Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

From PHQ-2 to SRS-22: how a depression screening tool relates to SRS scores in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

  • Case Series
  • Published:
Spine Deformity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of our study was to determine the relationship between Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ) scores—a simple, validated depression screening tool—and Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-22 questionnaire scores in patients with idiopathic scoliosis (IS).

Methods

IS patients screened for depression with the PHQ-2 who completed the SRS-22 over a 2-year period were reviewed. If PHQ-2 scores were positive (> 3), the more comprehensive PHQ-9 was administered. Median SRS-22 scores between positive and negative PHQ screens were compared. Nonparametric correlation between PHQ and SRS-22 Mental Health (MH) domain was performed. The ability of the MH domain to discriminate between patients with positive versus negative screens and patients with moderate–severe depression risk versus no–mild risk was evaluated with ROC analysis.

Results

521 patients were included. Patients with + PHQ-2 screens had significantly lower total and individual domain SRS scores, especially within the MH domain (4.0 vs. 3.2). For those with moderate-severe depression risk, total and individual domain scores were also significantly lower (MH domain, 4.0 vs. 3.0, p < 0.05). A weak, but significant correlation was observed between the PHQ and MH domain scores (rho = 0.32, p < 0.001). A cut-off of ≥ 3.6 on the MH domain demonstrated sensitivity of 0.75 and specificity of 0.86 for identifying patients at no–mild risk for depression.

Conclusion

Recognizing mental health conditions is critical to successful IS treatment as psychosocial conditions can negatively affect treatment outcomes. IS patients scoring < 3.6 on the SRS-22 MH domain should be considered for depression screening due to an increased risk of moderate–severe depression.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. RiesMerikangas K, He J, Burstein M, Swanson SA, Avenevoli S, Cui L et al (2010) Lifetime prevalence of mental disorders in U.S. adolescents-results from the national comorbidity survey replication–adolescent supplement (NCS-A). J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psy. 49(10):980–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Lewinsohn PM, Hops H, Roberts RE, Seeley JR, Andrews JA (1993) Adolescent Psychopathology-I. Prevalence and incidence of depression and other DSM-III-R disorders in high school students. J Abn Psychol. 102(1):133–44

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Clayborne ZM, Varin M, Colman I (2019) Systematic review and meta-analysis: adolescent depression and long-term psychosocial outcomes. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 58(1):72–79

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Romeo RD (2017) The impact of stress on the structure of the adolescent brain: implications for adolescent mental health. Brain Res 1654(Pt B):185–191

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Benjet C, Albor YC, Bocanegra ES, Borges G, Mendez E, Casanova L et al (2020) Incidence and recurrence of depression from adolescence to early adulthood: a longitudinal follow-up of the Mexican Adolescent Mental Health Survey. J Affect Disord 263:540–546

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Stikkelbroek Y, Bodden DH, Kleinjan M, Reijnders M, van Baar AL (2016) Adolescent depression and negative life events, the mediating role of cognitive emotion regulation. PLoS ONE 11(8):e0161062

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Chang WP, Lin Y, Huang HL, Lu HF, Wang ST, Chi YC et al (2016) Scoliosis and the subsequent risk of depression: a nationwide population-based cohort study in Taiwan. Spine. 41(3):253–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Auerbach JD, Lonner BS, Crerand CE, Shah SA, Flynn JM, Bastrom T et al (2014) Body image in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: validation of the Body Image Disturbance Questionnaire-Scoliosis Version. J Bone Joint Surg Am 96(8):e61

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhang J, He D, Gao J, Yu X, Sun H, Chen Z et al (2011) Changes in life satisfaction and self-esteem in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with and without surgical intervention. Spine. 36(9):741–5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sanders AE, Andras LM, Iantorno SE, Hamilton A, Choi PD, Skaggs DL (2018) Clinically significant psychological and emotional distress in 32% of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients. Spine Deformity 6(4):435–440

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lee SB, Chae HW, Kwon JW, Sung S, Lee HM, Moon SH et al (2021) Is There an association between psychiatric disorders and adolescent idiopathic scoliosis? A large-database study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 479(8):1805–1812

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Lin T, Meng Y, Ji Z, Jiang H, Shao W, Gao R et al (2019) Extent of depression in juvenile and adolescent patients with idiopathic scoliosis during treatment with braces. World Neurosurg 126:e27–e32

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gallant JN, Morgan CD, Stoklosa JB, Gannon SR, Shannon CN, Bonfield CM (2018) Psychosocial difficulties in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: body image, eating behaviors, and mood disorders. World Neurosurg 116(421–32):e1

    Google Scholar 

  14. Richardson LP, McCauley E, Grossman DC, McCarty CA, Richards J, Russo JE et al (2010) Evaluation of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 Item for detecting major depression among adolescents. Pediatrics 126(6):1117–1123

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Richardson LP, Rockhill C, Russo JE, Grossman DC, Richards J, McCarty C et al (2010) Evaluation of the PHQ-2 as a brief screen for detecting major depression among adolescents. Pediatrics 125(5):e1097–e1103

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Taylor R (1990) Interpretation of the correlation coefficient: a basic review. J Diagnostic Med Sonograp 6(1):35–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Roseman M, Kloda LA, Saadat N, Riehm KE, Ickowicz A, Baltzer F et al (2016) Accuracy of depression screening tools to detect major depression in children and adolescents: a systematic review. Can J Psychiatry 61(12):746–757

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Sawyer M, Whaites L, Rey J, Hazell P, Graetz B, Baghurst P (2002) Health-related quality of life of children and adolescents with mental disorders. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 41(5):530–538

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. O’Loughlin R, Hiscock H, Pan T, Devlin N, Dalziel K (2022) The relationship between physical and mental health multimorbidity and children’s health-related quality of life. Qual Life Res 31(7):2119–2131

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Sharma AK, Elbuluk AM, Gkiatas I, Kim JM, Sculco PK, Vigdorchik JM (2021) Mental health in patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery: diagnosis, management, and outcomes. JBJS Rev. 9(7):e20

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Koch KD, Buchanan R, Birch JG, Morton AA, Gatchel RJ, Browne RH (2001) Adolescents undergoing surgery for idiopathic scoliosis-how physical and psychological characteristics relate to patient satisfaction with the cosmetic result. Spine 26(19):2119–2124

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Glowacki M, Misterska E, Adamczyk K, Latuszewska J (2013) Prospective assessment of scoliosis-related anxiety and impression of trunk deformity in female adolescents under brace treatment. J Dev Phys Disabil 25(2):203–220

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Rivett L, Rothberg A, Stewart A, Berkowitz R (2009) The relationship between quality of life and compliance to a brace protocol in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis: a comparative study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 10:5

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Zebracki K, Thawrani D, Oswald TS, Anadio JM, Sturm P, Group SDS (2013) Predictors of emotional functioning in youth after surgical correction of idiopathic scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop 33:624–627

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Yang S, Werner BC (2019) Risk factors for prolonged postoperative opioid use after spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop 39(10):500–504

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Rullander AC, Lundstrom M, Lindkvist M, Hagglof B, Lindh V (2016) Stress symptoms among adolescents before and after scoliosis surgery: correlations with postoperative pain. J Clin Nurs 25(7–8):1086–1094

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Tones M, Moss N, Polly DW (2006) A review of quality of life and psychosocial issues in Scoliosis. Spine 31(26):3027–3038

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No external funding was received for this study. This study was supported by the Division of Orthopedics & Scoliosis, Rady Children’s Hospital, San Diego.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conception or design of the work; or Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data for the work: AAC, PON, VJS, BY, CEB, TPB. Drafting or critically revising the work: AAC, PON, VJS, BY, CEB, TPB. Final approval of the version to be published: AAC, PON, VJS, BY, CEB, TPB.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anthony A. Catanzano.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Anthony A. Catanzano, Jr., MD. No conflicts. Peter O. Newton, MD No funding was received for this work. Disclosures outside of the submitted work include: DePuy Synthese Spine: Grant paid to institution/research support, royalties or licenses paid to me, consulting fees, speakers bureau, payment for development of educational programs, patents: Anchoring systems and methods for correcting spinal deformities (8540754); Low profile spinal tethering systems (8123749); screw placement guide (79811117); compressor for use in minimally invasive surgery (7189244). Scoliosis Research Society: Grant paid to institution, board membership. EOS Imaging: Grant paid to institution. Nuvasive: Grant paid to institution. Orthopediatrics: Grant paid to institution. Stryker/K2M: Grant paid to institution, royalties or licenses paid to me, consulting fees, patent: Posterior spinal fixation. Alphatech: Grant paid to institution. Mazor Robotics: Grant paid to institution. Setting Scoliosis Straight Foundation: Grants paid to institution, board membership (unpaid). Thieme Publishing: Royalties or licenses paid to me. Cubist: Consulting fees, participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board. Mirus: Consulting fees. Globus Medica: Consulting fees. Pacira: Consulting fees. International Pediatric Orthopedic Think Tank: Board membership (unpaid). Electrocore: Stock or stock options. Rady Children’s Specialists of San Diego: Board membership (unpaid). Vrajesh J. Shah, BS No conflicts. Burt Yaszay, MD No funding was received for this work. Disclosures outside of the submitted work include: Biogen: Paid consultant. DePuy, A Johnson & Johnson Company: Paid consultant; Paid presenter or speaker; Research support to institution. Globus Medical: IP royalties. Stryker/K2M: Paid consultant; Paid presenter or speaker; Research support to institution. Nuvasive: IP royalties; Paid consultant; Research support to institution. Orthopediatrics: IP royalties. Pacira: Paid consultant. Medtronic: Paid consultant. POSNA: Board or committee member. Scoliosis Research Society: Board or committee member. Spine Deformity: Editorial or governing board. Children’s University Medical Group: Board membership (unpaid). Setting Scoliosis Straight: Board membership (unpaid). Global Spine Outreach: Research support to institution; Board membership (unpaid). Carrie E. Bartley, MA No conflicts. Tracey P. Bastrom, MA No conflicts.

Ethical statement

IRB approval was obtained for this study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This study was conducted at Rady Children’s Hospital, San Diego, CA, USA

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 69 KB)

Supplementary file2 (DOCX 119 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Catanzano, A.A., Newton, P.O., Shah, V.J. et al. From PHQ-2 to SRS-22: how a depression screening tool relates to SRS scores in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine Deform 12, 125–131 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43390-023-00759-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43390-023-00759-x

Keywords

Navigation