Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluating the Feasibility and Validity of a New Tool to Assess Organizational Preparedness and Capabilities to Support Patient Engagement in Drug Development

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Interest in patient-centric initiatives to engage patients as partners in clinical research and inform drug development strategy, planning and execution has increased exponentially during the past decade. Adoption, use, organizational approach and infrastructure supporting patient-centric initiatives, however, varies widely from company to company. The Drug Information Association (DIA) in collaboration with the Tufts Center for the Study of Drug Development (Tufts CSDD) at the Tufts University School of Medicine developed and validated an assessment tool that companies can use to evaluate their organization’s patient engagement preparedness and capabilities within the context of industry-wide practices. This paper discusses the development of the tool, the assessment experience, and implications for further refinement of the assessment process. Specifically, the team conducted an extensive literature review, compiled and analyzed case studies and gathered input from a working group of 18 biopharmaceutical companies. To validate the assessment tool and demonstrate its feasibility, the DIA-CSDD Tufts team conducted a pilot implementation involving onsite and virtual in-depth interviews among 14 biopharmaceutical companies. A subsequent paper will report on the findings from the 14 companies assessed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anderson M, McCleary K. From passengers to co-pilots: Patient roles expand. Sci Transl Med. 2015;7:291fs25. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.aac6023.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. US Food and Drug Administration. FDA-led Patient-Focused Drug Development (PFDD) Public Meetings Information Page. https://www.fda.gov/industry/prescription-drug-user-fee-amendments/fda-led-patient-focused-drug-development-pfdd-public-meetings. Accessed 20 September, 2020.

  3. Crossnohere N, Fischer R, Crossley E, Vroom E, Bridges J. The evolution of patient-focused drug development and Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Expert Rev Pharm Outcomes Res. 2020;1:57–68.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Yeoman FP, Seres M, Binder H, Chung H, Garzya V, et al. Defining patient centricity with patients for patients and caregivers: a collaborative endeavor. BMJ Innovat. 2017;3:76–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Stergiopoulos S, Michaels DL, Lopez Kunz B, Getz KA. Measuring the Impact of Patient Engagement and Patient Centricity in Clinical Research and Development. Therapeutic Innovat Regul Sci. 2020;54:103–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Vat LE, Finlay T, Schuitmaker-Warnaar TJ, Fahy N, Robinson P, Boudes M, et al. Evaluating the “return on patient engagement initiatives” in medicines research and development: a literature review. Health Expect. 2020;23:5–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Boutin M, Dewulf L, Hoos A, Geissler J, Todaro V, Schneider R, et al. Culture and process change as a priority for patient engagement in medicines development. Therapeutic Innovat Regul Sci. 2017;51:29–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Michaels DL, Lamberti MJ, Pena Y, Lopez Kunz B, Getz K. Assessing biopharmaceutical company experience with patient-centric initiatives. Clin Ther. 2019;41:1427–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lamberti MJ, Awatin J. Mapping the landscape of patient-centric activities within clinical research. Clin Ther. 2017;39:2196–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Patient Focused Medicines Development. Synapse—the Patient Engagement Network Page. https://synapse.pfmd.org/.

  11. Boudes M, Robinson P, Bertelsen N, Brooke N, Hoos A, Boutin M, et al. What do stakeholders expect from patient engagement: are these expectations being met? Health Expect. 2018;21:1035–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bance L, Sethuraman V, Feldman K, and Mitchell A. Four pillars to achieve patient centricity. Appl Clin Trials. https://www.appliedclinicaltrialsonline.com/view/four-pillars-achieve-patient-centricity. Accessed October 19, 2017

  13. Getz K. Reflections on the evolution of patient engagement in drug development. Pharm Med. 2019;33:179–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kirwan JR, de Wit M, Frank L, Haywood KL, Salek S, Brace-McDonnell S, et al. Emerging guidelines for patient engagement in research. Value Health. 2017;20:481–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Du Plessis D, Sake JK, Halling K, Morgan J, Georgieva A, Bertelsen N. Patient centricity and pharmaceutical companies: is it feasible? Therapeutic Innovat Regul Sci. 2017;51:460–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Parsons S, Starling B, Mullan-Jensen C, Tham S, Warner K, Wever K. What do pharmaceutical industry professionals in Europe believe about involving patients and the public in research and development of medicines?. A qualitative interview study. BMJ Open. 2016;6: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008928.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Forsythe L, Carman K, Szydlowski V, Fayish L, Davidson L, Hickam D, et al. Patient engagement in research: early findings from the patient-centered outcomes research institute. Health Aff. 2019;38:359–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Tan C, McGill JM, Mallbris L. Uniting discovery and care: the role of pharmaceutical companies in research, clinical studies, and patient care. J Invest Dermatol. 2020;140:527–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Stella Stergiopoulos, Kinari Shah, Zachary Smith, and Emily Botto for their contributions to this manuscript.

Funding

This study was funded by unrestricted organizational grants from AbbVie Inc., Amgen Inc., Amicus Therapeutics, AstraZeneca, Bayer AG, Biogen MA Inc., Bluebird Bio, Inc., Dermira, Inc., Horizon Pharma USA, Inc., Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Johnson & Johnson, MK&A, Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc., Pfizer Inc., Genentech, A Member of the Roche Group, Sanofi US Services Inc., Takeda Pharmaceuticals Company Limited, and UCB Biosciences, Inc.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Debra L. Michaels MS, RDN.

Ethics declarations

Conflict if interest

No potential conflicts were declared.

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Michaels, D.L., Peña, Y., Kunz, B.L. et al. Evaluating the Feasibility and Validity of a New Tool to Assess Organizational Preparedness and Capabilities to Support Patient Engagement in Drug Development. Ther Innov Regul Sci 55, 1193–1198 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43441-021-00289-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43441-021-00289-6

Keywords

Navigation