Skip to main content
Log in

Coronal decompensation following thoracic vertebral body tethering in idiopathic scoliosis

  • Case Series
  • Published:
Spine Deformity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Post-operative coronal decompensation (CD) continues to be a challenge in the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). CD following selective spinal fusion has been studied. However, there is currently little information regarding CD following Vertebral Body Tethering (VBT). Thus, the goal of this study is to better understand the incidence and risk factors for CD after VBT.

Methods

Retrospective review of a prospective multicenter database was used for analysis. Inclusion criteria were patients undergoing thoracic VBT, a minimum 2-year follow-up, LIV was L1 or above, skeletally immature (Risser ≤ 1), and available preoperative and final follow-up AP and lateral upright radiographs. Radiographic parameters including major and minor Cobb angles, curve type, LIV tilt/translation, L4 tilt, and coronal balance were measured. CD was defined as the distance between C7PL and CSVL > 2 cm. Multiple logistic regression model was used to identify significant predictors of CD.

Results

Out of 136 patients undergoing VBT, 94 patients (86 female and 6 male) met the inclusion criteria. The mean age at surgery was 12.1 (9–16) and mean follow-up period was 3.4 years (2–5 years). Major and minor curves, AVR, coronal balance, LIV translation, LIV tilt, L4 tilt were significantly improved after surgery. CD occurred in 11% at final follow-up. Lenke 1A-R (24%) and 1C (26%) had greater incidence of CD compared to 1A-L (4%), 2 (0%), and 3 (0%). LIV selection was not associated with CD. Multivariate logistic regression analysis yielded 1A-R and 1C curves as a predictor of CD with the odds ratio being 17.0.

Conclusion

CD occurred in 11% of our thoracic VBT patients. Lenke 1A-R and 1C curve types were predictors for CD in patients treated with VBT. There were no other preoperative predictors associated with CD.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author, (MCW).

Code availability

Statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS Statistics 26 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY).

References

  1. Kim DH, Hyun SJ, Kim KJ (2021) Selection of fusion level for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery: selective fusion versus postoperative decompensation. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 64:473–485

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Thompson JP, Transfeldt EE, Bradford DS, Ogilvie JW, Boachie-Adjei O (1990) Decompensation after Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation of idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 15:927–931

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gomez JA, Matsumoto H, Colacchio ND et al (2014) Risk factors for coronal decompensation after posterior spinal instrumentation and fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine Deform 2:380–385

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cho RH, Yaszay B, Bartley CE, Bastrom TP, Newton PO (2012) Which Lenke 1A curves are at the greatest risk for adding-on… and why? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 37:1384–1390

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Murphy JS, Upasani VV, Yaszay B et al (2017) Predictors of distal adding-on in thoracic major curves with AR lumbar modifiers. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 42:E211–E218

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Matsumoto M, Watanabe K, Hosogane N et al (2013) Postoperative distal adding-on and related factors in Lenke type 1A curve. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38:737–744

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Burrows KR, Henzell IS, Martin G, Chisholm CV, Carstens A, Hodgson BF (2023) Long-term adjacent segment degeneration at average 21-year follow-up of posterior instrumented fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine Deform 11:933–941

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Newton PO, Bartley CE, Bastrom TP, Kluck DG, Saito W, Yaszay B (2020) Anterior spinal growth modulation in skeletally immature patients with idiopathic scoliosis: a comparison with posterior spinal fusion at 2 to 5 years postoperatively. J Bone Joint Surg Am 102:769–777

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Samdani AF, Pahys JM, Ames RJ et al (2021) Prospective follow-up report on anterior vertebral body tethering for idiopathic scoliosis: interim results from an FDA IDE study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 103:1611–1619

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Raitio A, Syvanen J, Helenius I (2022) Vertebral body tethering: indications, surgical technique, and a systematic review of published results. J Clin Med 11:2576

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Miyanji F, Pawelek J, Nasto LA, Rushton P, Simmonds A, Parent S (2020) Safety and efficacy of anterior vertebral body tethering in the treatment of idiopathic scoliosis. Bone Joint J 102-b:1703–1708

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Pereira-Duarte M, Roy-Beaudry M, Turgeon I et al (2023) Pre-operative parameters influencing vertebral body tethering outcomes: patient’s characteristics play an important role in determining the outcomes at a minimum of 2 years post-op. Spine Deform 11:1389–1397

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Roser MJ, Askin GN, Labrom RD, Zahir SF, Izatt M, Little JP (2023) Vertebral body tethering for idiopathic scoliosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Spine Deform 11:1297–1307

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Demura S, Yaszay B, Bastrom TP, Carreau J, Newton PO (2013) Is decompensation preoperatively a risk in Lenke 1C curves? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38:E649–E655

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Larson AN, Fletcher ND, Daniel C, Richards BS (2012) Lumbar curve is stable after selective thoracic fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a 20-year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 37:833–839

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kang H (2021) Sample size determination and power analysis using the G*Power software. J Educ Eval Health Prof 18:17

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Studer D, Awais A, Williams N, Antoniou G, Eardley-Harris N, Cundy P (2015) Selective fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a radiographic evaluation of risk factors for imbalance. J Child Orthop 9:153–160

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Ishikawa M, Cao K, Pang L et al (2017) Onset and remodeling of coronal imbalance after selective posterior thoracic fusion for Lenke 1C and 2C adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (a pilot study). Scoliosis Spinal Disord 12:16

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Buyuk AF, Milbrandt TA, Mathew SE, Larson AN (2021) Measurable thoracic motion remains at 1 year following anterior vertebral body tethering, with sagittal motion greater than coronal motion. J Bone Joint Surg Am 103:2299–2305

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kwan MK, Chiu CK, Tan PH et al (2018) Radiological and clinical outcome of selective thoracic fusion for patients with Lenke 1C and 2C adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Spine J 18:2239–2246

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ishikawa M, Cao K, Pang L et al (2015) Postoperative behavior of thoracolumbar/lumbar curve and coronal balance after posterior thoracic fusion for Lenke 1C and 2C adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Orthop Sci 20:31–37

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. LaValva SM, Anari JB, Flynn JM (2021) Risk factors for persistent coronal imbalance or revision surgery following L3 LIV selection in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Spine Deform 9:1063–1072

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

There was no funding for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Contributions

YO, ANL, LB, FM, LA, SP, REH: data acquisition, analysis, interpretation, drafted/ revised work, approved final version. MW: conception/design, data acquisition, analysis, interpretation, drafted/revised work, approved final version.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michelle Cameron Welborn.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Yoji Ogura reports no financial conflict of interest. Dr. Larson reports consulting with Orthopediatrics, Medtronics, Depuy Synthes, ZimVie with funds directed to Mayo orthopedic research. In addition, Dr. Larson has royalties with Globus and a patent with Mayo. Dr. Blakemore reports personal fees from Stryker Spine, other from Pediatric Spine Foundation, other from Spine Deformity Journal, outside the submitted work; In addition, Dr. Blakemore has a patent U.S. Patent Application 10,548,639 pending to Stryker Spine, and a patent.US Patent Application 17/091773 pending to Stryker Spine. Dr. Miyanji reports personal fees from Depuy Synthes, personal fees from Stryker, personal fees and other from ZimVie, personal fees from Orthopaediatrics, grants from Setting Scoliosis Straight Foundation, other from AO Fracture, Tumour, Deformity Expert Group outside the submitted work. Lindsay Andras, reports grants from POSNA during the conduct of the study; stocks/shareholder of Eli Lilly, personal fees from Medtronic, personal fees from Nuvasive, personal fees from Orthopediatrics, personal fees from Orthobullets outside the submitted work. Dr. Parent reports personal fees from EOS-imaging, personal fees from Spinologics, personal fees from K2M, personal fees from EOS-imaging, personal fees from DePuy Synthes Spine, other from Academic Research chair in spine deformities of the CHU Sainte-Justine (DePuy), grants from DePuy Synthes Spine, grants from Canadian Institutes of Health Research, grants from Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America, grants from Scoliosis Research Society, grants from EOS imaging, grants from Canadian Foundation for Innovation, grants from Setting Scoliosis Straight Foundation, grants from Natural Sciences and Engineering Council of Canada, grants from Fonds de recherche Québec—Santé, grants and other from Orthopaedic Research and Education Foundation, other from DePuy Synthes, other from Medtronic, other from Orthopaediatrics, outside the submitted work. Dr. El-Hawary reports grants and personal fees from Medtronic Canada, grants and personal fees from Depuy Synthes Spine, personal fees and other from Orthopediatrics, grants from ZimVie, grants from Scoliosis Research Society, grants from Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America outside the submitted work. Dr. Welborn reports grants from POSNA, grants from Shriners Hospital for Children, during the conduct of the study; personal fees and other from Depuy Synthes, personal fees from Nuvasive, personal fees from Stryker/K2M, personal fees from Orthopediatrics, Personal fees from AstraZenica outside the submitted work.

Ethical approval (IRB)

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee (Western Institutional Review Board, Panel 5 Study # 20160128) and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Consent to participate

All research participants or their legal guardians provided written consent to be a part of study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ogura, Y., Larson, A.N., Blakemore, L. et al. Coronal decompensation following thoracic vertebral body tethering in idiopathic scoliosis. Spine Deform (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43390-024-00855-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43390-024-00855-6

Keywords

Navigation