Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Radial Head Fixation vs Replacement in Terrible Triad: Preliminary Results of a Prospective Cohort Study with Patient Reported Outcome

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

The combination of posterior elbow dislocation, radial head fracture, and coronoid fracture has been named “terrible triad” as this injury is difficult to treat and yield poor outcomes. Some studies compared the results of radial head fixation to replacement in isolated radial head fractures, very few reports have tried to compare both treatment modalities in the setting of a terrible triad injury.

The aim of this study was to compare the functional outcome of radial head fixation vs replacement in terrible triad injuries of the elbow.

Methods

A single-center, prospective cohort study was conducted at an academic Level 1 Trauma Center from April 2016 to April 2019.

A total of 30 patients with terrible triad injury of the elbow were enrolled. The primary outcome was the Quick Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (Quick-DASH) at 1 year. The secondary outcomes were to report the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) at 1 year and elbow range of motion.

Results

At final follow up for each patient (13.4 ± 1.2 months) The Quick-DASH score at 1 year for fixation group was 5 ± 2.3, for the replacement group it was 7.1 ± 7.1. The MEPS at 1 year for fixation group was 93.6 ± 8.4, for the replacement group it was 90.9 ± 9.4.

Loss of elbow extension at 1 year for fixation group was 17.1° ± 10.7°, for replacement group it was 18.75° ± 11.5°.

Conclusion

A systematic approach to address the bony and soft tissue components of terrible triad elbow injury is crucial to obtain satisfactory outcome. Our study shows that radial head repair and replacement, in the setting of terrible triad injury, yields comparable results.

Level of evidence

Level II, Therapeutic study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hotchkiss, R. N. (1996). Fractures and dislocations of the elbow. In C. A. Rockwood, D. P. Green, R. W. Bucholz, & J. D. Heckman (Eds.), Rockwood and green’s fractures in adults (4th ed., pp. 980–981). Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Watters, T. S., Garrigues, G. E., Ring, D., & Ruch, D. S. (2014). Fixation versus replacement of radial head in terrible triad: is there a difference in elbow stability and prognosis? Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 472(7), 2128–2135.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Josefsson, P. O., Gentz, C. F., Johnell, O., & Wendeberg, B. (1989). Dislocations of the elbow and intraarticular fractures. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 246, 126–130.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Johnston, G. W. (1962). A follow-up of one hundred cases of fracture of the head of the radius with a review of the literature. Ulster Medical Journal, 31, 51–56.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Knirk, J. L., & Jupiter, J. B. (1986). Intra-articular fractures of the distal end of the radius in young adults. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery: American Volume, 68(5), 647–659.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Egol, K. A., Immerman, I., Paksima, N., Tejwani, N., & Koval, K. J. (2007). Fracture-dislocation of the elbow functional outcome following treatment with a standardized protocol. Bulletin of the NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases, 65(4), 263–270.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Forthman, C., Henket, M., & Ring, D. C. (2007). Elbow dislocation with intraarticular fracture: the results of operative treatment without repair of the medial collateral ligament. Journal of Hand Surgery: American Volume, 32(8), 1200–1209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Pugh, D. M., Wild, L. M., Schemitsch, E. H., King, G. J., & McKee, M. D. (2004). Standard surgical protocol to treat elbow dislocations with radial head and coronoid fractures. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery: American Volume, 86(6), 1122–1130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Zeiders, G. J., & Patel, M. K. (2008). Management of unstable elbows following complex fracture-dislocations—the “terrible triad” injury. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery: American Volume, 90(4), 75–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ring, D., Quintero, J., & Jupiter, J. B. (2002). Open reduction and internal fixation of fractures of the radial head. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery: American Volume, 84(10), 1811–1815.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mason, M. L. (1954). Some observations on fractures of the head of the radius with a review of one hundred cases. British Journal of Surgery, 42(172), 123–132.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Regan, W., & Morrey, B. (1989). Fractures of the coronoid process of the ulna. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery: American Volume, 71(9), 1348–1354.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Garrigues, G. E., Wray, W. H., 3rd, Lindenhovius, A. L., Ring, D. C., & Ruch, D. S. (2011). Fixation of the coronoid process in elbow fracture-dislocations. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery: American Volume, 93(20), 1873–1881.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Beaton, D. E., Wright, J. G., & Katz, J. N. (2005). Upper extremity collaborative group: development of the QuickDASH: comparison of three item-reduction approaches. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery: American Volume, 87(5), 1038–1046.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gummesson, C., Ward, M. M., & Atroshi, I. (2006). The shortened disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand questionnaire (QuickDASH): validity and reliability based on responses within the full-length DASH. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 7, 44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Morrey, B. F., An, K. N., & Chao, E. Y. S. (1993). Functional evaluation of the elbow. In B. F. Morrey (Ed.), The Elbow and Its Disorders (2nd ed., pp. 86–97). Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Cusick, M. C., Bonnaig, N. S., Azar, F. M., Mauck, B. M., Smith, R. A., & Throckmorton, T. W. (2014). Accuracy and reliability of the Mayo elbow performance score. The Journal of Hand Surgery, 39(6), 1146–1150.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ring, D., Jupiter, J. B., & Zilberfarb, J. (2003). Roles of the medial collateral ligament and the coronoid in elbow stability. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery: American Volume, 85(3), 568–569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. O’Driscoll, S. W., Jupiter, J. B., King, G. J., Hotchkiss, R. N., & Morrey, B. F. (2001). The unstable elbow. Instructional Course Lectures, 50, 89–102.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. O’Driscoll, S. W., Morrey, B. F., Korinek, S., & An, K. N. (1992). Elbow subluxation and dislocation: a spectrum of instability. Clinical Orthopaedics Related Research, 280, 186–197.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Pugh, D. M., & McKee, M. D. (2002). The “terrible triad” of the elbow. Techniques in Hand and Upper Extremity Surgery, 6(1), 21–29.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Mathew, P., Athwal, G. S., & King, G. J. W. (2009). Terrible triad injury of the elbow: current concepts. Journal of American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 17(3), 137–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Rodriguez-Martin, J., Pretell-Mazzini, J., Andres-Esteban, E. M., & Larrainzar-Garijo, R. (2011). Outcomes after terrible triads of the elbow treated with the current surgical protocols. A review. International Orthopaedics, 35(6), 851–860.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ebrahim, N. A., Raberding, C. J., & Liu, J. (2012). A review of terrible triad injury of the elbow. Techniques in Shoulder Elbow Surgery, 13(3), 101–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Leigh, W., & Ball, C. (2012). Radial head reconstruction versus replacement in the treatment of terrible triad injuries of the elbow. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, 21(10), 1336–1341.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding was received for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sherif Galal.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Disclosure

The author, their immediate family, and any research foundation with which they are affiliated have not received any financial payments or other benefits from any commercial entity related to the subject of this article.

Ethical standard statement

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Afifi, A., Lymona, A.M. & Galal, S. Radial Head Fixation vs Replacement in Terrible Triad: Preliminary Results of a Prospective Cohort Study with Patient Reported Outcome. JOIO 54 (Suppl 2), 254–259 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43465-020-00090-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43465-020-00090-x

Keywords

Navigation