Skip to main content
Log in

Influence of thoracolumbar kyphosis on postoperative spinal alignment in patients with Lenke type 5C adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

Spine Deformity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Cite this article

Abstract

Purpose

This study aimed to examine the changes in thoracolumbar kyphosis (TLK) following correction surgery in patients with Lenke type 5C adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) and to evaluate its influence on postoperative spinal alignment and clinical outcomes.

Methods

Sixty-six patients with Lenke type 5C AIS were included and followed up for a minimum of 5 years after surgery. First, the patients were divided into two groups according to the preoperative TLK angle (Study 1; Kyphosis and Lordosis group). The patients were further classified into two groups according to the presence or absence of postoperative changes in TLK (Study 2; Changed and Maintained groups). Finally, the outcome variables were compared between these groups and analyzed for spinal alignment and clinical outcomes.

Results

In Study 1, patients demonstrated a significant kyphotic change in the Lordosis group and a significant lordotic change in the Kyphosis group postoperatively. No statistically significant differences were found between the two groups when comparing the pre- and postoperative coronal and sagittal alignment. In Study 2, there were no statistically significant differences between the Changed and the Maintained groups in each spinal alignment pre- and postoperatively. Each domain of the Scoliosis Research Society 22-item questionnaire remained unchanged at 5 years postoperation.

Conclusion

In many patients with Lenke type 5C AIS, TLK changed significantly and approached 0° after surgery. However, the magnitude of the preoperative TLK and the presence or absence of improvement did not affect postoperative spinal alignment. Furthermore, the patients had satisfactory clinical outcomes irrespective of TLK modification.

Level of evidence

III.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Data availability

The data is available with request from the authors.

References

  1. Liljenqvist U, Lepsien U, Hackenberg L et al (2002) Comparative analysis of pedicle screw and hook instrumentation in posterior correction and fusion of idiopathic thoracic scoliosis. Eur Spine J 11:336–343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-002-0415-9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Suk SI, Lee SM, Chung ER et al (2005) Selective thoracic fusion with segmental pedicle screw fixation in the treatment of thoracic idiopathic scoliosis: more than 5-year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30(14):1602–1609. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000169452.50705.61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lehman RA, Lenke LG, Keeler KA et al (2008) Operative treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with posterior pedicle screw-only constructs. Minimum three-year follow-up of one hundred fourteen cases. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33:1598–1604. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e318178872a

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Liu H, Li Z, Li S et al (2015) Main thoracic curve adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: association of higher rod stiffness and concave-side pedicle screw density with improvement in sagittal thoracic kyphosis restoration. J Neurosurg Spine 22:259–266. https://doi.org/10.3171/2014.10.SPINE1496

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Roussouly P, Labelle H, Rouissi J et al (2013) Pre- and postoperative sagittal balance in idiopathic scoliosis: a comparison over the ages of two cohorts of 132 adolescents and 52 adults. Eur Spine J 22(suppl 2):S203-215. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-012-2571-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Youn MS, Shin JK, Goh TS et al (2016) Relationship between cervical sagittal alignment and health-related quality of life in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J 25:3114–3119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-016-4488-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hwang CJ, Lee CS, Kim H et al (2018) Spontaneous correction of coronal imbalance after selective thoracolumbar-lumbar fusion in patients with Lenke-5C adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine J 18(10):1822–1828. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2018.03.013

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Wang PY, Chen CW, Lee YF et al (2021) Distal junctional kyphosis after posterior spinal fusion in Lenke 1 and 2 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis-exploring detailed features of the sagittal stable vertebra concept. Glob Spine J 7:21925682211019692. https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682211019692

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lowe TG, Lenke L, Betz R et al (2006) Distal junctional kyphosis of adolescent idiopathic thoracic curves following anterior or posterior instrumented fusion: incidence, risk factors, and prevention. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31(3):299–302. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000197221.23109.fc

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Wang T, Zeng B, Xu J et al (2008) Radiographic evaluation of selective anterior thoracolumbar or lumbar fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J 17(8):1012–1018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-007-0510-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hong JY, Suh SW, Modi HN et al (2013) Analysis of factors that affect shoulder balance after correction surgery in scoliosis: a global analysis of all the curvature types. Eur Spine J 22:1273–1285. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-013-2697-5

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Yang Y, Yang M, Zhao J et al (2019) Postoperative shoulder imbalance in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: risk factors and predictive index. Eur Spine J 28(6):1331–1341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-019-05933-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhang S, Zhang L, Feng X et al (2018) Incidence and risk factors for postoperative shoulder imbalance in scoliosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Spine J 27(2):358–369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-017-5289-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lenke LG, Betz RR, Harms J et al (2001) Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a new classification to determine extent of spinal arthrodesis. J Bone Jt Surg Am 83(8):1169–1181

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Wang F, Zhou XY, Xu XM et al (2017) Cervical sagittal alignment limited adjustment after selective posterior thoracolumbar/lumbar curve correction in patients with Lenke type 5C adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 42:e539-546. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000001906

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Tauchi R, Kawakami N, Ohara T et al (2019) Sagittal alignment profile following selective thoracolumbar/lumbar fusion in patients with Lenke type 5C adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 44(17):1193–1200. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000003043

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhao J, Yang M, Yang Y et al (2018) Proximal junctional kyphosis following correction surgery in the Lenke 5 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patient. J Orthop Sci 23(5):744–749. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jos.2018.05.010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Chen J, Fan H, Sui W et al (2021) Risk and predictive factors for proximal junctional kyphosis in patients treated by Lenke type 5 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis correction. World Neurosurg 147:e315–e323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2020.12.044

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhou Q, Hu B, Yang X et al (2021) Proximal junctional kyphosis in Lenke 5 AIS patients: the important factor of pelvic incidence. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 22(1):185. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04052-8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Chen K, Chen Y, Shao J (2022) Long-term follow-up of posterior selective thoracolumbar/lumbar fusion in patients with Lenke 5C adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: an analysis of 10-year outcomes. Glob Spine J 12(5):840–850. https://doi.org/10.1177/2192568220965566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Okada E, Watanabe K, Pang L et al (2015) Posterior correction and fusion surgery using pedicle-screw constructs for Lenke type 5C adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a preliminary report. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 40(1):25–30. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000000652

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ogura Y, Okada E, Fujii T et al (2020) Midterm surgical outcomes of a short fusion strategy for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with Lenke 5C curve. Spine J 20(3):361–368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2019.09.010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. O’Brien MF, Kuklo TR, Blanke KM, et al (2008) Radiographic measurement manual. Spine Deformity Study Group. Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA Inc., MN

    Google Scholar 

  24. Yagi M, Iizuka S, Hasegawa A et al (2014) Sagittal cervical alignment in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine Deform 2:122–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspd.2013.11.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Xu XM, Wang F, Zhou XY et al (2015) Sagittal balance in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a radiographic study of spinopelvic compensation after selective posterior fusion of thoracolumbar/lumbar (Lenke 5C) curves. Medicine (Baltimore) 94:e1995. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000001995

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Okubo T, Yagi M, Suzuki S et al (2021) Does selective posterior correction and fusion surgery influence cervical sagittal alignment in patient with Lenke Type 5 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis? A 5-year follow-up retrospective cohort study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 46(18):e976-984. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000003967

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Li J, Zhao Z, Tseng C et al (2018) Selective fusion in Lenke 5 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. World Neurosurg 118:e784–e791. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2018.07.052

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Pan X, Qiao J, Liu Z et al (2023) Posterior-only correction surgery for idiopathic scoliosis Lenke type 5c: differences of strategies and outcomes between adult patients and adolescent patients. Spine Deform 11(3):665–670. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43390-023-00647-4

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Editage (https://www.editage.jp/) for the English language review.

Funding

We have received no funding for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

TO: substantial contributions to the conception and design of the work; or the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data for the work; drafting of the manuscript; final approval of the version to be published; agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. SS, MO, YT, OT, NN: substantial contributions to the conception and design of the work; and the acquisition, analysis, and interpretation of data for the work; revising it critically for important intellectual content; final approval of the version to be published; agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. MM, MN: substantial contributions to the acquisition, analysis, and interpretation of data for the work; revising it critically for important intellectual content; final approval of the version to be published; agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. KW: substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work; and the acquisition, analysis, and interpretation of data for the work; drafting of the manuscript and revising it critically for important intellectual content; final approval of the version to be published; agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kota Watanabe.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

There are no conflicts of interest to declare.

Ethical approval

This study was approved by the Committee on Ethics and Institutional Review Board of Keio University School of Medicine. The procedures used in the present study adhere to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki.

Consent

All participants provided informed consent before inclusion in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Okubo, T., Suzuki, S., Ozaki, M. et al. Influence of thoracolumbar kyphosis on postoperative spinal alignment in patients with Lenke type 5C adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine Deform (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43390-023-00782-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43390-023-00782-y

Keywords

Navigation