Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Analysis on the Marketing Trend and Approval Lag of Imported Orphan Drugs from 2010 to 2021 in China

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

In order to meet the unmet needs of rare disease patients in China, importing orphan drugs is an important way. The objectives of this study were to investigate the marketing trend of orphan drugs approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and imported by China, to examine the orphan drug lag between China and the United States.

Methods

This study analyzes the orphan drugs approved by FDA and imported by China from January 2010 to December 2021. The approval lag for orphan drugs between China and the US was calculated and analyzed by approval time. Factors potentially affecting the approval lag, such as target disease, ATC classification, formulation, corporation name, drug type, and whether the indications belong to the first batch of rare diseases catalogue were investigated.

Results

The number of FDA-approved orphan drugs imported by China is increasing year by year, and the approval lag of these drugs is gradually decreasing, especially in the classification of Non-L, Injections, Non-United States, and biological product. Compared with 2010–2015, the approval lag of total drugs in the study was significantly improved in 2016–2021 (1977 days) compared with 2010–2015 (3928 days).

Conclusion

China’s groundbreaking regulatory reforms of drugs since 2015 had made significant progress in reducing orphan drug lags, but there is still considerable room for progress. We should more actively promote the approval of rare disease drugs in China, establish a better approval mechanism, and enable Chinese patients with rare diseases to receive drug treatment in a timely manner.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Song P, He J, Li F, Jin C. Innovative measures to combat rare diseases in China: the national rare diseases registry system, larger-scale clinical cohort studies, and studies in combination with precision medicine research. Intractable Rare Dis Res. 2017;6:1–5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Zhou S, Lang J, Wu J, Jin Y. Massive intraperitoneal effusion caused by rare disease: a case report. Asian J Surg. 2022;2022:1015.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Li XQ, Peng XX, Gong CX. Access to orphan drugs is a challenge for sustainable management of cystinosis in China. Chin Med J. 2018;131(19):2388–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Mu Y, Song K, Song Y. A cross-sectional study of price and affordability of drugs for rare diseases in Shandong Province, China. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(20):13319.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Rawson NSB. Canadian, European and United States new drug approval times now relatively similar. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2018;96:121–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hirai Y, Kinoshita H, Kusama M, Yasuda K, Sugiyama Y, Ono S. Delays in new drug applications in Japan and industrial R&D strategies. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2010;87(2):212–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Shao L, Xu L, Li Q, Chakravarthy R, Yang Z, Kaitin KI. Regulatory watch: innovative drug availability in China. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2016;15(11):739–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ueyama E, Kaneko M, Narukawa M. Analysis of pediatric drug approval lag in Japan. Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2021;55(2):336–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Luo X, Du X, Li Z, Qian F, Yang Y. Assessment of the delay in novel anticancer drugs between China and the United States: a comparative study of drugs approved between 2010 and 2021. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2022;113:170.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Search Orphan Drug Designations and Approvals, U.S. Food and Drug Administration. 2022. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/opdlisting/oopd/index.cfm. Accessed 24 May 2022.

  11. Center for Drug Evaluation, National Medical Products Administration. 2022. https://www.cde.org.cn/main/xxgk/listpage/b40868b5e21c038a6aa8b4319d21b07d. Accessed 24 May 2022.

  12. Drug Database. YAOZH. 2022. https://www.yaozh.com/. Accessed 24 May 2022.

  13. Tripathy S, Murthy PN, Patra BP, Mehra P, Dureja H. Challenges and prospects in Chinese pharmaceutical regulatory environment. J Gener Med. 2021;17(3):106–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bajaj G, Gupta M, Wang HH, et al. Challenges and opportunities with oncology drug development in China. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2019;105:363–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Yamashita K, Kaneko M, Narukawa M. A significant anticancer drug approval lag between Japan and the United States still exists for minor cancers. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2019;105:153–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhu X, Liu B. Launch delay of new drugs in China and effect on patients’ health. Clin Ther. 2020;42:1750–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. China General Office of the State Council. Opinions on deepening the reform of the review and approval system and encouraging the innovation of drugs and medical devices. https://www.nmpa.gov.cn/xxgk/fgwj/gzwj/gzwjyp/20171009164201907.html. Accessed 24 May 2022.

  18. Zhao S, et al. Time to raise the bar: transition rate of phase 1 programs on anticancer drugs. Cancer Cell. 2022;40:233–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Yao X, Ding J, Liu Y, Li P. The new drug conditional approval process in China: challenges and opportunities. Clin Ther. 2017;39(5):1040–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Li G, Qin Y, Xie C, Wu YL, Chen X. Trends in oncology drug Innovation in China. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2021;20:15–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Shao L, Xu L, Li Q, Chakravarthy R, Yang Z, Kaitin KI. Regulatory watch: innovative drug availability in China. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2016;15:739–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Li G, Liu X, Chen X. Simultaneous development of zanubrutinib in the USA and China. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2020;17:589–90.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhang S, Chen L, Zhang Z, Zhao Y. Orphan drug development in China: progress and challenges. Lancet (Lond, Engl). 2019;394:1127–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Cheng A, Xie Z. Challenges in orphan drug development and regulatory policy in China. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2017;12:13.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Xu L, Gao H, Kaitin KI, Shao L. Reforming China’s drug regulatory system. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2018;17:858–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Li X, Yang Y. The drug lag issue: a 20-year review of China. Investig New Drugs. 2021;39(5):1389–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. National Medical Products Administration. Review and approval of new drugs outside of China for urgent clinical needs. 2018. https://www.nmpa.gov.cn/zhuanti/ypqxgg/ggzhcfg/20181.03017.12016.html. Accessed 24 May 2022.

  28. Center for Drug Evaluation, National Medical Products Administration. 2022. https://www.cde.org.cn/main/news/viewInfoCommon/c4e1ef312a0a0c039a7a4ca55b91d4e8. Accessed 1 May 2023.

  29. Hwang TJ, Kesselheim AS, Tibau A, Lee CC, Vokinger KN. Clinical benefit and expedited approval of cancer drugs in the United States, European Union, Switzerland, Japan, Canada, and Australia. JCO Oncol Pract. 2022;18: e1522.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. National Medical Products Administration. 2018. https://www.nmpa.gov.cn/xxgk/ggtg/qtggtg/20180523110601517.html. Accessed 1 May 2023.

  31. Nakayama H, Matsumaru N, Tsukamoto K. The drug lag and associated factors for orphan anticancer drugs in Japan compared to the United States. Investig New Drugs. 2019;37(5):1086–93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Xu L, Gao H, Kaitin KI, Shao L. Reforming China’s d rugregulatory system. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2018;17:858–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Chaput B, Eburdery H, Crouzet C, Grolleau JL, Chavoin JP, Garrido I. Macrolane®: a severe case of calf cellulitis after modeling injection. Ann Chir Plast Esthet. 2012;57(1):83–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hang Zheng.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Peng, F., Zheng, H. Analysis on the Marketing Trend and Approval Lag of Imported Orphan Drugs from 2010 to 2021 in China. Ther Innov Regul Sci 57, 1314–1321 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43441-023-00572-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43441-023-00572-8

Keywords

Navigation