) and compared statistically with each other.
Results
There was no significant difference in terms of age, gender and alignment between Group A and Group B (p > 0.05). All OC grades were higher in Group A (p < 0.001). Positive correlation between ES and MFC chondromalacia grade was detected (r: 0.671, t: 6.266, p < 0.05).
Conclusion
ES, which refers to the difference in bone density in MFC seen in antero-posterior (AP) X-Ray, is a result of changes in subchondral bone due to chronic cartilage loss. ES detected on AP X-Ray may help in early diagnosis of medial femoral articular cartilage chondromalacia, even at grade 0 or 1. We recommend searching for ES, as the earliest symptom of chondromalacia, which occurs even before MRI lesions. Future studies may reveal additional information about ES.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs43465-020-00140-4/MediaObjects/43465_2020_140_Fig1_HTML.jpg)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs43465-020-00140-4/MediaObjects/43465_2020_140_Fig2_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs43465-020-00140-4/MediaObjects/43465_2020_140_Fig3_HTML.jpg)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs43465-020-00140-4/MediaObjects/43465_2020_140_Fig4_HTML.jpg)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs43465-020-00140-4/MediaObjects/43465_2020_140_Fig5_HTML.jpg)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs43465-020-00140-4/MediaObjects/43465_2020_140_Fig6_HTML.jpg)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs43465-020-00140-4/MediaObjects/43465_2020_140_Fig7_HTML.jpg)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs43465-020-00140-4/MediaObjects/43465_2020_140_Fig8_HTML.jpg)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs43465-020-00140-4/MediaObjects/43465_2020_140_Fig9_HTML.jpg)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs43465-020-00140-4/MediaObjects/43465_2020_140_Fig10_HTML.jpg)
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Disler G, McCauley TR, Kelman. CG, Fuschs MD, Ratner LM, Wirth CR, et al. Fat suppressed three dimensional spoiled gradient-echo MR imaging of hyaline cartilage defects in the knee: Comparison with Standart MR imaging and arthroscopy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996;167:127–132.
Peterfy, C. G., Schneider, E., & Nevitt, M. (2008). The osteoarthritis initiative: report on the design rationale fort the magnetic resonance imaging protocol fort the knee. Osteoarthritis Cartilage, 16:1433–1441.
McCaulay, R. T., Recht, M. P., & Disler, D. G. (2001). Clinical imaging of articular cartilage in the knee. Sem Musc Skel Rad,5, 293–304.
Cicuttini, F., Forbes, A., Asbeutah, A., Morris, K., & Stuckey, S. (2000). Comprasion and reproducibility of fast and conventional spoiled gradient-echo magnetic resonance sequences in the determination of knee cartilage volume. Journal of Orthopaedic Research,18, 580–584.
Coleman Jeremy, L., Widmyer, R. M., Leddy, H. A., Utturkar, G. M., Charles, E. S., Moorman, C. T., et al. (2013). Diurnal variations in articular cartilage thickness and strain in the human knee. Journal of Biomechanics,46(3), 541–547.
Bottomley, N. J., McNally, E., Jones, L., Javaid, M. K., Arden, N., & Gill, H. S. (2012). The MRI description of early anteromedial gonarthrosis. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British Volume,94, 47.
Yubo S, Mauerhan DR, Honeycutt. PR, Kneisi. JS, Norton. JH, Hanley. EN, et sl. Analysis of meniscal degeneration and meniscal gene expression. BMC Musculoskeletal 2010;11:11–19.
Englund, M. (2004). Meniscal tear—a feature of osteoarthritis. Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica,75, 1–45.
Howell, R., Kumar, N. S., Patel, N., & Tom, J. (2014). Degenerative meniscus: pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment options. World J Orthop,5, 597–602.
Chritoforakis J, Pradhan R, Sanchez-Ballester. J, Hunt. N, Strachan. RK. Is there an association between articular cartilage changes and degenerative meniscus tears? Arthroscopy J. Arthro 2005;21:1366–1369
Yu. D, Xu J, Liu F, Wang X, Mao Y, Zhu. Z. Subchondral bone changes and the impacts on joint pain and articular cartilage degeneration in osteoarthritis. Clinical and experimental Rheumatology 2016;34:929–934.
Karsdal, M. A., Leeming, D. J., Dam, E. B., Henriksen, K., Alexandersen, P., & Pastoureau, P. (2008). Should subchondral bone turnover be targeted when treating osteoarthritis? Osteoarthritis and Cartilage,16, 638–646.
Messent, A. E., Ward, J. R., Tonkin, J. C., & Wright, B. C. (2005). Tibial cancellous bone in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage,13, 463–470.
Wright, B. C. (2004). Subchondral bone changes in hand and knee osteoarthritis detected by radiography. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage,12, 10–19.
Taguchi, K., Chiba, K., Okazaki, N., Kido, Y., Miyamato, T., Yonekura, A., et al. (2017). Characterization of cartİlage defects detected by MRI in Kellgren Lawrence grade 0 or 1 knees. J Orthop Sci,22(5), 868–873.
Tylor, P., Datir, A., & Saifuddin, A. (2010). Magnetic resonance imaging of anatomical variations in the knee part 2: miscellaneous. Skletal Radiol,12, 1175–1186.
Harrison, B., Wood, M. B., & Keats, T. E. (1976). The grooves of the distal articular surface of the femur – a normal variant. AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology,126, 751–754.
Acknowledgements
No source of support in the form of grants, equipment, drugs, or all of these were used in our study. There are no conflicts of interest. All authors contributed to the study. The manuscript has been read and approved by all the authors. The manuscript represents honest work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
SC contributed to the study by collecting the data and writing the manuscript. CA contributed to the manuscript by collecting the data and literature, and as the corresponding author.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
All authors approved the manuscript and all authors declare that are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication.
Ethical standard statement
The current study was approved by the local ethic committee.
Informed consent
The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form, the patient(s) has/have given his/her/their consent for his/her/their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Çaglar, S., Albay, C. Can Ellipsoid Sign be One of the Earliest Findings of the Medial Femoral Condyle Chondromalacia of Knee Antero Posterior X-Ray?. JOIO 54, 518–525 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43465-020-00140-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43465-020-00140-4