Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

When Context Is Hard to Come By: External Comparators and How to Use Them

  • Commentary
  • Published:
Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

External comparators, also referred to as historical or synthetic controls, present transformational opportunities for broad context and insights alongside clinical research results. The recent confluence of access to quality real-world data (RWD), advanced epidemiologic methods, and legislative directives to regulators for expanded use of RWD is increasing interest in real-world external comparators, opening the door to achieve broader generalizability and learn more, faster. In this less standardized area of research, tailored scientific methodology must be applied for external comparators to accomplish clinical development objectives. Here, we describe methodological considerations for design and illustrate how RWD comparators have been used for regulatory and reimbursement decisions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christina Mack PhD, MPH.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mack, C., Christian, J., Brinkley, E. et al. When Context Is Hard to Come By: External Comparators and How to Use Them. Ther Innov Regul Sci 54, 932–938 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43441-019-00108-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43441-019-00108-z

Keywords

Navigation